NetIQ Access Manager vs Oracle Access Manager comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Access Management category. OpenText is ranked #21, while Oracle is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in AM, compared to Oracle’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

NetIQ Access Manager

Read 5 NetIQ Access Manager reviews

402 Views
264 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Access Manager

Read 19 Oracle Access Manager reviews

863 Views
486 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

NetIQ Access Manager

Oracle Access Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

NetIQ Access Manager and Oracle Access Manager are robust solutions for identity and access management. Users generally find NetIQ Access Manager more favorable in terms of pricing and support, yet Oracle Access Manager's extensive features make it a more compelling choice.

Features: NetIQ Access Manager is praised for its solid SSO capabilities and integration with various applications. Oracle Access Manager offers a broader range of features including advanced identity federation and better integration with Oracle products, making it the superior choice for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Users of NetIQ Access Manager pinpoint the need for a more modern interface and better documentation. Oracle Access Manager users recommend enhanced technical support and a more intuitive setup process. While both products have areas for improvement, Oracle's support appears more critical according to user reviews.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetIQ Access Manager is commended for its relatively straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Oracle Access Manager, while having more involved deployment procedures, benefits from a comprehensive support system. Users find NetIQ's ease of deployment simpler but rate Oracle's customer service more highly in terms of overall support.

Pricing and ROI: Users appreciate NetIQ Access Manager for its competitive pricing and reasonable setup costs, contributing to quicker ROI. Although Oracle Access Manager is perceived as more expensive, its wide array of features leads users to believe it offers better long-term value, justifying the higher investment.

To learn more, read our detailed NetIQ Access Manager vs. Oracle Access Manager Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetIQ Access Manager vs. Oracle Access Manager

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,207 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetIQ Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Access Management (4th)

Oracle Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of NetIQ Access Manager is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Access Manager is 2.4%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management

Featured Reviews

Cassio-Silva

Technology director at Asyg

Multi-Factor Authentication, stable, and extremely scalable

I use NetIQ Access Manager to protect one single application with Multi-Factor Authentication. The solution is deployed on both cloud and on-prem The Multi-Factor Authentication of NetIQ Access Manager has helped protect our organization. The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are…

Read full review

Upendar G

Senior Consultant at Wipro Limited

Efficiently manage applications with secure single sign-on and streamlined operations

Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access. Its ability to consolidate applications on a single interface streamlines operations significantly. The product is highly secure and reliable, especially in managing user access across various platforms. Multi-factor authentication enhances security by requiring additional verification steps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very easy to integrate with applications."

"The features that we have found most valuable with NetIQ Access Manager are its single sign-on and two factor two second factor database."

"There are lots of options to customize the solution to your needs."

"The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are SSO and Multi-Factor Authentication."

"The single sign-on feature is excellent."

"From a technical perspective, the solution is very good we can operate and control the user by ourselves."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"My company has used most features of Oracle Access Manager for various implementations, but the most helpful feature of the solution for the business and customers is single sign-on."

"Overall, I rate Oracle Access Manager nine out of ten for its extensive capabilities."

"The product was built to be scalable."

"Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access."

"I would tell others that this solution is reliable. If they are looking for a solution that is reliable and that is scalable, then this is a good one."

"The most valuable features of Oracle Access Manager are the single sign-on capability and is a very robust platform. It can take a high number of authentication, and authorization requests. It's very flexible."

More Oracle Access Manager pros

Cons

"I would love to see the upgrade procedure handled more effectively. I would prefer to have OVS installation possibilities, although the upgrade procedures should include the OS as well. You should be able to use the whole application as an appliance."

"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the security of the infrastructure and the server and the working networking device."

"The application portal could be improved with more options and easier customization."

"Classification of junctions and new versions of applications, such as APIs, can be added to enable the use of more devices that utilize biometrics for Multi-Factor Authentication to improve the solution."

"Having the ability to easily extract and view and compare and version control configurations would be ideal."

"The technical support is not very good at all."

"The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly."

"In other products, we can customize on the GUI end, whereas in Oracle, we need to take a backup of the JAR file and then customize it...and during this process, sometimes the WebLogic admin console will go down, which will impact the process."

"May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products."

"The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality."

"Sometimes if a session takes too long, you have to log in again."

"I suggest Oracle make the integration process for non-Oracle applications as straightforward and easy as it is for Oracle applications."

"In the next release, they should focus more on use cases related to customer access management, customer identity, and access management."

More Oracle Access Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is average."

"The product is a little expensive."

"On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."

"The tool is affordable."

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

"Can be expensive as a solution."

"I cannot comment on the exact pricing because Oracle has different licensing models for other clients, making it flexible."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

11%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Oracle Access Manager?

The product supports customization.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than alternatives like Okta and CyberArk. Although it offers robust security, the cost might not justify its features for organizations with fewer applications.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

To improve Oracle Access Manager, they should consider integrating more policies and enhancing automation, especially in managing server load and cache cleanup. Enhancements in automation would eas...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs NetIQ Access Manager

Compared 55% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs NetIQ Access Manager

Compared 45% of the time

More NetIQ Access Manager Competitors

IBM Security Verify Access vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 51% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 21% of the time

ForgeRock vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Auth0 vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 8% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Access Management

April 2025

Download NetIQ Access Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager

March 2025

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Overview

Access Manager provides a simple yet secure and scalable solution that can handle all your web access needs both internal as well as in the cloud.

OpenText

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Bancomext, Bouwend Nederland, Camera dei Deputati, CGT, Coopservice Group, Court of Appeals of Georgia, Etnic, European Automotive Manufacturer, FDM Document Dynamics, Hainan Province Information Center, Highland Community College, Huntington Bank, Johnsonville Sausage, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Mazars, Mexico's Tax Administration Service, Owens Community College, Pasco Risk, RDC, School District of Hartford, Senckenberg Nature Research Society, Sheetz, Spanish Public Employment Service, SUNY Orange County Community College, Swisscard, The Municipality of Siena, The University of Westminster, UMB Financial Corporation Invests in Identity Management, University of Dayton, University of Groningen, Vodacom, World Wide Technology

SekerBank, University of Melbourne

Buyer's Guide

NetIQ Access Manager vs. Oracle Access Manager

March 2025

Free Report: NetIQ Access Manager vs. Oracle Access Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about NetIQ Access Manager vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetIQ Access Manager vs. Oracle Access Manager report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.