Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Vicarius vRx comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Windows Server Up...
Ranking in Patch Management
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Vicarius vRx
Ranking in Patch Management
10th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (16th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (6th)
 

Featured Reviews

DL
Jan 3, 2024
Easy-to-use interface and manages updates for all Microsoft operating systems, including client and server versions
I use it to update It's free, easy to implement and use. It supports all the Microsoft operating systems, not only our systems but also the clients. The easy way to use it is the biggest benefit. The database could be improved. In large environments, for example, we often get problems with…
WA
Jul 18, 2024
Helps us combine vulnerability discovery, prioritization, and remediation into a single platform
Vicarius is valuable because it combines vulnerability discovery, prioritization, and remediation into a single platform. Traditionally, these functions are separated and often managed by different teams, such as security teams handling discovery and infrastructure teams responsible for patching. This division requires significant coordination and communication regarding vulnerabilities, necessary patches, and prioritization. Vicarius streamlines this process by directly linking identified vulnerabilities to required patches, enhancing efficiency. We have automated some of the patching using vRx's ability to perform that function. My infrastructure team handles the patching side, and we have shared access to the platform. I know that at least ten different tasks are automated, but I'm unsure if they've progressed even more. The gathering of patches that have been released, staged, and ready to go has been automated. So, all patches are already available, and we have some pre-done schedules that will automatically launch and start patching at predetermined times without further intervention. The automation process has saved at least 30 percent of our manual tasks. It takes two to three months to get a good overall vulnerability picture. The deployment takes a little while and some time to get used to the reporting. However, we saw decent data within two months and started asking questions about reporting and numbers. After three months, the overall dataset was good. Even now, we're still working on reporting, asking questions of Vicarius and trying to tweak some of the different reporting features. Vicarius has helped us reduce our mean time to remediate vulnerabilities. Because we can examine endpoints, the best use case I can think of as an example for shortening remediation time is when we start spot-checking and looking at the dashboard for endpoints that, for some reason, have a high count of vulnerabilities or a much higher count of more severe vulnerabilities, we can immediately go into patching from that console and start pushing things out. So it helps us to immediately take care of delinquent workstations, for example, those that have not been connected or a person just keeps leaving their workstation off during prescribed patching periods. Overall, I would say remediation time is 25 to 30 percent shorter. The biggest impact is on case-by-case patching. We follow a regular patching cadence. We're a Microsoft shop, so the largest number of patches we have to apply, like most others, is on Patch Tuesdays when Microsoft releases stuff. Since that's on a regular cadence, I wouldn't say that Vicarius has greatly affected that. But there's a great improvement when we perform cleanup work and try to catch all the outliers and delinquent machines.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution can be used to update PCs and servers."
"The product is quite stable."
"Instead of leaving each server to download their own updates, with WSUS you have a centralized management tool for all the updates alongside a log for all the servers. By creating and deploying a WSUS server that will download the updates from the internet and dispatch them to the other servers, you can have control over the entire deployment process."
"Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is an easy-to-use and stable solution."
"Provides the ability to create multiple downstream servers."
"Setup is very simple and straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to identify which updates are needed on a particular machine."
"Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is highly stable. It is one of the most stable solutions from Microsoft."
"Agent-based scanning is the most valuable feature."
"I also like how easy it is to use. We instructed some companies on how to use it, provided them with an account, and gave them the ability to deploy and patch. They could quickly figure it out. We can spend an hour in the office showing someone how everything works, and they're good to go. It's the same with our customers."
"The most valuable features of vRx would be virtualized patching and severity prioritization."
"We can easily deploy patches for third-party applications. It automatically downloads the patches for you. You do not have to download them, upload them to the solution, and configure your own scripts or anything like that. It is all automatic."
"Patchless Protection helps protect us from vulnerabilities that may not yet have patches from the manufacturer. I've used it for a piece of software that we don't have a patch for. It monitors that software, analyzes it, and makes sure nothing nefarious is going on when it's vulnerable."
"Third-party software patching is the most valuable feature."
"While other vulnerability scanners overwhelm us with a huge list of problems after a scan, Vicarius vRx goes beyond that."
"Vicarius vRx's ability to patch third-party software is particularly valuable for us."
 

Cons

"The security could be improved."
"The product lacks to offer some of the features offered by some of the open source solutions like Linux and others, making it an area where improvements are required."
"In the next release, I would like them to provide better connectivity. They must improve the connectivity between the WSS with Microsoft or the client."
"More integration with different platforms would be an improvement."
"Because you have to pay for the product and there may be other good free solutions, this may not be the best choice for a cost-minded organization."
"The product needs to improve its user interface."
"Microsoft Windows Server Update Services could improve the ease of use."
"I would like to see support for other operating systems such as Linux."
"While I appreciate the automation of vulnerability management, Vicarius vRx's current manual patchless application is a point for improvement."
"They do have a search function for device names. They already have a list of all our devices, however, if I'm looking for something, sometimes the name does not come up at the top of the list."
"The multi-tenant portal has room for improvement."
"I would like to see a way to build a virtual environment where we can test patches in real-time before we deploy."
"Unlike previous vulnerability management systems that relied on network scanning appliances to discover and assess endpoints, Vicarius' agent-based approach is less effective for devices like switches, routers, and printers where agent installation is impractical."
"Another complaint we've gotten is that the portal doesn't remember your username and password. You tell them your email, and it sends an invitation. You need to click that, and it takes you to a new portal, where you can finally log in. Maybe it's a security precaution, but it seems like a lot of extra steps to log in."
"The network device vulnerability scans can be improved. It would be helpful to be able to mitigate those vulnerabilities using SSH or SNMP to get those those updates out to those devices. I don't know if that is possible because it doesn't run an agent. But at the very least, having that CPE information relative to network devices would be incredibly helpful."
"I don't like logging in. The portal could be a better process. You could use some third-party push notification rather than sending an email, waiting for the link to generate, and clicking on it. That would be good. It's somewhat frustrating when I need to log in."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While it might be relatively more expensive for smaller companies, larger enterprises can find it robust and capable of delivering significant value."
"Because it is not open-source, it has to compete with open-source solutions. Relatively it is expensive to open-source."
"Configuration Manager is less expensive than Microsoft Windows Server Update Services."
"Microsoft's operating model determines the solution's pricing, and we use it based on our enterprise agreement, which incurs an annual cost."
"Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is not an expensive solution."
"The solution is expensive, and the licensing costs are yearly."
"The tool could be cheaper."
"The licensing of WSUS is free of charge because it comes with the Windows Server operating system, included as a feature of the operating system itself. It's simply a role that you enable within Windows Server."
"The pricing is fair."
"The price of vRx seems fair. None of our clients complained about the pricing. They all thought it was reasonable. Once people understood what it does, it didn't take much to get them to sign up."
"Vicarius' pricing was reasonable compared to the other systems we evaluated."
"Vicarius vRx's per-asset pricing makes it easy for me to market to clients as it scales with their needs."
"It is in the middle. It is not the cheapest solution, but it is also not terribly expensive. We found it to be a good fit. It is fairly priced."
"Vicarius vRx is reasonably priced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
18%
Media Company
16%
Non Profit
13%
Insurance Company
13%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft Windows Server Update Services?
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services needs to improve its reporting feature. The tool's competitor has better reporting capabilities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Vicarius vRx?
Vicarius vRx is slightly expensive. It could be a little lighter on the wallet.
What needs improvement with Vicarius vRx?
I don't like logging in. The portal could be a better process. You could use some third-party push notification rather than sending an email, waiting for the link to generate, and clicking on it. T...
What is your primary use case for Vicarius vRx?
We use vRx to do the patch management, vulnerability assessment, and remediation.
 

Also Known As

Windows Server Update Services, Microsoft WSUS, WSUS, Microsoft Software Update Services, Software Update Services, Microsoft SUS, SUS, MS Windows Server Update Services
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs. Vicarius vRx and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.