We are using SharePoint through Azure.
Managing Director at D3
Easy to use administrator interface, stable, and straightforward installation
Pros and Cons
- "The user interface is very good for administrators."
- "Microsoft should have one package for all their solutions in one place to be found."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
The solution has helped our company by having zero maintenance.
What is most valuable?
The user interface is very good for administrators.
What needs improvement?
Microsoft should have one package for all their solutions in one place to be found.
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Microsoft Azure for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Microsoft Azure is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have found Microsoft Azure scalable.
How are customer service and support?
I have satisfied with the technical support from Microsoft.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was easy.
What about the implementation team?
I did the implementation of the solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price of the solution could be less expensive and the pricing model could be less confusing.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to those wanting to implement the solution is to have training. It is important to train the internal employees.
I rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 201-500 employees
A stable and scalable cloud computing solution that enables you to work from anywhere
Pros and Cons
- "The most important thing is we don't have to maintain any physical infrastructure. With typical conventional on-premise solutions, we have to maintain many things like the hardware, clusters, etc. With this cloud platform, you don't have to worry about all those things. We have the service always available, and this is the main advantage. I like that we use everything on our standard Active Directory on on-premises on Azure. The key advantage is that you can have the sole indication based on the cloud. This isn't possible with an on-premise Active Directory. This enables work from home and at the office because it's on the cloud."
- "It could be more flexible. If you look at all Mircosoft products, they are not up to the mark. For example, Azure Ready doesn't provide the same kind of access a domain administrator has and the kind of flexibility that they have when using Active Directory. Microsoft support could be better. Their service could also be better. For example, specific policies for templates suddenly become unavailable. When I checked, they said that certain things might be withdrawn based on customer feedback. This happened once or twice, and it wasn't available at all for five days, it just went down."
What is our primary use case?
I have been using Microsoft Azure for Infrastructure as a Service in the cloud. We're using it to get the devices registered and be Azure Ready at home or the office.
What is most valuable?
The most important thing is we don't have to maintain any physical infrastructure. With typical conventional on-premise solutions, we have to maintain many things like the hardware, clusters, etc. With this cloud platform, you don't have to worry about all those things. We have the service always available, and this is the main advantage.
I like that we use everything on our standard Active Directory on on-premises on Azure. The key advantage is that you can have the sole indication based on the cloud. This isn't possible with an on-premise Active Directory. This enables work from home and at the office because it's on the cloud.
What needs improvement?
It could be more flexible. If you look at all Mircosoft products, they are not up to the mark. For example, Azure Ready doesn't provide the same kind of access a domain administrator has and the kind of flexibility that they have when using Active Directory.
Microsoft support could be better. Their service could also be better. For example, specific policies for templates suddenly become unavailable. When I checked, they said that certain things might be withdrawn based on customer feedback. This happened once or twice, and it wasn't available at all for five days, it just went down.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Microsoft Azure for about ten months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Microsoft Azure is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Microsoft Azure is a scalable solution. We have close to 1,200 people using this solution at our organization.
How are customer service and support?
I have used Microsoft support before. I would give them a six out of ten. This is because we had certain glitches happen that could have been avoided. For example, they say that this is because it's a new product or the new architecture. They say things like, "it will be more stable after some time, maybe a year or two."
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup and deployment were straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
Our in-house team implemented this solution. We have about 15 to 20 people to install and maintain this solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We pay yearly for the license.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this cloud computing service to new users.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Microsoft Azure a nine.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cloud Security Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Flexible, scalable and has very good performance
Pros and Cons
- "The solution has proven to be quite stable so far."
- "The solution needs to offer more data analysis services."
What is our primary use case?
It's primarily used for access to the cloud or the virtual machines and to have a cloud-based solution that can handle tasks such as data processing, or for having data storage, and all types of other things.
What is most valuable?
The product is very flexible.
The performance overall is great.
It's a great advantage for a company to be on the cloud. It gives a company nice advantages.
The solution has proven to be quite stable so far.
The solution has been scalable.
There are no new releases per se; the solution simply adds on more services over time.
What needs improvement?
The solution needs to offer more data analysis services. It would be extremely helpful to Azure's clients if they had more of this.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for about a year or so. I believe it's been around 12 months. It hasn't been that long.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of the solution has been very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
So far, we've found the scalability to be pretty good. If a company needs to expand, it can do so with ease.
We have about five people working directly on the solution currently.
How are customer service and technical support?
We haven't really dealt with technical support. I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are. I've never had any direct interactions with them personally.
How was the initial setup?
There isn't really an initial setup. It's on the cloud. You don't really have to deploy anything or set anything up.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Our customers don't have to pay any licensing fees in order to use Azure.
What other advice do I have?
As we are on the cloud deployment model, we're always on the latest version of the solution. It is always automatically updated for us.
Overall, I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've been pretty happy with its capabilities so far.
In general, I would recommend the solution to other organizations.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Data Science Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Good stability with good Databricks integration and comparable in price to AWS
Pros and Cons
- "The integration with Databricks is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
- "The design of the platform is not so easy to navigate. It's not very user-friendly."
What is our primary use case?
We use Microsoft Azure for blob storage and for a lot of the components that they have inside the cloud.
What is most valuable?
The integration with Databricks is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's easy to use and to put on the pipeline. Data Factory and Databricks together build a pipeline. They really integrate very well.
The stability is very good.
The solution is comparable to AWS in terms of pricing.
What needs improvement?
The design of the platform is not so easy to navigate. It's not very user-friendly.
Some services are more difficult to use in AWS and GCP. I have projects on the three clouds, and some things are easier to do on AWS. On the other hand, using Databricks on Azure is easy, as they are integrated well. However, some products are more difficult to use than other products.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability has been good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable in terms of performance.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have about 30 people using the solution.
How are customer service and technical support?
I don't really deal with technical support. I'm the data scientist manager. The engineering team would be the ones that would reach out for help if they needed support.
How was the initial setup?
In terms of deployment, each product requires a number of staff to deploy the model of machine learning or to build the stature to consume the data. It really depends.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I don't handle the licensing or payments aspect of the solution. I can't speak to the costs involved or what the license looks like.
In AWS, our monthly cost was something around $10,000 or something close to that. We had to pay around $120,000 a year. It's most likely something close to that.
What other advice do I have?
We are a customer and end-user. We don't have a business relationship with Microsoft.
We deployed the solution in multiple ways. We've used the solution both on-premises and on the cloud.
I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Network and systems administrator at a recruiting/HR firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
A stable platform with good technical support that is quick to resolve problems
Pros and Cons
- "My experience with technical support so far is very good."
- "If the price were reduced then it would be an improvement."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use Azure for Office 365.
What is most valuable?
My experience with technical support so far is very good.
What needs improvement?
If the price were reduced then it would be an improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Microsoft Azure for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
For me and many other people, the general view is that Azure is very stable. We definitely plan to continue using it in the future.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This is a scalable solution and we have thousands of users in our organization.
How are customer service and technical support?
I have had to contact Microsoft support about a problem that I was having with my virtual machine, where it could not find my VM. When I called them, they solved the problem quite fast.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Prior to Azure, we used all of our Microsoft products on-premises.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was easy because we didn't do anything.
What about the implementation team?
We hired an IT consultant who is experienced in setting up cloud solutions. We did not do any of the setup ourselves.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing fees depend on the number of users that we have.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, this product is very good and I can recommend it. It would be difficult to improve.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Microsoft and Dev-ops Architect at Mphasis
Very easy to create a Kubernetes cluster
What is our primary use case?
Working Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) to create a Kubernetes cluster.
We are maintaining two environments of Kubernetes cluster on Azure using Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS).
We have used other managed PaaS services like ACS, Database, and monitoring, integrated with Jenkins for continuous integration and continuous deployment.
How has it helped my organization?
We are running our product which is deployed on Azure AKS cluster. This really helps us to drive more business from customers.
What is most valuable?
- It's very easy to create a Kubernetes cluster with the Azure Console
- Able to connect to the cluster using Azure PowerShell
- Able to connect to the cluster using kubectl
- Very good help from Microsoft Knowledge Base and also from the community
- Very good support from the Microsoft team
- Easy to manage as the core part is handled by Microsoft
- Easy to add/scale up the cluster with more nodes by using the Azure console window or through scripting
- Can integrate plugins with Jenkins for auto deployment
- Integrated with a lot of open source tools for easy deployments and other functionalities like logging, monitoring, etc.
What needs improvement?
Better logging part when deployments are crashed, even when the entire cluster is crashed.
For how long have I used the solution?
One to three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Should always go with recommendations provided by Microsoft during the creation of new clusters. Otherwise, stability is an issue.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is very good.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is excellent. Recently, we have encountered a few issues however, the customer support team helped us very quickly to come out of it.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not previously use a different solution. Kubernetes is the one we are using for container orchestration through Azure-managed Kubernetes service.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very easy; straightforward.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Owner with 51-200 employees
Windows Azure Migration cheat-sheet
I was recently asked whether I do have some cheat-sheet for migrating applications to Windows Azure. The truth is that everything is in my head and I usually go with “it should work” – quickly build, pack and deploy. Then troubleshoot the issues. However there are certain rules that must be obeyed before making any attempt to port to Windows Azure. Here I will try to outline some.
Disclaimer
What I describe here is absolutely my sole opinion, based on my experience. You are free to follow these instructions at your own risk. I describe key points in migrating an application to the Windows Azure Platform-as-a-Service offering – the regular Cloud Services with Web and/or Worker Roles. This article is not intended for migrations to Infrastructure Services (or Windows Azure Virtual Machines).
Database
If you work with Microsoft SQL Server it shall be relatively easy to go. Just download, install and run against your local database the SQL Azure Migration Wizard. It is The tool that will migrate your database or will point you to features you are using that are not compatible with SQL Azure. The tool is regularly updated (latest version is from a week before I write this blog entry!).
Migrating schema and data is one side of the things. The other side of Database migration is in your code – how you use the Database. For instance SQL Azure does not accept “USE [DATABASE_NAME]” statement. This means you cannot change database context on the fly. You can only establish connection to a specific database. And once the connection is established, you can work only in the context of that database. Another limitation, which comes as consequence of the first one is that 4-part names are not supported. Meaning that all your statements must refer to database objects omitting database name:
[schema_name].[table_name].[column_name],
instead of
[database_name].[schema_name].[table_name].[column_name].
Another issue you might face is the lack of support for SQLCLR. I once worked with a customer who has developed a .NET Assembly and installed it in their SQL Server to have some useful helpful functions. Well, this will not work on SQL Azure.
Last, but not least is that you (1) shall never expect SQL Azure to perform better, or even equal to your local Database installation and (2) you have to be prepared for so called transient errors in SQL Azure and handle them properly. You better get to know the Performance Guidelines and Limitations for Windows Azure SQL Database.
Codebase
Logging
When we target own server (that includes co-locate/virtual/shared/etc.) we usually use local file system (or local database?) to write logs. Owning a server makes diagnostics and tracing super easy. This is not really the case when you move to Windows Azure. There is a feature of Windows Azure Diagnostics Agent to transfer your logs to a blob storage, which will let you just move the code without changes. However I do challenge you to rethink your logging techniques. First of all I would encourage you to log almost everything, of course using different logging levels which you can adjust runtime. Pay special attention to the Windows Azure Diagnostics and don’t forget – you can still write your own logs, but why not throwing some useful log information to System.Diagnostics.Trace.
Local file system
This is though one and almost always requires code changes and even architecting some parts of the application. When going into the cloud, especially the Platform-as-a-Service one, do not use local file system for anything else, but a temporary storage and static content that is part of your deployment package. Everything else should go to a blob storage. And there are many great articles on how to use blob storage here.
Now you will probably say “Well, yeah, but when I put everything into a blob storage isn’t it vendor-lock-in?” And I will reply – depending on how you implement this! Yes, I already mentioned it will certainly require code change and, if you want to make it the best way and avoid vendor-lock-it, it will probably also require architecture change for how your code works with files. And by the way, file system is also “vendor-lock-in”, isn’t it?
Authentication / Authorization
It will not be me if I don’t plug-in here. Your application will typically use Forms Authentication. When you redesign your app anyway I highly encourage you rethink your auth/autz system and take a look into Claims! I have number of posts on Claims based authentication and Azure ACS(Introduction to Claims, Securing ASMX web services with SWT and claims, Identity Federation and Sign-out, Federated authentication – mobile login page for Microsoft Account (live ID), Online Identity Management via Azure ACS, Creating Custom Login page for federated authentication with Azure ACS, Unified identity for web apps – the easy way). And couple of blogs I would recommend you to follow in this direction:
- Dominic Baier: http://leastprivilege.com/
- Vittorio Bertocci: http://www.cloudidentity.com/blog/
Other considerations
To the moment I cant dive deeper in the Azure ocean of knowledge I have to pull out something really important that fits all types of applications. If it happens, I will update the content. Things like COM/COM+/GDI+/Server Components/Local Reports – everything should work in a regular WebRole/WorkerRole environment. Where you also have full control for manipulating the operating system! Windows Azure Web Sites is far more restrictive (to date) in terms of what you can execute there and to what part of the operating system you have access.
Here is something for you think on: I worked out with a customer who was building SPA Application to run in Windows Azure. They have designed a bottleneck for scaling in their core. The system manipulates some files. It is designed to keep object graphs of those files in-memory. It is also designed in a way that end-user may upload as many files as day want during the course of their interaction with the system. And the back-end keeps a single object graph for all the files user submitted in-memory. This object graph cannot be serialized. Here is the situation:
In Windows Azure we (usually, and to comply with SLA) have at least 2 instances of our server. These instances are load balanced using round-robin algorithm. The end user comes to our application, logs-in and uploads a file. Works, works, works – every request is routed to a different server. Now user uploads new file, and again, and again … each request still goes to a different server.
And here is the question:
What happens when the server side code wants to keep a single object graph of all files uploaded by the end user?
The solution: I leave it to your brains!
Conclusion
Having in mind the above mentioned key points in moving application to Windows Azure, I highly encourage you to play around and test. I might update that blog post if something rather important comes out from the deep ocean of Azure knowledge I have. But for the moment, these are the most important check-points for your app.
If you have questions – you are more than welcome to comment!
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Owner with 51-200 employees
Windows Azure Basics (part 2 of n)–networking
In my previous post on Windows Azure Basics, I tried to introduce you the cloud computing concept and explain the Windows Azure Platform with not so technical terms. It is time now to get over the networking. What is happening behind the scenes? What we can or cannot (currently) use?
Lets first take a look at the following picture, which tries to show almost complete Windows Azure hosted service:
Here are the terms/abbreviations you see on the illustration:
Couple of words on protocols. Currently the Windows Azure hosted service only supports the TCP/IP stack of protocols. Meaning that you can only have TCP traffic to/from/within your instances. UDP is not currently supported (thus excluding IPSec also). What about web roles? Well, web roles are using HTTP protocol, which essentially lives over TCP. HTPS is also supported, because it also relies on TCP/IP. I very often see questions on whether sending/receiving mails is supported in Windows Azure, and the answer is yes. Before all, SMTP, POP(3), IMAP protocol families are all stacked over TCP. So we can have everything within the TCP stack, and (yet) nothing on the UDP stack (no SMB, no IPSec, no RTMP, etc).
Now, how can we route the Internet traffic to our instances in Windows Azure. The platform introduces an entity called Endpoint.
Endpoint is a combination of protocol type + port number, which effectively expose your instance to the internet at the given port number. What about protocol types? Well, currently you can only choose from “tcp” and “http/https”. There are two kind of endpoints: Input Endpoint and Internal Endpoint. While the Input Endpoint will expose your instance to the Internet, by routing all Internet traffic on selected port to your instance, the Internal Endpoint will only open communication between instances in a single deployment.
Something more on Windows Azure networking – the LB (Load Balancers) do not use sticky sessions. That means that every single request is routed on its own. So and end user can open a page on your website hitting Instance 0 of Web Role (check the illustration at the top), that page may create several AJAX requests and all AJAX request will go on their own route. Any of the requests may either hit Instance 0, but they may also Instance 1, and so on. That requires us to build a fully stateless applications. The application logic shall be fully operational and aware that some user’s requests may end up in one instance, other in other instances. So we have to always use a common storage (Azure Storage or SQL Azure or AppFabric Caching service) for all the data that needs to be persisted across user’s requests.
Remote Desktop? Yes, it is supported! Remote desktop operates on port 3389 over TCP protocol. Again the catch: Be aware that enabling a Remote Desktop for all your roles in your deployment (which just a checkbox), will automatically create an Input Endpoint for your service. This affects the total number of Endpoints per service (remember, it is 25)!.
What about sending mails, again? As I already wrote, the common mailing protocols are supported (SMTP, POP, IMAP), however Windows Azure does not provide a “Email-as-a-service” service. Luckily enough, a great collaboration was announced, and every Windows Azure subscription receives a complimentary free account on SendGrid with a limit of 10000 e-mails monthly (I think, this you can check ). So you can use the SendGrid service to send your application / service e-mails. You get it for free for the first 10k e-mails in the month. If your needs exceed this limit, you can upgrade your account for a very reasonable price!
Lets first take a look at the following picture, which tries to show almost complete Windows Azure hosted service:
Here are the terms/abbreviations you see on the illustration:
- LB – Load Balancer. It is the Windows Azure software Load Balancer, which routes the Internet traffic to and from your hosted service;
- VIP – virtual IP address. This is the internet facing public IPv4 (currently) network address for your hosted service. You have to pay attention to it, as you only have one single internet facing IP address per hosted service;
- DIP – direct IP address. This is an internal subnet IPv4 network address that each single instance of your roles has. You have one of these DIPs for every single instance, and there is only one per instance. This IP address in internal subnet and cannot be used to directly access a specific instance from outside the Windows Azure hosted service. You can, however use this address for internal communication between instances of your roles within the whole Windows Azure deployment (hosted service)t;
- The LB (Load Balancer) will not route any Internet traffic to the instances of your roles;
- The Windows Firewall of all your instances is set to default block everything (Effectively blocking even communication between different instances in a single deployment);
Couple of words on protocols. Currently the Windows Azure hosted service only supports the TCP/IP stack of protocols. Meaning that you can only have TCP traffic to/from/within your instances. UDP is not currently supported (thus excluding IPSec also). What about web roles? Well, web roles are using HTTP protocol, which essentially lives over TCP. HTPS is also supported, because it also relies on TCP/IP. I very often see questions on whether sending/receiving mails is supported in Windows Azure, and the answer is yes. Before all, SMTP, POP(3), IMAP protocol families are all stacked over TCP. So we can have everything within the TCP stack, and (yet) nothing on the UDP stack (no SMB, no IPSec, no RTMP, etc).
Now, how can we route the Internet traffic to our instances in Windows Azure. The platform introduces an entity called Endpoint.
Endpoint is a combination of protocol type + port number, which effectively expose your instance to the internet at the given port number. What about protocol types? Well, currently you can only choose from “tcp” and “http/https”. There are two kind of endpoints: Input Endpoint and Internal Endpoint. While the Input Endpoint will expose your instance to the Internet, by routing all Internet traffic on selected port to your instance, the Internal Endpoint will only open communication between instances in a single deployment.
Side note: you maybe already noticed that I am using “instances” more often then “roles”. I hope that you’ve read my first post and already know the difference. The key difference is that the instance is the actual VM (Virtual Machine) where your code lives, while the Role only defines the “footprint” for what to be instantiated on the Virtual Machine.The catch. There is always a catch, and the current one is on the constraints put on the Endpoints:
- You can have a maximum of 25 Endpoints per hosted service (Input + Internal);
- You define your endpoints by a Role! Meaning that two different roles cannot share a single Endpoint;
- All your Endpoints within a Hosted Service must be unique. Meaning that you cannot have an Input Endpoint (i.e. “EndpointWeb") serving HTTP protocol on port 80 for one Role and have another Input Endpoint (i.e. EndpointWebMVC) serving again HTTP protocol on port 80 for another Role. Here I stress that we define Endpoints at Role level, so every instance of this role will have the endpoints defined;
Something more on Windows Azure networking – the LB (Load Balancers) do not use sticky sessions. That means that every single request is routed on its own. So and end user can open a page on your website hitting Instance 0 of Web Role (check the illustration at the top), that page may create several AJAX requests and all AJAX request will go on their own route. Any of the requests may either hit Instance 0, but they may also Instance 1, and so on. That requires us to build a fully stateless applications. The application logic shall be fully operational and aware that some user’s requests may end up in one instance, other in other instances. So we have to always use a common storage (Azure Storage or SQL Azure or AppFabric Caching service) for all the data that needs to be persisted across user’s requests.
Remote Desktop? Yes, it is supported! Remote desktop operates on port 3389 over TCP protocol. Again the catch: Be aware that enabling a Remote Desktop for all your roles in your deployment (which just a checkbox), will automatically create an Input Endpoint for your service. This affects the total number of Endpoints per service (remember, it is 25)!.
What about sending mails, again? As I already wrote, the common mailing protocols are supported (SMTP, POP, IMAP), however Windows Azure does not provide a “Email-as-a-service” service. Luckily enough, a great collaboration was announced, and every Windows Azure subscription receives a complimentary free account on SendGrid with a limit of 10000 e-mails monthly (I think, this you can check ). So you can use the SendGrid service to send your application / service e-mails. You get it for free for the first 10k e-mails in the month. If your needs exceed this limit, you can upgrade your account for a very reasonable price!
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Microsoft Azure Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Popular Comparisons
Amazon AWS
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)
Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode)
Google Cloud
Google Firebase
Alibaba Cloud
SAP S4HANA on AWS
DigitalOcean
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud
Equinix Metal
NTT Cloud
Google Compute Engine
Skytap Cloud
SAP Hybris on AWS
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Microsoft Azure Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Gartner's Magic Quadrant for IaaS maintains Amazon Web Service at the top of the Leaders quadrant. Do you agree?
- PaaS solutions: Areas for improvement?
- Rackspace, Dimension Data, and others that were in last year's Challenger quadrant became Niche Players: Agree/ Disagree
- What Is The Biggest Difference Between Microsoft Azure and Oracle Cloud Platform?
- Which backup and recovery solution can backup Azure machines to its own (dedicated) cloud?
- Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?
- Which solution do you prefer: Alibaba Cloud or Microsoft Azure?
- How does Microsoft MDS (vs Informatica MDM) fit with Azure architecture?
- SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud (HEC): how to migrate to Microsoft Azure?
- Does F5 Advanced WAF work with Azure App Service?