OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText UFT One comparison

The compared OpenText ALM / Quality Center and OpenText UFT One solutions aren't in the same category. OpenText ALM / Quality Center is ranked #5 in ALM , with an average rating of 8.2, and holds a 5.7% mindshare in the category. OpenText UFT One is ranked #2 in FT , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 9.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText ALM / Quality Center users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of OpenText UFT One users who would recommend it.

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Read 204 OpenText ALM / Quality Center reviews

7,554 Views
3,152 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Read 93 OpenText UFT One reviews

8,465 Views
5,308 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

OpenText UFT One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText ALM / Quality Center and OpenText UFT One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.8

OpenText ALM/Quality Center's support is inconsistent, with varied user experiences, prompting reliance on internal, third-party, or premier support.

No sentiment score available

OpenText customer service is praised for responsiveness, though experiences vary, with mixed satisfaction levels and reliance on partners for support.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report

Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score

4.8

OpenText ALM faces high costs, outdated UI, limited compatibility, cumbersome reporting, and integration issues, needing broader platform flexibility.

Sentiment score

5.5

OpenText UFT One needs better object identification, browser compatibility, AI, integration, and interface, with concerns on cost and stability.

Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.

Huong Vuong

Sap Fico Consultant at Avient Corporation

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report

Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.6

OpenText ALM/Quality Center supports large user bases and diverse projects efficiently, despite occasional license and performance issues.

Sentiment score

7.1

OpenText UFT One offers scalability and flexibility, though users note speed and browser issues; licensing affects usage costs.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report

The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available

OpenText ALM/Quality Center's high costs make it challenging for smaller companies, promoting a shift to cheaper or open-source options.

No sentiment score available

OpenText UFT One is praised for robust automation but criticized for high costs and complex licensing options.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report

It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.9

OpenText ALM/Quality Center is stable with occasional issues; patching and updates enhance performance and minimize downtime.

Sentiment score

8.1

OpenText UFT One's stability is generally reliable but varies with system requirements and can be affected by version changes.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Valuable Features

Sentiment score

8.0

OpenText ALM/Quality Center offers robust traceability, integration, and scalability for efficient project oversight, test management, and defect tracking.

Sentiment score

8.5

OpenText UFT One excels in cross-platform compatibility, versatile scripting, and efficient automation for desktop, web, and mobile testing.

It is beneficial for managing testing data and has integration with Excel.

Huong Vuong

Sap Fico Consultant at Avient Corporation

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report

The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Categories and Ranking

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

204

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (5th), Test Management Tools (1st)

OpenText UFT One

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (4th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Lifecycle Management solutions, they serve different purposes. OpenText ALM / Quality Center is designed for Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites and holds a mindshare of 5.7%, up 5.7% compared to last year.
OpenText UFT One, on the other hand, focuses on Functional Testing Tools, holds 9.5% mindshare, down 9.8% since last year.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Has an initial setup phase that is easy to manage

The tool has some limitations for the dashboard, especially when it comes to 20 or 25 of them, which is sometimes not enough, and one may have to use a custom Excel to help extend the dashboard. The tool needs improvements since it is an old technology. OpenText ALM / Quality Center's improved version is ALM Octane but it does not support some of the traditional parts of the original product. Some of the traditional parts are missing in a lot of areas of OpenText ALM / Quality Center. It is difficult to directly transfer OpenText ALM / Quality Center to ALM Octane. Some of the classic OEMs have limitations, especially when used in an IDE network. There is a need for the tool to check where changes in UI or UX need to be made. The technology used for UI and UX are not user-friendly.

Read full review

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

62%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The cost is a bit high and this could be improved as there are new players with better pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

Costing is an area that needs improvement. It is a bit on the higher side and can be managed better as there are new players with better pricing. Aside from this, there are no other challenges and ...

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

The solution should have additional features, but not much. It already has some sort of artificial intelligence that must be developed. It needs to be in trend. The solution needs better marketing,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 24% of the time

OpenText ALM Octane vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 22% of the time

Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

Eggplant Test vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

November 2024

Download OpenText ALM / Quality Center product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

November 2024

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM

Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)

Learn More

OpenText

Overview

OpenText ALM/Quality Center serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps you govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes.

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

October 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.