OpenText Trading Grid vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

OpenText and SAP are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. OpenText is ranked #12, while SAP is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5. OpenText holds a 4.7% mindshare in BBM, compared to SAP’s 10.7% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of SAP users who would recommend it.

OpenText Trading Grid

Read 1 OpenText Trading Grid review

515 Views
380 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 31 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

3,302 Views
1,383 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenText Trading Grid

SAP Process Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Trading Grid and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Salesforce, Informatica and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.

To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Trading Grid

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (32nd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (19th)

SAP Process Orchestration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of OpenText Trading Grid is 4.7%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Process Orchestration is 10.7%, down from 16.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

VARUNKUMAR

Mgr Value Chain Integration/EDI at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines

The good thing about OpenText is that we have the mapping specification guideline available, which is not there in a solution like SEEBURGER. Whenever you want to take a decision to move away from OpenText, you have already documented your mapping and what your mapping looks like. So you go to the next provider, provide them with that mapping specification, and it'll be very easy for them to develop a new map instead of just taking the data - input data, output data - and then looking for how the data is getting transformed. So you have the mapping spec level which is a very good feature of OpenText, which we do not have in SEEBURGER. It's very hard to move from SEEBURGER. The solution is easy to implement. It's stable and reliable. They are the industry leaders in the integration space.

Read full review

Laxman Molugu

Chief Executive Officer at Saanvi systems inc

Enhances operational efficiency with valuable prepackaged content and cost-effective pricing

For organizations that operate within an SAP ecosystem, SAP Process Orchestration is recommended due to its cost-effectiveness and the availability of valuable prepackaged content. It is important to consider the needs of your industry, as SAP Process Orchestration may not meet all requirements in consumer-oriented sectors. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to implement."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"I think it is a very stable tool. My company did not have any problem with the tool."

"The main benefit is that the solution is low maintenance. Moreover, it's the license cost is very low because it's part of the package. The maintenance is standard maintenance. And the updates are regular. So there's a regular update and you can choose whether you want to do those updates or not."

"The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems."

"It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs."

"The solution is stable."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

Cons

"Technical support needs to be better."

"In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them."

"The solution is not very scalable because it is at the end of its life."

"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users."

"I think the main area that SAP PO should improve on is offering pre-delivered content like they do when you use SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI). SAP should not forget that they still have a lot of customers using Process Orchestration and they should focus more on providing pre-delivered content in SAP PO."

"I think the big improvement required in the tool stems from the fact that the whole issue around it is that we have some downtime failures during upgrades and patching."

"The cloud capability features need improvement."

"I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."

"We encounter challenges while connecting to MQTT and MQDD adapters."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."

"Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing...I rate the tool price a five out of ten."

"It's not an expensive solution."

"The pricing for this solution is fine."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part."

"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."

"Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

SAP Process Orchestration is considered to be cheaper than other middleware solutions up to a certain volume level. It is notably less expensive than alternatives like MuleSoft.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

SAP should improve the user interface, as it often lacks modern features and aesthetic appeal. Additionally, there are other areas in need of enhancement, including monitoring features and end-to-e...

See all answers

Comparisons

SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 26% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 24% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 21% of the time

TrueCommerce EDI vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 14% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Trading Grid Competitors

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 17% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 16% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 9% of the time

IBM App Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

November 2024

Download OpenText Trading Grid product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

October 2024

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Also Known As

Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Learn More

OpenText

SAP

Overview

OpenText Trading Grid (formerly GXS) is a unique global integration platform that enables and streamlines cross enterprise business processes. With extreme flexibility and a service-oriented, business-to-business e-commerce platform, the Grid helps companies automate global trading communities by shielding complexity from rapidly changing standards, eliminating manual and duplicative efforts and enabling a new level of process integration and business intelligence.

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

Sample Customers

Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

November 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Salesforce, Informatica and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.