Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Planisware vs ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.9
Planisware provides polite service driven by expert consultants, though support and responsiveness vary by expertise and package.
Sentiment score
7.8
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management support is praised for effectiveness, though some users desire faster response times and personalized assistance.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.8
Planisware needs better stability, user experience, integration, reporting, cost reduction, training, and adaptability beyond scaled agile frameworks.
Sentiment score
5.0
ServiceNow's Strategic Portfolio Management needs better usability, integration, reporting, and support, with room for enhanced automation and Agile features.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Planisware scales well on Linux but has variable performance in SaaS environments; customization is easier on-premises.
Sentiment score
7.6
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is scalable, customizable, and ideal for large enterprises, despite occasional hosting performance issues.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Planisware has high costs with variable pricing, extra charges for environments, support, and certifications, particularly for large enterprises.
No sentiment score available
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is pricey and complex, often benefiting larger enterprises more than medium-sized companies.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.4
Planisware is generally stable, especially with Linux and SaaS, though on-premises installations may face server-related challenges.
Sentiment score
7.7
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is highly stable, with responsive support despite occasional slow performance during large tasks or customizations.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.7
Planisware offers robust project management, reporting, and integration, enhancing communication and centralizing data for complex organizational needs.
Sentiment score
8.2
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management offers user-friendly, integrated project management with Agile features and comprehensive demand, resource, and analytics tools.
 

Categories and Ranking

Planisware
Ranking in Project Portfolio Management
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ServiceNow Strategic Portfo...
Ranking in Project Portfolio Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Planisware is 8.7%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is 13.2%, up from 12.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Portfolio Management
 

Featured Reviews

John Andrew Kossey - PeerSpot reviewer
A comprehensive project and portfolio management with robust scalability and dedicated long-tenured support team
Its benefits extend to the centralization and control of projects, particularly in terms of maintaining consistency in defining tasks, projects, cost accounts, and other essential elements. This level of standardization is crucial for efficiency and clarity, especially in large organizations managing diverse projects with varying timelines and complexities. The software's strength lies in its adept handling of categorization, allowing users to tailor how projects are categorized based on their specific organizational needs. Moreover, it facilitates the creation of activity types and simplifies the development of project templates. These templates serve as master projects, enabling users to swiftly replicate and customize projects by leveraging pre-defined structures. The significance lies in the ability to replicate successful approaches consistently. When a company discovers an effective method, it can be seamlessly incorporated into Planisware. The result is a standardized language that remains consistent across various projects.
Srinivasa Neelapu - PeerSpot reviewer
Strategies and goals are aligned with demands and partners, making it a strategic approach for the enterprise but the finance part needs improvement
SPM is definitely strong for project management, but its finance capabilities are not as robust. While there is a separate Financial Management product, it would be beneficial to have more out-of-the-box support for finance integrations within SPM. I’m not suggesting replacing systems like SAP for finance, but there should be better support for financial integrations. Currently, connecting to SaaS solutions is complicated, and getting into detailed financial calculations is challenging. Forecasting is manageable, but handling actual financials is not as straightforward. The finance area needs improvement, specifically making finance application integrations easier. Generic finance capabilities should be more user-friendly and integrated into SPM. Although they have started this journey, it hasn’t been fully released yet. There seems to be a roadmap, and once complete, it will be very useful. Additionally, incorporating a Q&A feature for entire strategies or project demands and enhancing text analytics within SPM would be beneficial.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planisware?
I don't have any specific details, however, it might be expensive.
What needs improvement with Planisware?
I haven't had the time to work with any other TPM tools, so I can't compare it to other tools just yet.
What is your primary use case for Planisware?
We actually use it for project planning and estimating the cost for the projects, in resource management, and as a timecard application. Users can log their time using the timesheet.
What do you like most about ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
We mainly use the solution to support operations and align our ITSM operations with our business goals. This involves coordinating between our application development, support teams, and network en...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
The pricing is average. They always have some extra options to add. I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
What needs improvement with ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
If we have enough information, we can address issues from the cloud to the top level of the organization. This allows us to see if our resources are being allocated properly from an executive persp...
 

Also Known As

No data available
IT Business Management, ServiceNow IT Business Management Suite, ServiceNow ITBM Suite, ServiceNow ITBM
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Apotex, Alstom Transport, HP, Stryker, Rexam, Jotun, Gelita, Kraton Performance Polymers, Abbvie, Rio Tinto Alcan, Maruho, Teva, SK Chemicals
Proximus, UNT SYSTEM, SAP SuccessFactors
Find out what your peers are saying about Planisware vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.