Asana Reviews

Asana is a tool that helps project managers do their tasks, follow up on them, and track the processes. They can also have feedback on the performance of those tasks. Asana helps project managers to plan for risk management.

Asana is a very simple interface for project managers to figure out, providing all the functions they need. Asana is one interface that contains multiple functions such as object key results (OKRs), time plans, metrics, and risk management. All these functions can help you to easily implement your project from the initiation to the evaluation stage.

When you have access to Asana as a project manager, you will find everything you want inside it. In some cases, if we use alternatives, we have to jump from one program to another and some apps to complete everything. However, Asana is an interface that includes everything you want.

It would be great if Asana could create a library for each project within the interface. For example, if you are working on ten projects and need to make daily changes to all of them, having a separate library for each project would be helpful.

Asana is a pretty stable solution.

Asana is a scalable solution. When it comes to project management, scalability is limited to the function you do. If we go to time planning, you can do the time planning for a one-year project or one hundred. It's the same. The solution's scalability is very high.

Currently, I am using Asana in our organization.

I’ve previously used MS Project and Oracle Primavera. Primavera is very difficult to adopt and use. MS Project is used for simple projects, providing only a chart and time planning. However, plenty of functions and apps you need for project management are missing in MS Project. You can run simple projects using MS Project, but it cannot help with complex projects.

You don't need to set up Asana because it's cloud-based, and you can work online.

Currently, I'm using Asana for free. The solution's free version can be used for basic functions. When my colleagues start using it, I will contact Asana and find the most efficient plan for us.

Since Asana is a cloud system, we always use the latest version of the solution.

Users can go ahead with Asana because it's easy. It's a stable and scalable solution that has all the functions you need for your project management. The solution can save your progress when you are offline so that you can find everything when you're back. This feature can be helpful when you have internet issues.

Overall, I rate Asana a nine out of ten.

In my company, we use Asana for project management tracking.

Asana helps us in our company to split tasks and assign them to different people. Asana allows each one to individually update the task completed, which can be tracked and visible to all the teams in the company.

The most valuable feature of the solution is its project management tracking systems.

There is always a constant need to update the product to be able to give it more features in terms of tasks like adding commands or nodes. The product's page is not user-friendly. In general, the product's page should be more friendly to use. Asana does have all the things the user requires, making it a good product.

I have been using Asana for a year. I am a customer of the solution.

It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We had multiple teams working from different countries in the company, with Finland being the place where the main office was located. There were only 30 users of the solution in the company.

The solution's technical support was okay. I rate the technical support a seven out of ten.

The technical support would respond through a chat system and get back to you at a later stage, so instant support wasn't available.

Neutral

I rate the initial setup a seven, on a scale of one to ten, where ten is the best.

The solution is deployed on the public cloud.

To be frank, I don't know the time taken for the deployment because when I joined the company, Asana was already a subscribed tool. I was not the person who had subscribed and deployed Asana in the company, making me just a user.

I was not involved in the pricing part of the product since it was done by development teams and my manager in the past.

I would like to tell those planning to use the solution that the product is a good fit for medium and big companies. I suggest small companies go for the lighter version of the solution sensitive, more simple. Asana's version, meant for medium and big companies, has more features and functions.

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

I use Asana for advanced use cases, including managing software development and other projects.

With one particular project, we manage the development activities with around twenty people on the project team and about five hundred tasks, for which Asana helps to manage our sprint planning.

The most valuable features of the solution are the different views, including the list view, table view, dashboard, and the ability to add fields or customize by adding some specific fields for a project.

The calendar view in Asana has shortcomings and can be improved. The other element is the ability to natively be able to add additional connectors to better manage the planned time versus the actual time for each task.

The timesheet aspect is an additional feature I like to see in Asana since we now use another application called Toggl for managing our time cards. It would be better if we could do what we do in Toggl directly in Asana since it would be easy to plan activities.

I have been using Asana for a year and a half. I use the solution's latest version.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

The initial setup was straightforward.

The solution is deployed on the cloud.

I have not specifically seen any ROI using the product. We use it as a part of different tools, so it is like looking at the ROI for an email, which is a part of the tools we need.

To those planning to use Asana, I would say there are many similar applications. It can be hard to choose from applications like monday.com, Asana, ClickUp, and others since they are all good for collaborative project management for smaller projects, which have not quite reached the level in terms of capabilities to manage very large projects. I have managed projects ranging from 25 million USD to 50 million USD, and I feel Asana cannot operate at that level.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Our marketing and communications team uses Asana as a project management and communication program. We input all of our marketing projects and their related tasks and assign each task to a staff member with a due date. This allows us to track our work's progress in Asana.

Asana has significantly reduced the number of emails we exchange because we can access the project directly. It organizes all the tasks related to each project, assigns them to staff with due dates, and tracks progress. This creates a historical record of our projects tied to specific dates, allowing us to review what we did last year and ensure that projects are updated. Asana has systemized our work by ensuring that every project has the same tasks, including peer review and proofreading. This has reduced mistakes and improved the quality of our work.

The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to keep us organized and on task.

Improvement-wise, I would like more options for changing notification settings. Currently, there are only a few available options, but it would be helpful to have more control over the notifications received. For example, if you are on a project, you can receive every notification related to it, even if the task isn't yours.

It would be interesting if Asana could integrate with email platforms like Outlook and on, Gmail, and Google Calendar. This way, when a project has a due date, it could automatically appear on people's calendars.

I have been using Asana for a year and a half. Also, I believe that I am using the solution's latest version. Specifically speaking, it is a cloud-based version.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten since it has never gone down while we were working on it.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten. So, depending on your subscription, I think you can add a significant number of users.

I don't have any experience with technical support.

I think the initial setup was pretty straightforward. We had help from our IT department, but I don't believe the process was complicated.

I have experienced a return on investment using the solution.

Price-wise, I think it's an affordable option for mid to large-sized companies.

It would be beneficial for users to take some time to consider the different types of projects they have across various categories and to create those categories before inputting the projects. This way, the system will be more organized and easier to search. If projects are simply added as individual items without any categorization, managing them can become overwhelming. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

We utilize Asana as a tool for our project managers, enabling them to create intake forms, develop timelines, and monitor progress. Additionally, we can easily share files by integrating with platforms such as Dropbox, Microsoft, and Outlook. We have various options to connect our internal system which this system facilitated communication between both platforms.

Asana's most valuable aspect is its ability to consolidate all tasks and projects onto a single board, allowing for seamless navigation through timelines from start to finish. Additionally, it enables the inclusion of key stakeholders and provides a private communication channel for discreet discussions. The organizational component of Asana is particularly beneficial, including its coding features.

It would be beneficial if Asana had a predecessor feature that automatically adjusts all subsequent dates when changes are made to a timeline. For example, if I assign a designer four hours for one task and two days for another, and the completion of a task takes longer than anticipated, it would be convenient if updating one date could prompt the adjustment of all other relevant dates. Essentially, this feature would streamline the process and eliminate the need for manual adjustments.

I have been using Asana for approximately five years.

Asana's solution is scalable and user-friendly, especially for key individuals who will be working on the platform frequently, such as designers and web developers. Once shown how to use Asana, it becomes straightforward to manage tasks and collaborate with others. Essentially, Asana's ease of use lies in the ability to explain and demonstrate its features effectively.

I have used the support from the vendor through email. I have had all my questions or issues addressed well. 

I rate the support Asana an eight out of ten.

Positive

The setup process for Asana varies depending on the client or company using it. For instance, with an ad agency, the setup may take around five hours as it requires thoughtful consideration of site mapping before determining how to utilize the platform effectively. Conversely, for individual entrepreneurs, the setup process should be straightforward as they are solely responsible for managing their own projects and can easily adapt to the platform.

Within one week the solution can be up and running. However, it takes three months to have the required people trained and for the solution to be operating well.

Previously, the deployment of Asana involved the director and IT personnel. The initial step was to identify the administrators who would have access to the account, followed by key stakeholders, such as IT and business management who set up the necessary configurations. Next, the project manager would begin adding tasks to ensure deadlines were met, and contractors were included as needed. The account management team was responsible for handling the accounts of the main individuals involved in the project.

Conducting a few workshops on how to use Asana can be beneficial in helping individuals understand its functionality. Once the framework is established, the process becomes more manageable, and it's easier to identify and address any bottlenecks or issues that may arise. Overall, once the system is set up and tested, using Asana should be seamless without any significant hurdles.

I rate Asana an eight out of ten.

I have used Asana while working at an e-commerce agency while working on creative projects and creating content like ads for Amazon or Walmart Connect. We used Asana to keep individuals within the agency updated on projects, even if they do not work within the creative team. 

When I worked at Claire's stores as a digital project manager for their internal digital creative team, we used Asana for different departments to log requests for creative projects. We also used it to manage the projects within the digital team. 

Asana allows you to create your own project with sub sections with subtasks that can be assigned. The feature I really love is that you can tag people to notify them that there has been progress on a project as well as add attachments. It is a central depository for everything. It is also really useful that you can add people outside your organization to projects you are working on. 

The use of Asana can be restricted if it is not set it up the right way. In some instances, there were subtasks where more than one person needed to review it, but I could only assign it to one person. I would have to create a subtask under a subtask and then assign it to other people. This could be improved. 

I have been using this solution for a year and a half. 

I used Basecamp and JIRA prior to Asana coming out. JIRA is used more for software developers or backend development projects.

The initial setup was complex because the onboarding is not done correctly. This is due to the fact that we are short staffed and did not have time to be trained. Once we had spent more time using the solution, it was easier to use and understand.  

This solution is reasonably priced. 

I would highly recommend Asana as I think it's a great tool. It is really easy to use once you are trained on it. It really helped me effectively manage projects and improve productivity and efficiency. It has a lot of options from an integration perspective with other platforms.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

My primary use case for Asana is project management. Asana allows me to invite team members to the same project, including external members, to follow up and contribute or observe.

Asana provides a stable environment, which is one of its pros.

I find the interface of Asana easy to interact with. It has a desktop client, which is a feature I hoped Microsoft would have, allowing interaction over the web interface.

There is room for improvement in integrating Asana with different technology vendors. The reporting and exportation of project results need enhancement. The interface has drawbacks, such as the requirement of manual input of personal data into project forms. Overall, the application form should automatically populate user data like email address and phone number.

I have used Asana for less than a year. I started using it this year.

I have not faced any stability issues since I started using Asana. I never encountered any glitches.

There are no limitations on the number of projects or the data entry. The limitation only applies to the number of users based on purchased licenses.

The Asana team interacts frequently with the PMO office to help with modification required or challenges faced.

Neutral

The initial setup of the desktop client was easy to install and use.

I installed the desktop client of Asana myself. I wasn't part of the IT team and thus not responsible for the integration. I am just a user of the platform.

Asana is overpriced based on its offering. On a personal level, I would not recommend it to myself. Due to its cost, I wouldn't select Asana if I were to buy a single license for managing my projects.

I have no information or interaction with other solutions. Compared to Asana, Microsoft might have a better chance of utilizing and integrating AI.

Compared to Asana, Microsoft might have a better chance of utilizing and integrating AI for improved functionality.

I'd rate the solution found out of ten.

We are using Asana to send tasks or tickets to different departments internally, inside the company.

It has helped our departments maintain visibility. If you're tagged in there, everybody can see it. It's different than emailing and being CC'd. If you have 30 emails before you became CC'd and then you have to go and read through each one of them, scroll down to the end to understand what's going on, it can get messy. Here, everything looks much better and it's much easier to understand what's going on.

The visibility is great. The fact that everybody can see all of the tasks, and all of the comments, is super helpful. If you are tagged inside this task, so it's very easy to see. The interface looks really nice and it's really simple to get around and view everything, especially the items directly related to your work. Task management and distribution are awesome. 

If you are not tagged in the task specifically, even though the task is in your department, you're not going to get notified that there is a new task for your department. You need to constantly have the assignment program open, so you can check in and basically do the tasks that are new, to assign them accordingly. 

From my department, if I send a task to a different department unless they open it and tag me personally, I'm not going to see this task anymore. That's a little bit tricky for us. We need that to be changed.

We don't get enough notifications. Everyone has to keep opening up Asana to check and see the tasks. If something isn't tagged, it won't show up in anyone's notifications.

I've been using the solution for three months. 

The solution has been quite stable. There aren't bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable. 

We haven't had an issue with scaling per se. However, we would like the visibility to expand beyond our department. There aren't enough notifications and everybody needs to open it up all the time to check tasks. 

We have about 100 users on the solution currently. It's used by all departments, including IT, back office, customer support, operations, partner department, management, and compliance.

We switched to Asana from Freshdesk. We also used to use Zendesk for ticketing. In my previous companies, we might have used Skype or Microsoft Teams or just plain email to communicate items to each other. 

We used to do emails basically and were CC'ing everyone. Then we went to Freshdesk as a ticketing system. Everybody wants to have Asana for the reporting system. It's much better to use Asana as everybody can see it. The managers and heads of departments can actually see what you're doing, and what each of their team members is doing all of the time.

We used Freshdesk as an email ticketing system, with clients mostly. It was not internal usage. Asana is better for creating tasks and having visibility without having to email people to inform them of tickets. 

I wasn't a part of the implementation process.

Our IT team handled the implementation. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. It's very useful and the interface is easy to use. As with any program, you need to get used to it, however, and maybe I'm just not used to it yet. Maybe they use notification alarms that I am missing or maybe they can be set. That's the biggest issue for us right now. In any case, the way it's set up, it's really nice. You can mark items as complete and you can mark is in progress. It's simple.

I would rate the product eight out of ten. If the alerts and notifications were better, I would rate it higher.