Microsoft Intune Reviews

We use Intune for security or endpoint inside the company and especially for many customers we have.

Microsoft Intune has helped us by improving our security posture, leading to fewer security problems, and helping us understand where we have issues. 

Intune's compliance features are valuable because they allow for immediate visibility into ongoing situations. The solution is very easy to use. We haven't implemented Microsoft Copilot but will adopt it next year. It will be interesting to use natural language to interact with Intune.

It would be interesting to integrate the server side of Intune. Some group policy updates we have on the Windows Server side and possibly some on the client side could also be included.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for about two years.

Microsoft Intune is very stable.

The scalability of Microsoft Intune is good. We don't have large customers, so we haven't seen any issues with scalability.

I rate Microsoft support nine out of 10. Customer service and technical support are good. The technical support from Microsoft and Infineon Technologies is also good. The quality and professionalism of the people are really good, although sometimes we need to escalate to get the right content and answers.

Positive

We previously used a solution from an older competitor that is now defunct.

We did not use an integrator, reseller, or consultant for the deployment because we are an integrator.

Our customers have seen a significant return on investment because they now understand and see where the problems are on the endpoints without needing to search the entire company.

We know the pricing is good because customers are not complaining about it.

We directly switched to Microsoft Intune after receiving good feedback from customers.

I would rate Intune eight out of 10. Some features could be added, but it is a rock-solid solution.

We primarily use Microsoft Intune for managing laptops, cell phones, and mobile devices. We aim to have control over corporate data when it is on personal or company-owned devices. This control is crucial for ensuring data protection, especially when a device is lost or goes missing.

Microsoft Intune helps us avoid issuing everyone company-owned devices. We provide a stipend, allowing users to bring their own devices. This approach gives us leverage against other MSPs. It also enhances collaboration because clients already covered by specific licensing can optimize their usage of Microsoft Intune.

Intune's integration with Microsoft 365 is exceptional. It allows a cohesive management experience for users, especially for a small MSP like ours. The automated deployment and configuration using Autopilot and the ability to secure data on lost devices are particularly helpful features.

The solution's user experience is so simple I can give a two-page PDF on how to enroll a cell phone or device, and they can follow it. Automatic enrollments help us migrate large numbers of users.  We take it slowly with them, but they are surprised at how easy it is to enroll a device.

We're still preparing to turn on Copilot in our environment for testing, but we need to sort our security more. We're doing a demo of Copilot, and we're checking out the features. We use another tool to pull the device data, but having everything in a single pane of glass makes more sense. We have to pull this information from four windows now, so having everything in one place is simpler.  

Training will be much easier for us than training someone on 20 different. Giving someone a few videos and having them start going through it will be more straightforward. I'm excited to see the growth of Copilot with Intune.

I would like Intune to natively support easier report generation. This improvement would enable less experienced staff to run reports more efficiently without relying on additional tools or functions.

We have been using Microsoft Intune for at least six years.

Microsoft Intune is reliable. Devices do not frequently go offline, and any connectivity issues usually stem from the user's side, such as a device being turned off.

Microsoft Intune allows us to scale device management efficiently. The system is easy for both technical and non-technical users to navigate, supporting a wide range of devices without complications.

I rate Microsoft customer service six out of 10. While some technicians go above and beyond, there is inconsistency, and connecting with the most helpful representatives is occasionally challenging.

Neutral

We initially used AirWatch for mobile device management before Intune matured. Eventually, Intune’s integration with Microsoft 365 became advantageous, allowing us to consolidate systems and migrate clients using alternative solutions back to Intune.

The setup, especially for mobile devices, has become entirely automated. Devices sync with accounts like Apple Business Manager or Samsung Knox, eliminating the need for hands-on configuration. From there, you can deploy everything by device or user login. 

Before, we used to bring them into our office. We would configure it and ship it out. We now pushed that back to the client and someone in charge of cell phone policy. Once they're powered on and signed in, everything else is taken care of.

We consulted Pax8, our partner, during the implementation for insights on licensing and Intune integration. Their support, coupled with information from Microsoft Ignite, helped address hybrid enrollment challenges.

We've seen a positive return on investment. The ease of use, along with automated features, proved beneficial when handling lost devices. A client successfully restored their wiped iPad and laptop, showcasing the system's efficiency.

Our company uses a flat rate model called stress-free IT. This model aligns with the necessary licensing, making it easy to cover features like Intune and conditional access, which are integral to our service offering.

We evaluated AirWatch (VMware AirWatch) and other mobile device management solutions before consolidating our clients under Intune due to its superior integration with Microsoft 365.

I rate Microsoft Intune nine out of 10. 

Our company has consistently used Microsoft products. As the mobile device administrator, I oversaw the transition from Workspace ONE to Microsoft Intune. This decision stemmed from a desire to reduce licensing costs by leveraging existing Microsoft licenses held by all employees, ultimately leading to significant financial savings.

Intune consolidates endpoint and security management tools into a single platform. This centralized approach allows for specialized roles while maintaining a shared understanding of the complete security solution.

Intune's overall user experience is good.

Intune's most valuable feature is its centralized management capability.

The enterprise application management system for mobile devices is effective for app discovery, deployment, and automatic updates. The automatic update feature functions well, eliminating the need for manual updates and individual prompts, which is convenient for both administrators and users.

Intune has made things easier for us because we are using Autopilot to build our laptops.

We've saved a lot of money by moving from Workspace ONE to Microsoft Intune for mobiles.

I've recently started using Microsoft Intune, specifically its mobile device management features. While both Intune and Workspace ONE offer similar functionality, I've noticed that Workspace ONE operates in real-time, whereas Intune has a noticeable delay when deploying policies or apps. The time we have to wait to deploy policies has room for improvement.

People using Intune for Windows deployment, etcetera, can get annoyed because of the Windows updates.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for three months because we've just moved over.

From a mobile perspective, Microsoft Intune has been stable.

From a mobile perspective, Microsoft Intune is easily scalable.

I have contacted technical support only once, and it was very helpful.

Positive

We used VMware Workspace ONE previously. The decision to switch and save on costs was made by the higher-ups.

I would rate Microsoft Intune nine out of ten.

I would definitely recommend Intune to a colleague. It provides a centralized platform for managing various devices, including laptops, desktops, and mobile devices, and seamlessly integrates with other Microsoft solutions like Azure and Active Directory.

We have a team that continuously works on solutions to make workflows smooth, like building laptops and ensuring deployments work smoothly.

Microsoft Intune is deployed across various departments and locations within our local government council. We have different physical sites and departments, and Intune is managed and implemented at the departmental level.

Our team is continuously developing solutions to streamline the laptop production workflow, including assembly, traffic management, and deployment. We also have a separate team dedicated to ensuring the process runs smoothly.

We use Microsoft Intune to deploy applications, check Autopilot status, and deploy Autopilot applications. We also use it to manage user profiles, assess compliance, and define compliance and configuration profiles, among other Intune configurations.

We implemented Intune to improve our compliance.

Intune consolidates all our endpoint and security management tools into a single platform. Intune allows us to securely manage Windows, macOS, iOS, Linux, and Android devices, both corporate-owned and personally owned, in one centralized location.

The user-friendly enterprise application management system allows easy app discovery, deployment, and automatic updates without IT assistance.

Microsoft Intune Suite is a great tool for MDM.

We use Copilot whenever we encounter difficulties or receive error messages while working on a solution.

Copilot is beneficial for environmental protection as it assists in finding solutions by providing necessary information.

Copilot helped simplify our IT and security operations overall.

Microsoft Intune has significantly improved how we manage our devices, applications, and security regulations.

Intune enables us to easily manage and secure hybrid work environments, safeguarding company and personal device data.

Intune's endpoint privilege management improves user productivity because we can create temporary privileged accounts.

Endpoint privilege management, through its implementation of least privileged access, helps to reduce our organization's attack surface by limiting potential vulnerabilities related to security and authentication.

Intune has improved our IT productivity. Auto patching has freed up their time because it requires no administrative support.

Microsoft Intune has helped save us costs by consolidating multiple tools into Intune.

Microsoft Intune Suite's integration with Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Security is great for both cloud and co-managed devices because we can use it to form a single dashboard for enabling and managing licenses and creating accounts. 

The most valuable feature of Intune is the user-friendly portal for end users.

One drawback of Intune is that we cannot find devices based on a user's region or location. As a global organization, having this ability would be helpful.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for four years.

Intune is stable. We have not encountered any downtime.

Intune scales to our needs.

The prolonged response time from technical support for Intune is unacceptable, as this tool is critical to our organization's operations.

Neutral

We previously utilized Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager but transitioned to Intune due to its advanced capabilities and cloud-based architecture, enabling centralized management and accessibility.

Intune reduces the need for administrators, resulting in time and cost savings by eliminating the on-premises hardware and personnel.

I would rate Microsoft Intune eight out of ten.

We manage over 5,000 devices using Intune, which requires a team of two to three people for maintenance.

Microsoft Intune is a good tool for large organizations. I recommend using the trial version and conducting a POC.

While Microsoft Intune offers centralized management and policy enforcement, it doesn't consolidate all endpoint and security management tools into a single platform. To comprehensively safeguard systems, additional solutions such as Microsoft Defender for Endpoint are necessary.

Achieving comprehensive endpoint visibility and IT control across various device platforms is a complex task, considering the diversity and freedom inherent in different systems. However, when it comes to deploying and managing devices like tablets, mobile phones, laptops, and specialized devices in Germany, a systematic and organized approach is crucial. Particularly noteworthy is the ability to configure IoT devices, such as numerous thermostats, water control systems, or sprinkler devices. Without a solution like Intune, scaling becomes a challenging issue, especially when dealing with thousands of such devices. Therefore, the use of a system like Intune becomes imperative in addressing these scaling challenges and ensuring effective device management.

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate my user experience with Intune as a six. The lack of intuitiveness makes it cumbersome to track and understand what needs configuration, especially when dealing with aspects like OneDrive and having to cross-reference settings across different areas of Intune.

In the context of securing hybrid work with Intune, our experience involved a two-day effort to configure the certificate for the Conditional Access server. However, once this initial setup was completed, we successfully configured VPN access for mobile phones. Despite the initial complexity, especially for a large company, Intune delivered on its advertised promises and proved effective in fulfilling the intended security functions.

Intune's effectiveness in securing data on company and BYOD devices is based on distributing security configuration data. While valuable, Intune has limitations, and comprehensive protection against cyber threats requires a sophisticated approach, including hybrid artificial intelligence solutions like Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. While Intune aids in system configuration, detecting and preventing attacks demands a more advanced defense strategy, comparable to sophisticated endpoint protection. Hybrid AI, with continuous human input, enhances threat evaluation, recognizing nuanced situations like suspicious timings in actions on developer endpoints.

It positively impacted IT productivity within the organization by enabling the secure addition of thousands of mobile phones to the VPN. In this regard, it performed effectively.

It played a crucial role in mitigating the risk of security breaches by securely distributing VPN certificates. While effective in this aspect, it's important to note that this alone is not sufficient. Endpoint security, such as developer endpoints, is analogous to having specialized tools for reading and managing complex systems.

It significantly contributed to cost savings. Manual configuration for each mobile phone would have taken approximately an hour per device per year, amounting to three or four thousand hours annually. However, with Intune, we accomplished the task in two days for five thousand devices, equivalent to around one hundred sixty hours. This resulted in substantial efficiency, reducing the effort from an ongoing five thousand hours per year to a one-time investment of a hundred sixty hours.

One of the most valuable aspects of Microsoft Intune is its seamless integration with Azure Active Directory, offering capabilities akin to Group Policy Objects. This integration provides a centralized platform for managing and enforcing policies, ensuring the stability of configuration data across devices, resembling the familiar functionalities of traditional group policies in an on-premises Active Directory environment.

In utilizing Intune's endpoint privilege management feature, I've primarily focused on configuring VPN access and certificates, although I'm not an Intune specialist. It's versatile enough for both configuring VPN access and managing large-scale IoT servers. For instance, in building management systems, especially in large structures like bank buildings, where numerous actuators are involved, configuring and securing them becomes a complex task. Intune proves valuable in this context. However, it's essential to recognize that while Intune serves as a powerful tool, relying solely on it is insufficient for comprehensive system security.

The integration of Intune capabilities with Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Security is crucial. As mentioned earlier, securing your machine requires tools like a developer endpoint, and relying solely on Intune may not be sufficient. While Intune allows configuration and deployment of Defender for Endpoints, having a dedicated tool is essential. The unique selling point of Microsoft lies in its seamless integration, especially notable for those working with Linux systems, where Microsoft's comprehensive integration sets it apart.

In terms of configuration, my experience with Intune is somewhat mixed. The configuration tool appears to be scattered throughout the Intune interface, requiring frequent navigation back and forth. The web interface, while functional, isn't particularly user-friendly, leading me to find PowerShell a preferable option. However, using PowerShell involves investing time in developing scripts. The challenge lies in the complexity of navigating between profiles and MDM configurations. Multiple windows need to be open simultaneously to grasp the overall configuration landscape.

I wish there was an improvement in the configuration process, as currently, it involves navigating through different locations with multiple windows open. Having a dedicated configuration server that assists in modifying the configuration service, and creating personalized structures, interfaces, and web services could enhance usability.

I have been working with it for three years. 

When evaluating stability, it's essential to consider the multitude of adversarial attempts, particularly from military opponents engaging in hacking activities. Microsoft has demonstrated its capability to withstand and defend against such sophisticated attacks, setting a high standard for security.

Considering the extensive number of support calls, I believe Microsoft handles them as effectively as possible. I would rate its customer service and support eight out of ten.

Positive

In the past, we utilized Windows services.

The number of people required for deployment depends on the specific tasks at hand. For instance, implementing the VPN solution involved five individuals, including specialists for firewalls and virtualization for the server endpoint. If the focus is solely on Intune-related tasks, one expert may be sufficient. However, in typical scenarios where Intune is used for onboarding machines or mobile device management, you'll need administrators with access to the relevant machines. It functions as a collaborative administration tool, and the required personnel would depend on the number of departments involved.

The pricing is inherently reasonable, as Microsoft leverages market insights to maintain the total cost of ownership at around ninety to ninety-five percent of what would be incurred in an on-premise scenario. Microsoft products inherently benefit from economies of scale and global reach, making them cost-effective.

It aids in vendor consolidation; otherwise, we would have had to manually configure around three thousand mobile phones.

It impacts the security posture positively when you are aware of what you configure and can update configurations promptly. However, as mentioned, the need for artificial intelligence in Endpoint Protection remains crucial.

I would recommend subscribing to reputable YouTube channels that focus on Intune or related topics. Building a strong foundation and gaining practical experience is crucial to understanding the intricacies of Intune. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

I'm using all the services that Intune provides, including managing Windows 10 devices and mobile devices, with both the mobile application management and without enrolling the devices. I use it for deploying configuration profiles, compliance and app protection policies, as well as onboarding Windows 10 devices to the Defender portal.

I haven't used other mobile device management solutions, but compared to SCCM, we eliminate a lot of on-premises infrastructure and maintenance by using Intune.

For mobile device management, especially for the Windows operating system, it's quite impressive. But it would really be helpful to have the option to manage server operating systems as well, like Windows Server, at least. That way, we could scrap the use of SCCM, which requires a lot of on-premises infrastructure.

Another area for improvement is the reporting structure. For example, currently, when deploying Windows 10 or Windows 11 updates, I don't get any detail or structured reports showing which updates are installed on the devices. It only gives me information on whether the update policy has been successfully deployed on the device or not. That type of installed-updates detail would be helpful.

I've been working with Intune for more than four years. I'm part of a support operations team managing clients' infrastructures on Intune.

The product is very stable. If you have to think about managing devices securely, go with Intune. Although I have not used any other mobile device management solutions, Intune is very reliable and it's hardly out of service at all.

From the start of my career, I have been managing clients in Europe but Microsoft has no boundaries when it comes to using Intune. There are certain services that are restricted to specific regions, but that is not the case with Intune. It can be used in any region and with any number of users. I have managed environments with 5,000 to 10,000 devices enrolled in Intune.

If there is a service outage, that is made very clear on Microsoft's service portal in the admin center. But if an issue comes up where, for example, a policy deployed from Intune has not been received on a device, it is very difficult to evaluate whether the issue is with Intune or the device. In that scenario, Microsoft itself is confused about whether the situation has to be escalated to the desktop support team or the Intune team.

Other than that, everything is good.

Neutral

The initial deployment process is very straightforward. It's software as a service. You just buy the subscription and start using it. It's not the case that there are very complex configurations or prerequisites to start off.

It does not require any maintenance on the customer's side. Microsoft takes care of all the maintenance.

Having devices managed at scale and maintaining security posture are, of course, value-adds, in comparison with the cost our clients pay to purchase the service. It is worth it.

Microsoft offers different licensing structures. It offers standalone licensing for Intune, but Intune is also included in other licenses, such as for Microsoft 365, E3, and E5, Business Premium, and Business Standard.

There are other MDM solutions, like Workspace One from VMware, which has support for server operating systems as well. I've never used it but I did a quick comparison of the supported operating systems.

We use it to a small extent for approximately 1,100 devices. The biggest portion of it is used in the Aviation department, which is one of our departments. They have invested heavily in some customized software that they've developed in-house. It is put on the devices, and the devices are primarily used by field staff. It's basically a mixture of work order assignment and work order management, as well as record keeping. For example, I could have a technician who is assigned to go and do a preventive maintenance inspection on an HVAC component in one of the terminals. That request or work order is submitted to his device. When he gets there, he scans barcodes for the room he is in and for the piece of equipment that he is working on. So, they track their actual work order, work order status, workloads, and equipment life cycle, and that's all done through Intune.

It helps us in securing devices. It has eliminated a lot of paperwork. It has simplified record-keeping and maintenance of equipment, life cycle management, staff workload, work hours, et cetera. That's the biggest impact on us, and that's also where most of the devices are used.

Its security is most valuable. It gives us a way to secure devices, not only those that are steady. We do have a few tablets and other devices, and it is a way for us to secure these devices and manage them. We know they're out there and what's their status. We can manage their life cycle and verify that they're updated properly.

It doesn't economize when you scale up. We have over 14,000 employees, and we have between 7,500 and 8,000 city-owned or personal devices being used to conduct city business. Its price can be improved. It is not a cheap solution.

It has been years since it was implemented.

Its stability has been fine. We've had no issues at all.

I don't see any issues with it. We currently have only about 1,100 users and licenses for the Intune product. The largest portion or over 50% of usage is by our Aviation department for tracking and managing their work order, workload,  equipment life cycle, etc. Other users are scattered in small numbers throughout a number of departments. 

Our Parts department also uses it. One thing that's a little bit unique is that they also have these assigned to temporary workers. So, we provide the licenses for a number of temporary workers for the summer or for the winter, and then we take them back and reassign them to somebody else. 

The other departments mostly use it for educational or small use cases where they think this will be a good fit, and it is the product that is available to them. I've heard nothing bad about it, and I have no problem at all with Intune.

In terms of future growth, we're currently looking at another product, but that doesn't mean we're going to go with that other product. We're working with a vendor on another solution, and that vendor also has a mobile device management product, but we're not yet ready to go there.

I've no direct input on it. Right now, we're on unified support, but we've always had their premier support. If we ever have a problem with any of our Microsoft products, including Intune, we do have a way to reach out and get additional assistance.

I'm not aware of any other solution being used. I know there were one or possibly two failed mobile device management project implementations. I was not a member of the department then, so I don't know the details. I only know that both of the deployments failed. In other words, either the vendor promises were not met, or we found a function that was supposed to exist but did not exist. 

It was pretty straightforward. It was not a very long, complex, and involved process. It was fairly easy to set up.

It was done in-house. For its maintenance, we have no one dedicated to it. Our client computing side takes care of that.

I've never tried to quantify an ROI for the program. We have just a small number of devices. At some point, we will look at implementing large-scale mobile device management, and that'll be a different case where we may look at Intune, Workspace ONE, or another product.

It is not a cheap solution. The price for a device when you start using it at a large scale can be improved.

It is covered under our enterprise agreement. We pay once a year. I am not aware of any additional costs.

It meets the basic security needs and management needs for most organizations. It allows you to monitor the security of devices and manage those devices if they're organization-owned. It is fairly easy and straightforward to manage. It is not difficult. Some of the other solutions are a little bit more difficult.

I would rate it an eight out of 10. It meets all the basic needs that most organizations will have for device management and device security. I am not sure if it can provide the required level of security for different business scenarios that require additional security, which means you'd have to run two systems in tandem.

Currently, we use Intune for endpoint security and deployments. We're migrating from SCCM to Intune cloud-first technology. We use it to deploy applications, CSPs, and conditional access.

Previously, we used on-prem SCCM to deploy applications we built manually. After migrating to Intune, we automated and streamlined the process of deploying applications with Autopilot. I can do more with my day. I can manage more applications and ensure that they're updated without monitoring and manually starting that process all over again.

My director used to say that we need to have cattle, not pets. You need to care for and manage pets, but you only need to feed cattle and put them out to pasture. Once you deploy it, you just let them out to pasture, and they update themselves. It's streamlined and so easy.

I've been exploring the Intune Suite, which includes Security Copilot and enterprise application management. EAM is a godsend. I can manage my third-party applications without having to worry about it. I

I set up a proof of concept for the advanced analytics. It was very streamlined. I like the information I got from it. For example, when we were troubleshooting an application, it told me possible scenarios and commonalities between group one and group two and what could be the issue. It is great in that aspect, but we decided ultimately we didn't want to go with it.

We're still learning how Copilot fits into our environment and setting up a POC for Security Copilot. We're trialing Copilot for a subset of users to get a baseline of how we're gonna be using it. I use it to manage my day, meetings, teams, and chats. It keeps me organized.

There are challenges with Intune, specifically in reporting. Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive. You can connect to Azure, monitoring, and the workbooks, but it's not streamlined. 

The user experience is still a little difficult. In the first version of Intune, everything is all over the place. It wasn't organized, and things weren't categorized. They changed the name in six months, and we had to relearn everything. 

I have used Microsoft solutions for about 15 years.

I am very impressed with the stability of Microsoft Intune. There hasn't been an instance where things just weren't working. While there may be service alerts or outages, it doesn't significantly impact our operations.

I rate Microsoft support five out of 10. Customer service is inconsistent. Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.

Neutral

We looked at Tanium and Recast for servers and management but ultimately chose to stay with Intune.

The initial setup was made easier with online resources. After setting up some basic components and connections, everything was interconnected seamlessly.

We used a consultant for further development after it was configured. CDW was used to help refine the setup.

There is a return on investment, particularly with the Enterprise Application Management and the efficient deployment features of Intune. It has given me more time in my workday.

Experience with pricing and licensing was challenging. Understanding Microsoft's licensing costs can require certification, making it difficult to know exactly what is needed versus what is available.

I would rate Intune seven out of 10. As much as I sing Intune's praises, I would like more improvements, especially in the reporting. We need to standardize how we use the solution. For example, just in October, we had the update rings completely fleshed out. Then, I went on vacation, and when I came back in October, it had completely changed with new names and new scenes. There are lots of strategic hoops to jump through, but it's a solid solution.