We performed a comparison between ManageEngine IT Asset Management and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Asset Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In my opinion, it is the MDM; patch management and deployment are the valuable features."
"The technical support is great."
"The auto-discovery feature has helped us a lot."
"The reporting is fine."
"Qualys VM is very stable."
"The features that are most valuable are the identification, scan features, and the identification of vulnerabilities."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The prioritization feature is great. I think it has all of the advanced features that we need."
"Qualys VM's best feature is vulnerability management."
"Qualys VM has allowed us to know the vulnerabilities we need to prioritize based on the threat levels and the possible impact if there's an intrusion."
"The assets that can be discovered are pretty easy to manage, but there should be a better way to manage non-discoverable assets. Our development team works on bots and tests particular hardware. They have got different varieties of hardware. They want a feature for managing these assets within a warehouse kind of environment. For example, our IT has received 100 items, and they have assigned these items as a bulk unit to a project manager. The project manager further wants to distribute these items within his or her team. Instead of maintaining a separate Excel sheet, the project manager should be able to reallocate these items from within the tool so that we have hierarchical entities for the same unit."
"The engineering area needs improvement."
"The asset management tool is costly."
"Qualys VM could improve by having more skilled support personnel."
"I do not like that all of the data is stored on the cloud."
"I would like to see this solution simplified to work more easily in a multi-cloud environment."
"They're still evolving their platform in terms of reporting capabilities."
"We face issues while scanning multiple assets."
"Endpoint stability and fault resolution could be improved."
"Its integration with ServiceNow and other similar products is complicated and can be improved. It should also have virtual batching. They should support more standards and compliance requirements and more customizations. For policy compliance, they can add the standards required by the countries in the Middle East. Each country generates its own standards and frameworks, and those frameworks should be there in all products, not only in Qualys. The market here is huge, especially in the cybersecurity field. Qatar has a framework for Qatar 2022, and each and every company in the public or private sector has to follow the Qatar 2022 framework."
"We are moving away from Qualys to Defender ATP because I find that Defender ATP is much better at prioritizing the vulnerabilities that I should be looking at."
More ManageEngine IT Asset Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine IT Asset Management is ranked 11th in IT Asset Management with 3 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 7th in IT Asset Management with 77 reviews. ManageEngine IT Asset Management is rated 9.4, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ManageEngine IT Asset Management writes "Stable and scalable solution ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". ManageEngine IT Asset Management is most compared with Lansweeper, ServiceNow, Axonius, Freshservice and BMC Helix Discovery, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management. See our ManageEngine IT Asset Management vs. Qualys VMDR report.
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
