ReadyAPI Test vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

SmartBear and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.3, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8. SmartBear holds a 0.5% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 18.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

ReadyAPI Test

Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews

640 Views
530 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 107 Tricentis Tosca reviews

17,040 Views
8,936 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Test

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Tricentis Tosca and ReadyAPI Test compete in the automated testing category. Tricentis Tosca seems to have the upper hand due to its versatility across different testing types and higher perceived ROI.

Features: Tricentis Tosca is known for its extensive automation capabilities, easy integration with various applications, and support for multiple testing types. ReadyAPI Test offers comprehensive API testing features, robust reporting tools, and intuitive test creation processes.

Room For Improvement: Tricentis Tosca users often highlight performance issues, a steep learning curve, and occasional complexity in initial setups. ReadyAPI Test users wish for better support for more diverse environments, smoother integration processes, and quicker response times from customer service.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca's deployment model is seen as straightforward, but some users mention occasional complexity in initial setups. Customer service is generally rated as responsive and helpful. ReadyAPI Test has relatively smooth deployment but receives mixed reviews for customer service due to slower response times.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca is perceived as expensive but delivers significant ROI due to its extensive automation features. ReadyAPI Test is considered more affordable, yet users feel the ROI is lower compared to Tricentis Tosca.

To learn more, read our detailed ReadyAPI Test vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test vs. Tricentis Tosca

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

ReadyAPI Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

12th

Ranking in API Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

1st

Ranking in API Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

107

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of ReadyAPI Test is 0.5%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 18.5%, up from 14.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Faiz Ahmed

Test Automation Specialist / Lead at Tata Consultancy Services

Oct 24, 2022

You can achieve any complex task with this tool

There aren't any plugins for UI automation. You need to make a custom code and download a job to put into the libraries. If it were panelized, then it would be straightforward. It should be in a panel of the tools, so you can add those tools as your test step in your test cases. For example, it would be nice to have a Selenium plugin available from the menu, where I can select "open browser" and provide the URL. That URL would be immediately open in the browser. This is like a keyword, and then the Selenium plugin should be there.

Read full review

Antonio Oteri

Supplier in ATOS for TIM Brasil at TIM

Sep 3, 2024

Ability to automate tests across various platforms and simplifies test creation

From what I've seen with my colleagues who make the software selection, the prices for this software in Brazil are too expensive to be applied to anything but huge customers. I'm surprised because I was in charge of planning and control at the company before, when there was a manager there. Normally, the company has structural licenses that are based on the company they are selling to. I see that these companies cannot spend this money on Tricentis. I think Tosca is losing this type of market. They should have a different license policy for medium and small companies. The same happened in the past with SAP, which changed its policy and also made licenses for low.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers excellent integration capabilities."

"The tool’s scalability is very good."

"It clearly makes it easy to test APIs based on the SOAP protocol. We are a logistics company, and we have lots of tracking calls coming in. We provide APIs for tracking services, and it makes sense for us to use SoapUI to test them thoroughly."

"The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"The solution has some good scanning features."

"One good feature is SoapUI's URL check, which allows you to check among the applications. I'm not just talking about the ones for Android. It has all kinds of multi-world tests that are really helpful."

"The out-of-the-box support for the database is a valuable feature."

Cons

"Could integrate the graphing module for load testing."

"SoapUI Pro could improve by having dashboards."

"Occasionally, when you are saving, the solution can hang."

"The UI should be improved."

"I would like more documentation, training, tutorials, etc. Also, I don't particularly appreciate that I have to save everything. It takes up a lot of space on my laptop, but I have to install the WSDL again If I don't save it."

"SoapUI would benefit from some more customization abilities. It's a good interface, but it would be nice if they added the ability to build custom dashboards where the user can do their own bar graphs and pie charts."

"ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution."

"Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is not that bad."

"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."

"ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten."

"The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."

"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."

"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."

"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."

More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is on the higher side."

"There are two licenses: single user and multiple user. A multiple-user license means that several people can work together on one project and collaborate on code stored in a central location. A single-user license is for people working alone on a one particular application. It's much cheaper than a multi-user workspace. If you are getting a large volume of licenses for an enterprise, you can probably negotiate a discount, but I'm not sure about that."

"Although the product is slightly more expensive than tools, its automation capabilities and reduced scripting needs justify the cost."

"They are probably more expensive than other comparable tools, but you also get the full suite of testing tools."

"The licensing cost for Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It has multiple features, but to use all of its features, you have to pay for additional licenses."

"I would like to see better costing packs. There are several features but USD $11,000 for one license is expensive."

"It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools."

"The tool's pricing is lower than that of other automation tools."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

14%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SoapUI Pro?

The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SoapUI Pro?

ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SoapUI Pro?

ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would b...

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 81% of the time

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 11% of the time

ReadyAPI vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 4% of the time

Apigee vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 2% of the time

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 2% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test

October 2024

Download ReadyAPI Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

October 2024

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

SoapUI NG Pro

No data available

Learn More

SmartBear

Tricentis

Overview

For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.

Tricentis Tosca is primarily leveraged for test automation across web, SAP, API, and mainframe applications, offering robust support for both regression and functional testing.

Tricentis Tosca's test automation capabilities extend to front-end and back-end testing, including processes like RPA and UI-based regression tests on Microsoft Windows. It supports Agile environments with multiple applications, enabling Salesforce automation, API endpoints, and end-to-end automation workflows. Tosca caters to diverse testing needs, integrating well with tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, although upgrades and customizations present challenges. Licensing costs and performance issues during loading and scanning are concerns, along with substantial learning curves for new users. Enhanced AI features and better reporting are on users' wishlist.

What are the key features of Tricentis Tosca?

Tosca BI: Ensures data integrity and accuracy in business intelligence testing
Tosca Commander: Centralized control for easy test management and maintenance
Model-Based Test Automation: Facilitates test creation without scripting
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with Jenkins and Bamboo for CI/CD
Diverse Application Support: Compatible with mobile, web, APIs, and SAP
Scriptless Nature: Simplifies usage and reduces maintenance efforts

What benefits should users consider?

Enhanced Automation: Streamlines testing processes, saving time and resources
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands within an organization
Test Management: Centralized control enhances efficiency and oversight
Ease of Use: Scriptless approach lowers the barrier to entry for users

Tricentis Tosca is implemented across various industries, serving sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail with test automation solutions to ensure application quality and reliability. Agile teams in these industries benefit from its multi-application support and ability to manage complex end-to-end testing workflows. The tool's integration capabilities are particularly useful in environments that rely on CI/CD pipelines, ensuring continuous testing and quick feedback loops.

Sample Customers

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test vs. Tricentis Tosca

October 2024

Free Report: ReadyAPI Test vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about ReadyAPI Test vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ReadyAPI Test vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best API Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.