Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs PeopleSoft comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
PeopleSoft's customer service is responsive but needs improvement in speed, response clarity, and efficiency for customized setups.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.9
PeopleSoft users seek UI modernization, mobile integration, enhanced customization, better tech support, robust analytics, and streamlined processes.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.5
PeopleSoft is highly scalable, effectively supporting diverse business sizes and integrating smoothly with various applications as needs grow.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
PeopleSoft's high pricing and licensing costs may suit organizations with complex needs, ranging $3M-$4M annually.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.1
PeopleSoft is generally stable and reliable, rated highly by users, though stability can vary during upgrades and customizations.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.3
PeopleSoft provides customizable ERP solutions with seamless integration, user-friendly interfaces, and strong support, ideal for complex business processes.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Dynamics AX
Ranking in ERP
5th
Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PeopleSoft
Ranking in ERP
11th
Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
Benefits Administration (4th), Talent Management (6th), Demand Management (2nd), Talent Acquisition (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics AX is 6.7%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PeopleSoft is 2.6%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
ERP
 

Featured Reviews

SherifAnter - PeerSpot reviewer
The sales and distribution modules are robust, and reliable, and seldom encounter issues
In GP, there are certain features like financial reporting that aren't part of the core GP package. Users might need to install additional components for these features. For example, there's a reseller product called Management Reporter, but many users would prefer to have the reporting capabilities integrated within GP itself, rather than relying on external tools. The manufacturing module in GP is quite basic, and those who require more advanced manufacturing capabilities often turn to third-party modules or tools. Additionally, you might be aware that in 2028, GP is expected to reach its end of life. Microsoft has already ceased selling GP to new customers. It's essentially the same product, but this marks the final year for GP's availability.
HarishMahanta - PeerSpot reviewer
Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages
I would like to see a chatbot in PeopleSoft as part of artificial intelligence. Moreover, there are already a few things in the cloud. In the market, all companies and entities are moving to the cloud, whether it is Oracle cloud or AWS cloud. The cloud is the most secure platform where we can also have Fusion. Few companies have migrated from PeopleSoft to Fusion or Oracle Cloud, or AWS cloud based on their organization's requirements. Some organizations are moving from PeopleSoft to upgrade their tools or application versions, while others are moving from PeopleSoft to HCM Cloud if they are into HCM. The cost of the product depends on the enterprise's size, and some enterprises are moving in quantity due to the current market. Additional areas that need improvement are the add-ons to the fluid pages and additional features in SCM and finance, both functionally and technically.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Retailer
6%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics AX?
The 2012 version is obsolete, and we don't have any support for it.
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics AX?
My clients' use cases for the product cover domains like retail, manufacturing, IT communications, and HR.
What are the differences between Oracle HCM Cloud and PeopleSoft?
Although both are solutions to manage HR, their differences make each one suitable for different companies. Oracle Cloud HCM is a platform for connecting all human resource processes in your organ...
What do you like most about PeopleSoft?
I use the reporting feature occasionally to check for potential improvements in timesheets. We have integrated it with Power BI.
 

Also Known As

Dynamics AX, Axapta, MS Dynamics AX
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ConQuaestor, D & H Distributing, Sunny Queen, Mesa Associates, Britax Childcare, Ibema, Arafa, Sabo S.p.A.
BMI Healthcare, Lone Star College System, Jefferson County Public Schools, Griffith University, Los Rios Community College District, Tervita Corporation, INFRA S.A. de C.V., ICF Habitat, Central Washington University, Tech Mahindra Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Stanford Childrens Health
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. PeopleSoft and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.