Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Vicarius vRx comparison

Microsoft and Vicarius are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Vicarius is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4. Additionally, 91% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Vicarius users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Read 80 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews

4,919 Views
3,894 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Vicarius vRx

Read 19 Vicarius vRx reviews

625 Views
189 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Vicarius vRx

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 24, 2024

Microsoft Configuration Manager and Vicarius vRx operate in the IT management and security sector. Microsoft Configuration Manager has the upper hand in extensive device management, while Vicarius vRx shines in advanced security features and vulnerability management.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager includes patch management, application deployment, and compliance reporting with a centralized management console. Vicarius vRx offers vulnerability management, patchless protection, and automated threat response for zero-day vulnerabilities.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager needs enhancements in performance, integration with non-Microsoft products, PowerShell capabilities, network deployment options, and reducing resource consumption. Vicarius vRx should simplify the patchless application process, improve login procedures, enhance network scanning capabilities, and streamline reporting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Configuration Manager's on-premises deployment provides extensive control but complicates setup, with generally good technical support despite some delays. Vicarius vRx's cloud-based deployment offers easy implementation, backed by strong documentation and reliable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager is expensive with licensing complexities but offers cost savings through automation. Vicarius vRx is competitively priced, though smaller organizations might struggle without discounts. Both offer substantial ROI, with Microsoft's high cost contrasting Vicarius's scalable pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Vicarius vRx Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Vicarius vRx

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Ranking in Patch Management

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (3rd), Configuration Management (3rd)

Vicarius vRx

Ranking in Patch Management

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (15th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (5th)

Featured Reviews

Abul Fazal

Service Delivery Manager at Almoayyed Computers

Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable

The initial setup for Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is simple. However, the configuration and management are not simple. Most of my clients are using the on-premise configuration. Cloud deployment is cumbersome because It requires lots of system communication to open from the cloud, and every client has to communicate with the cloud. We follow the Microsoft best practices procedure and white papers for implementation. Which includes single and multiple server deployments. The time it takes for deployment depends on the client's environment, such as the configuration and customization needed. However, the process can typically take two to three weeks to complete.

Read full review

Navdeep Saini

Principal Engineer at Blue HERON Technologies

It protects applications against zero-day threats

Vicarius vRx helps consolidate multiple tools for patching and remediation. It's critical that Vicarius combines vulnerability discovery, prioritization, and remediation in a single platform. We selected it for that reason. It protects us well. We use other tools, but we always go back to Vicarius to ensure everything's in line. It reduces the time needed to detect and remediate threats by about an hour. I would estimate it saves us about 20 hours each month that we can allocate to something else.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Microsoft Configuration Manager gives different tools in one solution."

"It lets you know what your infrastructure is like and what state you are in."

"The scalability to deploy the package."

"The major features of this product are the reporting tools. The most valuable features are package deployment and application deployment. Security management is also good because any vulnerability will be identified, and you can fix it. It's the best tool because you never know what kind of client you will have. For example, you may have your offices in low bandwidth remote areas. But it's achievable because it accommodates the bandwidth that you have available. Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is an excellent reporting tool for your environment. If you want to know the details about the hardware configuration, software configuration, what is causing a problem, or when a new feature update comes in for Windows, even that goes on SCCM itself. A lot of deployment stuff."

"The dashboards have information about our assets."

"The tool's most valuable features include security updates and patch management, which are critical functions for maintaining security. The automated software distribution and the ability to manage deployments are also highly useful. Enforcing compliance with set policies on systems is another key functionality we leverage."

"The product is useful for patch management."

"We're a Microsoft-centric organization, so we are happy with the integration between products."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros

"I also like how easy it is to use. We instructed some companies on how to use it, provided them with an account, and gave them the ability to deploy and patch. They could quickly figure it out. We can spend an hour in the office showing someone how everything works, and they're good to go. It's the same with our customers."

"Vicarius vRx offers several advantages, especially for organizations with diverse operating systems and applications requiring frequent patching."

"We can easily deploy patches for third-party applications. It automatically downloads the patches for you. You do not have to download them, upload them to the solution, and configure your own scripts or anything like that. It is all automatic."

"Vicarius vRx's primary strength is its user-friendly interface."

"Vicarius vRx consolidates vulnerability discovery, prioritization, and remediation in a single platform."

"Patchless Protection helps protect us from vulnerabilities that may not yet have patches from the manufacturer. I've used it for a piece of software that we don't have a patch for. It monitors that software, analyzes it, and makes sure nothing nefarious is going on when it's vulnerable."

"The prioritization of the vulnerabilities and patches that we must apply immediately is valuable. The automation of the tasks allows us to spend less time in that area."

"Vicarius vRx has reduced meantime to remediate by 90 percent."

More Vicarius vRx pros

Cons

"Some of the capabilities aren't fully developed yet. It's an ongoing work in progress. I think they are making some steps in the right direction as far as managing workstations centrally, like Intune."

"SCCM can improve on third-party application support."

"The reports are too busy. They could be simpler. I'm a technician, so I don't care how pretty the reports look. They should be easy to read. I'm designing this for production folks. They need to read the reports quickly when they're patching in the middle of the night."

"I would like to see an agentless version of the solution."

"Devices like smartphones and tablets are managed very well on VMware, however, they are absent in SCCM. I could configure iPad from the VMware site and it was done very easily. It should be just as possible on SCCM."

"The solution could improve the functionality for automating, license management. Additionally, more and better-looking reports are needed."

"The solution should be more compatible with different versions of Linux."

"There is no asset management package included."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons

"Unlike previous vulnerability management systems that relied on network scanning appliances to discover and assess endpoints, Vicarius' agent-based approach is less effective for devices like switches, routers, and printers where agent installation is impractical."

"It would be good if there were more login options. At the moment, it sends you an email to verify your email address, and then you can log in. It would be beneficial to have other options for signing in, like MFA or maybe security keys, especially since it is a security product."

"The user interface for deploying patches can be improved, as it appears complicated when launching patches."

"In the past, Vicarius vRx was cheap, but now they have adjusted their pricing policy, resulting in higher renewal costs."

"The multi-tenant portal has room for improvement."

"Areas that need improvement include the CPU usage and the delay between sending updates and receiving feedback on their status."

"I would like to see a way to build a virtual environment where we can test patches in real-time before we deploy."

"I don't like logging in. The portal could be a better process. You could use some third-party push notification rather than sending an email, waiting for the link to generate, and clicking on it. That would be good. It's somewhat frustrating when I need to log in."

More Vicarius vRx cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license price could be reduced for Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager They should make the price more affordable for smaller companies, most companies would be able to use the solution if it was priced better. There are more people on this cloud because you don't have to have either a server room or an on-premise server. You can have one IT person handle this without any local infrastructure."

"As far as I know, it is an annual operating expense license."

"We have to pay for a license."

"The price of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is expensive."

"Microsoft provides a steep price for their enterprise products, but they offer very competitive pricing for their legacy customers."

"Pricing and licensing are a downside of SCCM. It's expensive. I'd have to confirm this, but I think they changed the licensing to core-based instead of socket-based. It's not cheap, because you have to buy the software, you have to buy SQL. Another thing we learned from talking to Microsoft is that they provide you a license for SQL if you run it on the same box as the primary server. If you run it outside that box, you have to buy SQL. Microsoft does recommend you running it on the same box because of performance. But then, in order to run SQL, SCCM, and everything on the same box, you better have some resources. It's an expensive solution. There's no doubt about it."

"The price of SCCM depends on the size of the organization. The price is competitive."

"The solution operates on a licensing model that can be expensive."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice

"It is in the middle. It is not the cheapest solution, but it is also not terribly expensive. We found it to be a good fit. It is fairly priced."

"Vicarius vRx is reasonably priced."

"The pricing was very reasonable and fair compared to other products. I liked that there was no tiered system. One price gave access to everything, which is nice. It is not something you get too often with enterprise IT."

"In the past, Vicarius vRx was cheap, but now they have adjusted their pricing policy, resulting in higher renewal costs. We have had some conversations with them regarding a smaller jump in the renewal cost."

"Vicarius vRx is priced competitively within the market."

"The pricing is great because we are a reseller of the product. It is really up to us and Vicarius, and they are very easy to work with."

"Vicarius vRx's per-asset pricing makes it easy for me to market to clients as it scales with their needs."

"Vicarius vRx offers a competitive price point for the features it provides."

More Vicarius vRx pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Media Company

15%

Non Profit

13%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?

ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...

See all answers

What do you like most about SCCM?

One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Vicarius vRx?

Vicarius vRx is priced competitively within the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Vicarius vRx?

I have several applications on developers' assets and computers that cannot be updated due to potential conflicts with their current development tools. It would be beneficial if Vicarius vRx could ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Vicarius vRx?

We use Vicarius vRx for the visibility of all the assets in one place on the patch management status. The risk we're trying to mitigate is the need to patch a critical vulnerability across numerous...

See all answers

Comparisons

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 8% of the time

BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Systems Manager vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Vicarius vRx

Compared 41% of the time

NinjaOne vs Vicarius vRx

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Vicarius vRx

Compared 9% of the time

SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform vs Vicarius vRx

Compared 9% of the time

Ivanti Security Controls vs Vicarius vRx

Compared 7% of the time

More Vicarius vRx Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Configuration Manager

December 2024

Download Microsoft Configuration Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Vicarius vRx

November 2024

Download Vicarius vRx product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM )

No data available

Learn More

Microsoft

Vicarius

Overview

Microsoft Configuration Manager helps IT manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose. When Configuration Manager is integrated with Microsoft Intune, you can manage corporate-connected PCs and Macs along with cloud-based mobile devices running Windows, iOS, and Android, all from a single management console.

New features of Configuration Manager, such as the support of Windows 10 in-place upgrade, co-management with Microsoft Intune, Windows 10 and Microsoft 365 Apps for enterprise Servicing Dashboard, integration with Windows Update for Business, and more make deploying and managing Windows easier than ever before.

Vicarius vRx supports managed service providers and partners with compliance packages, vulnerability management, and patching for PCI, HIPAA, and cybersecurity needs, focusing on third-party and OS patching, especially on Microsoft Windows.

Vicarius vRx automates patching, virtualized patching, and severity prioritization through its cloud-based, agent-based approach which enhances consistency and flexibility. It includes patchless protection to block malware in unpatched software and features simplified dashboards for integrated vulnerability discovery and remediation. Users appreciate the user-friendly scripting engine, efficient third-party software patching, and real-time cybersecurity updates. Community support and customizable deployment options further add value. However, users find name changes and login difficulties confusing and report tediousness when configuring multiple reports. Desired improvements include virtual environment for patch testing, enhanced network device vulnerability scans, and better Microsoft Endpoint Manager interactions.

What are the key features of Vicarius vRx?

Automated patching: Streamlines the process of patching applications and operating systems.
Virtualized patching: Enables patching in a virtual environment to prevent disruptions.
Severity prioritization: Helps prioritize vulnerabilities to address the most critical issues first.
Patchless protection: Blocks malware in software that hasn't been patched yet.
User-friendly scripting engine: Simplifies the creation and execution of scripts for automation.
Integrated vulnerability discovery: Combines detection and remediation in a single dashboard.
Real-time updates: Provides immediate cybersecurity updates and notifications.
Community support: Offers robust support from the user community.
Customizable deployment options: Allows tailoring to fit specific requirements.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time-saving: Reduces the time required for software patching and management.
Vulnerability reduction: Decreases the number of vulnerabilities through automated processes.
Enhanced security: Provides patchless protection and real-time updates to improve security postures.
Flexibility: The cloud-based, agent-based approach adapts to various environments and needs.
Simplified management: User-friendly interfaces and streamlined processes offer easier administration.
Improved compliance: Helps meet PCI, HIPAA, and cybersecurity regulatory requirements.

Among managed service providers, Vicarius vRx is implemented for updating systems, showing capabilities to customers in lab environments, and securing endpoints through agent-based patching. These providers use vRx to efficiently manage third-party software patching and to maintain cybersecurity standards across industries.

Sample Customers

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Vicarius vRx

December 2024

Free Report: Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Vicarius vRx

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Vicarius vRx and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Vicarius vRx report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.