I work in technology, and my primary use case involves using tools like OpenShift, OpenText, and other microfocus tools to manage processes across different systems.
In our company, we implemented Micro Focus products like SiteScope at the customer end so that they can utilize the product's capabilities. The product is operated in many companies, including a financial company, and is used for monitoring web-based applications and the overall infrastructure. It is also used for monitoring a company's logs, scripts, and digital transactions. So, we just don't implement the product. We also operate this product.
It's used for monitoring all of our internal URLs, certificate expiration dates, as well as database connectivity, database queries, and internal URL availability.
We use the solution for agentless monitoring of network and systems infrastructure including Linux and Windows, multiple versions, and multiple "flavors". The primary use case is for meeting the needs of basic level monitoring of multiple devices across a single-site network. When accompanied by APM tools from the Micro Focus stable, Sitescope provides a useful "bottom-up" (technology --> Application) view of performance and availability. Other APM tools provide a "top-down" (i.e. a user-centric view) of performance and availability.
Head -Consulting and Delivery at Avekshaa Technologies
Real User
Top 20
2021-05-18T13:11:21Z
May 18, 2021
Our organization is focused on performance testing and we use a variety of tools for this purpose, both open-source and enterprise. We are consultants and we use these tools for our customers. This solution is being used for infrastructure monitoring. It lets us know what might be going wrong when we subject the application to a higher load. It gives us a fair view. It is a dockerized application where we use SiteScope to give the application performance management.
Managed Services Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2020-04-02T07:00:11Z
Apr 2, 2020
Our company manages four different city hospital environments and all of them have SiteScope but each uses a different version depending on how long ago the product was implemented. We're a government organization. We use and manage SiteScope monitoring tools in our different projects. Each project has different kinds and numbers of users. For example, one has 2,300 users, but normally we use SiteScope for the servers. Physical and virtual. SiteScope monitors 200 virtual servers in one of our projects. I'm a managed services manager and we're a customer of SiteScope.
OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.
OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable...
I work in technology, and my primary use case involves using tools like OpenShift, OpenText, and other microfocus tools to manage processes across different systems.
Our customers use Micro Focus SiteScope mainly for infrastructure monitoring, but it is also capable of application and database monitoring.
The main use case is basic infrastructure monitoring.
In our company, we implemented Micro Focus products like SiteScope at the customer end so that they can utilize the product's capabilities. The product is operated in many companies, including a financial company, and is used for monitoring web-based applications and the overall infrastructure. It is also used for monitoring a company's logs, scripts, and digital transactions. So, we just don't implement the product. We also operate this product.
The solution is primarily used for monitoring the servers, log files, and network devices.
It's used for monitoring all of our internal URLs, certificate expiration dates, as well as database connectivity, database queries, and internal URL availability.
We use the solution for agentless monitoring of network and systems infrastructure including Linux and Windows, multiple versions, and multiple "flavors". The primary use case is for meeting the needs of basic level monitoring of multiple devices across a single-site network. When accompanied by APM tools from the Micro Focus stable, Sitescope provides a useful "bottom-up" (technology --> Application) view of performance and availability. Other APM tools provide a "top-down" (i.e. a user-centric view) of performance and availability.
Our organization is focused on performance testing and we use a variety of tools for this purpose, both open-source and enterprise. We are consultants and we use these tools for our customers. This solution is being used for infrastructure monitoring. It lets us know what might be going wrong when we subject the application to a higher load. It gives us a fair view. It is a dockerized application where we use SiteScope to give the application performance management.
Our company manages four different city hospital environments and all of them have SiteScope but each uses a different version depending on how long ago the product was implemented. We're a government organization. We use and manage SiteScope monitoring tools in our different projects. Each project has different kinds and numbers of users. For example, one has 2,300 users, but normally we use SiteScope for the servers. Physical and virtual. SiteScope monitors 200 virtual servers in one of our projects. I'm a managed services manager and we're a customer of SiteScope.
We use SiteScope for monitoring of our production systems, system resources, and also some application monitoring.
We are using the solution for many things.
I have used SiteScope for over 10 years as a synthetic monitor for everything under the sun.