Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio vs OpenVINO comparison

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio vs. OpenVINO

Download the complete report

Helped 890,124 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Machine Lea...

Ranking in AI Development Platforms

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Science Platforms (6th)

OpenVINO

Ranking in AI Development Platforms

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the AI Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is 3.4%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenVINO is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio	3.4%
OpenVINO	1.8%
Other	94.8%

AI Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

reviewer2722962

Data Scientist

Platform accelerates model development, enhances collaboration, and offers efficient deployment

The best features Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio offers include deep integration with Python notebooks and Azure Data Lake, which allows me to import external data, and through the pipeline, I can build my models, performing what is called data injection for my model building, making that deep integration quite interesting to use. Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is a powerful platform for those already in the Azure ecosystem because it allows for scalability and provides a good environment for reproducibility, as well as collaboration tools, all designed and packaged in one place, which makes it outstanding. Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio has positively impacted my organization by reducing our project delivery times and increasing the pace at which we work, allowing us to focus on other more important tasks. Using Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio has reduced our model development time from approximately four hours to about two hours.

Read full review

Juan Huertas

Senior Data Scientist /Ai Engineer at Zantaz Data Resources

Empowers cost-effective model deployment on widely accessible hardware while needing cross-platform enhancements

What could be improved in OpenVINO is making the product more cross-platform. I know they are working with third-party plugins to extend the toolkit, and in this way, I can use it with NVIDIA GPUs or with other hardware because now it's primarily working in all Intel hardware. CPU, GPUs, TPUs, but only from Intel. If they make more cross-platform functionality, it would be great. It's difficult to make it work faster than the NVIDIA toolkit in their own GPUs. At least having the possibility and making it work faster than now in other hardware that is not from Intel provided would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to deploy."

"The AutoML is helpful when you're starting to explore the problem that you're trying to solve."

"The UI is very user-friendly and the AI is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the knowledge bank, which allows us to ask questions and the AI will automatically pull the pre-prescribed responses."

"The learning curve is very low. Operationalizing the model is also very easy within the Azure ecosystem."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"The integration with Azure services enhances workflow and meets my expectations."

"The solution is easy to use and has good automation capabilities in conjunction with Azure DevOps."

More Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio pros

"The features for model comparison, the feature for model testing, evaluation, and deployment are very nice, and it can work almost with all the models."

"One positive aspect about OpenVINO is that it supports more frameworks than the Google Coral TPU."

"The initial setup is quite simple."

"Intel's support team is very good."

"The solution's ability to stream data directly from camera inputs is the most valuable aspect for us."

"The benefit from using OpenVINO is that NVIDIA is dominating the market of GPUs and they set the price, so if I am able to run an LLM doing inference in commodity hardware, I am saving costs."

"Compared to Jetson Nano or Jetson TX2, or Jetson Xavier, OpenVINO is a much more cost-effective solution."

"The runtime of OpenVINO is highly valuable for running different computer vision models."

More OpenVINO pros

Cons

"In the Machine Learning Studio, particularly the Designer part, which is essentially Azure's demo designer, there is room for improvement. Many customers and users tend to switch to Microsoft Azure Multi-Joiners, which is a more basic version, but they do so internally. One area that could use enhancement is the process of connecting components. Currently, every time you want to connect a component, such as linking it to your storage or an instance like EC2, you have to input your username and password repeatedly. This can be quite cumbersome. Google, for instance, has made it more user-friendly by allowing easy access for connecting services within a workspace. In a workspace, you can set up various resources like storage, a database cluster, machine learning studio, and more. When connecting these services, there's no need to enter your username and password each time, making it a more efficient process. Another aspect to consider is the role of the designer, and they were to integrate a large language model to handle various tasks, it could significantly enhance the overall scalability and usability of the platform."

"As for the areas for improvement in Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, I've provided feedback to Microsoft. My company is a Gold Partner of Microsoft, so I provided my feedback in another forum. Right now, it is the number of algorithms available in the designer that has to be improved, though I'm sure Microsoft does it regularly. When you take a use case approach, Microsoft has done that in a lot of places, but not on the Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio designer. When I say use case basis, I meant recommending a product or recommending similar products, so if Microsoft can list out use cases and give me a template, it will save me a lot of time and a lot of work because I don't have to scratch my head on which algorithm is better, and I can go with what's recommended by Microsoft. I'm sure that isn't a big task for the Microsoft team who must have seen thousands of use cases already, so out of that experience if the team can come up with a standard template, I'm sure it'll help a lot of organizations cut down on the development time, as well as going with the best industry-standard algorithms rather than experimenting with mine. What I'd like to see in the next version of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, apart from the use case template, is the improvement of the availability of libraries. Microsoft should also upgrade the Python versions because the old version of Python is still supported and it takes time for Microsoft to upgrade the support for Python. The pace of upgrading Python versions of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio and making those libraries available should be sped up or increased."

"I think they should improve two things. They should make their user interface more user-friendly. Integration could also be better. Because Microsoft Machine Learning is a Microsoft product, it's fully integrated with Microsoft Azure but not fully supported for other platforms like IBM or AWS or something else."

"The data cleaning functionality is something that could be better and needs to be improved."

"I would like to see better prediction and analysis."

"They should have a desktop version to work on the platform."

"The data processor can pose a bit of a challenge, but the real complexity is determined by the skill of the implementation team."

"Overall, the icons in the solution could be improved to provide better guidance to users. Additionally, the setup process for the solution could be made easier."

More Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio cons

"The model optimization is a little bit slow — it could be improved."

"At this point, the product could probably just use a greater integration with more machine learning model tools."

"It would be great if OpenVINO could convert new models into its format more quickly."

"I couldn't get it to run on my Raspberry Pi 4 because the software packages to download were no longer available."

"I think that it's not properly designed for scalability. It's designed for other purposes, specifically to be able to use Intel hardware and run inference using generative models or deep learning models in Intel hardware."

"At this point, the product could probably just use a greater integration with more machine learning model tools."

"It has some disadvantages because when you're working with very complex models, neural networks, if OpenVINO cannot convert them automatically and you have to do a custom layer and later add it to the model, it is difficult."

More OpenVINO cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a license required for this solution."

"The pricing for Microsoft products can be complex due to changes and being cloud-based, so it's not straightforward. I've been familiar with it for years, but sometimes details about product licenses and distribution can be unclear. For Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio specifically, I would rate the price a six out of ten."

"I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with ten being very expensive. Not very expensive, not very cheap."

"I used the free student license for a few months to operate the solution, but I'll have to pay for it if I want to do more now."

"The solution cost is high."

"From a developer's perspective, I find the price of this solution high."

"In terms of pricing, for any cloud solution, you should know the tricks of the trade and how to use it, otherwise, you'll end up paying a lot of money irrespective of the cloud provider, so at least for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio pricing versus AWS, I would rate it three out of five, with one being the most expensive, and five being the cheapest. It could be cheaper, but you also have to be careful when choosing the plans, for example, consider the architecture and a lot of other factors before choosing your plan, if you don't want to end up paying more. If your cloud provider has an optimizer that seems to be available in every provider, that would keep alerting you in terms of resources not being used as much, then that would help you with budgeting."

"The solution operates on a pay-per-use model."

More Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio pricing and cost advice

"We didn't have to pay for any licensing with Intel OpenVINO. Everything is available on their site and easily downloadable for free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

890,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

29%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	30

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which do you prefer - Databricks or Azure Machine Learning Studio?

Databricks gives you the option of working with several different languages, such as SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or Python. It offers many different cluster choices and excellent integration with ...

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio?

The learning curve is very low. Operationalizing the model is also very easy within the Azure ecosystem.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio?

The pricing for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is reasonable since it's pay as you go, meaning it won't cost excessively unless specific resources are used.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenVINO?

The pricing of OpenVINO is reasonable.

What needs improvement with OpenVINO?

I have heard good things about OpenVINO. It doesn't consume much current for external GPU usage. However, it has some downsides because I couldn't get it to run on my Raspberry Pi 4. While not spec...

What is your primary use case for OpenVINO?

I wanted to use OpenVINO for my Raspberry Pi to analyze my sleep with a night vision camera and to improve GPU performance on my Raspberry Pi. I would have used OpenVINO's Model Optimizer feature t...

Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform vs Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

KNIME Business Hub vs Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio

Compared 10% of the time

Databricks vs Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio

Compared 6% of the time

TensorFlow vs Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio

Compared 5% of the time

Dataiku vs Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio Competitors

TensorFlow vs OpenVINO

Compared 32% of the time

PyTorch vs OpenVINO

Compared 19% of the time

Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform vs OpenVINO

Compared 10% of the time

Azure OpenAI vs OpenVINO

Compared 7% of the time

Lyzr AI vs OpenVINO

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenVINO Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio

Download Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio product report

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio report

OpenVINO

Download OpenVINO product report

Also Known As

Azure Machine Learning, MS Azure Machine Learning Studio

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio offers a drag-and-drop interface, seamless integration with tools, and compatibility with multiple programming languages, making it user-friendly and efficient for developing and deploying machine-learning models.

This platform supports Python, R, and more, with automation features like AutoML, scalable resources, and cognitive services enhance data normalization and deployment. Users can easily create models, integrate with Azure services, and accelerate data science projects using its comprehensive library. Despite its benefits, improvements are suggested for cross-platform integration, enhanced data preparation, and clearer pricing strategies. Users also look for better deployment flexibility, more algorithm options, and examples. Expanded AI features, increased accessibility, and DevOps integration would further benefit its users.

What are the main features of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio?

Drag-and-Drop Interface: Simplifies model creation and experimentation.
Integration with Tools: Works seamlessly with Azure services.
Compatibility with Languages: Supports Python, R, among others.
AutoML: Automates machine learning processes.
Scalable Resources: Provides adaptability in modeling.
Cognitive Services: Enhances data processing capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

User-Friendly Design: Encourages accessibility for non-experts.
Seamless Deployment: Eases transition from model development to deployment.
Comprehensive Library: Accelerates data science processes.
Predictive Analytics: Aids in forecasting trends and behaviors.
Fraud Detection: Enhances security measures effectively.

In healthcare, finance, and retail, users apply Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio for developing machine learning models, predictive analytics, and deploying models efficiently. Its low-code interface supports experimentation for customer behavior prediction, data analytics, fraud detection, and automated machine learning, facilitating their business and research applications.

Microsoft

OpenVINO offers comprehensive tools for computer vision tasks, widely appreciating its compatibility with multiple hardware and frameworks. It facilitates seamless integration and supports direct camera streaming, making it versatile for device deployment and optimization.

OpenVINO is a powerhouse for machine learning enthusiasts, providing support for Intel CPUs and non-NVIDIA GPUs. Its compatibility spans multiple platforms, enhancing the deployment of models on diverse hardware. Users can efficiently convert and deploy models using OpenVINO's Model Zoo, coupled with support for frameworks like PyTorch and TensorFlow. Despite its strengths, there's room for improvement in conversion speed and better compatibility beyond Intel. It proves valuable for IoT applications, optimizing models efficiently for edge devices.

What are the standout features of OpenVINO?

Runtime for computer vision models: Offers reliable runtime support for various AI models.
Support for Apple silicon: Extends compatibility to Apple hardware.
Ease of integration: Simplifies the incorporation into existing workflows.
Direct camera streaming: Allows direct integration with camera systems.
Model conversion feature: Facilitates seamless model adaptation and deployment.
Model Zoo: Provides access to a collection of pre-trained models.
Compatibility with frameworks: Integrates with PyTorch, TensorFlow.

What benefits should users look for?

Hardware cost savings: Reduces dependency on NVIDIA, offering inexpensive alternatives.
Custom deployment: Enables tailored model deployment.
Versatility: Supports numerous frameworks, enhancing flexibility.
Efficient IoT processing: Optimizes performance on edge devices.

OpenVINO's applications span multiple industries, notably in video analytics and IoT. Users utilize its capabilities to build sophisticated systems for real-time analytics, model optimization for low-power devices, and intelligent edge processing. Projects like sleep analysis on Raspberry Pi or surveillance systems showcase its diverse implementations, highlighting its capacity to enhance industry-specific solutions.

Intel

Sample Customers

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Schneider Electric, BP

Information Not Available

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio vs. OpenVINO