Microsoft Dynamics GP Reviews

We primarily use it for our accounting operations, specifically focusing on managing accounting transactions.

It's enhanced by a subscription billing add-on, to efficiently automate billing and invoicing, particularly due to our substantial customer database.

The issue we're encountering is that it's primarily designed for independent installations and not initially structured as a cloud-based solution, which has led to challenges with connectivity. In our current setup at work, disruptions in the connection can result in patches or transactions getting stuck midway. To resolve this, we often need to refresh the database and clear out data, which can be a cumbersome process.

I have been using it for eight years.

Since our organization operates globally with multiple companies scattered across the world, the primary challenge we face is connectivity issues. In a distributed setup like ours, dealing with internet disconnections or instability can hinder our work significantly. It's essential to have a solution that allows us to perform our tasks seamlessly without worrying about such interruptions. I would rate its on-premise stability capabilities nine out of ten.

It is a robust ERP system with good scalability, but our present needs are more aligned with cloud-based solutions rather than on-premises which necessitates a shift in design. When considering an upgrade for GP, it would be more advantageous to have a cloud-first approach from the outset, allowing for the flexibility to offer on-premises installations as needed. I would rate it seven out of ten.

The problems typically arise post-disconnections, leading us to manually address SQL tables' issues. This occurs only in a small percentage of cases, around one percent or even less, and occasionally necessitates contacting our vendor and they may liaise with Microsoft, but this process is relatively straightforward.

The initial setup is fairly easy.

Software installation typically can be completed within a day, unless it's a large-scale deployment. In my experience, we've managed software installations both in-house and on cloud-based servers. Currently, we have a cloud-based server, but we handle the installation and setup ourselves, with assistance from our vendor.

In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective.

If a company intends to use this ERP system on a global scale with connections spanning different locations and countries, it's important to note that this software is not inherently designed for cloud-based and long-distance usage. It leans more toward on-premises use within a single physical location. In such a multi-location, multinational scenario, I would recommend considering Microsoft Dynamics 365 instead, as it's better suited for these global, long-distance requirements. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

It is an ERP and a small and midsize business enterprise resource planning solution.

It is strong in integration, and in this particular business, you have a lot of independent software vendors that do products for vertical markets that integrate directly into GP. So, we tend to sell the strengths and not the weaknesses. But, if you want software that can run a bank, you need a system built from the ground up to run a bank, and this solution can't do that. So, when we purchase, we deal directly with Microsoft and don't go through the channel to buy our product.

It is a very good product and is priced well. If you look at current reviews, they are not on the top of the list, but our customers also think it's an excellent product.

It is very powerful for core financials.

The shortcoming of this solution is that part of it is written in 32-bit, and the world is moving to 64-bit and Business Central is completely 64-bit. This could be a limitation, not within the product itself, depending on what you want to interface and integrate.

We have been using this solution for a long time.

The database is SQL Server, which utilizes store procedures, and the store procedures are on SQL Server. So, to some extent, the product is scalable, but it's not one size fits all. For example, if you're running three big companies, it could probably scale to handle them. Still, if you are running 30 small companies, it probably couldn't take 30 small companies properly because of the functionality. Therefore, you have to know the marketplace. We have close to 100 customers using the solution.

It requires a lot of expertise to implement, and a customer can't buy it on the shelf and run it. We don't need more than two people to implement it because the customer does most of the work, and we train them. We do the project, set up the implementation framework, design the processes and run the system once it's implemented.

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. Regarding advice, find a reseller who understands the solution.

We currently use the solution for our fixed assets and payroll.

The fixed assets, payroll, the data module, and user-friendliness are most valuable.

Improvement should be in the reporting features. Something that is quite flexible that can include my balance sheets, so I don't need to depend on a consultant to do it for me. 

There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules. We use different sets of books such as CashBook and CheckBooks therefore if I select the wrong one the solution allows the transaction to just pass without warning. This causes extra work outside of the solution and our reconciliations do not match most of our transactions.

I have been using the solution for 14 years.

The solution is stable. It is on a standalone server and the security is not as hectic as it might be on the cloud. It is implemented on-site.

The scalability of the solution is fine. There is no problem with it.

It is ideal for small businesses or private companies, but for larger organizations with different tax regions from South America and the US, it requires a lot of customization.

There is local IT support and a dedicated support department that is centralized across 38 sites. When there is an issue, calls are logged in and they assist where they can, otherwise it is escalated to Microsoft.

Positive

The solution I previously used was Management Reporter, a legacy system that was slow.

The solution's price is steep. The licensing model is per user.

I rate Microsoft Dynamics GP an eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for our daily transactions, such as purchasing functions, sales functions, inventory management, and the whole general ledger, We also handle our financials and bank reconciliations such as bank management and cashbook management.

They've got a search feature called Smart Place that we find very useful. We can go through a whole lot of data from the past at any time from any origin. It actually takes you to the exporting functionality. 

The solution offers integrations with other software as well. We have integration with Microsoft Office where we can do Word and Excel, etc.

It's very convenient. 

Currently, we are actually looking at Payroll. Payroll we haven't implemented yet, however, it's there within the system. We are using a standalone payroll system as of right now. That becomes costly because it's outside the licenses that we are paying for Microsoft Dynamics GP. It will be easier and cheaper if we roll everything together, which we may do in the future.

The solution has an Integration Manager. You can actually pull a budget from Excel into the system. You can take it in and/or out.

If you have closed your year, you can reverse for one year. It has some nice functionality. If you have virtually missed something, you can go back and correct it, and reverse the year. It autocorrects your journal. You don't have to recapture everything.

It is quite a robust system.

We don't have proper data management. We have a government scheme where we service people and help them with housing. We call it the Self Help Housing Agency, where we provide funding, then you pay back the money without interest. It's one area that the system doesn't seem to handle it properly. We initially needed a system that was focused on test management in that aspect due to the fact that we wanted a revolving account where the money that you pay back goes into the fund and it funds other beneficiaries as well. That way, it never ceases to operate. You pay back, it goes into the fund, somebody also applies and then the money he pays back and it revolves like that. That said, we are not using the system for that. It doesn't work in the way we need it to. If it did, we'd definitely use it.

We also have services that are mostly data management. We only now use it for subsistence for others when they are traveling in between the jobs. For example, when you're traveling to another area, you apply for a subsistence allowance. That's the main thing that we are only using it for. That said, now, for Self Help and service leverage manuals, we need to computerize it so that it becomes part of the system as well. That's one area that needs to be looked at and improved somehow.

The budget aspect could be improved. I have to do my budgeting outside of the system on Excel, then whatever that has been approved I need to upload to GP. However, I want a system where I can start with projections. It would be great to be able to project with all the notes and have it give me my final outline and upload it automatically into that system. I don't know if that is possible. 

With payroll, the payroll that they have offers US or Canadian tax. However, here, our tax payments are different from the US and Canada. It is very difficult to put in our tax tables. We need some customization. It should be readily available for any country to use according to their tax implications. The system should know different types of tax regimes around the world so that it can accommodate. It's a little bit rigid on that.

I've been using the solution since 2008. It's been well over ten years at this point.

The solution is quite stable due to the fact that it's on-premise. It has maintenance utilities within itself, so you can just go in and run some maintenance or schedule it for daily backups and stuff like that. We don't experience bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

Generally, we try to handle the maintenance internally. However, we've used consultancy for support in the past and have also had to reach out to Microsoft directly.

At one of the sites, we had a big problem whereby the data was corrupted or that looked like somebody had deleted something important. The technical support did assist us. We logged the issue with Microsoft Directory. 

However, the main issue is we no longer have a go-in-between consultant or partner. Microsoft emphasizes partnership. They don't want you to deal with them directly. They'll say, "No, we've got a growing partner in the region. Try them." However, this time we went through them due to the fact that it was something that was within their system. They did ultimately help. They sent us to one of their partners in India. They helped the site get back on track. It was down for about two or three years, so they didn't close their financials for that period of time. However, now they are back on track.

We did previously use a solution called Cyborg back in the day. It had some components we needed. However, we've been with Microsoft since 1989. It's been a long time. We switched when we were able to get different modules.

I didn't handle the initial setup. It was more than ten years ago. On top of that, I might have been in support at the time. Now, I am a principal accountant. I just came into the role.

The maintenance mostly lies with the IT department. We have an IT department. They're the ones who go and do the routine maintenance for it. For major support or maintenance, normally we utilize our service level agreement and then we send tenders out. The respondents show their capabilities of skills and what their experience is. Then we adjudicate around that and select the best leader who will run a one-year or three-year contract. 

We are just coming off of a three-year contract that ended in November. Due to COVID, we couldn't send it out again. The idea going forward is to self-sustain, self-support, and to cut off outsourcing costs. We're actually training ourselves to be at the level of the consultant.

The licenses should be centralized. We, as a local authority under the ministry of local government, have the government pay on our behalf, and they are quite strict. It's an annual licensing that we are signed up for. It's quite hefty. We have 28 sites within the country and each site has to pay its own license. It means they are decentralized. If it was centralized, then it would have been easy. We are actually thinking of centralizing the whole system in one place and to cut off a whole lot of maintenance of servers. That way, licensing can be cut because it's licensed per user. The solution charges on a per user basis. 

For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money.

We're just a customer. We don't have a business arrangement with Microsoft.

I'm using the 2016 version of the solution 2016 due to the fact that I'm working for a local authority here. It's a standard across the country. We are with the local government.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

I'm a consultant and I don't use it personally, but our different clients use it for different purposes. It is mainly used for accounting, tracking different transactions into inventory, sales, and purchasing.

The solution is easy to use. 

As technology changes, the chart-up account needs improvement because the chart-up account is a string. They should make it more flexible. 

I have been using Microsoft Dynamics GP for over twenty years.

The solution is mostly stable but there are bugs. 

The scalability is good. I rate the availablity a ten out of ten. 

The technical support team is good. 

The initial setup is easy. The deployment takes a few minutes time. 

It is an affordable solution. 

It's the easiest ERP system out there to implement.

I will rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution for accounting. We only use the accounting aspect of the product.

The initial setup was very easy. You do not need a lot of technical in-depth knowledge to handle the implementation.

The stability is reliable. It's quite stable.

Overall, the solution wasn't that great.

The product doesn't do consolidations. It was hard to navigate the solution and the UI, the user interface, wasn't any good, to be honest.

We found it hard to navigate and it had a very outdated UI so that the user experience wasn't good at all.

This is now a legacy product, so they're phasing it out over time. 

The scalability was never very good.

We've been using the solution for the last 12 months or so. I've personally been using it for five-plus years or so. It's been a while.

The stability was good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. Its performance is mostly reliable.

The scalability is poor. If it wasn't getting pushed out, it could be something that they improved on. However, Microsoft is no longer continuing with the product.

I had up to 25 to 30 users. They were accounts payable clerks, accounting managers, controllers, et cetera.

I can't speak to if the company plans to increase usage, as I no longer work there anymore.

We had technical support through an integrator and not necessarily through Microsoft directly.

We previously used QuickBooks. We're implementing Dynamics right now.

While I wasn't at the company for the initial setup, it is my understanding that the initial setup is not complex. It's pretty straightforward and simple to execute.

I can't speak to how long the deployment took as I wasn't present during the process. It happened before I arrived.

We had in-house staff that managed the maintenance. We didn't require any new staff to manage it.

Our company used third-party integrators to handle the initial setup.

There is a yearly licensing fee that the company would have to pay, plus the cost of hosting and hybrid cloud costs.

We are end-users and direct customers. We don't have a partnership or business relationship with Microsoft.

This product is at end-of-life and is an outdated product. Therefore, I wouldn't necessarily recommend it to others. There are other options on the market.

In general, I would rate the solution at a three out of ten.

The solution has been great to work with so far. It offers a lot of control, which we really appreciate.

The product is very user-friendly and is easy to navigate.

You can track everything from beginning to end quite easily.

Their reporting is very extensive. If they cannot provide a certain report, they have a tool that is similar to a report writer that you can connect to and really customize the reports you need.

The purchase order and processing aspects of the solution should be improved.

In this latest version, they included mostly everything we currently require. The only thing that can be improved on is the way that transactions, for example, in account receivable, take place. When a customer makes a payment to us, it's unclear how to connect the software with the bank in order to properly identify the invoices and the amount of the payment the customer is paying us in order to apply those accounting and then close the invoices that are open. This would really save us a lot of time and energy if that aspect could be clarified or streamlined.

I've been working with the solution for about five years now, give or take.

The stability is good. We didn't have any issues with bugs or glitches. It's reliable.

The technical support is good. The company has its own developers on hand to answer any questions we might have. We're satisfied with the level of service we received.

The initial setup was a little complex. It's always uncomfortable when you are doing migrations from one system to the other and get the people to accept the new software or the newer ERP after they have worked for so long with another. 

You have to learn a lot to set it up after the data is collected. We needed to make sure everything was properly displayed to the developers.

For us, the most complicated part is that it's a US-based software and we had to deal with a lot of tax regulations in Puerto Rico.

We're just customers. We don't have a business relationship with Microsoft.

I'm not sure of the exact version we are using currently. It might be version 10.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

The product has improved a lot from the approval processing, attachments, and reporting. 

• Financial
• Payables
• Sales
• Inventory 

The system is easy to customize and has user-friendly access. 

It still can be improved in web-based and build reporting. 

No, but sometimes there are issues when the application is not maintained well.

Yeah.

Nine out of 10. Since I am a technical person, it is easy to support and modify according to a client request.

No. we were not using any other solution before.

Setup is straightforward. That is an another big advantage of this application.

Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft.

We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support. 

For a bigger environment, this is the best product to go with for an in-house support team. For a smaller environment, I would not suggest this product. 

Numerous third-party add-on products are available to purchase for specific business needs. A strong support system is available through a network of VARs and the internet community. The SQL database back end allows us to easily build integrations data between GP and other systems. It gives us the ability to develop customizations with .NET and Visual Basic.

We use the Sales Order, Purchase Order, and Inventory modules to handle this entire process from beginning to end.

Windows authentication is not available for the full GP 2016 client. The web client version only works for the standard product and a very limited number of third-party applications that must be written in Dexterity. If you have customizations written in .NET or Visual Basic, they will not work with the web client.

Our company has used the current GP 2016 version since we upgraded to it about six months ago, and have used previous versions for quite a few years. I have also used and/or consulted on this product for other companies for the past 19 years.

It has been stable overall for us.

We are a decent-sized organization with close to 150 GP user licenses and have been able to meet our scalability requirements as we continue to grow. We use a Citrix environment, so we only need to install updates and manage a small number of servers.

Support is normally provided by the VAR on record, of which there are plenty of well-skilled ones to choose from. There is also a vast amount of information on the web by which we normally resolve 90% or more of our issues without ever having to consult with our VAR. Our team is well-experienced with GP, so this works well for us. Others with less experience may need to consult with their VAR more often.

Since Dynamics GP is the company-wide ERP system we use, we migrate any companies that we acquire from their system to GP. I have also worked with clients in the past who have purchased GP and in most cases, they moved to GP because it provided additional functionality that their existing software did not have.

Initial setup is not that straightforward and I do not recommend that someone with limited experience of GP to do it themselves. Instead, an experienced VAR/consultant with a good understanding of accounting and reporting should be used, because they will be aware of the types of mistakes that are commonly made during setup that can result in much pain down the line.

I’m not that familiar with the current pricing structure, but your VAR can provide you with details of the different options. Be sure to ask them if Microsoft has any promotions running because they do periodically run them.

I have not evaluated anything else.

Invest the extra resources up front to work with a qualified consultant (VAR). If you are not an expert with this product, don’t make the mistake of thinking you can do it yourself, as you will stand a good chance of making mistakes that will be costly down the line. It’s very important to set up your initial account framework and GL account structure to handle the current and future needs of your business, so at the very least spend the time and effort to get this part right.

You can't easily manipulate the data and change something like in the QuickBooks where you can edit documents. This tool requires voiding and provides audit trails.

This is used by several different clients for different purposes. It helps to streamline and automate their accounting processes.

Some of its functionality should be more automated. They are always working on new releases.

I have used this solution for seven years.

There were no stability issues, especially when the server requirements are set up correctly.

If the servers are not set up to properly to house or maintain the data, then there could be scalability issues.

Microsoft usually gets back to you in an hour. I work at a consulting firm, so we field the low level support. If there is anything we cannot work through, or if there are bugs/quality issues, we reach out to Microsoft.

I've used several different accounting suites at an accounting firm and at other consulting firms.

The setup is complex, but there are instructions and consulting firms who can help you out with the process.

It can be expensive. It depends on the size of your business and what you are trying to achieve with it.

We did look at other options.

It depends on the size of your business and what you are trying to achieve.