Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.1. Microsoft holds a 11.6% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Read 47 Microsoft Azure File Storage reviews

3,351 Views
2,776 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Oracle Database Backup Service

Read 10 Oracle Database Backup Service reviews

396 Views
291 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Oracle Database Backup Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service compete in data storage and backup solutions. Microsoft Azure File Storage has the upper hand in pricing and support, while Oracle Database Backup Service stands out for its feature richness.

Features: Microsoft Azure File Storage users highlight easy integration, scalability, and robust security features as valuable. Oracle Database Backup Service users appreciate its advanced backup options, high data integrity, and comprehensive data management tools.

Room for Improvement: Reviewers of Microsoft Azure File Storage suggest improvements in performance speed and more granular backup options. Oracle Database Backup Service users point out the complexity of the setup process and desire better scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure File Storage is reported to have a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Oracle Database Backup Service users mention a steeper learning curve and slower customer service response times.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure File Storage is noted for its competitive pricing, delivering a strong return on investment due to lower setup costs. Oracle Database Backup Service, although pricier, provides substantial ROI if advanced feature sets are fully leveraged.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,466 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Database Backup Service

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure File Storage is 11.6%, down from 13.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database Backup Service is 1.0%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

PrashanthR

Lead Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Seamlessly streamlines document processing with advanced file storage and OCR integration

We need to store data over there. We process documents through Kofax Time is a major benefit, as well as ease of processing. With configuration, it happens quite easily, and we can finish tasks early. File storage is complemented by OCR with Azure Cognitive Service. This enhances the processing…

Read full review

Hossein Nezamabadi

Oracle Database Administrator | Linux system Administrator at Pooya Co. Inc.

Has an easy setup process and good technical support services

We use Oracle Database Backup Service to manage incremental, differential, and cumulative backups The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality. We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups. We have been using Oracle…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like about Microsoft Azure File Storage is its convenience for customers, cost-effectiveness, and high availability."

"It is a very scalable solution. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten."

"File storage is complemented by OCR with Azure Cognitive Service."

"Implementations with other products are easy."

"My client had zero data loss while using the solution for backups and file security."

"Its most valuable features are speed and security."

"Implementing Microsoft Azure has meant that we are using the same solution as our customers who use Azure Public Cloud. This allows us to integrate our application, as well as provide the solution to them."

"The most valuable aspect of Azure File Storage is that all the features are available in one place."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."

"It's a scalable product."

"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."

"The backup is reliable and intuitive."

"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."

"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."

"The interface is good."

"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."

More Oracle Database Backup Service pros

Cons

"The integration of the site storage with SQL was not completely seamless."

"In our use cases, we see the weakness in mobile internet connectivity."

"The provider needs to collect more information about the products."

"The pricing could be improved. They need to make the costs more transparent so users know what they will be charged and why ahead of time."

"The tool needs to add more controls and enhance Power BI. For instance, I'm just suggesting the visualization layer. Power BI can increase visualization as much as possible, and the product can add more controls to the data flows."

"They can improve the ability to assign permissions to different groups or users."

"They should make the solution more user-friendly."

"Microsoft Azure File Storage should improve its pricing."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage cons

"We cannot use the product with other brands."

"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."

"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."

"The solution needs to add an archive function."

"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."

"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."

"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."

"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."

More Oracle Database Backup Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."

"The solution is a bit pricey compared to AWS and Google."

"The price of Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive, we do not know exactly how the price is calculated."

"Microsoft Azure File Storage has a reasonable price."

"I think the pricing of the product can be reduced."

"The product must improve its price."

"The product's pricing need improvement."

"The licensing cost for Microsoft Azure File Storage comes with an agreement from Microsoft."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage pricing and cost advice

"The only problem with Oracle is its pricing."

"Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Oracle Database Backup Service a seven or eight out of ten."

"The platform is expensive."

"It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."

"The platform is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?

Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure File Storage?

The product is a reliable cloud solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure File Storage?

The price is almost the same as the competition. I would rate it three or three and a half out of ten on the pricing scale.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Database Backup Service?

From the database perspective, Oracle is the best.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database Backup Service?

The pricing must be improved. The only problem with Oracle is its pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database Backup Service?

The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it. One simple update can mess up the entire system.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 48% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 19% of the time

Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Competitors

Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 64% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 36% of the time

More Oracle Database Backup Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage

March 2025

Download Microsoft Azure File Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

February 2025

Download Oracle Database Backup Service product report

Also Known As

MS Azure File Storage

No data available

Overview

Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

Key scenarios:

Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
Integrate modern applications with File storage
Simplify hosting for high availability workload data

Microsoft

Oracle Database Backup Service is a secure, scalable, on-demand solution for storing Oracle Database backups in Oracle Cloud.

Oracle databases are backed up to Oracle Database Backup Service using the Oracle Database Cloud Backup Module. The module is available from Oracle Technology Network (OTN) and is tightly integrated with Recovery Manager (RMAN), so you can continue to use familiar RMAN commands for backup and restore operations.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Talon, Camden

Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

March 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.