Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Logz.io vs ManageEngine Log360 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
Logz.io improved monitoring efficiency, reduced costs, streamlined operations, enhanced analytics, and increased user satisfaction, boosting productivity and savings.
Sentiment score
5.4
ManageEngine Log360 provides early returns, is user-valued for proactive monitoring benefits, yet requires skilled teams for evolving threats.
If unauthorized personnel attempt to add logs, the monitoring informs the administrator, enabling them to act promptly, leading to savings in both time and money for the company.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
1.0
Customers appreciate Logz.io's proactive onboarding, helpful filters, and dashboards but desire more accessible technical support and quicker follow-up.
Sentiment score
7.2
ManageEngine Log360 provides responsive customer service, though complex issues may cause delays; specialized regional support is exceptional.
I would rate their technical support as nine out of ten.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
The support provided by ManageEngine Log360 is fantastic.
Lead IT Security and Remediation at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.0
Logz.io's scalability is praised for handling data efficiently, accommodating team sizes, and maintaining performance despite minor log event issues.
Sentiment score
6.8
ManageEngine Log360's scalability is mixed, with effective support but limited by licensing, technology, and variable deployment experiences.
We backed up the database and completed the recovery with the application, proving it is reliable for disaster recovery.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Logz.io is highly rated for stability, with reliable performance, prompt issue resolution, and effective support and notifications.
Sentiment score
7.5
ManageEngine Log360 is generally stable, reliable, and trusted, with occasional startup delays and minor cloud switch issues.
 

Room For Improvement

Logz.io requires release management, better alerting, customer update control, AI-based capacity planning, and improved documentation with affordable pricing.
ManageEngine Log360 needs improved backup, UI, Active Directory connectivity, AI capabilities, stability, encryption, and better support.
Without needing to purchase an add-on module, ManageEngine Log360 should include more in-depth reporting capabilities in the current module.
Lead IT Security and Remediation at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Log360 currently cannot gather information from Intune logs or cloud-integrated systems.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
At minimum, PostgreSQL support should reach the MS SQL level of features and support that ManageEngine Log360 presents.
Consultant at TurkOnay Elektronik Para ve Ödeme Hizmetleri A.Ş.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users value Logz.io's transparent pricing, cost-effectiveness, and flexibility despite higher costs for large data volumes.
ManageEngine Log360 is affordable with fixed pricing, a free trial, and is suitable for flexible budgeting despite some high-cost views.
The price is suitable from a perspective of different pricing options.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
 

Valuable Features

Logz.io offers auto-scaling, AI Insights, log analysis, open-source tech, seamless integration, cost-efficiency, flexible billing, and optimized dashboards.
Log360 offers user-friendly security management with analytics, compliance templates, real-time threat detection, and customizable reporting, enhancing efficiency.
All mandatory regulatory compliance reports are available with the integrated system, and companies can easily customize reports without coding to meet their policy or reporting requirements.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
ManageEngine Log360 was selected because AlienVault was moving strictly away from on-premises to the cloud, and an on-premises solution was required.
Lead IT Security and Remediation at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
ManageEngine Log360 could integrate with all systems, making it possible to integrate everything to the central location, which made it a useful and necessary tool.
Consultant at TurkOnay Elektronik Para ve Ödeme Hizmetleri A.Ş.
 

Categories and Ranking

Logz.io
Ranking in Log Management
39th
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
46th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.0
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ManageEngine Log360
Ranking in Log Management
25th
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
22nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Logz.io is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Log360 is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ManageEngine Log3601.2%
Logz.io0.8%
Other98.0%
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

Derrick Brockel - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
The solution is a consistent logging platform that provides excellent query mechanisms
We can query a lot of data points and build dashboards. The vendor is good at adjusting their models. Most companies want us to forecast our yearly use and pay it upfront on day one. With Logz.io, we commit to use 14 TB in a year. However, they measure us every month and give us a monthly bill. Depending on our monthly usage, we pay for 14 TB divided by 12 months or a little extra. It's a little bit more like AWS. Other solutions do not do it. They want their money upfront. We really like the dashboards. We have 36 sub-accounts. Each sub-account is an app, and we could put restrictions on that app. Previously, there were capacity restrictions on the sub-accounts. If we have a sub-account of 1 TB and use only 100 GB, we waste 900 GB that day. We could not share it between sub-accounts. Now, they provide an overhead volume. We do a reserve, and any sub-account could use anything over the reserve. It utilizes our footprint better.
Md Abdul Hakim - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
Integration capabilities impress while room for improvement exists in cloud compatibility
1. Enhanced Cloud Integration Current Gap: Log360 lacks native integration with Microsoft Intune and cloud-based Active Directory (Azure AD), limiting visibility for organizations transitioning to hybrid or fully cloud environments. Requested Improvements: Direct Intune Log Collection: Ability to ingest and correlate logs from Intune-managed devices to monitor compliance, device health, and security policies. Azure AD Deep Integration: Support for Azure AD audit logs, conditional access events, and identity protection alerts to provide end-to-end visibility. Cloud Workload Monitoring: Extend coverage to SaaS applications (e.g., Microsoft 365, AWS, GCP) for unified threat detection. Why It Matters: Many clients have migrated from on-prem AD to cloud-first setups this year. Without cloud-native log collection, critical security events (e.g., rogue Intune policies or Azure AD breaches) go unmonitored. 2. Improved Automation and Response Current Gap: Limited automated remediation (e.g., auto-isolating compromised devices) forces manual intervention. Requested Features: Playbook Automation: Pre-built workflows to auto-resolve common issues (e.g., disabling users after brute-force attacks). SOAR Integration: APIs to connect with SIEM/SOAR platforms (e.g., Splunk, Palo Alto Cortex) for escalated threat response.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Log360?
The price is suitable from a perspective of different pricing options. We already have an ongoing project where some features analytics can be escaped, and companies can manage their budgets carefu...
What needs improvement with ManageEngine Log360?
ManageEngine Log360 could provide more in-depth insights, particularly in reporting. Some other solutions provide deeper insights into issues, especially when generating reports. More detailed insi...
What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Log360?
ManageEngine Log360 is being used for database monitoring and as a SIEM solution.
 

Also Known As

Logz
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Dish Network, The Economist, Forbes, Holler, Kenshoo, OneSpan, Siemens, Sisense, Unity, ZipRecruiter
First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation
Find out what your peers are saying about Logz.io vs. ManageEngine Log360 and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.