

Sophos Mobile and Microsoft Intune compete in the mobile device management category. Microsoft Intune has an upper hand due to its seamless integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, enhancing management and security features.
Features: Sophos Mobile provides features like Synchronized Security with other Sophos products, corporate ownership control, and application control. It also offers data protection and diverse management capabilities across various devices and platforms. Microsoft Intune offers application management, conditional access, and seamless integration with Azure AD and Office 365. Intune's management of devices includes enhanced security features and integration with Microsoft's broader ecosystem.
Room for Improvement: Sophos Mobile needs improvement in initial setup complexity, iOS support, and its outdated interface. Users also reported a need for better support and integration with other products. Microsoft Intune requires improvements in intuitive reporting and analytics, better integration with non-Microsoft systems, and management features for macOS and Linux devices. It also needs enhancements in deployment and policy enforcement on mobile platforms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sophos Mobile offers cloud-based deployment but faces challenges in technical support, with reports of delays and inefficiency. Microsoft Intune primarily offers a cloud-based model with hybrid support. Customer service experiences vary, with frustrations around slow response times and complex issue resolution paths.
Pricing and ROI: Sophos Mobile offers a favorable pricing structure for smaller businesses, although it is considered costly compared to similar products. ROI is notable when used alongside other Sophos solutions. Microsoft Intune has competitive pricing when part of a Microsoft service bundle, making it cost-effective for companies using the Microsoft suite. However, its pricing can be seen as expensive for smaller organizations not fully utilizing Microsoft's services.
Everything we've gained from it makes my job easier day after day, and I see value in it as an engineer.
Microsoft Intune not only saves costs by reducing the number of personnel needed but also offers a comprehensive solution for managing laptops, applications, security, individual access, and enrollment.
Importantly, when someone leaves the company, it helps protect document access on their devices.
When a support ticket is submitted, it directly reaches someone with Intune support expertise.
When I contacted Microsoft, they had the same expertise, if not more, which is phenomenal because I felt heard and my problem was solved.
Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.
In terms of responsiveness, they handle the calls immediately and efficiently.
The technical support for Sophos Mobile requires improvement.
The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten.
Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties.
It supports organizations with 200 endpoints and those with more than 15,000 endpoints.
We recommend it for both small and medium-sized enterprises.
It could scale better to meet diverse client needs.
At an enterprise level with more requirements, there is room for improvement.
We have not experienced downtime, bugs, or glitches.
It appears Microsoft Intune undergoes changes without informing customers.
Microsoft Intune has been very stable.
Sophos is stable, and the product works well.
I would rate the stability of Sophos Mobile as a seven out of ten.
Features like unlocking devices sometimes fail, and the support offered for other operating systems is insufficient.
There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now.
Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive.
It would be beneficial to have the VPN feature incorporated into Sophos Mobile, even if it requires separate payment.
I also believe the portal itself requires improvements because the interface can be difficult to understand sometimes.
Regarding functionality, I think an area Sophos Mobile can actually improve is by infusing more AI-integrated services and solutions into the product.
Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs.
The Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly.
It costs approximately forty euros per user per month.
The product is affordable, and there is no issue with its purchase for small companies.
In terms of pricing, Sophos Mobile is favorable compared to other mobile device security solutions.
The pricing of Sophos Mobile is high compared to the market, specifically 40% higher.
Intune excels in configuration and compliance management for Windows 10, ensuring devices receive timely updates and adhere to organizational standards.
Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.
Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management.
Sophos Mobile has been rated nine out of ten for security and performance.
The features that stand out for maintaining mobile security are compliance and the ability to install applications and configure work profiles.
Sophos Mobile provides fantastic management and control along with web application control capabilities on mobile, features that would usually be on a firewall at the perimeter of the business or the organization.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Intune | 26.7% |
| Sophos Mobile | 2.4% |
| Other | 70.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 122 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 48 |
| Large Enterprise | 160 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.
Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.
What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.
Sophos Mobile is a Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) and security solution that helps businesses spend less time and effort to manage and secure traditional and mobile endpoints. The only UEM solution that integrates natively with a leading next-gen endpoint security platform, Sophos Mobile supports management of Windows 10, macOS, iOS, and Android devices.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.