Microsoft Configuration Manager vs ScienceLogic comparison

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Read 42 ScienceLogic reviews

826 Views
626 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 24, 2024

In the field of IT management and monitoring, Microsoft Configuration Manager and ScienceLogic are both notable contenders. Microsoft Configuration Manager has a slight advantage due to its broad integration capabilities and enforcement of uniformity across IT environments.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager offers comprehensive capabilities for application deployment, configuration management, and patch management. It integrates seamlessly with Intune for enhanced mobile device management and features robust reporting tools for compliance and updates. ScienceLogic excels with strong multi-tenancy support, customizable dashboards, and extensive monitoring capabilities that include built-in runbook automation and AWS support.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager could benefit from a more streamlined application package deployment process, enhanced performance, and better integration with non-Microsoft updates. ScienceLogic might improve its interface for easier navigation, enhance reporting capabilities, and provide better SNMP data support. There is also room for more turnkey integration with external platforms and comprehensive documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Configuration Manager is mainly deployed on-premises and offers support through Microsoft Premier and other online resources, though support quality can vary. ScienceLogic allows for both on-premises and cloud deployments and is recognized for good customer service, though its initial setup may be complex and require significant learning.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager's pricing is considered high due to licensing complexity and requisite infrastructure like SQL Server, making it more suited for large enterprises. ScienceLogic uses a subscription model that can become costly with more endpoints, but offers strong value through its features. Both solutions provide a good ROI, especially in environments where automation and comprehensive management are priorities.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: December 2024).

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. ScienceLogic

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Ranking in Server Monitoring

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (3rd), Patch Management (1st)

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Server Monitoring

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (8th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (32nd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (26th), IT Operations Analytics (8th), Cloud Monitoring Software (21st), AIOps (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 9.7%, down from 11.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 3.7%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Abul Fazal

Service Delivery Manager at Almoayyed Computers

Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable

The initial setup for Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is simple. However, the configuration and management are not simple. Most of my clients are using the on-premise configuration. Cloud deployment is cumbersome because It requires lots of system communication to open from the cloud, and every client has to communicate with the cloud. We follow the Microsoft best practices procedure and white papers for implementation. Which includes single and multiple server deployments. The time it takes for deployment depends on the client's environment, such as the configuration and customization needed. However, the process can typically take two to three weeks to complete.

Read full review

GauravSingh4

CEO at Parker Digital

Great integrations, power flow, and good support

They need a little more self-service. Some of the places where there's still a dependency on defense logic. If those could be eliminated, that would be ideal. They've done a fantastic job eliminating a lot of those dependencies and there's a lot of self-service. However, some of the areas where we could have it connect to, for example, Splunk or ServiceNow, in a self-care version versus having to go back to their engineers, that's an area where they could do a little more. There are still a lot of engineers who get involved versus if it's a little more API-driven and self-served dashboard connections. Doing it the other way would just make life easier for users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a very well-rounded product. It is a complete package with all the features using which we are able to manage our PCs very efficiently."

"The main, clear valuable feature is updating the latest, patches and updates from Windows. This is the main feature we really utilize a lot."

"This solution helps us by automating the patching of our system."

"Patching is the main feature because SCCM is made to control the entire environment without manually interpreting. So it is good to use for patching."

"Patching is very effective and reporting is very good."

"SCCM is a stable solution."

"There have to be made some improvement in WSUS and control in other non-Microsoft products updates."

"We're a Microsoft-centric organization, so we are happy with the integration between products."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros

"Power packs."

"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

"The power flow is great."

"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."

"It is simple."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"The TSM component could be improved."

"SCCM does not scale well, which is one of the reasons we are not going to continue to use it."

"Troubleshooting in general needs improvement. There's just a ton of logs to go through, and so finding the error log that corresponds with that you're doing can sometimes be difficult."

"The tool's deployment can be cumbersome."

"The analysis is something that can be integrated. Their report analysis can be improved a little bit due to the fact that most of the time complaints policies are saved by the admins. It's something that we need to look into and search for."

"In terms of scalability, I believe there's room for improvement. While SCCM is capable of handling our current needs effectively, scalability could be enhanced to accommodate future growth and larger deployments."

"There's no way to say, "I want this maintenance window to be on the second Tuesday of the month." It's strict. This window is this and that's it. You can't fluctuate."

"There is no asset management package included."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons

"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."

"There are often bugs in new releases."

"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price model is different for every client."

"Its licensing is quite complicated because we are getting the license not only for SCCM but for the full Microsoft package. We don't need to pay for a separate license. We need to have one license that includes everything we need, such as Windows, Microsoft 365, SCCM, encryption, and so on. So, we don't have a specific price for it. Perhaps, it is good that it includes the full suite of licensing of Microsoft. It is expensive, but we are getting a lot of features."

"For enterprises, there is an annual license required to use this solution. The price of the solution could be cheaper. However, this is mostly because of the exchange rate from the dollar to the Nigerian currency."

"We use the tool's free license. It is expensive."

"I would rate the cost as eight out of ten."

"There is an annual license needed to use the solution."

"The solution is expensive. Microsoft Configuration Manager would likely be considered high-priced for small businesses because they may not fully utilize all of its features and capabilities."

"The price of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is expensive."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?

ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...

What do you like most about SCCM?

One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required. The tool is more or less good. The tool needs to improve its APM capabilities.

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Comparisons

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 8% of the time

BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Systems Manager vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 15% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Configuration Manager

December 2024

Download Microsoft Configuration Manager product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

November 2024

Also Known As

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM )

No data available

Learn More

Microsoft

Overview

Microsoft Configuration Manager helps IT manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose. When Configuration Manager is integrated with Microsoft Intune, you can manage corporate-connected PCs and Macs along with cloud-based mobile devices running Windows, iOS, and Android, all from a single management console.

New features of Configuration Manager, such as the support of Windows 10 in-place upgrade, co-management with Microsoft Intune, Windows 10 and Microsoft 365 Apps for enterprise Servicing Dashboard, integration with Windows Update for Business, and more make deploying and managing Windows easier than ever before.

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell