The initial setup is pretty straightforward. Typically, the customer has the know-how to configure and put the products up by themselves. It's a pretty straightforward process.
When we buy this product for our customers, we have noted in the past that this product has an excellent signal.
Ruckus is a bad solution in general. It's pretty old and outdated.
When the customer wants to change that technology of the AP from the solution of old technology to new technology, they need to change the controller and the AP, and this is the point that tends to break the solution. It's hard to update.
We also work with Cisco and Aruba. We offer all three to our clients and they tend to choose which one they want to work with, or which has the best price point for them.
The initial setup is very easy and most customers handle it themselves. They can do the setup and configuration as it is not overly complex or difficult.
Typically, the client handles the implementation themselves, however, we can assist as necessary.
The customers don't seem to mind the cost of the solution. Typically they decide to go with it based on the cost.
We're partners and resellers. We used to have a relationship with Ruckus, however, it was purchased by Broadcom, and we don't have any business relationship with them.
It's important for us to present to our customer with some options. However, normally, our customers have a specific budget. In this case, we only move with the needs of our customers. In terms of Meraki, Ruckus, Aruba, et cetera, all work fine. We don't have problems. We don't have interference, or need a box reset, or face other kinds of problems.
Overall, I would rate the solution at a three out of ten.