Microsoft Intune Reviews

We are using Microsoft Intune for mobile device management (MDM) to provide context-aware access to the users. Mobile device management is what we predominantly use Microsoft Intune for.

Initially, the scope of Microsoft Intune was not too good because it could only manage certain endpoints such as laptops, desktops, and mobile devices. We initially had a problem with the servers, but they started supporting servers in the last three or four years, so now, it is good. It manages virtual machines and servers, both on-premises and in the cloud. It has improved and is still improving in a lot of areas. 

It provides group policies that we had in the early days of Active Directory. That is good when it comes to applying the policies to endpoints and servers from Microsoft Intune. Initially, we did not have all group policy settings inside Microsoft Intune, whereas now, we have patching and the ability to push the policies for antiviruses, etc. We can also handle mobile device management policies. Everything can be done via a single console. It is easily manageable, and we can have a single administrator to manage all the policies. We can have one or two administrators for backup. Traditionally, we had multiple administrators for each and every console. When you are a big Microsoft shop, it is easy to manage everything.

Microsoft Intune is good for a hybrid workplace. The conditional access policy is one thing that we can use for devices. For example, we can allow access to critical data only from corporate devices and not from personal devices even if someone is using the company account. We can go even more granular where someone can access the data but cannot download it to his or her personal device. Microsoft Intune is good for handling BYO devices.

It has had a good effect on our organization's attack surface. I would rate it an eight out of ten for that. We can implement rules for attack surface reduction. That is possible when devices are managed by Microsoft Intune. 

The IT productivity in our organization is far better. I would rate it nine out of ten for that.

Mobile device management is good. I am easily able to manage devices and assets, especially laptops and desktops. 

An important feature in Microsoft Intune is the Conditional Access policy, where I can provide specific access to a specific user based on geolocations, and there are multiple options inside it. Conditional Access is its best feature.

Its user experience is very good. I would rate it a nine out of ten for that.

For Windows machines, all the features are available within Microsoft Intune, but when it comes to Mac machines, it is still improving. It is not as good as Jamf. When it comes to customizable policies and other things in Mac machines, it is a little bit difficult. It is not as good as Jamf, but for Windows, Microsoft Intune is good if you have a good budget.

Its integration with Mac and Linux devices can be better. They should provide more features similar to Windows. We should be able to manage policies within Linux and Mac machines. If we can have more granular controls for these two operating systems, it will be really helpful. That is one area where they can improve.

When it comes to automatic updates, none of the vendors are doing it so well. The expectation right now is to have everything automated and automatically upgraded to the latest version of the software. The discovery capability of Intune is good because it is Microsoft. They can do discoveries based on their internal commands and other things and pull all the information into Intune. That is easy, but doing the upgrade of third-party software is a little difficult. It is evolving, but we cannot do the upgrades of all third-party applications. A financial or banking organization allows a limited set of applications to be used. For them, Microsoft Intune is better because when you have only 15 to 20 applications, you can easily upgrade them through an automated platform like this.

It is not similar to any of the PAM solutions. It is still in the starting phase. Other PAM solutions, such as CyberArk, can do remote session management. They can handle vaulting and other things. When it comes to EPM within Microsoft Intune, I do not know whether they are planning to go with the PAM or Privileged Access Management platform, but with the current solution, we can do user account management. We can do password rotations. We can add a new user, remove a user, and provide access to a particular resource for a user. All these steps are manageable and possible, but for Privileged Session Management and Access Management, it still needs improvement.

It is very important that the capabilities of the Intune Suite are integrated with Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Security for both cloud and co-managed devices. The integration with the M365 platform, especially with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Cloud Apps, and Endpoints, plays a big role. Intune can discover and find out the devices. The integration is still happening. It is not yet over. There is room for improvement.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for about seven years. I have been a customer for four years and then became a partner because I joined a new organization. This new organization is a partner of Microsoft. I have been with this organization for three years.

If there are any issues with Microsoft Azure Cloud, we may have issues or downtime, but they are rare. It is 99.99% available. Only if Microsoft Azure Cloud goes down, we have a problem. Otherwise, it is okay.

There are no issues with scalability because it is a cloud solution. It is automatically scalable.

If you are paying for support, you get good support. If you are not paying for support, you do not get support.

Technical support can be a bit of a problem when it comes to costs. They have a professional service and a normal service. With the normal service, it is difficult to find out answers from them because they are not experts. We only get experts with the professional service, so if we pay, we get support. This is something difficult for a small organization because they cannot always pay for support for every issue.

When you give a product, you should always provide good support. If you do not have technical people, what is the purpose of having a support team? It is useless. They should have at least one or two people who can technically help an organization.

We use different tools. We use Jamf for Mac and Ansible for Linux machines. We have not yet fully switched to Microsoft Intune for Mac and Linux. Very few Mac machines are with Microsoft Intune. Most of our Mac machines are still with Jamf.

Companies that are using Microsoft products go for Microsoft Intune. However, when people have more Linux or Mac machines, they do not choose Microsoft Intune for their organization. We recommend a solution only after knowing the expectations and use cases of a client. Small companies do not prefer Intune because they can have JumpCloud. Small companies with less than 500 users can also go for Google Workspace. For companies that already have a Microsoft license such as E5 or O365, going for Microsoft Intune makes sense.

Microsoft Intune improves the security posture, but because of the budget and other constraints, organizations can start looking at other vendors.

It is not complex when it comes to Windows machines. It is straightforward, but when it comes to the other operating systems, it is complex. It is not easy.

The number of people involved depends on the users. If you have 1,000 devices, for Windows machines, you do not need more than three or four people. However, for 1,000 Linux or Mac machines, you would need a ten-member team.

The maintenance is easy. You do not need extra people to manage Microsoft Intune because it is a cloud service.

I am using E5 security and compliance. It has all the Intune options and security and compliance subscriptions, so I use the full suite of Intune except the EPM module. We have not yet started using the Endpoint Privilege Management module. It is a small add-on that we have to use. Other than that, we are using everything.

There are other tools that give a similar approach but are not as good as Microsoft Intune. In terms of cost, it is more expensive than other tools like JumpCloud, Google Workspace, etc. There are multiple tools like this. Only if you are a Microsoft shop, I would recommend going for Intune. Otherwise, use some other tool and manage the organization.

Its licensing model is not complex, but it is very expensive compared to other solutions. They can bring more models and reduce the pricing. They should allow customers to select the features they want and price it accordingly. That would be a better option because not every organization needs conditional access or an antivirus solution. Some organizations that use Intune might use CrowdStrike, so they do not need Intune policies for antivirus. It would be better if they could bring more plans.

I would advise to not look at the cost first. Instead of the cost, look at the features and then list down the use cases for your organization, and then go for the consolidation of the tools. Microsoft Intune can give you a lot of features, but whether it is suitable for your organization or not is the main question. List down the use cases and then assess Microsoft Intune because it can give a lot of features that you do not want, but you cannot omit them while buying it.

We are not using Advanced Endpoint Analytics because we have Sentinel and Chronicle SIEMs in our organization. We also use SDR platforms, so we are not using Microsoft Intune for any of the analytics. We are also not using Microsoft Intune Suite's Cloud PKI.

We started using Microsoft Copilot for a small organization. It has only been two months. We are building the use cases for that organization. They have purchased the licenses, but we are building the solution design and use cases for that particular organization. They want to automate most of the things, identify the non-compliant devices, and automate whatever they find non-compliant. Our aim is to identify non-compliant devices, do some automation, and block them from accessing any of the critical data inside the organization, but we do not know if Microsoft Copilot can do that.

Overall, I would rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten.

We use Microsoft Intune for both application management and deployment for new users. Applications are packaged within Intune and then deployed to the end user's machines or devices, specifically targeting designated user groups.

Intune allows us to manage all our devices from one location.

The ability to manage all our devices from a single platform has significantly enhanced our security and IT operations. Previously, we relied on multiple applications, such as Ivanti and SCCM, to manage devices and security.

Intune is easier to use than SCCM. As a SaaS application, its services are GUI-based, simplifying its overall complexity.

We use Intune's advanced endpoint analytics to report the number of compliant devices, apply remediation, see the reasons for non-compliance, and track the number of BYOD devices. We can integrate third-party tools like ServiceNow if we need reporting or analytics that are unavailable through Intune.

Copilot's integration with our teams and Outlook has streamlined our workflow. It simplifies tasks like drafting emails and creating Word documents or PowerPoint presentations by providing helpful suggestions. Additionally, Copilot's independent profile allows us to reference documents from our OneDrive and seamlessly incorporate them into our emails. We can even leverage Copilot to reference Intune and integrate it into our various cloud data. Although Copilot is still in its early stages, its potential is evident. As we continue to use it, it will gather more data and refine its capabilities, offering even more features and benefits to end-users. Currently, we primarily use Copilot for drafting emails, creating presentations, and similar tasks, but its future applications are promising.

Intune helps protect data on both corporate-owned and BYOD devices in hybrid work environments. Devices can be registered through the company portal, and Intune can restrict their access to local storage, preventing unauthorized data downloads.

The endpoint privilege management feature helps restrict users' access. For instance, if they are accessing Outlook, they should not be able to access their local drives, preventing them from uploading or downloading anything from their corporate email. This feature enables those types of security settings.

Intune has significantly improved our productivity. Thanks to Intune and Autopilot, tasks that previously required four to five hours of IT effort can now be completed in just one hour. This translates to a 75 percent increase in IT productivity.

Intune has significantly reduced costs from a resource perspective. Thanks to Autopilot, scripting, and automation within Intune, a junior person can now complete tasks that previously required two engineers. This efficiency has resulted in a 50 percent cost reduction.

Intune has allowed us to consolidate other tools, such as SCCM and Jamf, reducing the need for additional licenses.  

The automatic patch management feature in the Intune Suite is helpful.

Intune has all the features enabled for Windows devices but needs to be improved on iOS and Apple devices. 

I have been using Microsoft Intune for one and a half years.

The response time from technical support has increased over time. Contacting their support remains straightforward, but while we used to receive a response within one hour, it now takes three to four hours for a Microsoft engineer to respond. The quality of their response has stayed the same.

Positive

Before implementing Intune, we used SCCM. We switched to Intune because of their advancements. We still use SCCM exclusively for server-related deployments, managing server-related applications, and patching. Everything for end-user devices has been moved to Intune. As for other similar tools, Jamf, which we used for iOS device management, can now be retired or decommissioned from our infrastructure since we can also manage iOS devices through Intune.

The deployment of Intune is straightforward, as it's a SaaS-based application. We set up our Intune connector and Azure Active Directory or the Azure AD Connect server to synchronize objects to Azure. Once that's done, we can manage our devices through Intune.

I rate Microsoft Intune nine out of ten.

The integration of Intune Suite with Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Security is included in our E5 license, providing us with the Intune license at no additional cost. This eliminates the need to purchase a separate Intune license, saving us money and streamlining our licensing.

Intune is a tool for managing configurations and policies for devices. It has additional benefits like monitoring and enforcing security measures. It helps us ensure that the devices we provide to our users are perfectly controlled so that data isn't leaking. For example, I can enable BitLocker to encrypt data on all employee devices. All laptops in the organization require antivirus software. Any laptops without antivirus are non-compliant, so I can block them in Intune. 

I can also use Intune to lock down specific activities on mobile devices. When people access their email, Microsoft Teams, or OneDrive on their mobile devices, I can enforce a policy that prevents them from copy-pasting data from the corporate email address mailbox to their phones. I can also block screenshots. 

We have nearly 100,000 users across multiple locations. That's one benefit of Intune. We can cover devices at several locations with a single cloud-based solution. 

The great part about Microsoft Intune is that we can target for Android/IOS/Windows devices with full control. We can also enroll Mac and Linux OS and enforce certain configurations and get compliance reporting. This provides us a key criteria for zero trust deployment model.

And now we have the option to integration of Ms Intune to MAC JAMF with API integration which makes the life simpler

And administrative Units helps a lot in scoping the device and providing the delegation to the required administrators which creates a very good RBAC management as well.

Intune is a cloud-based solution, so we avoid many of the headaches associated with on-prem maintenance like for example SCCM which was doing this job in the past and we need frequent patching and maintenance as well. Because Intune is a cloud-based solution whereas SCCM depends on on-premises technology to function, Intune has a simpler architecture with more options on MAM, reporting, security & MDM. We always get the latest security features and enhancements from Microsoft with the cloud-based solution Intune.

Intune allows you to create policies for managing mobile devices and mobile applications. Mobile application management targets and protects only the application. It will create a container for your application on the mobile device, securing the container and application. Mobile application management allows you to set limits on what employees do in specific applications that contain corporate data, such as Microsoft Outlook.

Intune device restriction policies enable me to enforce limitations on the device, like blocking the mobile camera or restricting the employees from using and inserting USB devices, including thumb drives and flash drives.

Intune's reporting and logging could be improved. When troubleshooting, it's difficult to collect the logs and determine what's happening. If I want to filter out the compliant devices, I can see it from the logs, but I would like the option to drill down further. 

I select one device, and Intune tells me it's non-compliant. I click on it, and it tells me the antivirus service is not running. It should provide some additional information. When did the service stop? Did the service start in the first place? Intune's internal graph API should also be improved because that is where we can apply commands. 

I've been using Intune for the last six years.

As stated the solution is very stable because there is 24/7 monitoring of the core component by Microsoft Monitoring Team. 

Microsoft Intune can scale easily since it's a cloud-based solution and we need to procure only licenses per user and no need to worry about maintaining the backend core component because it's handled by Microsoft.

I rate Microsoft's support a seven out of ten. Support is one area that requires massive improvement. In most cases, the frontline engineers collect the logs. After they review the logs, they will find the person who can help us fix the issue. 

Neutral

We previously used Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager, Microsoft's on-premise configuration management solution. We switched to Intune because we purchased an EMS E3 license that covers Outlook, Teams, Intune, etc. 

Ultimately, it comes down to costs. We don't need to spend money on SCCM licensing, and we get better cloud-based monitoring and reporting than SCCM. Most people prefer to move to Intune because they get some additional features included for free when they buy the EMS E3 license from Microsoft.

Setting up Intune was initially complex because we need to migrate everything from SCCM to Intune. If you already have your policies and configurations worked out on-prem, it will be the same once you move to Intune, and you'll see a massive improvement in configuration, compliance, reporting, and mobile device management.

The return on investment is that I have a better way to secure my devices and make them compliant. 

Intune's pricing is competitive. For example, the license of Blackberry's Enterprise Mobility Suite was costly, but Intune is affordable. It is included as an additional feature when you buy security enhancements for your organization. For example, let's say I have fifty users in my organization and all of them are using Microsoft cloud services, like Teams, Office 365, and OneDrive. 

In order to protect this, I'm going to buy the EMS E3, which includes security and also the option to utilize Microsoft Intune. I don't need to buy an additional license for software and device management. I can do all of this with the same license I bought for Microsoft security.

I see a significant gap between Microsoft Intune and products by other vendors. We were using SCCM on-premises, but Microsoft Intune added monitoring and security features, so we didn't see any suitable alternatives. 

I rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten. Before deploying Intune, you must understand your current setup and security needs. If you're only looking for a security solution, you can deploy Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. However, Intune is ideal if you want a more comprehensive security solution that covers configuration and compliance management. You need to understand the gaps in your current solution and what you want to overcome. 

I'm an IT manager contracting with a European company. We had to onboard Windows machines to the Azure AD, but they did not have an on-prem AD. I prepped the Azure AD on the cloud, and I started to migrate the laptops to Azure AD. 

Once that is done, we need to apply policies, but group policies will not run from Azure AD because there's no on-prem AD to derive the policy from. Intune comes in handy there. It has multiple capabilities. You can create your configuration profiles in Intune that apply to Windows and Mac. You can create security profiles and configuration profiles, and you can apply browser settings to some extent. It isn't a small tool in terms of size or breadth of capabilities. It's very capable. Anybody who has used SCCM will see a lot of similarities.

Intune has many components that replace third-party products. For example, Intune creates an inventory of each machine. Otherwise, I'd need a third-party asset management tool. Intune can also tell me which users are accessing a given machine because it's integrated with Azure AD.

It's easy to deploy a configuration or policy to a system, especially when you don't have Azure AD. Now we are talking to all these small and medium-sized customers who don't necessarily have an on-premise Windows Active Directory. If they have invested in Office 365 Premium, this functionality becomes available to them.

That's considerable savings because you get Intune with Office, and you're getting slightly more advanced Azure AD capabilities. They also get MS Defender, which is there on the Windows client. This March, Microsoft introduced Defender for Business. They activated the business subscription with the Office 365 Business Premium subscription. If a customer is looking for an antivirus solution with a centralized capability, the product is already there. 

Intune allows you to control the policy if you want to control hard drive encryption. We have third-party tools in the market that we used to invest in. Today, we have Windows-native BitLocker, and I can use Intune to manage that BitLocker encryption.

Intune can set policies on each machine. I can create rules and apply them to individual machines. It's much easier than using the Azure AD system.

Reporting in Microsoft solutions is pathetic. With Intune, I'm getting a free inventory tool, but I don't get a reporting tool. When I go to Intune, I can see one machine's entire data in terms of the hardware and the software running on it, but I cannot generate a report for all the machines in the organization. The reporting is the only feature holding back the functionality that is already there. 

All the other third-party tools are doing the same thing, whether Atlassian, ManageEngine, or Ivanti. They all install an agent on your system. Intune also has an agent on your system collecting inventory details and sending them across the central console, but Microsoft doesn't have the reporting capability there. That is the only drawback I see.

I started using Intune last year.

Intune is perfectly stable. We've had zero downtime.

Intune will scale because it's a cloud system. We are not installing anything. It's a Microsoft service. I have it running on around 200 machines.

I rate Microsoft support nine out of 10. In the past year, I've made 20 or 30 support requests on the Intune platform. Each time, it has been smooth. Usually, they sort the problem out on the first try. Once, the ticket was open for about two weeks because they had to do some backend testing on their side. 

Positive

I have used ManageEngine from a company called Zoho Corporation to do inventories and patching. Microsoft Intune lacks capabilities to patch Windows, Office 365, Acrobat Reader, etc. There is no way for me to apply and manage patches. I can create a patch configuration, but I cannot control when it has to be deployed and on which machines. If Intune adds patching, I don't need to invest in another patching tool.

Setting up Intune is pretty straightforward. There may be a few bumps in the road, but you shouldn't have much trouble if you're a system administrator or a pure IT guy. I did it by myself, and it took about two hours. You have to do the basic configuration. 

For that, you need a bit of reading to understand how your configuration is working within your overall setup. Once you do the necessary tweaking, Intune is up and running. After that, you create policies and do a test run on one or two machines. Once you verify that everything is working fine, you deploy it all. 

If you're not a techie, I could guide you step by step. It's as simple as that. After deployment, Intune doesn't require maintenance because it's a cloud product. 

We've seen a significant return on the investment. Otherwise, I would have to invest in a regular Windows Active Directory. If I were running Office Standard, which lacks this feature, I would have to buy something like Intune and pay for it annually.

Plus, I have to manage another product on the desktop. For example, if you're using a VPN client, the VPN client has to be installed and requires maintenance if something goes wrong. I don't have that maintenance cost because it's part of the Windows operating system.

We don't pay for Intune because it is bundled with the premium subscription to Office 365. It includes Intune and Defender. I don't have to buy two extra products to manage my enterprise.

I rate Microsoft Intune eight out of 10. Some functionality needs to be improved, but I believe Microsoft is working on it. They're developing the tool, and those features will be added, but I will give it an eight today.

If you're thinking about implementing Intune, you should look at what you already have in place. For example, if I wanted to bring my laptops onto Azure AD, Azure AD will do the job for me, so I don't need to invest in a regular Active Directory server.

Either I buy the server and run it on the cloud or I upgrade Office and Business Premium gives me all of the features. Business Premium is the top license. You have Business Basic, Standard, and Premium. The Enterprise equivalent is E3 and E5. 

The Business Premium is equivalent to E3. There is a limit on the number of machines. Per Microsoft's licensing model, you can do up to 300 machines on Business Premium. At 301, you have to switch to an Enterprise agreement.

We use endpoint management, both SCCM and Intune, so it is a hybrid model that we use in order to manage applications, patching, updates, and operating system deployment with Intune. We also use Autopilot for deployment.

Intune has been effective in managing various mobile devices. It would be Apple Business Manager for Apple devices, the iOS tray. It's easier to manage from Intune compared to Android. I've recently heard that Android devices will no longer be managed from Intune. The MDM part is moving away.

Intune's app management feature for supporting business operations is very easy and seamless for an admin to package applications on Intune. It's also very easy to track logs on the end-user device to understand deployment or push failures. Application management works really seamlessly with Intune.

Moreover, Intune has made it very easy to package and deploy LOB apps like MSI and MSI X applications available on the Microsoft Store. This is very helpful.

Intune brings all of the endpoint and security management tools into one place. Microsoft has integrated all its cloud platforms, like Defender for Endpoint and Intune for endpoint management. We can easily manage the Defender part from the Defender portal for endpoints, and it's very easy to track vulnerabilities on the Defender portal as well. 

It's just a matter of installing the Defender client on a device, and we can easily see all the scan results from that device on the portal. So it's very easy and simple, and the security information is all on the dashboard, ready to be presented to the client.

Automatic updating can be challenging for apps not available on the Microsoft Store. We need to package and download those apps, and it's not just pushing them; we need to create scripts to uninstall previous versions. That's a caveat compared to SCCM, where we can integrate third-party tools to manage third-party applications. I hope they will soon integrate something like Patch My PC. Apart from that, it's good.

We don't use the advanced endpoint analytics but, we use the basic features available on the dashboard. We have various data sources and get a lot of reports from there.

We also don't use Intune PKI as of now because we manage PKI from our on-prem environment. But we have seen that BYO CA (Bring Your Own CA) is now available on Intune. We can bring our own CA to reduce the load on the on-prem infrastructure. That's one of the features we need to test.

Overall, Intune provides a more secure and easily monitored environment, with live and native support, unlike other tools. For example, we might get data that is seven days old with other tools, but with Intune, we get data that's only eight hours old. This helps us understand what applications run on a particular machine and which operating system is installed. Intune has saved us time and provides valuable features.

The best features are application and update management. In the context of updates, it's very easy to manage device updates through Intune because they pull updates directly from the internet. We don't have to select and push updates as we do with SCCM. 

For application management, we have many options for packaging applications. 

The overall user experience of Microsoft Intune a ten out of ten. There are certain limitations, but I would still rate it ten out of ten compared to Jamf, Tanium, and BigFix. I find Intune far better and easier to use.

I also tested the enterprise application management feature. The way we are packaging using Windows 32 apps and LOB apps. These are pretty simple to manage.

We recently introduced Copilot on Microsoft 365 portal to help draft emails. We were highly dependent on Grammarly before, but Copilot has replaced it and saved us the licensing cost. That's one way we use Copilot.

Copilot won't protect our environment. It's just an AI tool. Defender is responsible for protecting our environment. Copilot can answer our questions quickly, without needing to browse through Google or a browser. It's integrated into almost every application. We can click on it and ask our questions.

Copilot has reduced the load of typing. We can just give it a brief instruction, like "draft an email to my manager regarding a new joiner," and it generates a draft. This saves us time and typing effort. We just need to proofread it.

We've only seen Copilot so far. We haven't tested any other AI tools in Intune yet. Copilot is very useful, and it's a Microsoft product.

The challenge we experience is with Mac management. We find Intune not capable enough to handle Mac devices, configurations, or operating system deployments. However, it's easy to manage Windows devices. Mac itself has a lot of restrictions. Linux and Mac operating system compatibility need improvement. Also, they need to work on making GPO (Group Policy Objects) compatible.

Microsoft needs to work on Autopilot and make it simpler at the end-user level.

We also face challenges managing group policy. Many group policy objects that we can manage from on-prem Active Directory can't be managed through Intune. That's something Microsoft needs to work on, and I'm sure they will.

I have been using it for more than four years. 

It is a stable solution. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

Everyone in our organization uses this solution. But, for the project I am involved in, just 15 people use it. 

We have medium to enterprise businesses as our clients. 

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten.

The customer service and support are average. Sometimes I feel they don't even know about their product. 

Neutral

I can compare it to Tanium. When I was doing a POC in place of Intune, we needed to compare other tools as well. Tanium is a good tool, but I can't find any other tool that can replace Intune with so many features.

I like the user-friendliness of Intune's GUI and the fact that we get so many features under one roof has attracted our attention.

The deployment of Intune depends on the environment in which it is being deployed. In our case, it was pretty simple because we didn't have much insight. However, depending on the requirements of a different environment, it can become complex.

The deployment takes a couple of months would be a good estimate. You need to plan everything and then execute, and migration is involved.

Intune works seamlessly with Microsoft Defender. With other security solutions, we see a lot of challenges. It depends on the complexity and scale of the environment. But it's really compatible with Defender and Intune integrates well with other security solutions.

Intune requires maintenance. It requires internet access because we need to manage certificates, check on the DMF file, and clean up stale devices.

It has helped admins immensely in order to manage those endpoint devices. With other tools, the device needs to be on the office network or VPN. Intune removes this dependency. 

We can manage devices through the internet, and we won't miss any devices that are offline.

It has saved 60% of our time. I can't put an estimate on cost savings, but it has saved a huge cost because we don't have to manage infrastructure anymore.

It's a little expensive, but it's worth having.

Compared to other tools in the market, Intune is a good tool to go with. It's a little expensive, but it's really good because we have almost everything under the same umbrella. The features that Microsoft offers are not available in BigFix, Tanium, or Canvas. But it also depends on your budget.

I would definitely recommend it. We get promoted features, and it's easy to use. The ease of use is really attractive for admins, especially compared to other tools.

Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

I am working with a bank to configure backups for auto-billing devices. We have Samsung tablets used in branches with only customer accounts, where customers open accounts using these dedicated devices. We create custom policies for these devices using Microsoft Intune across multiple domains. Some devices are auto-pilot, some are dedicated tablets, and others are hybrid Azure AD joined devices managed by Configuration Manager. We are using Microsoft Intune in three domains to manage those devices.

Microsoft Intune consolidates our endpoint and security management tools into a single platform. We employ specific policies for autopilot devices tailored for global and US requirements, focusing on banking and government security. To address these concerns, we've implemented policies within the bank that restrict USB and Bluetooth access through the attack surface detection feature. This restricted app concept has been applied to autopilot laptops to enhance their security posture by blocking USB devices and preventing unauthorized research build-up.

User experience is generally good when using open internet devices like 3G, 4G, or 5G, as banks often use restricted internet connections.

Intune offers rapid benefits. Any policy, deployment, or change we implement is reflected within two to three minutes for all users. This is especially valuable for managing laptops. We can quickly implement a cleanup policy if user laptops are compromised or accessed without authorization. In the worst-case scenario of a computer being stolen, we can swiftly deploy a policy to secure the device's data within a minute.

It offers rapid policy, deployment, and change implementation, with effects visible to users within minutes. Devices managed by SCCM can also benefit from Intune workloads and policies, providing a unified management approach. Intune and SCCM work together to address security concerns for hybrid Azure AD joined devices. Attack surface reduction policies can be implemented through either platform to protect devices from threats. Intune manages SCCM-enrolled and Intune-managed devices, offering comprehensive security and management capabilities.

Intune has enhanced the productivity of our IT department. We can now establish Active Directory-related policies for public auto-enrollment devices in remote areas like Karachi and Islamabad. Not confined to specific cities, these devices can be managed through autopilot with AD-related policies created on Microsoft Intune. However, these devices are not always on-demand, so we track them using autopilot policies and create eighty policy replicas for each device. This approach is highly effective for managing our large-scale operations, as users often face challenges like requiring USB access while working remotely. We specifically tailor policies for our hundred audit users, who move frequently between locations.

Our bank's most valuable Intune features are centered around the dedicated device concept. We've implemented policies for tabs used by branch employees during account openings and deployed custom policies and applications on these devices using our Rapid Account Opening application. This dedicated device approach and tailored Intune features have yielded excellent results.

Microsoft Intune needs to improve its security policies. I want more secure, reliable, and efficient security policies.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for five years.

We have Microsoft Premium, which entitles us to Microsoft engineer support specifically for Intune. They respond very quickly. When we open a case on Microsoft and select a severity level, we always choose 'A' because we have a production environment. The engineers connect with us within 15 minutes and are highly capable.

We have upgraded support with Microsoft engineers and direct connections with some of them. When we encounter issues related to Microsoft Intune, we directly contact these highly skilled engineers for immediate assistance. They collaborate with us to resolve problems and always require ticket creation to meet our KPIs. We open and close these tickets accordingly. While we manage a significant volume of tickets, our direct relationship with Microsoft engineers ensures efficient issue resolution and support.

Positive

In my previous role, I used IBM MaaS360. Microsoft Intune surpasses MaaS360 with its broader feature set, increased flexibility, and seamless integration with other Microsoft products like Entra for XDR and QRadar. Additionally, Intune offers a more user-friendly experience.

The deployment time for Intune depends on the number of users. For example, an organization with 15 users can take 15 days to deploy. Organizations also using Active Directory and Office 365 Premium require additional deployments so that the total deployment time can reach 25 days.

Intune deployment is straightforward and has a stable internet connection. Given our appropriate EMS E3 and F3 licenses, we anticipate no significant challenges as long as our internet connection remains reliable.

I would rate Microsoft Intune nine out of ten.

After the deployment, Intune requires no maintenance. As long as the internet connection is stable, Intune can ensure all policies work as intended.

Microsoft Intune is the future. Using Intune, we can access other Microsoft tools like XDR through one portal. Pre-COVID users working remotely had to manage laptops not connected by a domain, and now all the devices and policies are managed through Intune.

We use Microsoft Intune for device and identity management, providing end-user support, determining device hardware placement, collecting diagnostic logs, deploying patches, distributing software and feature updates, and managing quality rings. This platform enables us to manage over 20,000 devices across our organization effectively.

Intune provides a centralized platform for managing our security, allowing us to establish compliance rules and implement restrictions based on corporate security approvals and project requirements. For instance, we can disable print screens or activate screensavers after specific intervals to enhance security.

Intune offers a positive user experience, and we can monitor each user's activities.

We use Microsoft Intune's Enterprise Application Management feature to manage Forcepoint DLP, Endpoint DLP, privileged identity management, Cisco MD, and other enterprise applications according to organizational needs.

Within half an hour of being added, a device syncs with Intune, enabling policy synchronization and providing immediate benefits. Intune also offers troubleshooting assistance for any device linked to it.

Intune helped increase our IT team's productivity.

I like Intune's ability to manage roles, maintenance tasks, compliance settings, and patch development for all endpoints.

The information we receive at the device level needs improvement. For instance, we can gather data on 10K devices but not 4K ones. I want to access information about devices that currently aren't included. Twenty percent of the workload integrated into the cloud from collected data represents inapplicable scenarios. I want Intune to decrease this by at least ten percent.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for two and a half years.

We have also used Nexthink, which can connect more devices, but Intune allows us to collect more detailed information.

I would rate Microsoft Intune ten out of ten.

With Intune, managing devices is a breeze. I use it to enforce security policies and seamlessly deploy applications to handle Windows 11 upgrades. It is like my one-stop shop for device management – no more manual headaches, just simple templates making my life easier. Plus, with Windows 10 support ending soon, Intune ensures a smooth transition to the latest and greatest without much hassle.

Overall, Intune has been a game-changer for our organization. It offers enhanced visibility, helping me identify and fix issues swiftly. Since implementing it, our security score has seen a noticeable improvement.

Intune gives me full visibility and control across all devices. For instance, if a device is slowing down, Intune alerts me, and I can proactively upgrade the hardware, like moving from HDD to SSD or M.2, ensuring optimal performance. It is like having eyes and control over the entire device landscape.

Intune has significantly reduced the risk of security breaches. With its robust security features and compliance monitoring, I can track and manage everything from emails to miscellaneous activities, ensuring a proactive stance against potential security threats.

The user experience of Intune is a perfect ten for me. It provides an incredibly helpful and seamless interface.

Intune has saved costs by preventing potential security threats. Restrictions on accessing miscellaneous websites have been invaluable in avoiding virus downloads and data loss. 

The reporting and analytics features in Microsoft Intune have been a lifesaver. In the report section, I can quickly identify device issues, compliance problems, or deployment failures. It provides a clear overview, allowing me to take immediate action, whether it's redeployment or manual adjustments, keeping everything in check and running smoothly.

While Intune works perfectly well, the only potential downside is that the deployment could be a bit complex for some users.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for three years.

The stability of Intune is impecable.

I would rate the scalability of Intune as a ten out of ten. I have not had any issues with it.

Technical support from Microsoft for Intune is top-notch, a solid ten. Whenever I have had issues and opened a ticket, they have been quick to respond within half an hour to two hours. The solutions provided are effective with detailed instructions and additional information.

Positive

My deployment model for Intune is gradual and cautious. It is like navigating through a vast ocean, where I test on a few devices first, slowly deploying one thing at a time. I learned the hard way that rushing impacts users, so it is a step-by-step process, taking a month or two, testing, deploying, and making adjustments as needed. Patience is the key to Intune deployment.
Deploying Intune wasn't a walk in the park, but it wasn't overly complex either. I would say it is moderate—needing time, experience, and knowledge. Testing is crucial.

Microsoft takes care of updates and maintenance. I just need to stay on top of deploying new patches that come from vendors, ensuring our machines are up-to-date and secure.

The return on investment with Intune has been excellent. The increased productivity and control over machines justify the cost, giving a full value-for-money experience.

We use Microsoft Intune to ensure security compliance mainly through our DLP project. It is our go-to for deploying new features and staying on top of security patches. Intune keeps us informed about vulnerabilities, making it easier for me to download and deploy updates across our infrastructure, ensuring a robust and secure system.

The standout features of Microsoft Intune for managing and securing our workforce are endpoint protection, streamlined deployment of applications, and easy handling of feature updates. Creating Intune policies is a breeze; for instance, deploying applications is just a matter of selecting them and letting Intune take care of the rest. It is a time-saving and efficient way to keep our systems secure and up-to-date.

The real game-changer in Microsoft Intune for our data security is the ability to create and enforce specific policies. I have set up two types: one within Intune and the other through GPO. The combination of both has been pivotal in ensuring robust security measures for our organization.

Having all endpoint and security tools in one place with Intune is quite valuable. It allows me to track device usage, block systems, and, if necessary, wipe company data for security purposes. The integration with OneDrive ensures seamless syncing and backup of user data, providing an added layer of protection. It is like having a control center that empowers me to respond swiftly to any security concerns.

For securing hybrid work and data protection, I set up Intune to handle encryption using tools like BitLocker. It provides an added layer of security, allowing me to manage BitLocker keys and make necessary changes for better control. This way, even in a hybrid work environment, I have visibility and control over data protection measures.

Intune's integration with Microsoft security has significantly bolstered our organization's security. From prompt security patches to timely machine restarts and access control, it covers a multitude of aspects, ensuring a robust and proactive security stance.

Using the Endpoint Privilege Management feature in Intune has been a productivity boost.

After deploying Intune, there was a shift in user freedom, but it was a positive change. I could restrict access, control network usage, and block certain applications, enhancing overall security. While some users may find it limiting, it aligns well with the organization's focus on security.

Intune must integrate with Microsoft 365 and Security. The synergy is powerful. For instance, in security, I identify vulnerabilities and know precisely what patches to deploy using Intune. It is like a seamless collaboration that streamlines the process.

Microsoft Intune's integration with other Microsoft tools has revolutionized my device management strategy. It is like a helping hand that makes everything easy and seamless. Over the past five to six years, it has become an essential and efficient part of my device management toolkit.

Microsoft Intune's integration with other Microsoft tools has revolutionized my device management strategy. It's like a helping hand that makes everything easy and seamless.

For new users, my advice is to take advantage of Microsoft's virtual training sessions and certifications. Sometimes, they offer free certifications, which can be beneficial for users, considering the investment companies make. The biggest lesson I have learned is the incredible control and flexibility Intune provides. From deploying and removing applications to blocking and deploying the OS, it gives complete control over the infrastructure, making it invaluable for users in the field.

Overall, I would rate Intune as a ten out of ten.