I use it for test management within Jira.
Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Integration with tool streamlines test management but needs better exporting options
Pros and Cons
- "It has a very intuitive user experience."
- "It has a very intuitive user experience."
- "It's difficult to export the test cases in Zephyr, especially with screenshots or attachments, making sharing test cases not very easy."
- "The solution is not really stable. Sometimes in the past, some pages wouldn't load due to issues."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
This tool boasts an incredibly user-friendly interface that integrates seamlessly with other Jira tools. I particularly appreciate its intuitive features for designing test plans, creating test cases, and executing test cycles.
What needs improvement?
Some areas for improvement, include its export capabilities. Exporting test cases, especially those with screenshots or attachments, can be cumbersome, hindering easy sharing and scalability.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for six years.
Buyer's Guide
Zephyr Enterprise
January 2025
Learn what your peers think about Zephyr Enterprise. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Neutral
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I think that is an area where it can be improved since it's not easy to scale.
How are customer service and support?
The support team is okay. I would rate them as maybe three out of five. It is not very straightforward. In the past, the response has been fast and the follow-ups as expected from good customer service.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
Since it's a plugin that I can directly add to my Jira platform, it doesn't take time to add it to the program. Once I add it, it's all good. I would say it takes one to two hours.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I think it's an average pricing compared to others.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend it mainly for manual testing and test management. Within Zephyrscale, they also have automated testing, however, I would recommend it only for test management.
The overall rating is seven out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: Jan 27, 2025
Flag as inappropriateBuyer's Guide
Download our free Zephyr Enterprise Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: January 2025
Product Categories
Test Management ToolsPopular Comparisons
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Eggplant Test
TestRail
Tricentis qTest
Visual Studio Test Professional
Helix ALM
Panaya Test Dynamix
IBM Engineering Test Management
PractiTest
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira
OpenText Silk Central
QMetry Test Management
QA Touch
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Zephyr Enterprise Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Zephyr has parameterized data driven facilities?
- Comparison Data for MBTech ProveTech?
- Tosca Testsuite Version 10.0
- BDD Testing: Pros and Cons
- Is Panaya Test Dynamix better than Tricentis Tosca?
- When evaluating Test Management Tools, what aspects do you think are the most important to look for?
- Tosca Testsuite with Selenium WebDriver
- What are the commonly leveraged practices or tools for managing regression or performance test cases/scripts?
- What is adhoc testing?
- Why is Test Management Tools important for companies?