Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Reviews

I'm the head of our IT department. 

I like that Kaspersky provides us with web and DNS protection over https.

Everything is automatic on Kaspersky but it would be great if they could add a feature for examining suspicious files. I'd like the solution to offer additional protection. 

I've been using this solution for one year. 

The solution is stable, we haven't had any problems. 

In our organization, each department has its own antivirus so scalability is not relevant to us. We only have four users in our department. 

I haven't needed to contact technical support. 

I previously used Avast. I switched to Kaspersky because it seemed to work more quickly detecting suspicious files without affecting our work. 

The initial setup is straightforward. We carried out the deployment in-house and it took about a week. We have a manager and a tech person dealing with the solution. We're in a small network environment and we don't need much. 

The solution is free for now. 

I rate this solution 10 out of 10. 

We primarily use the solution for our servers. It's for security.

We enjoy the solution as, when we are online we are secure. It's easy to use and not too heavy. It doesn't slow down any machines at all. 

The product is quite stable.

It's scalable enough for us.

The product is straightforward to set up. 

There could be more secure.

The prices can go down a little bit.

I've used the solution for quite some time. It might have been six years at this point. 

It's a stable product. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

We find the product to be scalable. You can expand it if you need to.

We have five people using it in our organization. 

We've never contacted technical support. We've never had an issue. It works the way we need it to and we've never had a problem.

We started with Kaspersky. We didn't use a different solution previously.

The initial setup was straightforward. We are a tech company and therefore we found it pretty simple. Even a layman, however, can do the installation. It's not complex or difficult. We deployed it with our engineers. 

We handled the setup ourselves. We didn't need the help of any consultants or integrators. 

We'd like the pricing to be lower. It can get a bit pricey.

We pay for an annual license.

As a cloud solution, we're always on the latest version. We update it automatically on the cloud.

I'd recommend the solution to others. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. There's room for improvement, however, we've largely been happy with it. 

The tool helps us to protect from hacking, malware, phishing, etc.

I like the tool’s response to malware and trojans.

The product should release more frequent updates. The tool needs to improve its scalability as well.

I have been using the solution for three to four years.

The solution is stable and I would rate it a nine out of ten.

The solution is scalable and I would rate it an eight out of ten. My company has around 500 users for the solution. We plan to increase the number of users. In the next two to three years, the number of users will be doubled.

I didn’t encounter any issues hence haven’t contacted tech support yet.

The tool’s setup is straightforward. The setup gets completed within a day.

We did the solution’s deployment in-house.

We have seen ROI with the solution’s use.

The solution’s pricing is okay.

I would rate the overall solution a nine out of ten. One IT administrator is enough to manage the solution. You need to regularly update the solution. If you don’t update regularly, then you will have more chances of encountering security threats. You need to also refrain from using unknown software.

I primarily use Endpoint for protection against viruses.

The most valuable feature is Endpoint's management.

The main problem with Endpoint is that Kaspersky is a Russian company, and my clients prefer not to use it.

I've been using this solution for ten years.

Endpoint is stable.

Kaspersky's technical support is good.

The initial setup is easy, taking no more than a week.

Endpoint's pricing is good, especially compared to expensive solutions like Sophos.

Endpoint is a good technical solution because it provides granular control over devices. I would give it a rating of eight out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution for security.

Overall, the solution is okay.

We have a central console and from there you can monitor all workstations via an agent. The agent is installed on workstations and servers and after that, the agent can contact the central server from which we can see all of the information. We can see if the antivirus has been updated, if the solution has been detecting anything, or if there are any issues, for example. 

The pricing is very good. It's quite cheap. It might be one of the least expensive. 

It does not cover all of our security issues. It's not a complete security solution. We'd like something like CrowdStrike Falcon. We'd like the same features as CrowdStike. If they can have even better features than CrowdStrike in the future, it would be better.

The solution lacks EDR features.

The solution is cheaper than other products. However, it's not as complete. 

We are looking to evaluate CrowdStrike. We understand that that solution covers more features.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's a good product, however, it does not cover enough for us. We need something more expansive.

Our company uses the solution to provide security protection for clients in higher education and in the Ethiopian financial industry such as bankers and microfinance. 

The solution provides high-end security that is critical for financial institutions and bankers. 

The interface is intuitive with no issues. 

Documentation needs to be simplified and improved so that it provides good product awareness for end users like the documentation provided by CheckPoint. 

Vouchers and training should be offered to enhance the solution's reachability. Certification exams should be accessible and priced reasonably. 

I have been using the solution for one year. 

The solution is stable. 

The solution is scalable. 

Technical support is good and provides well-documented materials. 

The setup and installation are not complicated. 

Our company implements the solution for customers. 

The solution is expensive in comparison to CheckPoint and Fortinet. 

Our company purchased a three-year license that included a warranty and technical support. 

Our company is moving to CheckPoint because we are the only premium partners in East Africa so that increases our market value.

We also like FortiEDR for endpoint securities. 

I recommend trying the solution because of its security sensitivities. 

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

I use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for security protection for our endpoints for the users.

There is a problem with the solution, it came from Russia and we are looking for a replacement.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for approximately two years.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is a stable solution.

I have found Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response not to be scalable.

We have approximately 700 users using the solution. We do not have plans to increase usage. We are looking to switch solutions.

We were using Panda Antivirus previously.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response's initial installation were straightforward. To installation of the solution on the end-users systems takes 10 minutes. However, from the console, it is a little more time, approximately two days to configure.

We only needed one person for the implementation and support of the solution. We had some support hours from the vendor if needed.

We were on a three-year license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price could be better.

I would not recommend this solution to others. We are moving to different solutions.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response an eight out of ten.

The solution is great for customers who would like to secure their endpoints and provide protection for users. It's based on the RFP response, actually, our customer reference.

The simplicity is great

It's a very light product. 

We've found the solution to be stable.

It's scalable and easy to expand.

The installation process is very simple. 

Symantec is a better option. Kaspersky needs to strengthen its standing in the market.

It would be ideal if they could make it even easier to use.

I've been using the solution for maybe five years at this point. 

The stability of the product is great. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

You can scale the solution if you need to. It's not difficult. 

We have 15 users on the solution currently.

I've never directly contacted technical support. I cannot speak to how helpful they would be.

We sometimes deal with Symantec or FireEye, depending on the requirements. 

The solution is easy to set up. It's not a difficult process. That said, I didn't do the installation myself and therefore cannot speak on how long the deployment took. 

Our engineers handled the installation process. 

We pay a monthly licensing fee. 

I would recommend the solution to others. It's been good so far. 

I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten.