Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs ScienceLogic comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 20, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
ScienceLogic's support is quick, responsive, and available 24/7, but sometimes requires multiple interactions and varies in knowledge levels.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.5
ScienceLogic needs improvements in monitoring, user interface, stability, customization, support, and user-friendliness, with challenges in automation and database monitoring.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.8
ScienceLogic is highly rated for scalability and adaptability, though some report onboarding and resource management challenges.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
ScienceLogic's pricing ranges from $8 to $15 per endpoint, offering value through extensive features and straightforward subscriptions.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.3
ScienceLogic is praised for stable performance, with high ratings, minor customization issues, and occasional challenges in large environments.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.2
ScienceLogic offers agentless configuration, robust monitoring, third-party integration, customizable dashboards, scalability, AI, and comprehensive coverage, ensuring user-friendliness.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Configuration Man...
Ranking in Server Monitoring
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (3rd), Patch Management (1st)
ScienceLogic
Ranking in Server Monitoring
13th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (33rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (26th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (22nd), AIOps (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 9.5%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 3.7%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Sachin Vinay - PeerSpot reviewer
We can specialize the policies related to each device group which ensures that each group has access to the applications they need for their work and non-work hours
I give the solution a nine out of ten. Maintenance is required for some client requests because a few of our cases involve clients reporting issues with their applications. We need to maintain their laptops because they usually run into issues while running other applications. However, in the case of personal computers, there is no problem. We can maintain them with only 20% of the typical maintenance requirements. I would recommend that everyone try out the Endpoint Manager solution from Microsoft. It is a great product because it integrates well with Microsoft products, which most organizations use. This reduces the number of integration and troubleshooting problems. Even if Microsoft products are not used in an organization, I still recommend this product. Other solutions are available but there may be some integration and troubleshooting problems.
GauravSingh4 - PeerSpot reviewer
Great integrations, power flow, and good support
They need a little more self-service. Some of the places where there's still a dependency on defense logic. If those could be eliminated, that would be ideal. They've done a fantastic job eliminating a lot of those dependencies and there's a lot of self-service. However, some of the areas where we could have it connect to, for example, Splunk or ServiceNow, in a self-care version versus having to go back to their engineers, that's an area where they could do a little more. There are still a lot of engineers who get involved versus if it's a little more API-driven and self-served dashboard connections. Doing it the other way would just make life easier for users.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?
ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...
What do you like most about SCCM?
One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...
What do you like most about ScienceLogic?
The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?
My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price.
What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?
The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required. The tool is more or less good. The tool needs to improve its APM capabilities.
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM )
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. ScienceLogic and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.