Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo

Top 10 Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Alternatives

Vendor: Palo Alto Networks
4.3 out of 5
1,656 followers
Post review

Top Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, and OPNsense. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls surpasses its competitors by offering cutting-edge threat prevention, superior user-friendly management, and advanced AI-driven insights that enhance network security and deliver unparalleled protection for enterprises.

Palo Alto Networks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Palo Alto Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate appeals to budget-conscious buyers with affordable pricing, easy licensing, and UTM features suitable for smaller businesses. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls attract those seeking advanced threat prevention and integration, justifying higher costs with superior long-term protection benefits.
Download Fortinet FortiGate vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Fortinet FortiGate setup is affordable, whereas Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls entail higher initial costs, reflecting differences in initial user investment. Fortinet's cost-efficiency contrasts with Palo Alto's premium price point, highlighting divergent pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate setup is affordable, whereas Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls entail higher initial costs, reflecting differences in initial user investment. Fortinet's cost-efficiency contrasts with Palo Alto's premium price point, highlighting divergent pricing strategies.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer advanced security with machine learning, ideal for enterprises prioritizing comprehensive threat prevention. In comparison, Netgate pfSense provides a flexible, cost-effective open-source solution with VPN, firewall, and router functionalities, appealing to budget-conscious organizations valuing versatility.
Download Netgate pfSense vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Netgate pfSense has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which requires a higher initial investment due to its advanced features and capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Netgate pfSense has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which requires a higher initial investment due to its advanced features and capabilities.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
OPNsense
4.1 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
OPNsense
4.1 out of 5
OPNsense attracts with open-source flexibility and ease of use, appealing for cost-effective solutions. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer advanced security features, making them ideal for businesses prioritizing comprehensive threat protection despite higher costs and complexity.
Download OPNsense vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
OPNsense offers a cost-effective setup, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls involve higher initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
OPNsense offers a cost-effective setup, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls involve higher initial costs.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Secure Firewall is valued for its pricing, integration, and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls excels in advanced threat prevention and application control, though requiring more complex configuration and higher investment for enhanced security features.
Download Cisco Secure Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Cisco Secure Firewall requires a higher setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer a more budget-friendly initial investment. The cost differences clearly highlight Cisco's premium positioning compared to the more cost-efficient Palo Alto Networks option.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Firewall requires a higher setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer a more budget-friendly initial investment. The cost differences clearly highlight Cisco's premium positioning compared to the more cost-efficient Palo Alto Networks option.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Sophos XG
4.1 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Sophos XG
4.1 out of 5
Sophos XG offers unique synchronized security and dual anti-malware engines, ideal for real-time safety. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide sophisticated threat detection and machine learning, suiting environments requiring advanced protection. Sophos XG's pricing appeals to SMEs, while Palo Alto matches premium security investments.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG offers a more affordable setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide advanced features at a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG offers a more affordable setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide advanced features at a higher initial investment.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Azure Firewall
3.7 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Azure Firewall
3.7 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer comprehensive security features like application visibility and advanced threat protection, appealing to enterprises seeking extensive protection. In comparison, Azure Firewall integrates well with Azure services, providing easier deployment and scalability, attracting those invested in the Azure ecosystem.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher setup cost compared to Azure Firewall, making the former more suitable for organizations with substantial security budgets while the latter appeals to those seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher setup cost compared to Azure Firewall, making the former more suitable for organizations with substantial security budgets while the latter appeals to those seeking cost-effective solutions.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Check Point NGFW
4.4 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Check Point NGFW
4.4 out of 5
Check Point NGFW attracts buyers with competitive pricing and robust threat prevention, offering easy deployment. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls appeal with advanced threat detection and application-aware control, justifying their higher cost with comprehensive features and long-term investment value.
Download Check Point NGFW vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Check Point NGFW has a higher setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offers a more budget-friendly setup option. The difference in pricing can be significant for organizations prioritizing cost-efficient solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point NGFW has a higher setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offers a more budget-friendly setup option. The difference in pricing can be significant for organizations prioritizing cost-efficient solutions.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox appeals with its simple setup and strong support, making it ideal for smaller businesses. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer advanced security features like application control, making them attractive for businesses prioritizing comprehensive security despite a higher price.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox offers a lower setup cost, providing budget-friendly security solutions, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls require a higher initial investment, aiming for enhanced features and performance.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox offers a lower setup cost, providing budget-friendly security solutions, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls require a higher initial investment, aiming for enhanced features and performance.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
SonicWall TZ
4.1 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
SonicWall TZ
4.1 out of 5
SonicWall TZ offers ease of configuration with cost-effective pricing and flexibility, suitable for smaller businesses seeking basic security features. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide advanced security capabilities, ideal for enterprises needing comprehensive protection despite higher costs and complexity.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. SonicWall TZ Report
SonicWall TZ has lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls has higher setup costs, reflecting advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall TZ has lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls has higher setup costs, reflecting advanced features.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Juniper SRX Series Firewall
3.9 out of 5
Juniper SRX is ideal for cost-conscious buyers needing strong routing and deployment flexibility. In comparison, Palo Alto NG Firewalls attract those prioritizing advanced threat prevention and integration, suitable for enterprises despite their higher costs.
Download Juniper SRX Series Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
The Juniper SRX Series Firewall offers a lower setup cost compared to the higher setup investment required for the Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls.
View comparison
Pricing
The Juniper SRX Series Firewall offers a lower setup cost compared to the higher setup investment required for the Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM offers simplicity and cost-effectiveness, making it suitable for budget-conscious organizations needing SD-WAN and UTM capabilities. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide superior threat prevention and AI features, appealing to buyers prioritizing robust security despite higher costs.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM setup costs tend to be lower than Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which often require higher initial investment. The difference in setup expenses makes FortiGate-VM more appealing for budget-conscious buyers.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM setup costs tend to be lower than Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which often require higher initial investment. The difference in setup expenses makes FortiGate-VM more appealing for budget-conscious buyers.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Untangle NG Firewall
4.3 out of 5
Untangle NG Firewall offers flexibility and cost-effective solutions suitable for small businesses, emphasizing ease of deployment and straightforward use. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls focus on advanced threat prevention and extensive security features, appealing to enterprises prioritizing robust protection despite higher costs.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. Untangle NG Firewall Report
Untangle NG Firewall offers a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which typically involves a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Untangle NG Firewall offers a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which typically involves a higher initial investment.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
SonicWall NSa offers cost-effective security with features like Site-to-Site VPNs, appealing to businesses valuing hands-on management. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide advanced threat prevention and real-time threat monitoring, ideal for organizations needing cutting-edge security solutions.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. SonicWall NSa Report
SonicWall NSa offers a straightforward setup with competitive initial costs, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls present a more complex setup process that may involve higher upfront expenses. These differences highlight distinct considerations between the two firewall solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall NSa offers a straightforward setup with competitive initial costs, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls present a more complex setup process that may involve higher upfront expenses. These differences highlight distinct considerations between the two firewall solutions.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Sophos XGS
4.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Sophos XGS
4.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks offers advanced security with machine learning and DNS features suitable for large enterprises. In comparison, Sophos XGS provides user-friendly VPNs and scalability, appealing to small and medium businesses focusing on comprehensive yet cost-effective network security.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. Sophos XGS Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have been noted for a higher setup cost, whereas Sophos XGS is often praised for its more affordable initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have been noted for a higher setup cost, whereas Sophos XGS is often praised for its more affordable initial expense.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
KerioControl
4.1 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
KerioControl
4.1 out of 5
KerioControl suits small to medium businesses with easy VPN setup and efficient management. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer advanced threat prevention, suitable for enterprises needing scalability. KerioControl's cost-effectiveness contrasts Palo Alto's extensive, yet expensive, security features.
Download KerioControl vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
KerioControl offers a lower setup cost compared to the more premium setup required for Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls.
View comparison
Pricing
KerioControl offers a lower setup cost compared to the more premium setup required for Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls excel in advanced threat prevention, offering robust security and integration for enterprises. In comparison, Sangfor NGAF is favored for its user-friendly approach and cost-effective features, appealing to budget-conscious buyers with integrated firewall and WAF solutions.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. Sangfor NGAF Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls often highlight a higher initial setup cost compared to Sangfor NGAF, making Sangfor an appealing option for those seeking lower upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls often highlight a higher initial setup cost compared to Sangfor NGAF, making Sangfor an appealing option for those seeking lower upfront expenses.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall offers robust VPN capabilities, transparency, and ease of use in extensive network management. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide advanced threat prevention and application control for security-conscious users, despite being more costly.
Download Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is known for its cost-effective setup, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls tend to have higher initial costs, reflecting their advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is known for its cost-effective setup, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls tend to have higher initial costs, reflecting their advanced features.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
3.8 out of 5
Forcepoint excels with its centralized management and scalable architecture, offering advanced intrusion prevention. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks offers comprehensive threat prevention, including sandboxing. Choose Forcepoint for budget-friendly pricing and ease of deployment; opt for Palo Alto Networks for advanced analytics and application-aware traffic control.
Download Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall often has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for users focusing on initial expenses. Palo Alto Networks, however, might justify its higher setup cost with advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall often has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for users focusing on initial expenses. Palo Alto Networks, however, might justify its higher setup cost with advanced features.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Huawei NGFW
3.6 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Huawei NGFW
3.6 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide application visibility and advanced threat prevention with comprehensive security features. In comparison, Huawei NGFW offers competitive pricing with traditional firewall functionalities that suit budget-conscious users, despite lacking in advanced threat intelligence and application control offered by Palo Alto.
Download Huawei NGFW vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher setup cost, while Huawei NGFW offers a more budget-friendly alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher setup cost, while Huawei NGFW offers a more budget-friendly alternative.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security offers automated deployment and identity awareness, perfect for cloud environments. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide inline, real-time attack prevention with machine learning, making them ideal for sophisticated network protection with advanced threat prevention capabilities.
Download Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
The setup cost for Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is evaluated as cost-efficient, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is noted for being relatively higher, emphasizing a substantial difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is evaluated as cost-efficient, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is noted for being relatively higher, emphasizing a substantial difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Zscaler Cloud Firewall
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NGFWs leverage advanced threat prevention with App-ID and DNS Security for real-time protection, while Zscaler Cloud Firewall offers cloud-native security across web traffic. In comparison, Zscaler integrates with CASB, whereas Palo Alto provides comprehensive on-premise visibility. Choose based on deployment needs.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. Zscaler Cloud Firewall Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer competitive setup costs with robust security features, while Zscaler Cloud Firewall provides a scalable cloud-based solution with potentially lower setup expenses, highlighting a clear differentiation in deployment costs and architecture.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer competitive setup costs with robust security features, while Zscaler Cloud Firewall provides a scalable cloud-based solution with potentially lower setup expenses, highlighting a clear differentiation in deployment costs and architecture.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Hillstone E-Series
4.6 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Hillstone E-Series
4.6 out of 5
Hillstone E-Series offers cost-effective, simplified network security, appealing to mid-sized enterprises with uncomplicated requirements. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls deliver advanced protection and integration, suitable for organizations needing comprehensive security despite higher costs.
Download Hillstone E-Series vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
The setup cost for Hillstone E-Series is lower, offering affordability, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher initial setup cost, reflecting their advanced features and robust capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Hillstone E-Series is lower, offering affordability, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher initial setup cost, reflecting their advanced features and robust capabilities.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Cisco IOS Security
4.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Cisco IOS Security
4.0 out of 5
Cisco IOS Security offers robust integration with existing infrastructure, providing stable security features for enterprises. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls deliver advanced threat prevention and real-time protection, appealing to organizations prioritizing cutting-edge security and precise application control over comprehensive enterprise integration.
Download Cisco IOS Security vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Cisco IOS Security setup costs are generally lower, making it attractive for budget-conscious organizations, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide more advanced features, potentially justifying their higher setup expenses for enterprises demanding comprehensive security capabili...
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco IOS Security setup costs are generally lower, making it attractive for budget-conscious organizations, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide more advanced features, potentially justifying their higher setup expenses for enterprises demanding comprehensive security capabili...
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Juniper vSRX
3.9 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Juniper vSRX
3.9 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer advanced security features like WildFire and IPS for comprehensive threat management. In comparison, Juniper vSRX's focus on traffic segmentation and scalability provides flexibility for varying environments, appealing to buyers prioritizing integration and technical strengths.
Download Juniper vSRX vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Juniper vSRX generally involves lower setup costs, whereas Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls often require a higher initial investment. This cost contrast could influence preferences based on budget and feature requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Juniper vSRX generally involves lower setup costs, whereas Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls often require a higher initial investment. This cost contrast could influence preferences based on budget and feature requirements.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
GajShield Next Generation Firewall
3.9 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer premium security features with deep application inspection, ideal for organizations valuing advanced threat prevention. In comparison, GajShield Next Generation Firewall provides cost-effective security solutions, appealing to budget-conscious organizations seeking essential features with stable performance.
Download GajShield Next Generation Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls involve significant setup costs reflecting their comprehensive security features, while GajShield Next Generation Firewall offers a more cost-effective setup option with efficient deployment focused on core security functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls involve significant setup costs reflecting their comprehensive security features, while GajShield Next Generation Firewall offers a more cost-effective setup option with efficient deployment focused on core security functionalities.

Related categories

Firewalls
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
WAN Edge