Microsoft Intune Reviews

As an administrator and user of Microsoft Intune, we have implemented several key features. Currently, we are using it for Windows updates across the whole company, pushing updates through Microsoft Intune. We also use it for the mass deployment of new applications.

Additionally, for security and access, we implement conditional access controls through Microsoft Intune. We have completed corporate device configuration and starting new journey on bring your own device (BYOD) management.

We use enterprise application management features in Microsoft Intune, with most applications integrated without multi-factor authentication previously. We need to control the number of devices accessing our environment to prevent data breaches or PII issues.

The most useful features in Microsoft Intune are the policy enforcement and conditional access. These features make our operations easier from a company perspective. Each company has its own policies, which are often only written in documents. By using Microsoft Intune, we can enforce these policies throughout the organization, binding everyone together instead of just having documented policies.

Microsoft needs to strategize its licensing structure. When using Microsoft Intune, we bought a small scale of controls, only controlling part of the devices, though Microsoft Intune can do much more. The Intune Suite offers more features, allowing extensive integration with either internal or cloud environments without requiring third-party licensing. However, each feature has a separate license, making logistics and cost management difficult if not strategically bundled together.

I have been working with Microsoft Intune for at least 2 years.

I would rate technical support from Microsoft a nine out of ten.

We previously used System Center Configuration Management (SCCM). With SCCM, out of 10,000 staff members, only 2,000 to 3,000 received updates and deployments. The updates were slower, and using SCCM caused more network congestion as updates were pushed through the internal network. With Microsoft Intune's cloud-based deployment, users can receive updates and application deployment almost everywhere, and they get updates almost daily. This keeps machines up to date and helps reduce vulnerabilities.

It's easy. In terms of cloud, I am mainly focusing on Azure. There are other divisions that handle AWS and also Huawei Cloud.

While managing Microsoft Intune, we experience some glitches in our hybrid environment with on-premises Active Directory. If the on-premises system has an issue, it can synchronize to the cloud with additional problems. This requires resolution on both sides, which is difficult. It's not Microsoft Intune's fault; it's due to our environment. For companies wanting to use Microsoft Intune, it's better to avoid a hybrid deployment and join everything to the cloud.

In terms of automatic updating with Microsoft Intune, users sometimes complain about needing to restart for weekly updates. Updates are automatically pushed to devices for security purposes. Microsoft Intune helps us manage these updates automatically, unlike SCCM, which requires manual work.

We conducted workshops with Microsoft to ensure we hosted management internally instead of paying third parties. We mobilized our internal team, which has allowed us to avoid additional costs related to external services.

All security solutions worldwide are expensive. Microsoft has allowed a small scale of features within Microsoft Intune for cost-efficient solutions. If you want the full suite, you need to invest more to gain better security features. It's not necessarily more expensive. You need to choose which features to buy. For basic features, Enterprise Mobility + Security E3 (EMS E3) is the lowest pricing Microsoft can offer.

We plan to explore Microsoft Intune Cloud PKI more, as it's not just a replacement for the CA server on-premises. It's a game changer for SSL certificates, eliminating reliance on third-party solutions such as GlobalSign and DigiCert. We plan to implement Wi-Fi with certificate integration, though this is currently just a vision, as we need to purchase it.

Microsoft Intune focuses on device management, including MDM (mobile device management) and MAM (mobile application management). Microsoft Intune can control various devices, but we currently focus on four operating systems: Android (with Google Play Store) and iOS for mobile devices, and Windows and macOS for computers. Our recommendation for Microsoft Intune would be to use it for managing device resources and ensuring policy enforcement according to company guidelines. Each device must maintain current security to prevent attacks or vulnerabilities.

I would rate Microsoft Intune an eight out of ten. I recommend Microsoft Intune and suggest purchasing it along with Microsoft 365 Suite or Azure, as the Intune Suite is essential for managing everything from antivirus to policies and accessing the environment.

Microsoft Intune policies, remote wipe, and using corporate and private profiles are valuable features, but MFA is the most valuable feature as it ensures that the end user is authentic. After authentication, logs can help us diagnose further. Previously, we didn't know who was using the devices, with every person having 3, 4, or 5 mobile devices registered to their email. We didn't know which device was live or not. With MFA, it is very helpful to identify which one is the last authenticated device. We can also restrict the number of devices using Microsoft Intune.

From an end-user perspective of Microsoft Intune, I haven't experienced any challenges since installation. However, some customers have reported experiencing slowness when using lower versions of the Android system. This observation has been reported to the distributor team, and they are working on it. Hopefully, this issue will be resolved in the next release.

As we have only been using it for six months, it might be too early to identify other areas for improvement. 

We recently started using Microsoft Intune. We just completed about six months of usage.

It is very stable.

We have plans for expanding our business at least 5 to 10% in the next financial year with Microsoft Intune. With most people opting for hybrid work and not coming to the office five days a week, working from home or branch offices, the requirement will definitely grow.

It is too early to provide comprehensive feedback regarding the technical support for Microsoft Intune. We have basic support included in the plan. We have not opted for the advanced support ticket facility. We haven't utilized support services as we haven't faced any issues in the last six months. Without any support scenarios, we cannot comment on response times or resolution quality.

Neutral

We were not using any other solution. The requirement for such a solution came from the data breach incident. After that incident, it was brought to our notice that we needed an MDM solution to protect our data. 

It's very smooth. It's done with two to three clicks. It's very easy.

After installation, Microsoft gave us a vulnerability assessment. Our IT administrators handled the necessary tasks based on the recommendations. The patch management, pushing of patches, and manually updating applications are helpful. They inform us when auto update is off, alerting us to turn on application updates when vulnerabilities are found.

We have not evaluated the measurable benefits since the deployment of Microsoft Intune. With only six months having passed, we need more time to observe and evaluate the returns.

It comes with the E5 plan. We bought the E5 plan from Microsoft.

From a price perspective, the E5 plan we opted for includes features we aren't fully utilizing. Our basic needs were offline Office for end users and cloud-based emails. When we inquired about MDM specifically, they offered separate plans, such as MDM Basic and others. We compared all options and migrated because paying separate license fees for Office and Microsoft 365 mailbox would be more complex. While it is somewhat costly, the major benefit is that we can select licenses only for those using personally owned devices rather than the entire organization.

We had an incident in our organization where we found a data breach in a mobile device, specifically on a personally owned device that employees were bringing in. To protect against this, we evaluated multiple products, including IBM, Microsoft, and ManageEngine. We chose Microsoft Intune as we were already existing Office 365 users. It was easier for us to upgrade the plan from our existing one to E5. It came with a bundle where we received all the services we wanted: private profile, secure download, prevention of sharing corporate data, and access to corporate data. It is easier for us to manage everything from a single console.

ManageEngine's MDM solution was less expensive and of good quality based on our evaluation. However, we couldn't proceed with it because their management console was different, and we were already using Office 365 with a 100 GB mailbox. Migrating all emails would have taken considerable time and risked potential email loss.

Microsoft Copilot is integrated with E5, and some users are utilizing it for writing emails and creating presentations. Copilot is an effective AI engine that helps predict known vulnerabilities and facilitates notification management and task scheduling. 

For endpoint protection, we use Acronis through a separate console, which we've been using for 3-4 years with satisfaction. We are not using Microsoft Defender Advanced Security as it cannot currently integrate with third-party solutions. 

I would rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten. It is very stable. The GUI is very good and efficient. Everything is fine. The only issue is with the Android devices.

We use Microsoft Intune as an MDM solution for all of our Windows laptops and some of our company mobile phones. This serves as an endpoint solution we use so we can control the users' laptops or phones and have access to things on their devices.

Without Microsoft Intune, there would be a lot of cybersecurity attacks happening. We need to use Microsoft Intune so we know which devices can access all of our company resources. If they don't have Microsoft Intune, we automatically deny them from accessing company-sensitive information, so it serves as a layer to protect all of our assets.

I appreciate how easy it is to deploy certificates to end users to get control over their device with Microsoft Intune; that's what Microsoft Intune is known for, and that's what we use them for.

The user experience of Microsoft Intune is pretty easy. Initially, the user has to download a certificate, so when we first give them a certificate to download, they download it on their side, and once they verify themselves, we have access to their phone or laptop, which works pretty effectively.

We are using Microsoft Copilot with Microsoft Intune. Microsoft Copilot helps us with the deployment of Microsoft Intune. Previously, things were more difficult to manage, especially when certificates expire, as they need to be pushed out every year. Sometimes we forgot that, and then people's laptops stop working, so Microsoft Copilot helps us stay on track.

Microsoft Copilot is equally as important as Intune. The go hand in hand as it works in conjunction with Microsoft Intune to affect the deployment process.

Microsoft Intune can be improved by making it even more seamless for users to download their certificates. Currently, we have to push it out to their laptop and they have to do some work on their end, but if we could integrate it so it's seamlessly done and the end user doesn't even know that Microsoft Intune is on their laptop and it's just naturally there, that would be even better. This is especially true for Apple devices, such as Apple phones, where you have to push it out and the user has to accept or deny whether Microsoft Intune can have access to these applications. If it were easier for us to do it automatically without getting permission, that would be beneficial, but in today's environment, we have to get permission to access data.

To make it a perfect ten, it would be helpful if there was a better way to troubleshoot user issues, as I've had a few users with corrupt files before and had to redeploy it without knowing the root cause.

We have been using Microsoft Intune for eight years.

I would rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten for stability and reliability. We've never really had any issues with it in the past, and if we have, it's maybe one or two random people where their certificate is corrupt or something's wrong, so we just need to go back and redeploy it, which is not really a significant issue.

Microsoft Intune scales very effectively with our growing needs. The only requirement is more licenses, so once we get more licenses, we're able to deploy them more quickly.

I haven't needed to contact customer service or technical support, which is a good sign. Since I haven't had to use them, I have no experience with their quality of service.

Positive

We did not use a different solution. We started with Intune.

My experience with the deployment of Microsoft Intune was good. Initially, I didn't know much about it, so I had to review all the documentation, complete training, and watch videos to get familiar. Once I got a grasp of things, I tested it on my phone and laptop, and when it worked, I felt comfortable deploying it to more people. I eventually deployed it to about 7,000 machines as it scaled up.

The biggest return on investment for using Microsoft Intune comes down to protecting security. We are protecting all of our assets and using it as an endpoint MDM solution, which fulfills our needs.

Microsoft Intune costs about $7 per user per month, which is somewhat on the pricier end. That said, it's a reliable product, so it's fair. If it were less expensive, we would be able to roll it out to more people, so it's definitely something we're considering.

We use Microsoft Intune for Windows products and Jamf for Apple Mac products. I'm not sure if Microsoft Intune works for Macs. If they do, that's something we'd be interested in exploring.

I prefer Microsoft Intune because Jamf is not the most reliable solution based on my personal experience.

We do not use Microsoft Intune Suite's cloud PKI.

We also do not use the Enterprise Application Management features of Microsoft Intune Suite.

I haven't examined the Advanced Endpoint Analytics in the Microsoft Intune Suite yet. That said, we do have it; I just haven't had the opportunity to review it.

I rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten.

Microsoft Intune is primarily used for mobile device management (MDM) and mobile application management (MAM) to secure and manage corporate devices, applications, and data.

Microsoft Intune has proven to be highly effective in managing Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android devices. From inventory control and application management to security and compliance, Intune streamlines IT operations, significantly reducing management time. This efficiency allows IT staff to focus more on providing care and support to end users.

Microsoft Intune has significantly enhanced our organization's IT operations by streamlining device management, strengthening security, and improving overall efficiency. Key improvements include:

•  Simplified Device Management: Centralized control over Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android devices, reducing manual configurations and deployment time.

•  Enhanced Security & Compliance: Automated enforcement of security policies, including encryption, access controls, and compliance monitoring, ensuring data protection and regulatory adherence.

•  Improved Application Management: Seamless deployment and management of business-critical applications, reducing downtime and improving user experience.

•  Efficient Remote Work Support: Secure access to corporate resources for remote and hybrid employees, enabling productivity while maintaining security.

•  Reduced IT Workload: Automation of routine tasks, such as software updates and policy enforcement, allowing IT staff to focus on higher-value initiatives and user support.

From my expertise with Microsoft Intune, the most valuable features likely include:

1. Zero-Touch Deployment with Autopilot

• Why? It simplifies device provisioning, allowing new devices to be automatically configured with the correct policies, applications, and security settings. This reduces manual setup time and ensures consistency across the organization.

2. Endpoint Security & Compliance Policies

• Why? Enforcing security baselines, BitLocker encryption, and Defender settings ensures devices remain secure and compliant with industry standards, minimizing security risks.

3. Conditional Access & Integration with Microsoft 365

• Why? Conditional Access helps control who can access corporate resources based on device compliance, location, or risk level, enhancing security without disrupting productivity.

4. Mobile Application Management (MAM)

• Why? It allows control over corporate apps without managing an employee’s entire personal device, making it ideal for BYOD environments while protecting sensitive data.

5. Remote Actions (Wipe, Lock, Reset, and Remote Assistance)

• Why? The ability to remotely wipe lost or stolen devices, reset user passwords, or assist employees in troubleshooting reduces downtime and enhances security.

6. Software & Patch Management

• Why? Automating Windows updates, deploying critical patches, and ensuring app versions remain up to date improves security and reduces IT workload.

Microsoft often updates and modifies the user interface without providing timely documentation for administrators. Changes such as relocating options, renaming settings, or removing features altogether can create confusion. As a result, administrators must search through Microsoft documentation— which may not yet reflect these updates— to identify and adapt to the changes.

I have been utilizing Microsoft Intune across various deployments of the M365 GCC, GCCH, and commercial platforms for approximately 8 to 9 years.

The system itself is great. It is on an enhanced platform that I do not have anything to worry about. The only part I need to worry about is my own redundancy on my side since if my circuit goes down, I will lose connectivity to the platform.

Intune scales effectively as your organization grows. As the user base increases, the cost per user decreases, making it a sustainable solution. Additionally, features like Windows Autopilot simplify zero-touch deployment and device provisioning, saving valuable IT time as you scale.

The need for Microsoft support was minimal due to our ability to rely on available documentation, even though some of it was somewhat outdated. We were able to effectively use this documentation to understand the functionality and features of Intune within our organization's operations. While there were occasional gaps in the documentation, our internal expertise and familiarity with Microsoft 365 allowed us to navigate and implement the necessary configurations without significant external support. This proactive approach helped streamline the deployment and ongoing management of the platform.

Neutral

No, switching is unnecessary. Microsoft allows for the integration of third-party solutions or the development of custom alternatives within Power Platform.

The initial setup of Microsoft Intune can be considered relatively straightforward, but with some complexity that requires an engineering mindset for full optimization.

At a high level, the process involves configuring the service, setting up device policies, integrating with Azure Active Directory, and applying security settings. For organizations that already use Microsoft 365 services, the setup is generally more streamlined due to the integration with Azure AD, which simplifies user and device management.

However, for an engineer, the complexity arises in designing the policies, determining which configurations and security measures are required based on organizational needs, and ensuring that devices across multiple platforms (Windows, macOS, iOS, Android) are properly managed. The setup process also requires thoughtful planning to align with compliance requirements, such as data protection, encryption, and remote wipe capabilities. Configuring these settings with precision is crucial to avoid security vulnerabilities.

Moreover, the engineering mindset is essential when working with advanced configurations, such as conditional access policies, application deployment strategies, or setting up integration with other Microsoft services like Endpoint Manager or Defender for Endpoint. Testing and fine-tuning these configurations to ensure they work as intended across various devices and user profiles can add complexity but is necessary for long-term success and security.

Overall, while the setup can be streamlined, a thorough understanding of your organization’s IT architecture and security requirements is essential to leverage Intune effectively.

I collaborated with our in-house team to deploy Microsoft Intune as part of the broader Microsoft 365 suite. Together, we leveraged our internal resources and expertise to integrate Intune seamlessly into our existing environment, ensuring smooth deployment and configuration. By utilizing our team’s knowledge of our organization’s infrastructure and security requirements, we were able to customize Intune settings to meet our specific needs, providing a secure and efficient device management solution across the organization.

The resources required to house and manage numerous physical servers, maintain various third-party software license bundles, and handle the upkeep of the infrastructure—including costs for cooling, electricity, and regular maintenance—would incur a significant financial burden. When compared to an all-in-one, secure Microsoft cloud-based solution, the contrast becomes clear. The cloud eliminates the need for extensive physical maintenance, providing built-in security and scalability. It offers the flexibility to seamlessly integrate additional products, reducing the reliance on physical devices. This not only simplifies IT management but also reduces overall operational costs, making the Microsoft cloud-based solution the most cost-effective and efficient choice for businesses.

For businesses, especially those in regulated industries, the cost of security features like encryption, data loss prevention, and multi-factor authentication can add up quickly if purchased individually. However, with Microsoft 365, particularly in environments like GCC High, these essential features are bundled together, providing strong protection without the need for additional third-party solutions. For example, $1,000 per year for an end-user on GCC High is a competitive price when considering the built-in compliance certifications and government-grade encryption.

Although the pricing may seem high at first glance, Microsoft’s licensing model is structured to scale with the growth of an organization. As the business expands, the cost per user decreases, making it a long-term investment that supports growth and adaptability. Features like Windows Autopilot for zero-touch deployment, MDM (Mobile Device Management), and MAM (Mobile Application Management) simplify the management of an expanding device fleet, reducing administrative overhead.

A key advantage of Microsoft 365, including Intune, is its seamless integration with the wider Microsoft ecosystem. From SharePoint and OneDrive to Azure AD and Microsoft Teams, these components work together as a unified solution. The pricing reflects this comprehensive value, streamlining the management of various enterprise functions from a single platform and saving time and resources in the process.

We did evaluate other options, which were developed within Power Platform. These alternatives offer the same level of security, as they are built within the same platform as Microsoft Intune.

Overall, Microsoft Intune is a powerful tool for managing devices, securing corporate data, and integrating with the broader Microsoft ecosystem. A 9/10 rating reflects its strengths and the few areas where it could further enhance its capabilities.

We are using various security solutions and implementing a Zero Trust framework for our organization. Intune is part of this framework.

We are transforming our flat network by adopting different cloud solutions, and our own applications are hosted in the cloud. Intune ensures our security throughout our entire cloud-based system, improving our security posture.

Intune is valuable for managing various endpoints and integrating with the Azure cloud, which is essential for our organization. The user experience is good because we only use Microsoft solutions, which are user-friendly.

We have Intune's enterprise application management in our pipeline, and our infrastructure and hybrid cloud team are working together to deploy applications using Intune. It has security analytics, and more exciting features are on the way. 

Cloud PKI helps us manage the complexity of certificate infrastructure. Previously, we hosted all the VMs in our own data center, but now we're on the cloud, helping our user base and VMs grow. 

Copilot helps our engineers work better by making suggestions and offering resolution metrics. We can understand and push those patches or fixes from that side.

Intune could be improved by organizing different solutions, like Defender and Sentinel, into a single package. This would allow us to focus on security while Microsoft manages other areas. Having a unified solution would drive better management of various sectors. Although the Intune user experience is good, we should continue enhancing it.

I have used Intune for one and a half years.

Since we started last year, it's relatively new, and I would need more time to fully assess it. However, I have positive thoughts about Microsoft Intune's stability and anticipate it will be beneficial for us.

Intune is scalable, and Microsoft is always focused on scalability, especially for business conglomerates like ours. Scalability has been ensured, and it's working correctly.

I rate Microsoft support seven out of 10. Technical support can be challenging when resources shift, requiring repeated explanations. Support from India sometimes provides information without the right solution. Given our premium support, expert-level service from Microsoft could be enhanced. 

Neutral

Before Microsoft Intune, we used regular security solutions. We chose Microsoft Zero Trust for full security.

The initial setup was aided by our partner, who guided us well. Although there was much to learn initially, current processes have simplified the experience.

We worked with a local reseller, Elevate Solutions, who is implementing the Zero Trust framework for us. They have been committed and focused on implementing the right solutions, which has been helpful.

Earlier incidents caused data loss and required reentry. Microsoft Intune has improved our processes.

We have a limited budget for security investments, so Microsoft should consider reducing pricing in our region. This would make investment more viable, especially since larger businesses in other countries can afford it easily.

We evaluated Google Cloud Platform (GCP) before choosing Microsoft Intune, but since our team is experienced with Microsoft, and Microsoft's clear vision for the future aligns with ours, we chose Microsoft Intune.

I rate Microsoft Intune eight out of 10. 

I'm using Microsoft Intune for user rights and management of groups. I need to make profiles easy for the company while regulating security management of devices like laptops and mobile phones. I create profiles for them, deploy the devices, and manage everything from users to groups, profiles, and deployment.

I appreciate how clear Microsoft Intune is. However, I dislike how it lags sometimes. I cannot work on multiple processes at the same time. For example, I cannot work on one screen to find a problem on a user's account, on another screen to deploy a phone, and on a third screen to work on a profile to make adjustments simultaneously. Microsoft Intune lags and is not responsive when attempting this.

A better and more friendly user interface would be helpful because at first sight, things appear easy. However, it is not immediately clear how profiles work together with groups and why a laptop appears on one device for Windows and at the same time appears on a group separately. If I delete it from a device, it is not deleted from the group. I have to perform multiple checks in order to wipe a device.

Including a profile for Zebra technology devices such as PDAs or printers would be beneficial. I would like to manage these kinds of devices in Microsoft Intune as well.

Incorporating an AI such as Gemini could be valuable. I could ask it questions such as "I have this thing to solve in Microsoft Intune" or "I need to include this new option in a profile for a device" instead of searching for where I need to put it or searching on Google or forums about how to program it. The AI could do it for me.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for almost two years.

I am fine with both stability and responsiveness.

I really do not know because Microsoft Intune is managed from another country. I work from a step below.

I have not had any interactions with customer service.

I am not currently working on developing another solution with Microsoft Intune. I am using the existing one. I am not using any other product for managing my devices.

I do not know at all because I work in IT and the cost and licensing costs are managed by management.

The aspects I have already mentioned include the introduction of AI for some modifications on profiles. I was telling them to spend some time researching how things are working behind the screen, specifically how it works and how I have to think about them working in a backend part.

Before Microsoft Intune, I did not use any other product for device management or EMM remote access. I did not search about them and have no problem because I have more focus on how to improve the existing solution in Microsoft Intune for deployment to make it faster.

I do not know anything about the technical support and have not escalated any questions to them. My overall rating for this review is 8.

Its price is reasonable. It is a part of our M365 suite.

I have not been satisfied with it, and I am planning to change it soon. There are a lot of updates coming from Microsoft that suddenly affect our security policies. With each update, a new feature is introduced. However, there's often no clear advice regarding these changes. If we encounter a problem, we have to rely on the Microsoft Community to discover that a new feature has impacted our security policy, at which point we need to make adjustments. That's why I plan to position our operations around an agnostic tool.

Overall, Intune is quite complex, especially if you have conditional access associated.

They can cover Apple iOS in the future to enhance its functionality.

I have been working with Microsoft Intune for more than 5 years.

The kind of issues I face include a lot of updates coming from Microsoft that all of a sudden affect our security policies.

Technical support by Microsoft is okay.

Neutral

We are not using Microsoft Intune for patch management. We are looking into Kaseya. I am satisfied with Kaseya, which is why I would like to further evaluate standardizing Kaseya across the organization. I don't want to utilize Microsoft Intune because I prefer an agnostic solution rather than one that is heavily reliant on a specific brand.

Its deployment was neither easy nor difficult.

I don't have any problem as far as cost is concerned. It is bundled with our license. 

I would rate Microsoft Intune a seven out of ten.

I am the end user of Microsoft Intune. Our company has moved our Windows and Mac devices to Microsoft Intune, which allows us to have common policies and manage all the devices.

I find what is most valuable about Microsoft Intune is how, at the granular level, it allows us to manage the devices.

I have realized that while it provides a lot of granular control on Windows devices, it has comparatively less functionality for Mac.

I have been working with Microsoft Intune for a total of four years of work experience in Intune.

It is good, but Microsoft Intune is sometimes browser-specific in terms of stability and performance.

I think the scalability of Microsoft Intune depends on the company, as it provides a lot of flexibility regarding licensing and storage.

I have tried to communicate with Microsoft Intune's technical support once, but I think it is better to explore solutions on our own. Based on my experience with technical support, I would rate them around six or seven, as it highly depends on who raises the query.

I have only been working with Microsoft products and my company was using AWS before gradually migrating everything to Microsoft.

I have main projects only on Microsoft Intune.

I do use Microsoft Intune's Cloud PKI. I have not used much of Microsoft Intune's Cloud PKI, as we have only used it in our tenant to save important passwords.

We have a Copilot license for mainly admins in Microsoft Intune, and I have been using it. Usually, if I want to track the sign-ins of any user, I can tell Copilot to fetch the sign-in data for that user in a specific location, and it actually fetches all the data. We can train the Copilot agent for Microsoft Intune to defend against any threats, and we are trying to tell it how to handle these situations.

I am not using the Enterprise Application Management features of Microsoft Intune; there is an application manager in my team who is using it.

I am currently working on Microsoft Intune's advanced endpoint analytics. For now, Defender is doing the job in helping us with the security aspect, as we have not fully configured everything in Microsoft Intune yet.

When I started working at my current company, Microsoft Intune was already there, but only for Windows devices. I am not aware of the pricing and licensing of Microsoft Intune, as there is a separate billing administrator handling it.

I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.

We are using Microsoft Intune for the management of desktops and laptops because we have a business where we don't have all users in the office. Many of them work from home from different countries. Management of the devices was almost impossible with the tools that we were using before, such as ServiceDesk. We are using Office 365, and we are Microsoft users in a Microsoft environment. After that, we decided to grow with Microsoft Intune. Initially, it was planned to better manage the devices and serve as a deployment tool.

Microsoft Intune has definitely affected IT productivity in our company. We shortened the time for issuing new PCs and changing PCs. It enforced our security and deployment of the Gold Build. We were waiting for that; it shortened that time significantly, and we got our security certifications regarding that very fast after we bought it. Junior technicians and help desk staff had much less time to spend on the deployment of the PCs.

We are using the endpoint privilege management feature and find it very useful and good.

The thing I appreciate most about Microsoft Intune is that the management of the devices was very simplified. We have all machines connected to it at all times, whether they are in the office or working from home. The greatest thing is that we create unique deployments for security, which we call the Gold Build Windows 11, and the deployment of that operating system with all the security settings that we set up for our business is very easy; it is much simplified compared to before. We created everything that we needed on Microsoft Intune, and all you need to do is just set up a new PC or an existing one, put it on the network, and let Microsoft Intune do everything else in order to have a completely full machine with everything you need from one place. Everything that you need to change, when we decide to change something, is in one place and will be deployed immediately.

Reporting can be better. Only global administrators can see detailed reports at the moment, and I don't want to use the global admin. We have only two global administrators in the USA and Europe, and it should be available for the global reader role because currently, when I need to do some reporting, I have to send a request for the global admin report.

We didn't have any complaints in terms of user experience, from administrators or from users. The only problem for us was that we had different access levels for the administrators, and that was very hard to accomplish. That was the one part that we were keen on and contacted support. It's not so granular. That was the problem.

One thing that I don't appreciate in deployment is that it needs to be put in the group of the machines over the security group; you cannot put it into only one PC.

I started using Microsoft Intune in my last company, and I have been using it for almost two years.

We didn't have any issues regarding stability.

Microsoft Intune is very scalable.

It's a great suite for big companies that have over 3,000 users and many devices to manage. It's great from the management point of the devices, and also users; it's collaborative with Office 365, and the pricing is for companies that have more than 3,000 users.

We contacted them when we had the issue with the serial numbers of the machines. Microsoft support was not very responsive, and it took approximately one and a half months to get on a call to clear what the problem was. Every time they changed technicians, we had to explain the problem again. We were explaining for one and a half months without getting help. We ultimately resolved the problem ourselves. They are not responsive and not intuitive in giving solutions.

Neutral

We used Service Desk Plus previously. At the moment, we are using other management tools, but very soon, we will go for Microsoft One. Between Service Desk Plus and Microsoft Intune, I prefer Microsoft Intune because of its pricing and features.

In terms of app discovery, deployment, and automatic updating, it's great; although sometimes, it's very hard to find the deployment version of the applications for Microsoft Intune because some software companies do not create them. For example, we find it much simpler in other software, such as Datto. We use Datto for remote access and deployment of some specific applications, but for most applications, we use Microsoft Intune. 

The initial deployment was not difficult for me. The project took one month to deploy.

We saw the benefits of Microsoft Intune after some time. We had some issues, and we contacted support at Microsoft. We used a lot of non-brand machines, and that was the issue. We couldn't enroll them in Microsoft Intune because they didn't have serial numbers, and unfortunately, Microsoft couldn't help us on that. We solved the issue by ourselves by writing down in the BIOS our internal number with a script, and that was the solution. After we crossed that bridge, it was much better.

We had a very small team; three engineers were doing the implementation.

The overall pricing of Microsoft Intune is good for companies that have big IT budgets, 3,000 or more users and devices.

We started using Copilot, but we stopped the usage of AI at the moment in our domain. We want to make it more granular in terms of who can use it. Our end users cannot use it. It was a request from our clients to set that up at this point, and we have an IT department in the company that will make improvements. We took Copilot professional licenses, and it's very good.

It is important for us that the capabilities of the Intune Suite are integrated with Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Security for both cloud and co-managed devices. We are still in hybrid mode, but within Intune, Office 365, and Azure, we will soon be in the cloud, totally independent of anything on the ground.

I would rate Microsoft Intune an eight out of ten.

We primarily use Microsoft Intune for managing laptops, cell phones, and mobile devices. We aim to have control over corporate data when it is on personal or company-owned devices. This control is crucial for ensuring data protection, especially when a device is lost or goes missing.

Microsoft Intune helps us avoid issuing everyone company-owned devices. We provide a stipend, allowing users to bring their own devices. This approach gives us leverage against other MSPs. It also enhances collaboration because clients already covered by specific licensing can optimize their usage of Microsoft Intune.

Intune's integration with Microsoft 365 is exceptional. It allows a cohesive management experience for users, especially for a small MSP like ours. The automated deployment and configuration using Autopilot and the ability to secure data on lost devices are particularly helpful features.

The solution's user experience is so simple I can give a two-page PDF on how to enroll a cell phone or device, and they can follow it. Automatic enrollments help us migrate large numbers of users.  We take it slowly with them, but they are surprised at how easy it is to enroll a device.

We're still preparing to turn on Copilot in our environment for testing, but we need to sort our security more. We're doing a demo of Copilot, and we're checking out the features. We use another tool to pull the device data, but having everything in a single pane of glass makes more sense. We have to pull this information from four windows now, so having everything in one place is simpler.  

Training will be much easier for us than training someone on 20 different. Giving someone a few videos and having them start going through it will be more straightforward. I'm excited to see the growth of Copilot with Intune.

I would like Intune to natively support easier report generation. This improvement would enable less experienced staff to run reports more efficiently without relying on additional tools or functions.

We have been using Microsoft Intune for at least six years.

Microsoft Intune is reliable. Devices do not frequently go offline, and any connectivity issues usually stem from the user's side, such as a device being turned off.

Microsoft Intune allows us to scale device management efficiently. The system is easy for both technical and non-technical users to navigate, supporting a wide range of devices without complications.

I rate Microsoft customer service six out of 10. While some technicians go above and beyond, there is inconsistency, and connecting with the most helpful representatives is occasionally challenging.

Neutral

We initially used AirWatch for mobile device management before Intune matured. Eventually, Intune’s integration with Microsoft 365 became advantageous, allowing us to consolidate systems and migrate clients using alternative solutions back to Intune.

The setup, especially for mobile devices, has become entirely automated. Devices sync with accounts like Apple Business Manager or Samsung Knox, eliminating the need for hands-on configuration. From there, you can deploy everything by device or user login. 

Before, we used to bring them into our office. We would configure it and ship it out. We now pushed that back to the client and someone in charge of cell phone policy. Once they're powered on and signed in, everything else is taken care of.

We consulted Pax8, our partner, during the implementation for insights on licensing and Intune integration. Their support, coupled with information from Microsoft Ignite, helped address hybrid enrollment challenges.

We've seen a positive return on investment. The ease of use, along with automated features, proved beneficial when handling lost devices. A client successfully restored their wiped iPad and laptop, showcasing the system's efficiency.

Our company uses a flat rate model called stress-free IT. This model aligns with the necessary licensing, making it easy to cover features like Intune and conditional access, which are integral to our service offering.

We evaluated AirWatch (VMware AirWatch) and other mobile device management solutions before consolidating our clients under Intune due to its superior integration with Microsoft 365.

I rate Microsoft Intune nine out of 10.