We performed a comparison between Microsoft Dynamics AX and PeopleSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Microsoft Dynamics is very stable."
"Support is really good."
"The product's most valuable features are its day-to-day operations, Power BI-driven workspaces, and homepage."
"The response time of the solution is very good."
"The relation between CRM and Sales, that's the main strength of this ERP."
"It has the same UI and is very similar to any other Microsoft product."
"In terms of features, GP offers a wide range of strong capabilities, particularly in the financial module."
"Almost all of the features that we use are efficient. Live master planning successfully handles all of our company's requirements."
"It is a customizable product. We can customize it based on our needs, which is one of the features that I like about PeopleSoft. As far as financial accounting is concerned, the user interface is very good. You can also configure Chart of Accounts for all performance insights."
"All the features of the solution are integral to the functionality. Additionally, the navigation customization is beneficial."
"Flexibility in configuration."
"It's great for helping users deal with their supply chain."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"A valuable feature is HCM."
"The breadcrumb approach to navigation in PeopleSoft is good. nVision is also a good supplement."
"PeopleSoft is scalable."
"The manufacturing module in GP is quite basic, and those who require more advanced manufacturing capabilities often turn to third-party modules or tools."
"Microsoft Dynamics AX can improve by having a more modern user interface. It should be more modular and dynamic. Additionally, the solution could be easier to connect with APIs with other technologies."
"Change management could be better."
"It needs better financials and reporting from the system, not through Excel."
"The database requires a huge CPU and memory resources."
"It could be more scalable and stable. It would also be better if the interface were more integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem because 2012 is not really integrated."
"There is also slowness in database backup."
"There is room for improvement when handling various currencies within the current Microsoft Dynamics AX system."
"The solution could have better processes and automation, or features that allow for a paperless environment."
"There could be more adaptability of the system."
"PeopleSoft can improve by having proper connectors. It's very difficult to change some interfaces with the other systems."
"The whole systematic flow of any query raised to HR should be improved."
"In my opinion, it needs more performance, maybe something technical related, because it's very slow for us and even small activities take a while."
"The Time and Labor module is not that flexible."
"We have already deployed it and we have had it for several years but we are switching to a modern HCM SaaS cloud product."
"Areas that need improvement are the add-ons to the fluid pages and additional features in SCM and finance, both functionally and technically."
Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked 6th in ERP with 52 reviews while PeopleSoft is ranked 12th in ERP with 80 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics AX is rated 7.6, while PeopleSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics AX writes "A stable product that offers excellent ROI and reliable technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". Microsoft Dynamics AX is most compared with SAP ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, whereas PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP and SAP ERP. See our Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. PeopleSoft report.
See our list of best ERP vendors and best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.