MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Tungsten RPA comparison

Salesforce and Tungsten Automation are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Additionally, 91% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Tungsten Automation users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 55 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

4,636 Views
2,776 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Tungsten RPA

Read 25 Tungsten RPA reviews

2,606 Views
1,946 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Tungsten RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Tungsten RPA Report (Updated: September 2024).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Tungsten RPA

September 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 801,634 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd), Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Workload Automation (9th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (1st)

Tungsten RPA

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (11th)

Featured Reviews

Dimitrios Karachalios

Application Architect at Lutech

Feb 22, 2024

Useful for asynchronous messaging, but it lacks features, and the storage is limited

The solution is used in many projects. I'm an IT consultant. I use the tool when there's a need for asynchronous messaging It is a nice product to expand the functionality of our event-driven architecture. The use of ACK is valuable. I can leave a message through the code and take advantage of…

Read full review

reviewer2037681

Product Owner RPA at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Jan 18, 2023

The solution handles batch processing efficiently

I rate Kofax seven out of 10 for ease of setup. Setting up Kofax isn't always straightforward, but it's not overly complex. It's in the middle. The average deployment time is hard to pin down. It's part of our ABN NAMRO infrastructure, which prevents us from doing things quickly. The time it takes isn't due to Kofax. Everything needs to be optimized based on internal procedures, etc. Generally, it isn't a big issue for us.We do everything in-house with a platform team of around six people that handles maintenance, lifecycle management, etc. The maintenance consists of updating the infrastructure and installing new applications. Sometimes our accounts raise vulnerabilities that need attention, but they're usually minor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool helps with order management and automates the enterprise's orchestration, invoice creation, product maintenance, and product life cycle. The API manager feature helps us configure, secure, and call APIs."

"The solution is scalable, and its performance is quite good."

"Initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment is a cakewalk."

"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."

"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."

"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."

"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."

"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."

"The drag and drop functionality is quite good."

"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."

"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."

"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."

"The OCR was quite stable and flexible."

"The pricing of the solution is quite good."

"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."

More Tungsten RPA pros

Cons

"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."

"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."

"The solution is very costly. The solution should provide a package with fewer capabilities at a lower price for specific companies that don’t have a big IT budget. Not every customer requires all the capabilities of the software. It will be a good fit in the market, and they will easily sell it more."

"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."

"Information on monitoring could be improved."

"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."

"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"It's extremely expensive to change things in Anypoint MQ. There's also this issue of slow output of messages, and that needs to be improved."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"The process discovery could be a bit better."

"Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath."

"The scalability has room for improvement."

"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."

"The solution needs to be scalable."

"Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution."

"The technical support must be improved."

"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."

More Tungsten RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price seems to be competent in comparison to other products in the market."

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."

"The solution has a high price."

"The product comes complete at one set price including support."

"The licensing is core-based. My customers tell me that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites."

"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

"Mule Anypoint Platform pricing is slightly higher compared to Dell Boomi."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"Kofax RPA's licensing costs are yearly and expensive."

"I don't have complete insight at this point in time, but I would guess that Kofax is a lot less expensive than Automation Anywhere. I would expect its license to be on a yearly basis."

"The solution’s license is not expensive."

"The pricing model for automation solutions like Automation Anywhere, UiPath, and Microsoft Power Platform is subscription-based, where costs are calculated based on factors such as the number of hours used and the scale of automation required.......With Kofax, you purchase a license upfront, and that's all you need. You can create as many automation workflows as you require without additional costs for individual use cases."

"Price is not a problem, because they are a competitor and we have a special rate."

"Its pricing is reasonable given the product capabilities. Kofax has a wide range of products, and it can sometimes be confusing to understand which capabilities come with which product set. One of the key facets that we've been looking into recently is cognitive document recognition that was a core pile of some of their other technologies such as Kofax transformation modules (KTM)."

"There is a standard license needed to use Kofax RPA and the price is reasonable."

"Kofax RPA is moderately priced but expensive in comparison to UiPath and Power Automate."

More Tungsten RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kofax RPA?

You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kofax RPA?

Previously, Tungsten RPA offered perpetual licenses, but now it has a subscription-based model for more flexibility, similar to the Microsoft developer platform.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kofax RPA?

We've faced a few challenges with Tungsten RPA. One issue I recall was with sending emails that needed multiple attachments. At the time, the feature only allowed attaching one file at a time. We d...

See all answers

Comparisons

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft Composer vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon SQS vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

UiPath vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 40% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 13% of the time

Blue Prism vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 11% of the time

Automation Anywhere (AA) vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 6% of the time

Tungsten TotalAgility vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 4% of the time

More Tungsten RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

August 2024

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Tungsten RPA

August 2024

Download Tungsten RPA product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow

Learn More

Salesforce

Tungsten Automation

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Tungsten RPA

September 2024

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Tungsten RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Tungsten RPA and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Tungsten RPA report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.