Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.1. Microsoft holds a 12.5% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Azure File Storage
Read 47 Microsoft Azure File Storage reviews
  • 3,748 Views
  • 3,103 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
Oracle Database Backup Service
Read 10 Oracle Database Backup Service reviews
  • 428 Views
  • 344 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service compete in data storage and backup solutions. Microsoft Azure File Storage has the upper hand in pricing and support, while Oracle Database Backup Service stands out for its feature richness.

Features: Microsoft Azure File Storage users highlight easy integration, scalability, and robust security features as valuable. Oracle Database Backup Service users appreciate its advanced backup options, high data integrity, and comprehensive data management tools.

Room for Improvement: Reviewers of Microsoft Azure File Storage suggest improvements in performance speed and more granular backup options. Oracle Database Backup Service users point out the complexity of the setup process and desire better scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure File Storage is reported to have a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Oracle Database Backup Service users mention a steeper learning curve and slower customer service response times.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure File Storage is noted for its competitive pricing, delivering a strong return on investment due to lower setup costs. Oracle Database Backup Service, although pricier, provides substantial ROI if advanced feature sets are fully leveraged.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure File Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Database Backup Service
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
14th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure File Storage is 12.5%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database Backup Service is 0.9%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

PrashanthR - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamlessly streamlines document processing with advanced file storage and OCR integration
We need to store data over there. We process documents through Kofax Time is a major benefit, as well as ease of processing. With configuration, it happens quite easily, and we can finish tasks early. File storage is complemented by OCR with Azure Cognitive Service. This enhances the processing…
Read full review
Hossein Nezamabadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an easy setup process and good technical support services
We use Oracle Database Backup Service to manage incremental, differential, and cumulative backups The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality. We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups. We have been using Oracle…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"First of all, the solution is very secure. Secondly, the solution is very fast. It is reliable and available all the time."
"The security features and the ease of integration are good."
"The product can integrate with all platforms. My team also does data visualization, and Power BI can directly connect with those nodes. We can very conveniently connect with multiple tools for our database. The benefit here is that by utilizing the same storage application, my application is linked with their application through the same server. This setup provides real analytics and data for a holistic purpose, which is advantageous."
"Integration with the entire Azure platform."
"File storage is complemented by OCR with Azure Cognitive Service."
"It's a stable product."
"It was quick to synchronize back from Azure to the on-premise server."
"The solution is easy to use."
More Microsoft Azure File Storage pros
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"It's a scalable product."
"The interface is good."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
More Oracle Database Backup Service pros
 

Cons

"The initial setup is complex. Unless you have done it a few times it, it is going to be hard."
"The pricing and technical support could be better."
"Maybe Microsoft can make it more economical because it is a costly affair."
"It’s a challenge to find the right support person."
"The support could improve."
"Lacks integration with other platforms."
"The integration of the site storage with SQL was not completely seamless."
"I have had issues migrating my data to another subscription."
More Microsoft Azure File Storage cons
"The solution needs to add an archive function."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
More Oracle Database Backup Service cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost for Microsoft Azure File Storage comes with an agreement from Microsoft."
"We pay for both yearly and monthly licenses. The yearly one is cheaper than the monthly one."
"For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."
"The pricing is usually dependent on your storage requirements. Overall, I believe Microsoft Azure File Storage's price is reasonable."
"One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."
"The product's pricing need improvement."
"The product must improve its price."
"We have Microsoft Azure File Storage's enterprise license."
More Microsoft Azure File Storage pricing and cost advice
"The only problem with Oracle is its pricing."
"It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."
"Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Oracle Database Backup Service a seven or eight out of ten."
"The platform is expensive."
"The platform is expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?
Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure File Storage?
The product is a reliable cloud solution.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure File Storage?
The price is almost the same as the competition. I would rate it three or three and a half out of ten on the pricing scale.
See all answers
What do you like most about Oracle Database Backup Service?
From the database perspective, Oracle is the best.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database Backup Service?
The pricing must be improved. The only problem with Oracle is its pricing.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Oracle Database Backup Service?
The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it. One simple update can mess up the entire system.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 47% of the time
Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 18% of the time
Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 16% of the time
Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 7% of the time
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 7% of the time
More Microsoft Azure File Storage Competitors
Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service Logo
Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service
Compared 62% of the time
Amazon S3 vs Oracle Database Backup Service Logo
Amazon S3 vs Oracle Database Backup Service
Compared 38% of the time
More Oracle Database Backup Service Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure File Storage
January 2025
Microsoft Azure File Storage reportDownload Microsoft Azure File Storage product report
Buyer's Guide
Public Cloud Storage Services
January 2025
Oracle Database Backup Service reportDownload Oracle Database Backup Service product report
 

Also Known As

MS Azure File Storage
No data available
 

Learn More

Microsoft
Oracle
 

Overview

Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

Key scenarios:

  • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
  • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
  • Integrate modern applications with File storage
  • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data

Oracle Database Backup Service is a secure, scalable, on-demand solution for storing Oracle Database backups in Oracle Cloud.

Oracle databases are backed up to Oracle Database Backup Service using the Oracle Database Cloud Backup Module. The module is available from Oracle Technology Network (OTN) and is tightly integrated with Recovery Manager (RMAN), so you can continue to use familiar RMAN commands for backup and restore operations.

 

Sample Customers

Talon, Camden
Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service
January 2025
Free Report: Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.