Parasoft Development Testing Platform vs Qt Squish comparison

The compared Parasoft and Qt Group solutions aren't in the same category. Parasoft is ranked #15 in ALM , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 0.3% mindshare in the category. Qt Group is ranked #12 in TAt , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qt Group users who would recommend it.

Parasoft Development Testin...

Read 4 Parasoft Development Testing Platform reviews

196 Views
146 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Read 18 Qt Squish reviews

2,782 Views
1,443 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Parasoft Development Testin...

Qt Squish

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and Qt Squish based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: September 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

September 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 801,394 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft Development Testin...

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (15th), Application Requirements Management (9th), Test Management Tools (19th)

Qt Squish

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is designed for Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites and holds a mindshare of 0.3%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
Qt Squish, on the other hand, focuses on Test Automation Tools, holds 2.8% mindshare, up 2.5% since last year.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Edmund Suarez

Sr. Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

May 25, 2023

Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable

We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests Our customers require that we perform static analysis and have no critical high errors. We must also have 100 percent code coverage for my test to verify that everything is good and…

Read full review

AnirbanSarkar

Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Aug 21, 2023

Seamless functionality, plug-and-play installation, and highly reliable

There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package. The froglogic Squish solution is only handling GUI regression testing, this is its forte. However, a lot of clients are looking into performance testing associated with it. If a performance testing capability can be added as a part of it, this would bring great value. froglogic Squish has a code coverage solution and they have done a pretty good job on it. The penetration testing could be added as a separate module, this would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."

"The most valuable feature is code coverage."

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

Cons

"The solution's speed has room for improvement."

"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"The price could be better."

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Costly."

"The platform is highly-priced."

"It is expensive."

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

18%

Healthcare Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Parasoft Development Testing Platform?

The most valuable feature is code coverage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft Development Testing Platform?

The solution's speed has room for improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft Development Testing Platform?

We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

The platform is highly-priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

My primary use case for this solution is for automatic software testing. Specifically, I use it to test software's user interfaces using a test tool that automates these tests.

See all answers

Comparisons

Codebeamer vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform

Compared 59% of the time

Jira vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform

Compared 41% of the time

More Parasoft Development Testing Platform Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 20% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 19% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 15% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish

Compared 6% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

September 2024

Parasoft Development Testing Platform report

Download Parasoft Development Testing Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

August 2024

Download Qt Squish product report

Also Known As

Parasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP

froglogic Squish

Learn More

Parasoft

Qt Group

Overview

Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t. Includes:

- Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards

- Preconfigured compliance reporting

- Customized Advanced Analytics

- Interactive Navigation of Results

- Traceability

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Sample Customers

General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Qualcomm, AAI Textron, Boeing, Fidelity, Johnson & Johnson, CIBC, Penske, Thales, Dell,

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

September 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: September 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.