Microsoft Azure API Management Reviews

We primarily use the solution to manage our APIs.

The ease of use of the solution is excellent. It's a very user-friendly solution. 

The initial setup is quite straightforward. 

We found the solution to be very stable.

The solution can scale if you need it to.

Technical support is very helpful.

The solution has very fair pricing.

The lack of wording in the API could be improved. In the API you need to delete the suffix. It is annoying that you need to have a suffix. We can add a suffix at the API level, not at the operation level, and that could be improved on.

There are a couple of features that are lagging.

I've been working with the solution for five years or so. It's been a few years at this point. 

We have found the solution to be quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. Its performance is reliable. 

The solution scales well. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so with relative ease.

We have about 15-20 users on the solution so far.

Technical support has been very good. They are quite helpful and responsive. We are very satisfied with the level of support provided to us.

The initial setup is straightforward. A company shouldn't have any problems during the process.

The cost of the solution is very fair. It's not overly expensive. It offers very good value.

We are Microsoft partners.

I'd recommend the solution to other individuals and organizations. Overall, I've been quite satisfied with its capabilities.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

The basic tier is pretty good. 

It's publicly available API Management.

The price is pretty reasonable for us. 

We need better integration with VNet. 

It would be nice to not only configure it through the interface but also with an ARM template or something like that. Maybe it's possible, but it's not that easy to find.

It took us time to get used to the interface. Now that we run it, it's a little bit hard to have a testing environment and the production environment and keep it synced. If you can do that through a script, that would be far easier. However, there was a time thing on our side. We couldn't get it done, and in the end, we just set it up manually.

The licensing tiers can be misleading. 

It would be ideal if there was a way to add monetization into the mix so that we could more easily sell our APIs.

I started using the solution about three years ago, and I use it now and again on a few projects. 

We didn't have a previous solution.

I wasn't directly involved with the implementation, and I'm not sure how long it took to deploy the product. 

Some of my colleagues implemented the solution. We did it ourselves using the documentation provided by Microsoft. 

We are using a basic tier. 

For the things we do, it's reasonable in terms of cost. You can implement it in the developer solutions. That's basically more or less free. But if you implement VNET in it there, you can only upgrade it if you use premium, and premium is so expensive. That's just no fun. That was a little bit annoying since you think you have a good solution in your development environment, and then you are in production and need a premium tier to have the same configuration. We had to reconfigure some stuff.

We also looked at Apigee, and Apigee has some integrated features, however, Apigee was very complex to get started with. Apart from that, we are a Microsoft company, and we're on the Microsoft stack. It was more logical to keep everything in Azure. That's why we chose Azure API Management.

We use Azure and it suits our case pretty well. It could be better, but we might also have to learn more. Currently, I would rate it at an eight out of ten for our use case. We might also want to use it in the future to sell subscriptions, which is not possible out of the box. You can configure subscriptions, yet you still have to do the whole selling and measuring and things like that. That's not fully integrated.

We have been using this solution to protect our APIs and to decouple our APIs between the host versus the outside world. It operates as a gateway pattern in front of the APIs.

We use this solution for API rate limiting and for its security features against DDoS.

The scalability of this solution could be improved. The volume which the API Management task service can handle needs to be improved. Cost wise, this solution could be optimized.

This is a stable solution.

This is not a scalable solution. 

The customer service and support for this solution is average. They have not been able to provide a solution to some of the challenges we have faced. 

Neutral

The initial setup is not complex as this is a PaaS-based solution.

This is an expensive solution. 

I would advise others to evaluate their volumes, nonfunctional requirements, and just check whether the NFR performance metrics of API Management has been met. Otherwise, better take a trade-off between, because we have gone through the hard path, tried everything using it, and then we have moved from API Management to Apigee.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. 

My primary use case is application monitoring.

We had all our Saas applications on the cloud, so it's easier to centralize everything in Azure, including configuration and maintenance. There's also no need to get another portal for maintenance on additional things, so we can monitor the issue directly.

The most valuable features are the Active Directory integration and wireless backup.

Azure API Management could be improved with better integration with all of Microsoft's tools. They should also provide basic cybersecurity tools in the package.

I've been using this solution for two years.

Azure API Manager is stable.

This solution is scalable.

Microsoft's technical support is helpful, although there are some issues with time zones.

Positive

The initial setup was easy - it didn't take long, and the additional features were added normally.

We implemented using an integrator.

There are no additional costs above the main license.

We're very satisfied with Azure API Management. We've had no issues with bugs, everything runs smoothly, and the connection between the cloud and the on-premise infrastructure was good. I would rate this solution nine out of ten.

I primarily utilize the platform for integrations, monitoring, and process automation within our business workflows.

The solution's configuration capabilities are the most effective features for enhancing API security.

The product's navigation feature needs enhancement. 

I have been working with the platform for approximately three to four years.

I rate the solution's scalability around eight or nine.

The support services are good. However, they could be improved. 

Positive

The deployment process is not overly difficult. However, each API integration presents interface connectivity and parameters, which can introduce challenges.

The time required for deployment varies depending on the integration interface in question.

I rate the solution's pricing between three and four, as it could be more competitive.

The platform's insights improve over time, allowing us to monitor system health and receive notifications for updates.

We integrate it with Dynamics and other business tools, which enhances our data analysis and reporting capabilities. It facilitates better insights and easier data manipulation, although I rely on my team for detailed analytics.

I recommend the platform, particularly for organizations that require API utilization and integration, as it has proven to be effective in our experience.

Overall, I rate it an eight out of ten. 

Microsoft Azure API Management provides customers with customized solutions for various use cases and situations, allowing them to deploy their API strategy and products while also managing and protecting APIs.

It provides solutions for architecting, deploying, and monitoring APIs with other Azure services. 

Users can manage their complete API lifespan using Azure API Management.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure API Management is monitoring.

When compared with Apigee, I prefer Microsoft Azure API Management.

When comparing the API Gateway of Microsoft Azure API Management with those of Apigee and Vital Mikram, which are other API management solutions, I prefer, Vital Mikram, the others are similar.

I would like to see more integration with other platforms, as well as increased security.

I have been working with Microsoft Azure API Management for ten years.

Azure has both a certificate and a level certification.

Microsoft Azure API Management is stable.

Microsoft Azure API Management is a scalable solution.

We have ten users in our organization.

We have a team of five to ten technicians to maintain this solution per unit.

Technical support is good.

The initial setup is straightforward.

It was deployed very quickly.

We deployed it ourselves. It was done in-house.

The price is comparable.

In my opinion, it is similar to Apigee.

I would rate Microsoft Azure API Management a seven out of ten.

The integration with Azure Active Directory is a good security feature for authentication and authorization. There is multifactor authentication. You can also use all of the Azure AD features integrated with API Management. 

There is always room for improvement. There should be more analytics abilities so you can know how much traffic there is. Log Analyzer isn't well integrated with this solution. 

I have been using this solution for two to three years.

It's on the cloud, we don't have any hiccups or problems with the stability. 

The technical support is pretty good. Sometimes it's slow. It depends on each case. Sometimes they need to engage with the US and there's a big time difference between there and Australia so it takes longer. 

Our public APIs are mostly in Axway. B2C APIs are a combination of Azure and AWS. Cost is a big difference. Axway offers two solutions. One on-prem and the other option is cloud. It's not a SAS solution, they host us in AWS but we can push the costs for version upgrades. It's much more expensive than Azure or AWS.

You have to read about how to do it four or five times and then you can implement it. It's a publicly accessible API so it needs a security layer and then you can secure it. Otherwise, anybody can access it. You need proper controls, authentication, and authorization. You need to sort this out first. 

I would recommend doing a combination of AWS API Gateway and Azure API Management. You can authenticate APIs in Azure Active Directory and from there you expose all of your serverless components and use them as a backend with Azure. But it depends on what your use case is. It can be used as a combination or as a standalone. 

I would rate it an eight out of ten. 

To make it a ten, there should be better analytics features so we can know how our product is performing. 

We are in the healthcare industry, so all the applications which are related to one hospital, it binds to Microsoft Azure API Management, and this is our use case for it.

I like the integration function of Microsoft Azure API Management. Integration of this solution is easy.

There's some area for improvement for this solution's performance. Sometimes it can be challenging. We're working with design patents and we're hoping to see the performance issues sorted out.

We've been working with Microsoft Azure API Management for a year now.

Microsoft Azure API Management is a stable product, but we have not been able to test it yet on a multi-cloud environment.

Microsoft Azure API Management is scalable. There are no issues with its scalability.

Microsoft has a good technical support team. They are very helpful.

Integration of this solution is easy. I won't call it an initial setup. It's an integration.

I was able to work with Apigee.

We used Microsoft Azure API Management only in the Microsoft environment, but not in a multi-cloud environment.

Microsoft Azure API Management is cloud-based, in particular, it is a single cloud centered around Microsoft components and not on the Cross components.

I have no idea on how long it took to implement Microsoft Azure API Management. The testing and development team is the best resource on how long it took.

The number of users of this solution in the group I'm associated with is 300,000. Increasing the number of users will depend on the mergers and acquisitions, and how the group is doing.

For maintenance, we have a backend support team that handles application support. The major point is that if the API has a lot of issues, particularly in data silos, Microsoft Azure API Management has made it more convenient to manage those.

We're still trying and testing the integration function of this solution, and we're also trying to go deeper into its performance.

My rating for Microsoft Azure API Management is a nine out of ten.

I don't have any variance data with Apigee. Apigee is better than Microsoft. I have more numbers for Apigee compared to Microsoft.