Acronis Cyber Protect Reviews

I use the company's solution for endpoint protection and backup.

The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it provides endpoint protection and helps deal with disaster recovery needs for now. We need to set up malware, and sometimes, we need to set up some malware for our viruses. The tool also helps to deal with malware and ransomware attacks.

The replication part and failover are areas in which improvements are required.

I have been using Acronis Cyber Protect for seven years. My company provides the tool to our customers.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The tool is good for small and medium-sized companies.

I have contacted the solution's technical support team. I got a quick response from the tool's support team. I rate the technical support an eight or nine out of ten.

Positive

The product's initial setup phase is simple. The tool is user-friendly.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

Our clients do the product's setup phase with our company's help.

I would describe the product as a mid-priced tool for small and medium businesses.

The product meets our company's disaster recovery needs.

The tool's anti-malware and anti-virus protection functionalities are integrated with Acronis Cyber Protect.

The tool helps with real-time threat monitoring.

It is easy to integrate the product with SIEM or some other tools.

Though the tool is good for enterprise-sized companies, there is a need to get more licenses and upgrade the existing ones.

Acronis Cyber Protect need not be integrated with any AI tools since its engine already has AI to deal with anti-virus.

I recommend the product to others.

I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

It is used for backup. In terms of deployment, it has got the capability of both. It can be on-premise and on the cloud.

Acronis is a flexible solution. It can back up workstations, endpoints, and even your virtual environments and cloud-based environments. So, we can do the backup of the whole gamut of products.

We can also do instantaneous recovery of individual items, files, documents, etc. It also has good pricing and support.

I would like to have more cybersecurity integration to properly round up the product and its offering. In terms of cybersecurity, if the offerings can be more versatile so that it is not just a backup solution, it would be great. Some addition to cybersecurity would really be helpful so that it becomes a kind of a suite of products. Backup and recovery form a part of the broader security strategy. Its integration with other cybersecurity solutions would provide proper visibility to not just your cybersecurity dashboard but also to all of your backups. You would have a pretty good view of the entire security landscape that you are managing.

It should definitely be more stable, and it should support larger platforms. It can maybe support cross-cloud implementations.

I have been using this solution for at least five years.

It is stable, but it could be more stable.

It is scalable for medium to large environments but not for very large environments.

So far, we have provided this solution to about 15 to 25 customers. 

Technical support from Acronis is pretty good. It is world-class.

It has got very good and broad support.

Its installation is not very difficult. It is pretty straightforward. With a little guidance from the manuals and other resources, a regular skilled engineer can easily perform the installation. Of course, it is not suitable for a layman.

We have two engineers supporting it. We also have one Sales and Account Management person for managing the plans.

Its price is quite friendly on the pocket. You need to pay the licensing cost upfront, and then the support charges are on an annual basis.

I would definitely recommend Acronis to those who are starting out on the backup and recovery or want to migrate to and are looking for a fine-grain and stable solution. The good part is that you can still have the backup on the cloud. So, that would also take care of your offsite backup.

I don't have many comparison points. Based on whatever experience I've had on Acronis, I would rate it a nine out of 10.

We use this solution to basically backup anything. Servers, physical or virtual, and also some critical workstations. We can backup as emails or as folders. We are partners with Acronis and I'm the general manager.

The solution has helped us because it supports a lot of platforms and we don't have to install anything at our end in terms of a server and the like. Everything is on the cloud and that's a good start for us. 

The administration is pretty flexible in terms of defining a multi-tenant type of setup. They've come up with a new feature this year, an anti-malware solution. It's focused for MSPs and enables clients and users to be setup to access only one customer or customers. The idea is great although it still needs some work. They also have a notary application to sign files as well as support for Office 365 and even Google Apps backup. We're able to back up mailboxes and OneDrive and SharePoint, things like that.

We have issues with the SQL databases which are supported but not so successfully, it's a little shaky. It seems to tie up the use of the database, locking it to some extent. The big issue is that users are not able to access the databases when it's doing a backup. Some of our customers work around the clock and need continual access. The SQL backups have to work better so that they have MySQL or Maria support. We still use CloudBerry sometimes and it doesn't have that issue. It does the backup without tying up the database and it's still accessible to the user. That's something that Acronis have to improve. The other is the antimalware application, which is good in theory, but doesn't work so well. It uses a lot of resources and causes issues with some applications. That occurred when we switched from Webroot to Acronis Antimalware. In some instances, we had to go back to Webroot. There are some great concepts but not always such great executions. 

I've been using this solution for over a year. 

It took us a couple of months to fine-tune the solution. Since then it's been fine, there's a dashboard where you can see in a snapshot how the backup is working and it's going well.

The solution is scalable and as you grow, you just move to a different price tier. We have one person monitoring the solution. We hope to increase use in the future. 

Technical support is not good. Support is often delayed because we don't have real-time support or the option of chat, which is not available yet. They are aware there's an issue and are hiring more support staff but my experience was not that good.  

There were some issues with the initial setup, we chose Google for storage and when it came to disaster recovery, it didn't work so I had to go back and redo everything again using Acronis Cloud instead. We lost some time as a result. I did the implementation but we had some support from Acronis. 

Our licensing costs are around $1,000 per month and that includes storage. We have around 15 terabytes. Everyone looks for better pricing, but it's not that bad. They have changed the licensing three times since we started working with them. They're looking to make things simple. The idea is to use less license numbers. Then there's the transparency; we pay according to time on the platform and would like to know the cost, but it's not available. We get the invoice and by then it's too late. We need the information up front. 

With all the new features being added, the solution is becoming heavy in its use of resources. It's important to be aware of that because it affects the running of some applications. And that's not good because if you implement a security solution, you have to make it safer. 

The concepts are there but the execution is not that good so I would rate it a seven out of 10. 

We use this solution to backup some core, critical systems in our primary data center.

The most valuable feature is its consistency. It is an established product.

I feel like this product a little bit locked in the past.

This is not a feature-rich solution.

I would like to see a more SaaS-based solution, perhaps more cloud-centric. Essentially, keeping in lock-step with the other companies out there doing platform (PaaS) or software (SaaS) as a service, solutions.

We would like a more cutting edge, cloud-based DR solution that uses, for example, compression algorithms to make sure that backups run faster.

It is a stable product.

I have never had scalability problems with it.

I have not directly spoken with technical support.

We leverage all of our operations through what used to be Dell Services but is now known as NTT Data.

Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis.

We did an evaluation of many different solutions, primarily because we were moving from more on-premise to cloud-based solutions. So, as a result of going to the cloud, we looked at the Best of Breed in the cloud space.

Ultimately, we implemented two solutions. We use a Veeam cloud backup appliance solution and a leveraged TSM environment for our core operations provider. It was decided based on cost flexibility and technology richness.

Because this solution is not feature-rich, we have looked at other solutions.

My advice for somebody who wants to implement this solution is to make sure that they understand the requirements. This includes the RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and the RPO (Recovery Point Objective). Based on the requirements, find the solution that is going to fit best for what they really want to invest in.

I would rate this solution a six out of ten.

Centralized management is valuable to us. We have everything in a single pane of glass. Everything, including Microsoft 365, Google Workstations, servers, and virtual machines, is under one management console. It has EDR as well. To backup, I just click on the backup plan and run it. The tool has helped enhance our organization’s security posture. The solution provides a few features for cyber protection. The integrations run well. We get no errors. If something happens, I can restore it. That’s all I need.

The pricing could be improved. The licensing method for Microsoft 365 and Google is not that great.

I have been using the solution since 2014.

The tool is stable. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

We have five to ten users in our organization. I rate the tool’s scalability an eight or eight and a half out of ten.

We raise a support ticket when we need help. Depending on what we write in the ticket, the support team will come back to us with a response. If the ticket is not very comprehensive, it will take longer. Sometimes, the ticket needs to be escalated, and we waste time.

Neutral

I used Backup Exec more than ten years ago. I switched to Acronis because I got an offer from Acronis with some free licenses. After I used them, I decided to purchase Acronis.

I rate the ease of setup a nine out of ten. We have an on-premise version, and we use the cloud console. The deployment takes half an hour.

I rate the pricing a five out of ten. In some aspects, the product is cost-effective.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

My initial experience with Acronis was to backup my email server's contents. This happened in 2008 when my email suddenly went down, but to my surprise, the backup didn't include the email server. However, after restoring everything, I gained confidence in the software and began using it to backup my DC servers.

Acronis Backup is valuable if your data is affected by ransomware, you are able to get it back.

There are times when the backups are slow. A faster backup would be better.

The cloud faces a danger concerning data integrity. Briefly, the threat is to attack the integrity of data stored in the cloud. A hybrid solution that combines cloud storage with local storage on your DC server and provides a secure perimeter to protect data without alterations would be ideal. It's crucial that this solution also synchronizes with the cloud to prevent data from being distorted or stolen.

I have been using Acronis Backup for approximately 10 years.

The solution is reliable and stable.

The price of Acronis Backup could be reduced, it is expensive.

I rate Acronis Backup a ten out of ten.

I use the basic Acronis solution to back up all of my drives. I have a desktop and a laptop, with several hard drives attached to them.

In difficult situations, where something was accidentally erased or there was another kind of error, I can return to the latest backup and recover. For me, it's been very successful and very effective.

The most valuable feature is the fact that it backs up my systems transparently in the background, and I'm not even conscious of it. I just get a notice that it's successfully backed up.

When I first started using Acronis, I found it a little bit confusing when it came to the configuration.

Sometimes I have a problem where my settings need to be reset. However, I have been using it for so long that I know what I have to do it fix them.

I have been using Acronis for between three and four years.

This is a stable solution, other than the occasional problem that I have with needing to reset the settings.

Technical support is excellent. When I needed help, in the beginning, they did it with a remote connection. They were able to log into my system, take care of the problem, and explain what they did.

I have been in contact with them from time to time and they are still excellent.

I needed help from technical support in the beginning when I first started working with it.

The cost of updates is less than $100 USD yearly. If you don't update it then there are no additional charges.

My advice for anybody who is implementing Acronis is to contact support if they have any trouble. I would definitely recommend them. As it is now, this is a product that I am satisfied with the way it is, and I cannot think of any additional features that I would need.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I've reimaged servers and been back up and running in exactly no time with the completely new hardware. 

The Universal Restore allows you to reimage a computer without having to have all the drivers. It allows you to boot the machine; once you get the machine up and running, then you can install the drivers.

Click Here For a Free 30-Day Fully Functional Trial of Acronis Backup v12.5

It doesn't seem to do the following on the server but it does so on the work station: It does not delete locked files. So I created a small batch file that, after the backup, I go in and I run. That deletes all the extraneous lock files. I tried running the batch file automated but it would not run for some reason.

I keep five months of full images of the server. And my work station, I keep three copies, three months' worth. And I backup my data separately. All the data is on a server and nothing is on the computer.

I backup data daily, five copies of it. Every five days, I overwrite the first one. So I've got five days of data, and three days of images and of the workstation, and five copies of the server image. I do it automated every month and I've never had a problem.

I've used all of them. I've used Norton Ghost, and years and years ago something called FastBack. Norton Ghost is really the only other one, but my experience is there are more problems with using it than Acronis.

Very simple. I can create a backup program in just in minutes because I know the program so well. It is very easy to set up if you know anything about computers, and even if you're not familiar with computers.

It takes me no time at all and the backup procedure is pretty much straightforward, depending on how complicated your system is. 

I'm using the pro version. Personally, I think that the home version is more complicated to set up than the professional version, for some reason. You would think it would be the other way around.

Click Here For a Free 30-Day Fully Functional Trial of Acronis Backup v12.5

Buy it. Simple. It's the best backup. I've used it to restore a number of machines without any trouble at all. It's very simple with a hard drive. It makes it much easier if you have a complete new system.