Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Odoo vs PeopleSoft comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.1
Odoo offers high ROI with affordability, automation, efficiency, and noticeable cost savings despite a slight learning curve.
Sentiment score
6.4
PeopleSoft offers a strong ROI with cost-effective implementation and maintenance compared to alternatives like Oracle and SAP.
Currently, I manage those tasks independently, which is a significant cost-saving measure for my small business.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Odoo's customer service is praised but needs faster, personalized support; ratings average six to seven out of ten.
Sentiment score
5.7
PeopleSoft's customer service is satisfactory, with responsive support, varying quality, and improvement needed in speed and expertise.
Technical support from Odoo is available and eager to help.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Odoo is a scalable, cloud-based solution praised for flexibility, integration ease, and suitability for mid-to-large enterprises.
Sentiment score
7.6
PeopleSoft is praised for its scalability, seamless integration, stability, and adaptability, effectively supporting diverse organizational needs and growth.
I rate the scalability of Odoo as eight to nine out of ten.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Odoo is highly stable, with minimal issues, reliable performance, and strong data integrity in diverse environments and industries.
Sentiment score
7.6
PeopleSoft is stable and reliable, with occasional bugs, earning high marks for stability despite minor infrastructure challenges.
Stability is very important because any software that supports your business must be available consistently.
 

Room For Improvement

Odoo could improve customization, support, scalability, integrations, mobile apps, documentation, and expand modules and cost-effective solutions.
PeopleSoft needs improvements in user interface, performance, integration, support, customization, and documentation to address current challenges.
Odoo's documentation needs improvement, as there are areas that are not well-documented.
 

Setup Cost

Odoo offers a cost-effective ERP solution for SMEs with flexible pricing, despite potential costs increasing with more users.
PeopleSoft's pricing is substantial, influenced by users and modules, offering significant value through customization and flexible agreements.
The pricing for Odoo is affordable, with the solution being significantly cheaper than its competitors like SAP, Microsoft, and Oracle.
 

Valuable Features

Odoo is a versatile, cost-effective open-source platform with customizable modules and user-friendly integration for comprehensive business management.
PeopleSoft offers customizable, robust features for HR and finance, seamless integration, reliable reporting, and strong security, enhancing business appeal.
The CRM and sales tools are highly effective, with customizable proposal templates aiding client interactions.
It aids me from an auditing perspective, as it's all system-driven, and cannot be altered.
 

Categories and Ranking

Odoo
Ranking in ERP
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
CRM (7th)
PeopleSoft
Ranking in ERP
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Activity Based Costing Software (4th), Benefits Administration (5th), Talent Management (6th), Demand Management (2nd), Talent Acquisition (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Odoo is 3.4%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PeopleSoft is 2.6%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
ERP
 

Featured Reviews

ThomasPetrou - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration across functionalities has streamlined business operations and improved cost efficiency
Odoo's documentation needs improvement, as there are areas that are not well-documented. Additionally, some underlying technologies need refactoring to more modern structures. Although it's not immediately necessary since the system works, changes to the architecture would be beneficial. From the transition from version 17 to 18, it appears they are aware and have begun addressing some of these concerns.
UshaKatyal - PeerSpot reviewer
A mature solution that needs right implementation
I think PeopleSoft HR is pretty good and very mature. The people who built PeopleSoft now work on Workday. Workday has asked me to join them as an employee a few times, but I don't take anyone's employment because Workday isn't very user-friendly. With PeopleSoft, you can do a lot. Oracle now bundles PeopleSoft and calls it Oracle Cloud, but the programs are the same. Recruiters often don't know this and say you're not qualified if you don't have Oracle Cloud experience. However, Oracle has just put PeopleSoft in the cloud and packaged it as Oracle Cloud. Overall, if the solution is implemented correctly, it runs very smoothly. I think people shouldn't customize it. They should use it as is and try to adapt to it. Many people didn't understand PeopleSoft at first. For example, during COVID, some companies hired offshore people who didn't know what they were doing and messed everything up. You need to know the rules and regulations of the country where you're implementing the tool because every country has different rules for HR, benefits, and payroll. Canadian payroll differs from US payroll, but they're on the same platform in the solution. It's a very mature system, but people prefer newer options like Oracle Cloud. I was also involved with SAP S/4HANA. I don't think it's good for the government sector because government workers are a bit lazy about technical things. I understand S/4HANA because I have a technical background. It has a different structure, while PeopleSoft has more of a file and table structure, which is easier. If the tables are set up wrong, things go wrong. But if you know how to set it up correctly, it runs smoothly, and you can adjust it if needed. The problem is that companies are hiring big consulting firms that want money. They hire offshore people who don't know the country's rules and do programming. If you buy a package and still have to do custom programming, why buy the package at all? These days, I'm doing a lot of business process reengineering for people because they don't know how to implement it correctly. If you implement it right, you can reduce manual work. However, it depends on change management and how senior management handles it. It works fine if you implement the tool on-site or hybrid, not cloud and do it correctly. But in a cloud situation, there are problems. Many countries change their payroll and benefits rules often. With the cloud, you can't easily change things. You have to ask the company to make changes, which costs much money. People who don't want an IT department go for the cloud. But I've seen many companies fail with the cloud. The cloud is just everything packaged together. Your data sits in someone else's cloud, and you must accept whatever they do. Payroll is very sensitive. If payroll is wrong, the whole company suffers. I've worked on the financial and school sides, too. I'm comfortable with the tool if it's implemented correctly. But many companies don't implement it right, which is why they might say it is too much. I did a big project for an oil and gas company. I was a program control manager with 51 people under me. We used Oracle, but Oracle isn't as good as PeopleSoft for payroll. If the solution is implemented correctly, it's fine. But you need the right implementer. Big consulting firms often give wrong information and use inexperienced people. For maintenance, PeopleSoft sends updated rules to new tables at year-end. You compile the new tables and start the new year. But you need to know which changes apply to your country. I talk to many senior PeopleSoft people and always get LinkedIn messages about business opportunities. I now help about 50 clients when they have problems, but I'm not traveling. If you know the HR and payroll business well, you can implement anything - PeopleSoft, Oracle, or S/4HANA. I've done all of these. S/4HANA is more complicated and technical. It's similar to an old software called IDMS. You have to be very technical, and if you don't do it right, it won't work. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Educational Organization
7%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
University
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Odoo?
The versatility of Odoo is one of its most valuable features for business productivity. It offers modules for purchase, inventory, manufacturing, sales, help desk, timesheets, point of sale, email ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Odoo?
The pricing for Odoo is affordable, with the solution being significantly cheaper than its competitors like SAP, Microsoft, and Oracle, while offering a comparable range of services. Thus, in terms...
What needs improvement with Odoo?
Odoo's documentation needs improvement, as there are areas that are not well-documented. Additionally, some underlying technologies need refactoring to more modern structures. Although it's not imm...
What are the differences between Oracle HCM Cloud and PeopleSoft?
Although both are solutions to manage HR, their differences make each one suitable for different companies. Oracle Cloud HCM is a platform for connecting all human resource processes in your organ...
What do you like most about PeopleSoft?
I use the reporting feature occasionally to check for potential improvements in timesheets. We have integrated it with Power BI.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
BMI Healthcare, Lone Star College System, Jefferson County Public Schools, Griffith University, Los Rios Community College District, Tervita Corporation, INFRA S.A. de C.V., ICF Habitat, Central Washington University, Tech Mahindra Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Stanford Childrens Health
Find out what your peers are saying about Odoo vs. PeopleSoft and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.