

Sophos Mobile and Microsoft Intune are prominent in the mobile device management category. User feedback suggests Microsoft Intune is generally preferred due to its extensive features and integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, although Sophos Mobile is appreciated for its security capabilities.
Features: Sophos Mobile is noted for its synchronized security, supporting various devices, and managing complex security integrations. Users appreciate its asset management, strong reporting features, and ease of management. Microsoft Intune is recognized for its deep integration with the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, comprehensive management tools, and scalable cloud-based administration, emphasizing compliance and application management.
Room for Improvement: Sophos Mobile could benefit from better integration with additional Sophos products, more seamless iOS compatibility, and easier setup processes. Microsoft Intune, while robust, could improve its reporting capabilities and user interface. Additionally, support for non-Microsoft OSs like macOS and Linux, and simplified configuration setup are areas for potential enhancement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sophos Mobile typically serves public cloud and on-premises environments, with some users reporting slow support experiences. Microsoft Intune, operating within hybrid and cloud infrastructures, benefits from reliable support through the Microsoft ecosystem, though new users may find it complex.
Pricing and ROI: Sophos Mobile offers a straightforward and affordable pricing model, often leading to a high ROI when combined with other Sophos solutions. Microsoft Intune, usually part of the Microsoft 365 package, provides cost advantages through integration with Microsoft products, though its standalone pricing can appear high.
Everything we've gained from it makes my job easier day after day, and I see value in it as an engineer.
Microsoft Intune not only saves costs by reducing the number of personnel needed but also offers a comprehensive solution for managing laptops, applications, security, individual access, and enrollment.
Importantly, when someone leaves the company, it helps protect document access on their devices.
When a support ticket is submitted, it directly reaches someone with Intune support expertise.
When I contacted Microsoft, they had the same expertise, if not more, which is phenomenal because I felt heard and my problem was solved.
Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.
In terms of responsiveness, they handle the calls immediately and efficiently.
The technical support for Sophos Mobile requires improvement.
The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten.
Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties.
It supports organizations with 200 endpoints and those with more than 15,000 endpoints.
We recommend it for both small and medium-sized enterprises.
It could scale better to meet diverse client needs.
At an enterprise level with more requirements, there is room for improvement.
We have not experienced downtime, bugs, or glitches.
It appears Microsoft Intune undergoes changes without informing customers.
Microsoft Intune has been very stable.
Sophos is stable, and the product works well.
I would rate the stability of Sophos Mobile as a seven out of ten.
Features like unlocking devices sometimes fail, and the support offered for other operating systems is insufficient.
There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now.
Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive.
It would be beneficial to have the VPN feature incorporated into Sophos Mobile, even if it requires separate payment.
I also believe the portal itself requires improvements because the interface can be difficult to understand sometimes.
Regarding functionality, I think an area Sophos Mobile can actually improve is by infusing more AI-integrated services and solutions into the product.
Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs.
The Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly.
It costs approximately forty euros per user per month.
The product is affordable, and there is no issue with its purchase for small companies.
In terms of pricing, Sophos Mobile is favorable compared to other mobile device security solutions.
The pricing of Sophos Mobile is high compared to the market, specifically 40% higher.
Intune excels in configuration and compliance management for Windows 10, ensuring devices receive timely updates and adhere to organizational standards.
Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.
Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management.
Sophos Mobile has been rated nine out of ten for security and performance.
The features that stand out for maintaining mobile security are compliance and the ability to install applications and configure work profiles.
Sophos Mobile provides fantastic management and control along with web application control capabilities on mobile, features that would usually be on a firewall at the perimeter of the business or the organization.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Intune | 29.5% |
| Sophos Mobile | 2.5% |
| Other | 68.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 117 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 46 |
| Large Enterprise | 152 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
Microsoft Intune provides centralized management of mobile devices and applications, ensuring security, compliance, and productivity through integration with Microsoft services like Microsoft 365 and Azure Active Directory.
Organizations use Intune for managing mobile devices and applications, enhancing security and compliance across platforms. With features like single sign-on, conditional access, and zero-touch deployment via Autopilot, it facilitates efficient operations. Intune's scalability, easy enrollment, and capabilities such as remote wipe support diverse device management, offering robust data protection and efficient operation. Despite its features, improvement areas include reporting, compatibility with non-Microsoft devices, and better support for macOS and Linux devices.
What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
In industries such as finance, healthcare, and education, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure secure and compliant device management. Companies leverage its capabilities to deploy security policies and manage both corporate-owned and BYOD environments, facilitating a unified approach to data protection and compliance.
Sophos Mobile is a Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) and security solution that helps businesses spend less time and effort to manage and secure traditional and mobile endpoints. The only UEM solution that integrates natively with a leading next-gen endpoint security platform, Sophos Mobile supports management of Windows 10, macOS, iOS, and Android devices.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.