Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery vs Trellix Endpoint Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
eDiscovery (6th)
Trellix Endpoint Security
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (11th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and Trellix Endpoint Security aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is designed for eDiscovery and holds a mindshare of 3.6%, down 8.4% compared to last year.
Trellix Endpoint Security, on the other hand, focuses on Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP), holds 3.5% mindshare, down 3.7% since last year.
eDiscovery
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Alejandro Stromer - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 4, 2024
A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup
We have experience in engineering and capital projects. It is an add-on to extend project and asset management documentation The solution offers a full tech search and a unique user experience. Also, it is extended within traditional artificial intelligence. The solution could improve…
AhmedEl-Tayeb - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 23, 2022
Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services
Some of our products have a first and second line owned by us. We are giving support services to the customers instead of the vendor. Some other products are supported directly by the technology vendor, however. Technical support from the vendor is very bad. Usually, when the customer submits a ticket, they put a severity level on the case. Whenever the case is very important, and there is a real malfunction in the product on the customer side, and there is something down that needs someone to have a look immediately, it takes more time than it should to even engage with the customer. When someone has to contact the customer and have a remote session within the customer environment, they sometimes lack in terms of communication with the customer. The support centers are located in the East and not all have an acceptable level of English in order to communicate directly with the customer.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts."
"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc."
"The solution is very stable."
"It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines."
"The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use."
"Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis."
"The technical support is excellent."
"The DLP and user interface are the most valuable feature."
"The solution is reliable."
"This product has the capability to check a wide range of vulnerabilities and devices."
"It has been protecting us for many years, and we hope it will continue to do so for many years to come."
"McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection is stable. We don't have any bugs being reported."
"What I like best is the integrated end-to-end security that works with the security information and events manager."
"The primary reason the solution is good is because of its ease-of-use."
"Some of McAfee Endpoint Security's main features are it has benefits over normal conventional antivirus solutions because it works much faster."
 

Cons

"There were minor UI bugs."
"I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function."
"Ease of use and learning curve need improvement."
"In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow."
"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better."
"​Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process.​"
"We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email."
"We experienced some bad behavior when we first installed the product. The system also starts slowly in some instances. If for some reason this solution crashes, we could lose all our data."
"I think it would be nice if Dynamic Application Control would come together with McAfee Endpoint Security."
"The solution needs to improve its virtual patching capabilities. One area where it could improve is by offering a patch management solution bundled with its security products. This would make it even more competitive against solutions like Kaspersky that offer this feature."
"They can make it free, but that's not going to happen."
"I've encountered minor challenges related to encryption."
"I would like this solution to do what Palo Alto traps does because I would only need to run this one product."
"The initial setup is complex. It is a very complex product. You must have experience with it."
"Users can just install software into their computers. We need some sort of application control system that, if there are any pieces of software that are not whitelisted, then the solution could flag it or maybe alert the administers. That would be very helpful."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
"​The product is affordable and user-friendly.​"
"We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
"EnCase is an affordable solution."
"McAfee's prices are flexible and can be quite competitive, although there are other solutions that are even more so."
"Trellix Endpoint Security is neither a cheap nor an expensive solution."
"The price of this product is good."
"When comparing the solution to others it is a bit expensive. We are on a monthly license."
"Pricing is fair."
"Pricing is reasonable and runs at a cost per user per year."
"I would rate the cost as four to five, considering it's normal compared to other products. I find it nominal and worth the money."
"Trellix Endpoint Security is an inexpensive platform."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Government
9%
Educational Organization
40%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText EnCase eDiscovery?
I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
What is your primary use case for OpenText EnCase eDiscovery?
We have experience in engineering and capital projects. It is an add-on to extend project and asset management documentation.
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?
The solution is not an expensive tool. Compared to other options, it's mostly average-priced. I've deployed it for customers ranging from 100 nodes to over 5,000 nodes. Its renewal prices are very ...
 

Also Known As

EnCase eDiscovery
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Total Protection for Endpoint, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, MCAFEE Complete Endpoint Protection
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ontario Ministry of Government, Aerospace Company, Chesterfield Police Department
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText EnCase eDiscovery vs. Trellix Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.