Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Qualibrate comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.0
Panaya Test Dynamix improved test efficiency, reduced manual efforts, and provided measurable benefits in productivity, cost-effectiveness, and resource allocation.
Sentiment score
8.1
Users saved time, reduced defects, expedited market entry, and anticipated positive ROI with successful automation implementation.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.7
Users praise Panaya Test Dynamix customer service for prompt, knowledgeable, and efficient support with effective communication and problem-solving skills.
Sentiment score
7.4
Qualibrate offers reliable support with quick responses, but some users note delays in acknowledging support requests.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Panaya Test Dynamix is praised for scalability, efficient test case management, integration, reliability, and performance under large workloads.
Sentiment score
7.3
Qualibrate efficiently supports scalable automated testing and increased workflow demands, accommodating diverse projects with plans for expansion.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Panaya Test Dynamix stands out for its stability, reliability, and efficient performance, excelling under heavy workflows and various conditions.
Sentiment score
8.0
Qualibrate is seen as generally reliable, with stability improvements and prompt support communication, but potential for further enhancement remains.
 

Room For Improvement

Panaya Test Dynamix requires better customization, clearer error messages, improved performance, enhanced integration, easier navigation, and more comprehensive training resources.
Qualibrate's reporting and integration need improvements, with users seeking better support, test designing, scheduling, and automated alerts.
 

Setup Cost

Panaya Test Dynamix offers competitive, scalable, and cost-effective pricing with customizable packages to meet diverse organizational testing needs.
Qualibrate provides cost-effective, flexible licensing, appealing to enterprises for its integration with SAP Solution Manager and competitive pricing.
 

Valuable Features

Users praise Panaya Test Dynamix for its automation, detailed reporting, ease of use, seamless integration, and efficient defect management.
Qualibrate simplifies test automation with a low-code interface, seamless SAP integration, and efficient process documentation and playback.
 

Categories and Ranking

Panaya Test Dynamix
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
27th
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
13th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Defect Tracking (6th), Test Management Tools (20th)
Qualibrate
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
38th
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
22nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (39th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualibrate is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Alain Vanhaeght - PeerSpot reviewer
More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options
For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.
FD
Reduces our testing time significantly, enabling us to release more frequently
The most valuable feature is the way it works, the usability. From the first setup, the user interface is the most beautiful. It's very nice the way you can recover things and make it work. We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate. Because everything we do is in SAP Solution Manager, we are now able to do test automatization, combined with Qualibrate. All the defects are available in SAP Solution Manager and all the changes will be in Qualibrate, immediately. From Qualibrate, we see whether tests are good or not. We can create a test-related incident in Solution Manager for those that are not good, and Test Suite in Solution Manager will notify the person who has to rebuild it. That works very nicely.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
22%
Computer Software Company
16%
Retailer
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo
AirFrance KLM, Provincie Noord Holland, Ministerie van Defensie, Nouryon, Bell Helicopter, Textron,
Find out what your peers are saying about Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Qualibrate and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.