OpenText AppWorks vs OpenText ProVision comparison

OpenText AppWorks and OpenText ProVision are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText AppWorks is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.7, while OpenText ProVision is ranked #46. OpenText AppWorks holds a 0.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText ProVision’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText AppWorks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of OpenText ProVision users who would recommend it.

OpenText AppWorks

Read 10 OpenText AppWorks reviews

343 Views
217 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText ProVision

Read 3 OpenText ProVision reviews

223 Views
136 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

OpenText AppWorks

OpenText ProVision

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText ProVision and OpenText AppWorks compete in business modeling and application development respectively, with AppWorks holding an edge due to its comprehensive capabilities in app development and integration, offering more robust features and efficiencies.

Features: OpenText ProVision includes strategic planning, detailed business models, and process analysis tools. Its focus is on providing strategic insights into organizational structures. OpenText AppWorks offers low-code app development, advanced workflow automation, and facilitates quick adaptation to business changes. It's known for a broader set of functional features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ProVision provides flexible deployment and reliable support but may require specialized expertise due to complexity in setup. OpenText AppWorks has a straightforward deployment process aligning with agile methodologies and features strong customer service, making it more accessible and easier to handle in dynamic project environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText ProVision's initial costs can be significant because of its analytical depth, potentially delaying ROI. OpenText AppWorks may have higher initial costs compared to some other products, but its efficiencies in workflow automation and faster application delivery often result in quicker ROI, presenting a cost-effective choice over time.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText AppWorks vs. OpenText ProVision Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AppWorks vs. OpenText ProVision

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText AppWorks

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText ProVision

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

46th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText AppWorks is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ProVision is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks ( /products/opentext-appworks-reviews ) are the BPM ( /products/informatica-intelligent-data-management-cloud-idmc-reviews ) modules. There is the standard BPM ( /products/informatica-intelligent-data-management-cloud-idmc-reviews ) modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP ( /categories/erp ) system.

Read full review

reviewer1944672

Senior Director, Head of Process & Functional Architecture, Intelligent Automation at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration

I primarily use OpenText ProVision to create our end-to-end process repository and library for different parts of the organization, capturing the collaboration process to get the right inputs OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We really appreciate the process automation and how can you create human tasks as one of your processes."

"The monitoring aspect is highly valuable, as it offers an exceptional capability to track every minute of action performed by a business user in the global context."

"OpenText AppWorks has standard features such as system-to-system and human-to-human integrations, but what I find most valuable in the solution is its monitoring feature that tells you more about your processes, how to restart and how to stop each process, etc."

"From a business perspective, the most valuable aspect lies in the optimization of processes."

"Its customer support is reliable and easy to approach."

"The good part of OpenText AppWorks is that all of its components are together in one platform, including integration capability, UI capability, and workflow capability."

"One of the most useful features is the code is customizable, we can make it our own."

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

More OpenText AppWorks pros

"All the features come as part of a standard license."

"The stability of the product is very good."

"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."

Cons

"The crucial missing element is the archival function."

"AppWorks could be improved by including BPM simulation."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

"From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model."

"OpenText needs improvements in its integration model to align with newer integration types."

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"There could be some improvements with the low code design part. It could be more customizable and more user friendly."

"OpenText AppWork's low-code capabilities can be enhanced by integrating them with AI offerings like Aviator."

More OpenText AppWorks cons

"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."

"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."

"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

"The price is on the higher side."

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Retailer

Energy/Utilities Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText AppWorks?

We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenTex...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 21% of the time

Appian vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 19% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 16% of the time

OutSystems vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 12% of the time

More OpenText AppWorks Competitors

Visio vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 100% of the time

More OpenText ProVision Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AppWorks

April 2025

Download OpenText AppWorks product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download OpenText ProVision product report

Also Known As

No data available

Metastorm ProVision

Overview

OpenText Appworks. AppWorks is OpenText's Enterprise Application Development and Management platform. It allows you to quickly and easily build purpose-specific apps for the enterprise using the web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript. These apps can connect to the OpenText EIM Suite using RESTful API.

OpenText

OpenTextâs MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes

OpenText

Sample Customers

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AppWorks vs. OpenText ProVision

April 2025

Free Report: OpenText AppWorks vs. OpenText ProVision

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText AppWorks vs. OpenText ProVision and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText AppWorks vs. OpenText ProVision report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.