Acronis Cyber Protect Reviews

I use it to back up my home laboratory. I use it to back up my demo lab and secure my data.

For me, the cost is a significant advantage.

Acronis Cyber Protect should support immutability storage and user support for immutability and Air Gap. These features would be beneficial. 

I have been using this solution for four years or more. 

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten.

I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten.

I fix the problems by myself.

The initial setup was straightforward for me. I'm technical, so it was easy. It took about an hour to protect my servers and registration service.

For maintenance, I'm the only administrator, so just me.

The solution offers a classic price, and I'm okay with it.

I've worked with various products, such as Networker, NetBackup, and others.

I use them all simultaneously.

I would recommend Acronis to other users. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. There is room for improvement. 

We make use of the standalone version. The server and the box are compliant when it comes to the backup. 

It would be nice to have a partition that I can boot and reinstall when taking a backup image from the operating system. 

As we are going for CD, it would be nice to have external storage connectivity. 

The ability to integrate with different platforms should be added as a feature. It would be nice to have the restoration also from the server itself. 

We have been using Acronis Backup for two years or more.

The solution does not need to be scaled. It suits my business needs. 

We have not had occasion to contact technical support. 

The solution was easy to install and to deploy. Everything was good. 

One can do the deployment on his own. 

There is no need for a technical team. 

Our licenses come with a one-time yearly subscription fee. 

The solution is deployed locally. 

The solution suits my business needs. It works perfectly for me. There is no need for updates or added features. 

I would recommend the solution to others. 

For the moment, we use the solution solely for our servers. We are talking around 20 users. 

I rate Acronis Backup as a nine or ten out of ten. 

I use the basic Acronis solution to back up all of my drives. I have a desktop and a laptop, with several hard drives attached to them.

In difficult situations, where something was accidentally erased or there was another kind of error, I can return to the latest backup and recover. For me, it's been very successful and very effective.

The most valuable feature is the fact that it backs up my systems transparently in the background, and I'm not even conscious of it. I just get a notice that it's successfully backed up.

When I first started using Acronis, I found it a little bit confusing when it came to the configuration.

Sometimes I have a problem where my settings need to be reset. However, I have been using it for so long that I know what I have to do it fix them.

I have been using Acronis for between three and four years.

This is a stable solution, other than the occasional problem that I have with needing to reset the settings.

Technical support is excellent. When I needed help, in the beginning, they did it with a remote connection. They were able to log into my system, take care of the problem, and explain what they did.

I have been in contact with them from time to time and they are still excellent.

I needed help from technical support in the beginning when I first started working with it.

The cost of updates is less than $100 USD yearly. If you don't update it then there are no additional charges.

My advice for anybody who is implementing Acronis is to contact support if they have any trouble. I would definitely recommend them. As it is now, this is a product that I am satisfied with the way it is, and I cannot think of any additional features that I would need.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I've reimaged servers and been back up and running in exactly no time with the completely new hardware. 

The Universal Restore allows you to reimage a computer without having to have all the drivers. It allows you to boot the machine; once you get the machine up and running, then you can install the drivers.

Click Here For a Free 30-Day Fully Functional Trial of Acronis Backup v12.5

It doesn't seem to do the following on the server but it does so on the work station: It does not delete locked files. So I created a small batch file that, after the backup, I go in and I run. That deletes all the extraneous lock files. I tried running the batch file automated but it would not run for some reason.

I keep five months of full images of the server. And my work station, I keep three copies, three months' worth. And I backup my data separately. All the data is on a server and nothing is on the computer.

I backup data daily, five copies of it. Every five days, I overwrite the first one. So I've got five days of data, and three days of images and of the workstation, and five copies of the server image. I do it automated every month and I've never had a problem.

I've used all of them. I've used Norton Ghost, and years and years ago something called FastBack. Norton Ghost is really the only other one, but my experience is there are more problems with using it than Acronis.

Very simple. I can create a backup program in just in minutes because I know the program so well. It is very easy to set up if you know anything about computers, and even if you're not familiar with computers.

It takes me no time at all and the backup procedure is pretty much straightforward, depending on how complicated your system is. 

I'm using the pro version. Personally, I think that the home version is more complicated to set up than the professional version, for some reason. You would think it would be the other way around.

Click Here For a Free 30-Day Fully Functional Trial of Acronis Backup v12.5

Buy it. Simple. It's the best backup. I've used it to restore a number of machines without any trouble at all. It's very simple with a hard drive. It makes it much easier if you have a complete new system.

Live System Imaging – Zero Downtime.

The key for me at the time was allowing my Engineers to have their weekends free vs rotating them through a schedule so that servers were taken offline and imaged during the change window. Post-implementation, this fell to zero and boosted morale by allowing the engineers to enjoy their weekends with their families. In this instance, showing the team that I valued their personal lives and was willing to pay to insure their quality of life resulted in a dedicated team that was thankful and produced more.

This organization also highly mission critical server applications where RTO was very low. We did use Load Balancers and other technologies, but for a catastrophic failure this solution presented an RTO of roughly 1 Hour (depending on the size of the server) although often less. It became routine to run an off cycle image before any major physical server upgrade, thus improving the speed from development to QA to production. Developers could be less leery of major changes knowing that the back-out was quick and reliable.

There can be inconsistencies between builds in terms of the product working with one NIC or another, especially on newer generation servers. Usually downloading the latest bits solved, though. A minor nit, but it’s the only gripe I’ve had to date.

7 Years.

None.

None.

None.

Excellent.

Excellent.

Relatively Straightforward. We needed to create an in house script to purge old images (vs using something like a product retention setting). This may have been corrected in subsequent versions.

In-House.

Somewhat difficult to quantify. The key for me at the time was allowing my Engineers to have their weekends free vs rotating them through a schedule so that servers were taken offline and imaged during the change window. Post-implementation, this fell to zero and boosted morale by allowing the engineers to enjoy their weekends with their families. In this instance, showing the team that I valued their personal lives and was willing to pay to insure their quality of life resulted in a dedicated team that was thankful and produced more.

This organization also highly mission critical server applications where RTO was very low. We did use Load Balancers and other technologies, but for a catastrophic failure this solution presented an RTO of roughly 1 Hour (depending on the size of the server) although often less. It became routine to run an off cycle image before any major physical server upgrade, thus improving the speed from development to QA to production. Developers could be less leery of major changes knowing that the back-out was quick and reliable.

Rough cost at time of implementation was approximately $1200 per managed server. One engineer monitored the job status, spending approximately 15 minutes per day.

No.

Great product, nearly set-and-forget for Server Live Imaging once fully configured.

We use the solution for backup.

Universal Restore is valuable to us. It allows us to restore two dissimilar hardware. It creates a DR scenario for smaller clients.

The support and documentation must be improved. It's hard to find information. The portal is a little bit finicky. We must search for exactly the right thing, or it is difficult to find solutions.

I have used the solution for two years.

I rate the tool’s stability an eight out of ten.

I rate the tool’s scalability a nine out of ten since it is cloud-based. The biggest difficulty is how different backups created by different user accounts cause segregation. It causes issues sometimes in restoration. The solution is suitable for SMEs. It gets quite difficult to manage over a certain size.

We have used Azure Site Recovery a little bit. Acronis is a better product, though.

The initial setup can be painful if someone has no experience using the tool. It is not 100% intuitive. However, we do it a lot. So, it is fairly simple for us. The product is cloud-based.

I rate the pricing a seven out of ten on a scale where one is high, and ten is low.

It is frustrating when we cannot find the right information when something goes down. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

The most important use case is to backup notebooks and other environments of the completed image and to back up global environment imaging and you can leverage the backup when you are making a migration as well. 

The solution is stable. The performance has been fine so far.

We found the installation process to be pretty simple. You don't need a huge team to implement it. Just one person is fine. 

Technical support is great.

I don't find the product to be overly scalable. 

The product would be better if they offered more integration capabilities. 

I've used this solution for this year and the previous year as well. In total, we've likely used it for four or five years at this point. 

We've found the stability to be very good. The solution is reliable and offers nice performance. There aren't bugs. It's not glitchy. I don't find that it crashes or freeze. 

The product isn't very scalable. It's an aspect they could improve upon. Right now, it's limited. 

We have six to seven customers using the solution. There might even be a few more in some special environments. 

The support has been great. they don't need to be faster. They're very helpful and responsive, and we're satisfied overall. We find having them to be very important. 

The initial implementation was not complex or difficult. It was very easy, very straightforward. 

The deployment itself only takes about an hour or so. It's not a long and drawn-out process. 

You only need one person - an admin - for the deployment and maintenance tasks. 

We pay a yearly licensing fee. There are no additional costs to the standard license and fees.

I'd advise other users that, if you're making a backup with Acronis, you always ensure you do a double backup.

I'd recommend the solution to other users and companies. It offers an excellent level of service. We are satisfied with them. 

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.

I use the same backup software provider across all my clients. This means I only have to stay on top of manage interface and workflow. In that aspect, it's reliable.

Consistency and reliability. The interface is easy to understand and consistent across applications. While not 100%, it is a very reliable backup solution.

[Click Here for FREE Trial of Acronis Backup. See Why It Gets 5-Star Reviews.]

It makes a full image of the hard drive. If a hard drive fails, all we do is recover to another hard drive. We just pop in the hard drive and that's very fast as well. Speed and the ease in which we recover full hard drives are valuable features.

I needed tech support to straighten out an issue with cloud backup. I have troubleshooting to do with failed backups.

[Click Here for FREE Trial of Acronis Backup. See Why It Gets 5-Star Reviews.]

There were no stability issues.

There were no scalability issues, although my biggest client has a relatively small-scale backup system.

I would give technical support a rating of 8/10. They are very good, quick to access, quick for remote to server, and quick to troubleshoot. Sometimes they are a little slow in understanding the exact issue, but they eventually get it and resolve it.

We used Symantec. We switched because they had a bad user interface and it was very difficult to use. I left Symantec years ago for Acronis. The only other backup I encountered was the one included with Windows Server OS.

The initial setup was somewhat straightforward.

Pricing is what it is. I don't shop around once I find a good solution. I insist they maintain ongoing support year after year for updates and tech support.

We did not evaluate other options.

Go for it!

[Click Here for FREE Trial of Acronis Backup. See Why It Gets 5-Star Reviews.]

It makes a full image of the hard drive. If a hard drive fails, all we do is recover to another hard drive. We just pop in the hard drive and that's very fast as well. Speed and the ease in which we recover full hard drives are valuable features.