Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Fabricio Oliveira Nascimento - PeerSpot reviewer
PMO Project Manager - Information Security at Redbelt
MSP
Great support, easy to deploy, and scalable
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution has helped our organization manage our internal and external activities."
  • "The financial area of RSA Archer has room for improvement."

What is our primary use case?

We use RSA Archer to connect to the purchasing department so that vendors can sell new projects, and we can connect these sales to our project management. This solution connects both areas to develop demand and activities, allowing us to control technical resources and manage hours. RSA Archer also helps with Project Builder and Microsoft Project to check activities, start and finish times, and layered activities.

How has it helped my organization?

The solution has helped our organization manage our internal and external activities.

What is most valuable?

The price of the solution is very affordable.

What needs improvement?

The financial area of RSA Archer has room for improvement. I would like to be able to send invoices to our customers through the solution.

Buyer's Guide
RSA Archer
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about RSA Archer. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I give the stability an eight out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have 100 people using the solution. I give the scalability an eight out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

Technical support is the best.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward. The deployment required five people.

What was our ROI?

I have seen a return on investment.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I give the price a five out of ten.

What other advice do I have?

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

I recommend the solution to others.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Gulsher Baloch - PeerSpot reviewer
GRC Solution Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Provides efficient dashboard features, but its scalability needs improvement
Pros and Cons
  • "It has the best workload management features."
  • "Its customization features could be better."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for administration and policy management purposes.

What is most valuable?

The solution's most valuable features are data feeds, templates, reports, dashboards, and workload management.

What needs improvement?

The solution’s customization features could be better. Its performance and scalability need improvement as well. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using the solution for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the solution's stability a five out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution’s scalability is low compared to OpenPages. At present, we have two users for it in our organization. We might increase the usage ahead.

How are customer service and support?

We have received assistance from the solution’s technical support team many times.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Our clients migrated their work data from Archer to OpenPages for better performance and scalability.

How was the initial setup?

We can deploy the solution on the cloud and premises as well. It depends on the client’s requirements. The process takes approximately two to three hours to complete. We develop a management module in the testing server. After a successful review from the client, we export the package to the production environment.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution’s pricing is moderate.

What other advice do I have?

I rate the solution a five out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
RSA Archer
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about RSA Archer. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1720377 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Analyst - Security Governance at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
One platform with good options for tailoring to requirements; lacking somewhat in customization
Pros and Cons
  • "Good dashboards and reporting features; it's easy to gather reports quickly."
  • "There are certain restrictions on API integrations, and it is not simple or straightforward."

What is our primary use case?

We have a partnership with RSA Archer and I'm a lead analyst and GRC for the company. 

How has it helped my organization?

We use this solution as a central repository. Instead of using various GRC options or other tools, we can use one platform with options to tailor the product to our needs. That's the benefit of using RSA Archer.  

What is most valuable?

I like the dashboards and reporting features; it's easy to gather reports quickly which is great when your VP is waiting for the KPIs. The solution is generic and it's great to have out-of-the-box workflows and concepts. I'm very satisfied with Archer, possibly because I've been using it for so long and I'm in my comfort zone. I know, for example, that ServiceNow GRC is more customizable but it's not as secure as RSA Archer.

What needs improvement?

I'm using a Mac and I can't get Archer to load in Safari. In addition, there are certain restrictions on API integrations, and it is not simple or straightforward. I'd like more customization and to be able to design our API integrations more easily, it would make a huge difference. We moved to SaaS because we wanted more integration and we wanted RSA to help with that. There has been some improvement but it's still not great. For no reason that we can figure out, there are issues with email; sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. We've raised that problem with RSA. There are some security concerns when it comes to authentications or DMZ or service accounts, which are still managed by RSA.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been working with various Archer solutions for about nine years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The SaaS version is stable. We have an Archer admin team that meets weekly with a representative from RSA so that any concerns or issues can be resolved as soon as possible. 90% of my work is on Archer and about 60% of the company are users of this product. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of the solution is reasonable. 

How are customer service and support?

I'm satisfied with the Archer support. 

How was the initial setup?

I don't have a good recollection of the deployment process but we had three representatives from RSA and three or four engineers from a vendor contractor. Deployment probably took over six months, including the change from on-prem to SaaS. The solution hasn't required maintenance since we moved to SaaS. 

What other advice do I have?

It's important to first look at the out of box workflow that RSA is offering, and then go for customization. Don't customize or overdo workflow because it degrades the overall Archer performance.

I rate this solution seven out of 10. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Team Leader at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
User-friendly, secure, and reasonably priced
Pros and Cons
  • "It is a very friendly tool. We can easily understand what is going on inside the tool. I like this tool. We can work with the tool for the ERP platform. We can create automated applications based on the requirements."
  • "There were so many problems that we had found. One time, the search index was not working. We also faced slowness in Archer, but I resolved this issue."

What is our primary use case?

I work with user management, policy management, enterprise management, risk management, and third-party management.

We are using its service version. We have to buy that license, and based on the license, they're providing us with the application.

What is most valuable?

It is a very friendly tool. We can easily understand what is going on inside the tool. I like this tool. We can work with the tool for the ERP platform. We can create automated applications based on the requirements.

It is very secure with three levels of access. We can give three levels of access in Archer. We can give access at the field level, application level, and code level. So, it is very secure.

What needs improvement?

There were so many problems that we had found. One time, the search index was not working. We also faced slowness in Archer, but I resolved this issue. The queue services were running on two servers, whereas they should have been running only on one server. There were also many duplicate records. I had to go and check the specific field and update that. After that, we removed all duplicate records from Archer.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We faced performance issues only in the lower version. The reason was that they were using only three servers and one database. We increased the services and RAM, and we had two application servers, three web servers, and one database. Whenever there are any performance issues, we need to check the jobs in the server backend. Sometimes, jobs are running for the last five days and that's why new jobs are not being picked up. In such cases, we have to prioritize the jobs that will go first and that will go second.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is easy to scale. If we want to increase the number of users in Archer, we have so many tools. We can create more than 1,000 users in Archer at one time. We only need a license. 

Currently, more than 30,000 users are using Archer. We plan to keep using this solution. It is being used by so many companies.

How are customer service and support?

When we face any issues related to the application, RSA is there immediately. We can raise a ticket and after that, they help us. Everything is fine in terms of support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously, they were storing the data in Excel sheets, but when they wanted to move to Archer, based on the requirements, I created the fields, and I created the workflow and access control for that.

I have worked on SAP ERP in my previous company. I started to work on Archer after I moved to this company.

How was the initial setup?

In our team, we have only three members. I am from India and two more people are from the US. Because our team size is very small, we have to perform every activity. We take care of the administrative work, development work, and support work. If anything happens in the system, we will check why it is happening and sort it out.

An application's deployment typically takes one month, but it will vary based on the requirement. If we are working on one application with more than 100 fields or critical workflows, it will take time. For fewer fields or workflows, we can create an application within a week, and we can move it to production.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is not expensive. It is reasonable. We only pay for the licensing.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate RSA Archer an eight out of 10.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1714917 - PeerSpot reviewer
RSA Archer Consultant at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Consultant
Excellent advanced workflow but issues with performance
Pros and Cons
  • "Makes auditing much more convenient."
  • "Performance could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

My main use cases are risk assessment and policy use. I also use this solution to create on-demand applications.

How has it helped my organization?

RSA Archer allows you to implement government risk compliance and acts as a mechanism to ensure that the compliance policies and standards are met. It also documents every exception with proper reasoning. This makes auditing much more convenient.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the advanced workflow, which has totally ruled out any issues with data-driven events and which makes it easier to explain things to end-users because you can show them a screenshot of the workflow.

What needs improvement?

An area for improvement is Archer's use of Internet Explorer as a core browser due to its dependence on Silverlight, despite Microsoft ending its support for IE and moving to Edge. I would like to see an end to the use of Silverlight and IE and for Archer to add the ability to use any browser to make key changes and configurations. In addition, I would like for the new questionnaire feature to be developed further and for Archer to develop a proper built-in framework for working with organizations with sub-organizations and multiple companies.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been working with RSA Archer for 28 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Archer's performance could be improved - older versions can be very slow, and the application crashes from time to time.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Archer is easy to scale.

How are customer service and support?

I have to contact technical support about once a month due to some issues with logging in. Generally, the team is responsive and proficient, though sometimes they can be a little slow to respond.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup is quite complex because every organization requires three instances of Archer, which requires changing the specific components for each instance and needs three teams to be involved in deployment. Deployment can take anywhere from a couple of hours to a full day or two, depending on how many different modules are being installed and the areas being impacted.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Archer is fairly highly-priced, especially for smaller companies.

What other advice do I have?

If using the on-premises version of Archer, it's necessary to train at least a couple of people who can provide ongoing support. Prior to purchasing the product, make sure that you define your exact requirements and go over them with the RSA Archer team. I would rate this product as seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
reviewer1711899 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Streamlines management and organization but struggles with large amounts of data
Pros and Cons
  • "Even non-technical people can be masters of the product."
  • "Some areas are not truly automated but are only scheduled."

What is our primary use case?

My primary use cases are IT risk management, policy management, IT compliance management, vendor risk management, and vulnerability management. 

How has it helped my organization?

RSA Archer allows you to create on-demand policies and custom solutions. It automates all our governance, risk, and compliance processes so that they can be easily managed and organized. Archer can build and automate workflows for anything that contributes to your risk.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of this solution are the ease of developing solutions and managing advanced workflows.

What needs improvement?

The main improvement I would like to see in the on-premises version is the amount of data the product can hold. You need to have a really good server to make it run if you have a large amount of data, which may be challenging for bigger organizations. Another improvement would be making more features available as APIs. There are also some automation issues - some areas are not truly automated but are only scheduled, requiring someone to be present to monitor the process, meanwhile using a lot of automation can slow the system. Finally, I would like to see more scope for developers to play around with the project - currently, it is so tightly coupled that you do not have many options compared to some other products.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been working with RSA Archer for ten years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Assuming you stay within the limits stated in Archer's documentation, the stability is good. However, if you exceed their limits, you may need to play around with your power distribution to keep everything running smoothly. New patches or updates can also cause hiccups with stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product is easy to scale.

How are customer service and support?

Archer's technical support is pretty good - they are supportive, and their ticketing system provides real-time updates about any incidents that occur. The team also responds quickly to high-priority issues.

How was the initial setup?

Setup was straightforward - for the on-premises version, the vendor sends an executable file, then you procure your resources and deploy yourself. The installation itself takes about twenty minutes at most, although preparation to install can take some time.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This product is at the higher end of the price scale, but it provides better, more accessible functionality and customization than cheaper products.

What other advice do I have?

You don't need any experience with coding language to use this solution as it has drag-and-drop functionality. In two to three months, even non-technical people can be masters of the product. In addition, out-of-box solutions like risk management and policy management are really good. Maintenance is not a big problem, but if you heavily customize the product, you may need someone to keep an eye on those. I would also say that if you don't have your processes measured, don't jump directly into any of these products, including Archer. Make sure your processes are mature before implementing a product like this. I would rate this product as seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Sameh Hablas - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at Al Danah Information Systems Solutions
Real User
Top 10
Streamlines management of internal processes, assists with governance and compliance
Pros and Cons
  • "Archer seamlessly integrates data systems without requiring additional software."
  • "I would like to have the ability to build and maintain an inventory of personal data processing activities and assets utilizing a purpose-built taxonomy and data structure."

What is our primary use case?

We use RSA Archer as an Information Security Management Systems Compliance solution in sectors such as business resiliency, operational and enterprise risk management, audit management, public sector, security and IT risk management, third-party governance, and regulatory compliance management.

How has it helped my organization?

RSA Archer GRC modules allow you to build efficient, collaborative enterprise governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) programs across IT, finance, operations, and legal domains. With RSA Archer, you can manage risks, demonstrate compliance, and automate business processes.

What is most valuable?

This solution allows us to define and automate business processes for streamlining the management of content, tasks, statuses, and approvals.

We are able to consolidate governance, risk, and compliance information of any type.

Archer seamlessly integrates data systems without requiring additional software.

Automate movement of data into and out of the platform to support data analysis, process management, and reporting.

What needs improvement?

I would like to have the ability to build and maintain an inventory of personal data processing activities and assets utilizing a purpose-built taxonomy and data structure.

Tracking data retention schedules and executing a checklist based on Article 30 requirements as it relates to processing activities would be a helpful addition.

Having the ability to manage activities related to notifications and consents linked to the processing activity inventory would improve this solution.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Lead-IT & Information Security at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Allows for easy risk management and presents data wonderfully
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features are the advanced workflow and the dashboards. This tool can present data wonderfully to management, and it is easy for them to manage the risk plans."
  • "An area for improvement would be the user interface. They could also offer more on-demand applications free of cost."

What is our primary use case?

My primary use case of this solution is for government risk compliance, including risk management, cost reviews, and security management.

How has it helped my organization?

The risks which impact the organization or the IT section are presented in a well-displayed manner, which helps us to plan for, manage, or even mitigate risks. In short, Archer helps us plan our risk management very easily. 

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are the advanced workflow and the dashboards. This tool can present data wonderfully to management, and it is easy for them to manage the risk plans.

What needs improvement?

An area for improvement would be the user interface. They could also offer more on-demand applications free of cost.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using Archer for seven or eight years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Archer has some performance issues when working on a single server. There is also a tendency for bugs to appear with every update.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I found this product easy to scale.

How are customer service and support?

The tech support team is very good, but they need to be a little quicker to respond.

How was the initial setup?

The complexity of the setup varies depending on the size of your network. With one server, installation is easy and shouldn't take a knowledgeable person more than three hours to complete.

What was our ROI?

We've seen a good return on investment in terms of time saved.

What other advice do I have?

I would advise anyone thinking of implementing Archer to go for it. I would give this tool a score of eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free RSA Archer Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free RSA Archer Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.