Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Reviews

We use EDR on our Windows servers, desktops and laptops. Our use case is for security, file scanning and to prevent data loss.

The firewall options are impressive, the solution does a good job of filtering and blocking unusual traffic. It's very easy to use, easy to deploy, and easy to operate. 

No product is perfect and I think the stability could be improved a little. I'd also like to see performance improvement as the system can be heavy, slowing down our computers, and things don't always work smoothly. Performance could be improved. 

We've had a license with Kaspersky for six years. 

The solution is stable. 

The solution is scalable. We have around 700 users in the company. 

EDR is deployed from the server, it's an easy and manageable process. It's a matter of the system administrator running the profile from the server.

We have a three-year license. It was initially very reasonably priced but we are based in Pakistan and we are not doing well against the dollar so the price has increased significantly. 

I've recommended this solution to many colleagues. I think Kaspersky is a reliable and stable solution.

I rate this solution nine out of 10. 

We use the solution to monitor 200-300 equipment. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers centralized monitoring where we can monitor everything from a single point. I also like its security and network traffic features. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert needs to include a traffic interface. 

I have been working with the solution for eight years. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is very stable. 

My company has 200 users for the product. I rate its scalability an eight out of ten. 

The tool's customer support is good. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert's installation was easy. 

I rate the product a ten out of ten. 

We use the solution for the new threat landscape since personal endpoints are not enough for protection. So customers are looking for, you know, endpoint detection and response. So they can centrally manage all endpoints and communicate data across every endpoint that they have on the network. So we have been using, like, the normal endpoint detection, endpoint protection. And after that, we deployed EDR and Azure for a few customers, which are kind of separate products. Actually, the experience was not that great in terms of the approach to EDR for Kaspersky because it wasn't one product. It's two different products that are working together. They kind of integrated, like, two products integrating with each other. But the performance and the administration become a headache for the administrators.

In terms of the protection itself, Kaspersky has been doing a great job. It's just the approach, the technology itself, performance, and impact on the systems it's protecting, that are more of a concern. The concern is significant, especially when compared to alternatives that are more lightweight and available on a cloud platform. So, the aforementioned areas should be considered for improvement.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert for two years. My company is a reseller of Kaspersky. We have been working with Kaspersky for almost ten years now.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution. I recommend the solution for small to medium businesses since its deployment and management are complex and bigger enterprises could go for cloud-based or move towards the next-gen solutions rather than Kaspersky.

I am not happy with Kaspersky's support since basic support is very cool unless you pay for some advanced support, in which you get better responses and feedback from Kaspersky's team. In my opinion, right from the start, they should offer good support.

The solution's initial setup process was complex when considering that it's just to get in the integration right from the start .So, there have been some issues where we had to contact Kaspersky and have the engineers work it out for us. So, it could have been a much simpler way to do it. The deployment process took two weeks with the help of three to four engineers who normally handle such stuff.

Kaspersky helped us with the implementation part.

Kaspersky's pricing is very competitive when it comes to comparison with the other solutions.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for security. We use it between businesses to protect endpoints.

The solution is very fast.

The EDR is quite helpful.

It is stable. The performance is good.

Overall, it works very well.

It's good for blocking threats.

Technical support is excellent.

It is scalable. 

The pricing is decent.

When I have the protection of my terminal or device, I don't have a problem. I haven't had any issues.

We'd like more integrations to be available in the future.

We've been using the solution for two months. 

The stability and performance are very good. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. It is very stable. 

The solution is quite stable. We have the advanced version, and there is a possibility to upgrade as necessary.

We have close to 100 people using the solution. We do not have plans to increase usage. We are a small enterprise. We'd only increase the usage if the number of resources increases.

We have used technical support. They are very reactive and experienced. 

We did use any other EDR solutions. We also have experience with Norton, for example. The experience was not positive.  

My understanding is that the solution is easy to set up. However, I did not participate in the setup. 

It took two days to deploy the solution. 

In terms of planning, we are looking to fully deploy it in the next two months.

We have about ten technical people that can handle deployment and maintenance tasks. We had two main people managing it, and others handled the systems and network. 

We did not need a consultant. We had an integrator handling the setup, and it was easy to deploy it. Typically, it can be handled by a technical team. 

We have a license that covers 100 people. We have a license that we pay yearly. We generally pay for two years at a time. 

The licenses are affordable. 

I'm an end-user. The solution is new to me. I'm not sure of the version number we are using.

I'd recommend the solution to others. We plan to integrate it with more things and help control more devices. We'll integrate it with our network assessment devices as well.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. 

We are using it to protect our user end. For the server-side, we are using Trend Micro.

It is easy to manage. 

The initial setup is simple. 

It is stable. 

We have local support available to us.

I could be covering more devices, for example, the XDR. If it covered more products, it would improve the XDR.

I've been using the solution for three to four years. 

It is stable and reliable. 

We are not facing any major issues regarding the protection of the endpoints. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

Around 2,000 people use the solution. We do not plan to increase usage.

We have a local company here in Pakistan that we get support from.

We also use Trend Micro.

The initial implementation process is easy and very straightforward. It's not overly complex. It only takes one to two days to handle the complete deployment.

I'm not sure about how the licensing works. It may be per user. I'm not certain. 

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. I don't have that information. 

I'm not directly using this Kaspersky solution. The other team is managing the solution, and that's why I don't have much personal experience. I do not manage it directly.

I'd recommend the solution to other users and companies. 

I'd rate the product seven out of ten.

We use the solution to create a test scenario for detecting a potential threat in the network.

The solution's cybersecurity policies help us protect some extensions of the primary documents in case of a ransomware attack. Also, in case endpoint servers get compromised, it protects them. Thus, we can manage exclusive and essential extensions for systems using it.

The solution's most valuable feature is machine learning. It monitors the traffic and events to detect suspicious activity.

They should include XDR features in the solution. It would help us collect data metrics from different endpoints. Thus, we could identify the origin of the ransomware or malware attacks within the network. Also, they should include sandboxing features.

We have been using the solution for three years.

I rate the solution's stability an eight.

The solution's deployment process involves configuring the network and changing the active directory. The most challenging part here is opening specific ports and blocking or allowing certain services through firewall settings.

The solution's cost is reasonable compared to other vendors.

I suggest a cost versus-benefit analysis to others while looking for EDR and XDR solutions. Considering the advantages of Kaspersky, it offers patch and vulnerability management. It takes time to deploy initially. But once you deploy it correctly, you will get a lot of features. I rate it as an eight.

We are using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for protecting our clients and our systems from digital threats. For example, our operating systems.

The most valuable features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response are the threat detection technologies, and activity monitoring and support tools. Additionally, the port and USB security, and antivirus are effective.

The installation process could be more streamlined.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for approximately four years.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is stable.

The solution is scalable. We are able to upgrade modules and we have not had any problems.

The initial setup of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is simple but the time of installation could be quicker. We set up our Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response server and our clients installed it on their end.

We have been satisfied with the license of the solution.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response a nine out of ten.

We are Kaspersky partners and I'm an endpoint specialist. 

The major features I really like are behavior detection and the firmware scanner. The solution also has great threat prevention. Machine learning is also very good as is the real-time protection. The best thing is you can also get a vulnerability report. There are a couple of other features EDR has that are not available in other solutions and that includes the system-level device for controlling the UI which enables control of applications at the location level. There is also the IoC scanner that Symantec doesn't have. Finally, the threat intelligence portal gives me global visibility into threats and their interconnections which is great. 

The one thing Symantec has that EDR lacks is device control. I think Kaspersky has to increase its features when it comes to antivirus control. I'd like to see an increase in the 30-day retention period. 

I've been using this particular solution for 3 years but have used other Kaspersky solutions for over 15 years. 

The solution is stable. 

The scalability is good. Scaling is a matter of creating a new server and replicating all the data. It's not a big issue to do the migration or to upgrade hardware. We currently have around 20,000 users with that number increasing every day. 

The technical support is really bad. They have three models of support and if you have the regular level of support, it can take days to get a response. It forces you to pay extra to get premium support, and then you hear from them within two hours. 

The initial setup is straightforward. If you're deploying for customers then the deployment time will depend on the size of the organization and the level of preparation that has been done in advance. If you have 10,000 users, deployment will take about a day if everything is ready.  

Licensing costs are very reasonable. This is not an expensive solution. 

There are some features lacking in this solution and if I compare it with CrowdStrike or Microsoft, they are both better solutions than Kaspersky. I rate this solution eight out of 10.