Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Trading Grid vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Trading Grid
Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (32nd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (19th)
SAP Process Orchestration
Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of OpenText Trading Grid is 4.7%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Process Orchestration is 10.7%, down from 16.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business-to-Business Middleware
 

Featured Reviews

VARUNKUMAR - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 19, 2022
Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines
The good thing about OpenText is that we have the mapping specification guideline available, which is not there in a solution like SEEBURGER. Whenever you want to take a decision to move away from OpenText, you have already documented your mapping and what your mapping looks like. So you go to the next provider, provide them with that mapping specification, and it'll be very easy for them to develop a new map instead of just taking the data - input data, output data - and then looking for how the data is getting transformed. So you have the mapping spec level which is a very good feature of OpenText, which we do not have in SEEBURGER. It's very hard to move from SEEBURGER. The solution is easy to implement. It's stable and reliable. They are the industry leaders in the integration space.
Laxman  Molugu - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 15, 2024
Enhances operational efficiency with valuable prepackaged content and cost-effective pricing
SAP Process Orchestration is used as a middleware for B2B and AI integrations. It serves as a standard middleware for SAP projects, facilitating data exchange between external partners or internal systems.  It is particularly beneficial in the defense industry for orchestrating logistics…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is easy to implement."
"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."
"The main benefit is that the solution is low maintenance. Moreover, it's the license cost is very low because it's part of the package. The maintenance is standard maintenance. And the updates are regular. So there's a regular update and you can choose whether you want to do those updates or not."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."
"With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."
"t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution."
"The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems."
"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are its system monitoring and alerts."
 

Cons

"Technical support needs to be better."
"It is not a scalable solution for the cloud. I would not recommend this for the cloud."
"Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information."
"I think the main area that SAP PO should improve on is offering pre-delivered content like they do when you use SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI). SAP should not forget that they still have a lot of customers using Process Orchestration and they should focus more on providing pre-delivered content in SAP PO."
"The solution could improve by making it more user-friendly by limiting the code required. We have to add some code in some cases where we need complex logic or some other functions. If this was able to be done in a more simplified manner then it would save a lot of effort and time."
"It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way."
"Some configurations can be a little tricky."
"It would be beneficial to enhance the ease of implementing new projects and improve overall stability in our implementations."
"The product roadmap suggests it will approach the end of support in several years, and a lot of innovations are now implemented by SAP not in SAP PO, but in SAP Integration Suite, hence, the platform is stable, but doesn't receive a lot of new features in recent updates."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market."
"Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing...I rate the tool price a five out of ten."
"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."
"We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable."
"It's not an expensive solution."
"Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."
"The pricing for this solution is fine."
"The pricing depends on what type of client you are with SAP and the contract you have. There is a licensing cost that needs to be paid."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Retailer
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?
It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?
The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges associated with the prod...
What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?
Some configurations can be a little tricky. The consulting team had to spend a long time checking SAP's community forums and documentation to achieve some goals. The tool could release some new fun...
 

Also Known As

Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin
Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Salesforce, Informatica and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.