Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText ALM Octane vs ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.1
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management boosts ROI by enhancing collaboration, improving insights, and reducing costs through effective integration and planning.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.7
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management support is praised for effectiveness, though some users desire faster response times and personalized assistance.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.6
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is scalable, customizable, and ideal for large enterprises, despite occasional hosting performance issues.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
OpenText ALM Octane is stable and reliable, frequently updated, with minor deployment issues quickly resolved, highly rated by users.
Sentiment score
8.1
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is highly stable, with responsive support despite occasional slow performance during large tasks or customizations.
 

Room For Improvement

ServiceNow's Strategic Portfolio Management needs better usability, integration, reporting, and support, with room for enhanced automation and Agile features.
 

Setup Cost

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is pricey and complex, often benefiting larger enterprises more than medium-sized companies.
 

Valuable Features

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management offers user-friendly, integrated project management with Agile features and comprehensive demand, resource, and analytics tools.
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText ALM Octane
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (8th)
ServiceNow Strategic Portfo...
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Project Portfolio Management (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText ALM Octane is 1.6%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is 5.0%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Raghunathan Govindarajapuram - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution used for test management that is perceived to be an outdated tool by its customers
The number of individuals participating in the deployment process varies. Our company provides testing services, employs 34,000 individuals, and many of our clients utilize Micro Focus ALM Octane. This implies that many people use this tool, after considering 34,000 end-users from our company's end who are using Micro Focus ALM Octane. For deployment, the number of required tech engineers depends on the size of the project. For installation, one or two people may suffice. However, for usage, there will be many others who need to use it. The tool itself does not require any maintenance. However, it may require customization based on the specific needs of each customer. Workflows may need to be customized to meet the unique requirements of each customer. It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Srinivasa Neelapu - PeerSpot reviewer
Strategies and goals are aligned with demands and partners, making it a strategic approach for the enterprise but the finance part needs improvement
SPM is definitely strong for project management, but its finance capabilities are not as robust. While there is a separate Financial Management product, it would be beneficial to have more out-of-the-box support for finance integrations within SPM. I’m not suggesting replacing systems like SAP for finance, but there should be better support for financial integrations. Currently, connecting to SaaS solutions is complicated, and getting into detailed financial calculations is challenging. Forecasting is manageable, but handling actual financials is not as straightforward. The finance area needs improvement, specifically making finance application integrations easier. Generic finance capabilities should be more user-friendly and integrated into SPM. Although they have started this journey, it hasn’t been fully released yet. There seems to be a roadmap, and once complete, it will be very useful. Additionally, incorporating a Q&A feature for entire strategies or project demands and enhancing text analytics within SPM would be beneficial.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
28%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
10%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?
The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?
The tool's price is extremely high. When I was using Micro Focus, there were ten licenses, costing around 1,38,000, which was outrageous.
What do you like most about ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
We mainly use the solution to support operations and align our ITSM operations with our business goals. This involves coordinating between our application development, support teams, and network en...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
The pricing is average. They always have some extra options to add. I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
What needs improvement with ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
If we have enough information, we can address issues from the cloud to the top level of the organization. This allows us to see if our resources are being allocated properly from an executive persp...
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane
IT Business Management, ServiceNow IT Business Management Suite, ServiceNow ITBM Suite, ServiceNow ITBM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
Proximus, UNT SYSTEM, SAP SuccessFactors
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText ALM Octane vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.