ScienceLogic Reviews

ScienceLogic can be deployed on-premise and on the cloud. It is up to our clients what cloud provider they want to use. They can choose from many of the cloud vendors, such as Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud. Most of our offerings are still using the IBM cloud.

We are only using ScienceLogic for infrastructure. It can be for a small account, it could be a large account. Most of our large accounts are Fortune 500 companies. We have some of the large accounts around the globe, which are using ScienceLogic to manage their business.

I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity.

I have been using ScienceLogic for approximately eight years.

The stability of ScienceLogic is great.

I have no problem scaling ScienceLogic.

The support that ScienceLogic offers is very good and responsive.

The initial implementation of ScienceLogic is straightforward because often we use our cloud services and the only thing we need to do is add collectors on the client's environment and then connect into the cloud offering. The installation of the collectors and making them connected to the network into the servers that we have on top of the cloud is not complex.

The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve.

We decided to use ScienceLogic instead of IBM tool monitoring which we evaluated.

The benefit for ScienceLogic is they are agentless. This is one of the most benefits of using ScienceLogic. You often don't need to install any agents. When we used other solutions the agents caused us some delays in progress.

I rate ScienceLogic a nine out of ten.

One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards.

Overall, it is a very solid tool for Fault and Performance Monitoring. We use the tool to provide views into their environment.

Our engineers use the tool when engaged on a Systems and Network Architecture project to determine baselines and to monitor changes we make.

Our NOC also uses the tool to provide monitoring services to our client.

I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services.

We have used this solution for three years.

The deployment was smooth. However, we deployed on our internal systems, then expanded to include external and managed systems.

We have had excellent reliability with the product. There are sometimes issues when changes and migrations are done to monitored elements, but we have seen that with every solution that I have deployed.

We have not had any scalability issues. However, we only have a few thousand elements. This is something I will continue to watch as it grows.

Customer Service is fantastic. Their Customer Service has been the best I have encountered. They are willing to work through issues with their product or simply issues that can be tangential to the product itself.

Overall, technical support has been excellent. When I have run into issues that move past their Tier-2 support, I had the opportunity to work with their directors and their development staff.

We switched because of cost and the overall level of effort it was taking to keep up with managing the solution. This was not a full time job, but simply a part time job for one person. This solution has allowed us to provide support with a fraction of the resources, instead of dedicating a full-time resource.

The initial setup was rather simple. We used Professional Services as well as Technical training resources from ScienceLogic.

The deployment was done remotely by a single individual in few days. Overall, he was very competent.

We have had a very solid ROI since we use the product as part of our Managed Services offering. It has allowed us to keep the prices both competitive and profitable.

Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow.

We migrated from Nimsoft to ScienceLogic, but I have worked with a large number of Enterprise Monitoring platforms in my career. We considered Nagios, SolarWinds, and ManageEngine before deciding on this solution.

I am excited to see the new version, Version 8. But the product has continued to grow and whenever I have had issues, ScienceLogic has stepped up as company. I feel very comfortable recommending them as a solution.

The ability to write custom dynamic applications, and the ability to create custom dashboards to display multiple device graphs in one place.

We have been using EM7 as our monitoring solution since our product was launched 7 years ago. EM7 has allowed us to respond quickly to service outages, and has been a great help in identifying the cause of these outages.

The upgrade process occasionally proves to be exciting. ScienceLogic Support is always able to resolve the exciting issues promptly, but I'd rather seem them not appear in the first place.

My company: 7 years

Me personally: 3 years

No. Initial deployment is always quick and easy. I'be deployed more than a dozen appliances and not encountered any issues.

Not with EM7, just with my hardware. Even in those instances, ScienceLogic support has been a great help in getting things running again.

The only scalability issues I've encountered have been due to bugs in my hardware. When I have followed heir published hardware recommendations and used reliable hardware I have seen no scalability issues.

Excellent. I've only called to address licensing issues, and they have always been able to resolve my issues quickly.

The best I've ever experienced. No matter whether my issue has been due to system configuration, operator inexperience, or hardware problems, they have always been able to guide me to a prompt resolution.

I've used Nagios a number of times, and have tried Zabbix and a couple others. All of the other solutions make generating graphs and configuring alerts a painful process. With EM7 it's painless.

Very simple. With the auto-discovery capability, I didn't have to created complicated configuration files like with Nagios.

In-house. The solution was initially implemented by my boss, but I took over 3 years ago. Since then I have thoroughly enjoyed supporting EM7.

The product is a bit expensive, but impressive capability and expandability comes at a price. My management team has never hesitated to approve my requests for new licenses.

My boss tells me that they looked at Nagios and Zabbix, and discovered that they didn't offer nearly the capabilities offered by EM7. The fact that our primary provider of satellite communications services also uses EM7 was an additional big help in making the choice.

I highly recommend on-site training from ScienceLogic's staff. They convey a great deal of information very quickly and painlessly.

ServiceNow API integration - Allows us to automate monitoring alerts for our internal infrastructure as well as our client environments.

Highly Customizable - The platform is capable of almost anything in terms of reporting/monitoring/alerting. If I determine there is something I need to be monitoring, I can quickly create an event that will be generated. When combined with ServiceNow intergration, our Support Team can quickly address issues.

Phone-Home Collectors - Having the ability for the collectors to report back to a central database over the internet is an amazing feature. Rather than spending weeks establishing a Site-to-Site VPN with each of our customers, we simply provide and ISO file to our clients and input the address/key of our database. We can turn up collectors in a matter of minutes.

I work for a Managed Service Provider and we rely heavily on our monitoring/alerting platform. One of the primary functions of our Support Team is the acknowledgement of alerts and communication with our clients on the health of their environment. ScienceLogic has given us the ability to generate tickets directly from monitoring events. When a client requests that we provide alerts on a specific function/feature being unavailable, I can typically create a new event policy that fits the bill.

Our Client team works to provide meaningful information to our clients in the form of reports. ScienceLogic allowed for us to create PRI utilization reports that we can send to our clients. The automation / scheduling of the reports reduces the administrative overhead put on the Client team and myself.

Simplified Interface - ScienceLogic can be a bit overwhelming when you begin working with it. The amount of customization is sometimes too much. A simplified user interface would help to alleviate this.

NetFlow Support - I would like to see ScienceLogic support Netflow so that it can be used to identify applications that could be affecting network bandwidth.

Configuration Backup - Another feature I would like to see added to ScienceLogic. It is unfortunate that I have to use different systems to perform certain functions of a Network Management System (NMS)

We have used the solution for approximately 2 years.

There were no deployment issues to my knowledge. I wasn't part of the initial deployment. However, the infrastructure consisted of a Database, Administration Portal and Data Collector. All were deployed as virtual appliances on a VM host.

Overall, the system has been very stable. In the two years we have had the system, I have only encountered two instances where the database would experience issues. It would lock up and collectors would stop sending data to it. A system reboot typically cleared up any problems I would see.

We have not encountered any scalability issues yet. We have grown from monitoring 100 devices to upwards of 500. The system doesn't seem to be experiencing any problems.

The customer service has been excellent. Whenever I have a question or require assistance, they are helpful and polite.

The Supoort Team consists of some great engineers. I feel confident that when I submit a support ticket, I will get an engineer who understands the system and how to best resolve the problem I am experiencing.

We were not using an NMS prior to ScienceLogic. As we grew, we wanted a way to provide monitoring/alerting and ticket generation from the platform. ScienceLogic fit that bill perfectly.

The initial setup is straight forward from a high-level. We received assistance from ScienceLogic on the initial installation / configuration. I was not involved in the actual deployment but it sounded like it went well.

We worked directly with ScienceLogic on the installation. I was not involved in the initial deployment. The co-worker who deployed the system seemed to be happy with their level of expertise.

Licensing is based upon the number of the devices, as well as the tier of the device being monitored. For example, a Tier 1 license is going to cost less than a Tier 6 license. I suggest that you appropriately classify your devices in the proper tier. Otherwise, you may find that the automated discovery of the devices will put them in the incorrect tier.

Our team evaluated SolarWinds as well as ScienceLogic. From a pricing perspective, ScienceLogic was superior. Also, the deployment of ScienceLogic was better suited to our Managed Service Provider environment. Having to establish Site-to-Site VPNs for all of our clients would significantly increase the deployment time. The phone-home collector available from ScienceLogic is an excellent solution for any MSP.

Pros:

- The platform is excellent for monitoring / alerting / ticket generation to ServiceNow

- You can customize virtually every aspect of the system.

- Phone-Home collectors allow you to deploy remote appliances within different networks with no need for VPNs.

- Virtual or hardware appliance options

- Excellent Customer Service and Support

Cons:

- The User Interface is a bit overwhelming until you become more familiar with it.

- No Configuration Backup support

- No NetFlow support

We use the solution for monitoring networks, applications, and server environments.

ScienceLogic has all functions in one solution.

The user interface could be improved. The sizing and footprints of the central environment need improvement, too. 

The solution lacks functionality. The main issue is the granularity of user management.

I have been using ScienceLogic for three months.

The product is stable.

The footprint and complexity of ScienceLogic can require significant memory, CPU, and disk space. This can lead to overloaded servers and components, resulting in a sluggish user interface.

A total of 400 users are using this solution.

I rate the solution’s scalability a six out of ten.

We had very limited contact with customer support.

I can compare it with Broadcom. ScienceLogic is cheaper with less functionality.

The initial setup is very complex.

ScienceLogic comes with a good price.

I rate the product’s pricing a ten out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

Power packs.

With all the new devices being deployed, it is great to see the vender supporting them as they come out.

Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus.

Five years.

Never.

Never. It runs at 100% and performs at 100%.

No.

It is top rated. I have never waited on hold for help.

It is top rated. They always have a solution or an answer to my questions.

SevOne. EM7 is just more feature rich and stable.

Very easy and straightforward.

In-house.

100%.

Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor.

SevOne.

If your looking to have an OSS, demo EM7.

We make extensive use of the custom application profiling and monitoring. Most of our applications have enterprise SNMP MIBS and we make extensive use of the modelling capabilities and auto-discovery/classification to ensure our systems are monitored when they come online.

One of our largest challenges before implementing our ScienceLogic system was the presence of nuisance alarms. After implementing ScienceLogic, we were able to eliminate this issue by extensive use of the modelling tools.

The reporting module needs work. We often find ourselves creating reports by accessing the backend database directly instead of the built-in tools. We would also like to see improvements in the modelling capabilities for the IT service toolset.

We have been using ScienceLogic for over 7 years.

Deployment was done in a systematic way by cutting over segments of the network and types of systems. We did not have any significant issues with deployment.

We have not had issues with stability for several years. The platform is very stable and does not require a lot of system admin time.

We currently have 20,000+ systems in our primary ScienceLogic system and general performance is acceptable. We would like better scalability in the time-series performance data storage.

We don't use a lot of customer service directly from ScienceLogic. We have a long standing relationship with them and typically cut through to the appropriate level straight away.

Technical support is good. We have extensive in-house knowledge and typically only escalate the most serious of technical challenges.

Yes. Our previous product had many deficiencies including lack of logical expressions, mixed licensing, limited cross-functional tools, and other issues. Also, getting our own enhancements into the product was impossible.

It was basically straight forward to get up and running. Assuming networking and firewalls are open appropriately it can be setup and providing value within hours.

Both. We typically handle our own implementation for small upgrades and installations. For large upgrades, we contract ScienceLogic directly to assist. They are very knowledgeable in their support for implementation.

That is difficult to measure for a monitoring platform... We consider it a positive ROI by having to the ability to get high quality actionable events and reducing headcount needed to maintain multiple tools.

Boils down to each organization - you can model ScienceLogic as a subscription or as a capital purchase + expense. We have a mixed model depending on the organization within our company and its preference.

Yes, we looked at SevOne, HPOV (NNM + OVO), SMARTS + Watch3Net, plus a few others. We also weighed open source products like Nagios and OpenNMS.

ScienceLogic is an excellent all around suite of tools. We were able to reduce the number of tools by its adoption. They constantly innovate and move in lockstep to most industry trends.

We use the product to monitor our servers, network switches, and other devices. We can check if there are any issues with the patching.

ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard. Additionally, there are role-based access features for admins.

Admins do not have direct access to the reporting. It goes first to the AIOps team, who have access to reports. They forward based on what is required and requested through us. We have to follow up protocols to get through that. It needs improvement. 

I have been using ScienceLogic as a customer for the last nine months. We are using the latest version.

Initially, we encountered customization-related issues. I rate the product’s stability a six out of ten.

Adding resources is easy and accessible in ScienceLogic. You can customize and monitor and can have automated management. You can write automation scripts with the right level of access and send alerts and notifications. It is a built-in feature, but only some have access to it.

In my team, we have 25 ScienceLogic admins. In the AIOps team, we have another 50 users. Its scalability is a seven or eight out of ten.

Our AIOps team manages the application and does the customizations for each team. They initiate contact with the technical support team.

The setup is straightforward. It is easy to manage and check for alerts. The classification of alerts is specific. It makes it easier for admins to manage alerts. We can quickly identify what is critical and a warning-level alert. We move the managed servers across the network while migrating the clients' data from other products to ScienceLogic.

ScienceLogic is a great tool for system administrators. It is convenient and feature-rich, with a lot of customization options available. The dashboards and support information are very specific and detailed; you can customize it for convenience. The pre-built information is also very useful and granular, making it easy to identify problems. The alert levels are well-defined and can be customized for each customer. ScienceLogic is also very intuitive and can automatically pick up signals and categorize alerts.

ScienceLogic's alert system is already top-notch, but you can also customize it further to meet the needs of each customer specifically. For example, you can set different alert levels for different SLAs. You can also customize the alert notifications to be sent to the appropriate people. This way, you can ensure all alerts are handled quickly and efficiently. We can also customize the alert levels depending on the nature of the issue. The alert system is designed well and provides very specific load ratings. However, we can customize the alerts per our customer's SL agreements.

Overall, I rate ScienceLogic an eight out of ten.