I'm a system implementer, so I implement the system for customers. I implement whatever the customer needs at their site. It's generally all the BI information that they have in the data warehouse.
Its performance is very good.
That's one of the biggest misconceptions for any potential MicroStrategy implementation.
Business now a days stack it against tableau,spotfire, SSIS,QlikView and other 'newer' tools (previously they used to compare against Cognos, BO,Actuate,SAS BI )..and all in all no one comes closer to return-on-investment when compared to MicroStrategy.
Yes, initial setup cost and resource cost may be higher than most but you will get most of what you will spend. And in most organizations MicroStrategy is rolled as an shared platform which ultimately reduces 'actual cost' for any new project using MicroStrategy as solution.
In other words, which BI platform will give you cube,mobile,clustering,scalability,object re-usability , detailed SDK with one of most power SQL engine ?
I'm a system implementer, so I implement the system for customers. I implement whatever the customer needs at their site. It's generally all the BI information that they have in the data warehouse.
Its performance is very good.
Users are getting their reports when they need them.
The whole Repository side of things is beneficial because you develop it once, and you can use it anywhere, in the Enterprise grade.
If you compare it with Power BI with the DAX language, it would be great to put that into MicroStrategy.
It's pretty stable.
The scalability is excellent.
I would rate technical support at seven out of 10.
The choice was political: IBM Cognos against MicroStrategy, and due to IBM internal mechanisms.
My criteria for selecting a vendor are, first, that the application software works, and secondly, the support - and local support as well.
I was involved in the initial setup and it's pretty complex, but it's very powerful once it's set up.
Pricing, in general, is high. With Power BI, you get mobile with the license, whereas with MicroStrategy, you have to purchase mobile for extra.
If you're looking for enterprise BI, go for MicroStrategy.
I would give the tool an eight out of 10. The local office would get a two out of 10. But the tool itself is just a good enterprise-grade tool.
For how long have you used this product?
- 9 yrs
Which features of this product are most valuable to you?
- Mobile and in general, use of this Software by End Users.
Can you give an example of how this product has improved the way your organization functions?
- Users are getting their answers quickly and acting on their business KPI's
What areas of this product have room for improvement?
- Distributing Reports
Did you encounter any issues with deployment, stability or scalability?
- Few Challenges but deployment and stability has been fairly good but scalability of the product is quite challenging.
Did you previously use a different solution and if so, why did you switch?
- Business Objects. Switched to MicroStrategy for ease of use and Mobility Support.
Before choosing this product, did you evaluate other options? If so, which ones?
- Yes. Tableau
How would you rate the level of customer service and technical support?
- Good
Was the initial setup straightforward or complex? In what ways?
- Being in this technology for more years I'm impressed with the straightforward setup approach of their recent releases.
Did you implement through a vendor team or an in-house one? If through a vendor team, how would you rate their level of expertise?
- In House.
What is your ROI on this product?
- Close to $4 Million, I believe.
What advice would you give to others looking into implementing this product?
- Great Product but requires attention on their individual needs.
Hello
Before settling for Microstrategy, you did look into Tableau. Can you please point out the reasons that led you into opting for Microstrategy and not Tableau. Thank you
Gunjan you should check the reports developed as I agree with all the comments and Microstrategy is tool which is capable of running queries on large databases. There are lot of best practices and tuning techniques in Microstrategy which I would suggest you should try to research. All in all the amount of Out of the box features provided by Microstrategy is not provided by any other tool that I am aware of.
In case you have any questions/queries I would be happy to assist. Feel free to reach out to me.
Thanks and Regards
Arpit Agrawal
Business Intelligence Consultant
Email: ArpitAgrawal9@yahoo.co.in
Please consider the environment before printing this email
- SQL Engine
-Ease of mobile BI development and deployment
-Scaleability
- Security (encryption) with compression
- Idea for enterprise wide BI delivery
It needs better EM logging. EM is MicroStrategy enterprise manager which logs usage and stats. It has becomes very difficult over last couple of years to use this feature to have a BI environment rolled out to users.
MicroStrategy customer support including premium support is pretty bad in handling product level question or defects..which leads to lots of dissatisfaction for a customer
Provides seamless integration between browser-based BI and Mobile BI.
Mobile. It brings reports/dashboards closer to the business user. They can access it whenever they want with their mobile devices. It also provides consistent user experience similar to the same reports/dashboards on browser, and it is very intuitive.
The product is designed for enterprise. A lightweight version would be easier for a smaller workgroup.
Not at all. MicroStrategy is known for its enterprise ready platform.
Every software with a flawed design has issues. MicroStrategy is not an exception.
I would rate technical support as an eight out of 10.
Initial setup was straightforward.
MicroStrategy needs a certain level of back-end design skill. Choose the right back-end system.
We mostly do reporting for the business units. It is performing very well.
The data governance leads people to trust the data that they have, and they know where to get it.
In 2018, we are planning to use the semantic layer. We are also planning to look at investing in mobile analytics.
The data governance is the most important thing.
I have not seen the data-wrangling capabilities in 10.10. If that is not good, then that. Then, it needs better visualizations.
The stability is great.
The scalability is great.
Technical support is awesome. I have a specific contact who answers me correctly when I ask questions.
I was not involved with the initial setup, but will be involved with an upcoming upgrade.
If MicroStrategy can do what Tableau does, then we would like to have one platform.
Consider the maturity of MicroStrategy's data model.
Most important criteria when selecting a vendor: Going forward, it will be integration with other platforms, like Salesforce and Hadoop.
Ease of use was valuable. It enabled our end users to do their own reports as self-service with little to no training, thus requiring less support.
It allowed end users to self-service their reports.
Metadata management could be improved. When you delete an object, if there is any object directly linked the metadata, this may become corrupted and break the software. The only way to restore it is to delete the linked objects, whether or not you know which of them have this issue.
I have used this solution for eighteen months.
We did encounter stability issues. We had a serious metadata corruption problem.
The cost of licensing made scalability unprofitable.
We would give technical support a rating of 5/10. The existing whitepapers and documentation were very useful, but actual support never answered us.
I cannot comment, as I took the server that was already set up by a previous colleague.
This all depends on your budget.
Ensure there is enough of a budget for continued support, or look for a different product where there is a bigger community.
I've followed MicroStrategy for nearly 20 years as an intelligence analysis system integrator for the Federal government. As an analyst, a major strength of MicroStrategy is that when I pull an analytical thread and start to follow it I don't have to worry about falling into the "white space" between cubes and waiting for the IT shop to build another cube to answer my question (if I even remember what it was by the time they get back to me). This advantage is huge, and usually overlooked when decisions are made about the tool to procure. A second major strength is the single metadata database that supports the analysts as well as the administrators seamlessly. Add the additional usability features that comes with building a product from the ground up over a period of 20 years and you have a fantastic product. Granted, learning it can be intimidating and complex, but the same can be said about using the esoteric features of MS Excel. But, the product and its applications can be learned and placed into the hands of a company's major asset, its analysts.