Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText ALM Octane vs ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
OpenText ALM Octane reduces costs and increases efficiency by automating processes, streamlining project management, and enhancing analytics.
Sentiment score
7.7
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management delivers high ROI through streamlined planning, enhanced decision-making, and application consolidation for mature organizations.
The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks.
For organizations that haven't invested in people and processes, the product is underutilized and seen as overpriced.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
OpenText ALM Octane's support is praised for responsiveness and expertise but needs improvement in follow-up times and complex cases.
Sentiment score
6.8
ServiceNow's support is generally positive, with some noting delays; training and documentation aid but needs vary.
They have knowledgeable teams across all levels.
While they have a skilled team, reaching the right resource can sometimes be a challenge.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
OpenText ALM Octane is scalable, integrates well with DevOps tools, but users face licensing issues despite reliable performance.
Sentiment score
7.6
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management excels in scalability and adaptability, supporting diverse companies and departments, ideal for larger enterprises.
We can expand the number of servers and resources as required.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
OpenText ALM Octane offers highly stable performance with minimal issues, regular updates, and efficient support addressing any concerns.
Sentiment score
8.1
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is highly stable and reliable, with minor slowness during updates and customizable features.
 

Room For Improvement

OpenText ALM Octane struggles with integration, flexibility, and user management, needing improvements in security, support, and Agile processes.
ServiceNow SPM struggles with complexity, pricing, UI, integration, and lacks intuitive features, hindering user experience and satisfaction.
While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs.
It's not that the product lacks features, but rather organizations often adopt it at a maturity level beyond their capacity.
Making the product more cost-beneficial would help more organizations consider investing in it.
 

Setup Cost

OpenText ALM Octane is costly but valued for its features and scalability, offering ROI and enhanced support.
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is costly, with variable pricing and additional fees, suitable for large enterprises' needs.
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product.
If a company is prepared to get a return on the investment, the price is worth it.
It's a bit costly currently.
 

Valuable Features

OpenText ALM Octane offers extensive agile management, robust test management, seamless integrations, and flexibility for Agile and Waterfall methodologies.
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management excels with integration, flexible project management, and cost tracking, enhancing strategic decision-making and goal alignment.
Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes.
The platform consolidates multiple offerings into one module, eliminating the need to invest in siloed applications.
The most valuable features include managing our portfolio, getting a grip on demand in the environment, and making informed decisions about which projects would provide the greatest return.
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText ALM Octane
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (8th)
ServiceNow Strategic Portfo...
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Project Portfolio Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText ALM Octane is 1.8%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is 5.5%, up from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

GeorgNauerz - PeerSpot reviewer
Makes team collaboration between IT and non-IT users easier with more transparency
The user experience is a lot better than any tool that I have used before. Overall, it is great. It has a smooth interface, which is very user-friendly. It makes it easier to work together and have more transparency and customization, which is very good. There are a lot of features where you can add fields, input individual fields, and input rules, like templated rule-based interaction between entities. The Backlog management is really interesting, because it is all in one place. You don't have a feature here and a feature there, instead you have the Backlog and testing using different backup items, like user storage features and tasks, all in one place. In addition, we are able to write documents, which we can transfer to backup items. Then, we can test them in the same solution without switching tools, or even switching from one part of the tool to another part, because it is all in one place. We use the solution’s Backlog and Team Backlog capabilities. They make our DevOps processes easier through transparency and asset collaboration.
Srinivasa Neelapu - PeerSpot reviewer
Strategies and goals are aligned with demands and partners, making it a strategic approach for the enterprise but the finance part needs improvement
SPM is definitely strong for project management, but its finance capabilities are not as robust. While there is a separate Financial Management product, it would be beneficial to have more out-of-the-box support for finance integrations within SPM. I’m not suggesting replacing systems like SAP for finance, but there should be better support for financial integrations. Currently, connecting to SaaS solutions is complicated, and getting into detailed financial calculations is challenging. Forecasting is manageable, but handling actual financials is not as straightforward. The finance area needs improvement, specifically making finance application integrations easier. Generic finance capabilities should be more user-friendly and integrated into SPM. Although they have started this journey, it hasn’t been fully released yet. There seems to be a roadmap, and once complete, it will be very useful. Additionally, incorporating a Q&A feature for entire strategies or project demands and enhancing text analytics within SPM would be beneficial.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?
The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...
What do you like most about ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
We mainly use the solution to support operations and align our ITSM operations with our business goals. This involves coordinating between our application development, support teams, and network en...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
It's a bit costly currently. Efforts are being made to explore cost-benefit measures for investing in it.
What needs improvement with ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
There is always scope for improvement. As of now, making the product more cost-beneficial would help more organizations consider investing in it.
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane
IT Business Management, ServiceNow IT Business Management Suite, ServiceNow ITBM Suite, ServiceNow ITBM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
Proximus, UNT SYSTEM, SAP SuccessFactors
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText ALM Octane vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.