Auvik Network Management (ANM) Reviews

We use Auvik for network mapping. It helps us to understand the layout and where things are so that we can troubleshoot the flow of data, where something is on the network, and why it might be having an issue.

Before Auvik, I had to go on-site to the client's offices to physically trace all the cables manually and draw the network map on a diagram tool. That would take a long time, and there was potential for human error. When something changed, I had to go back and update the map. It took hours. With Auvik, the devices quickly populate the screen, and I can click through them. That's incredible. It's a huge time-saving troubleshooting tool. We realized Auvik's benefits immediately. Once I understood the features, the benefits were very clear.  

Auvik has sped up our resolution time in many ways. When something is offline or something is wrong with a site-to-site connection or a switch, we can easily go in and see what's happening. We can identify what's connected and what may have been disconnected. It's more often used on the tier two side, but the tier one techs aren't using it. 

I like having a remote tunnel where I can access web interfaces inside a network, whether it's a DVR, an NDR camera system, a printer interface, or an IoT device that has a local web interface. I love being able to tunnel in straight through Auvik instead of having to VPN in or remote to another. It's more straightforward and makes troubleshooting that device more accessible.

Auvik gives us a real-time picture of the network. In the past, when we did things manually, it was never up-to-date. Auvik keeps everything updated. The network map is accurate in the sense that it generates the correct data. Sometimes, we need to update it with the SNMP credentials. If we're feeding it the information it needs, it's highly accurate.

Auvik's interface is decent overall, but I wish I could get more of a full-screen map layout. That would be helpful. Overall, the flow of everything on the screen is good, but I would like a more full-screen, immersive user experience. There are too many menus around. It would help to have the ability to sift and move through it more easily, but there's too much stuff in the way.

I found the search feature somewhat frustrating. For example, let's say I'm searching for an IP address. Even though this thing exists, it doesn't do a good job of showing it to me. 

We have used Auvik for nearly six years.

Auvik is stable. We haven't had any problems. 

Our customers aren't growing quickly, so scalability means rolling Auvik out to new clients or clients adding new devices. If we're talking about adding new clients, it's easy to implement. If we're talking about clients adding stuff to the network, it's automatic, so we don't need to do much besides inputting the credentials.

Before Auvik, I constructed manual network maps. We are using other remote management tools like Kaseya RMM. It's a different type of tool that overlaps in a few areas. 

I was not directly involved in the deployment. After deployment, it requires very little maintenance. We only need to deploy the Auvik collector and ensure it's running. 

I rate Auvik nine out of 10. I suggest reaching out to their customer relationship people. They're super personal and helpful. Take advantage of them. 

We use Auvik Network Management to detect devices on our network.

We implemented Auvik Network Management to gain the exact visibility I needed. This allows us to see devices on the network that might not be company-issued laptops, or even managed devices at all, such as unauthorized routers or access points plugged in by employees.

The UI is easy to use. There are a lot of different menus but they are not difficult to navigate.

While Auvik's network map excels at linking most devices, some manual adjustments may be necessary depending on the situation. This could include scenarios where the map struggles to identify which devices are connected to specific switch ports.

Auvik's network map provides as close to real-time visibility as we can get.

We saw the benefits of Auvik immediately after everything was set up.

The most valuable feature is device discovery through SNMP. This allows the tool to automatically gather detailed information about connected devices. For instance, it can identify a printer and determine if it's low on ink, out of paper, or experiencing a jam.

Auvik's network map, while helpful, could benefit from improved clarity. Currently, the amount of information displayed can become overwhelming. Zooming out provides a wide view of all devices, but compromises detail. Conversely, zooming in allows for closer inspection of specific devices, but sacrifices the overall network layout. This clutter makes it difficult to find a balance between seeing everything and seeing things clearly.

I have been using Auvik Network Management for three months.

Auvik Network Management is stable. We have not had any lagging or downtime issues.

Auvik Network Management is highly scalable.

The initial deployment was straightforward. I completed the deployment myself by following the easy-to-follow setup guide. The deployment took one hour to complete.

Auvik tends to be on the pricier side. Unlike some competitors who charge per site, they bill based on the number of devices they discover on our network. This per-device pricing can lead to costs quickly adding up for larger networks.

We evaluated one other solution, but Auvik had more features and was easier to use. The platform layout, overall functionality, and detail stood out with Auvik.

I would rate Auvik Network Management seven out of ten.

No maintenance is required from our end.

I would recommend Auvik Network Management to others.

For a smoother and faster setup, Auvik users should have a good understanding of their network devices beforehand. This includes identifying firewalls, switches, and access points. Preconfiguring SNMP on these devices would be particularly beneficial.

We use Auvik to create a graphical representation of our network. It's easier to trace issues when we know what's connected at a glance. Auvik gives us alerts when a device goes offline, and we use Auvik to identify the place in the network path where the issue lies. Was it a core switch? A downstream switch? Was it not a switch at all?

Auvik makes troubleshooting more manageable and the workflow smoother. When troubleshooting an outage or a node that went down, we can immediately identify the problem. It reduces the time we spend troubleshooting, allowing us to spend more time on other tasks, which is a roundabout way of saying it makes us more efficient. I'd estimate that it reduces the time we spend on these tasks by about 30 percent. 

Troubleshooting is just like anything else. You always focus on the tools you use the most or the ones that are the most effective. Auvik is one of the top two we use for specific issues, namely network outages or known downs.

Auvik improves our visibility into your remote and distributed networks. It provides quick visualization, so we don't need to log into any individual switches. We can do everything through Auvik, especially port tracing. We need to see what device is connected to which port. This can be easily done within Auvik.

It also helps us delegate tasks within our IT team. As soon as we locate where an outage lies, we can instantly determine whether it needs to go to a low-level technician or a higher one based on what we see on the network map or alert that Auvik triggers.

It doesn't automatically keep our network inventories up to date because we still need to enable SNMP on the device. But once it's in the inventory, it's easy to manage with the existing devices we already have.

A cloud-based solution reduces our hardware costs because we don't need to deploy a VM for monitoring. Also, we're a managed service provider, so we would have to have an on-prem solution for each client, which would be cost-prohibitive.

I like Auvik's alerts. We can configure the alerts for a specific timeframe, i.e., we can set it to alert us when devices have been offline for a specific amount of minutes. If a device or port is flapping, we can ignore it or allow only the first alert to come in and mute the subsequent alerts.

The monitoring and management are quite straightforward. I rate it nine out of 10 for intuitiveness. During onboarding, we went through how to set everything up. It's a set-it-and-forget-it solution, and we can use templates to move forward with other devices that we add based on our documentation.

Auvik is one of our go-to solutions, depending on the issue. If we see a device go down, we usually get an alert from Auvik or our RMM solution. Auvik lets us trace graphically to know where the issue could lie, reducing the amount of troubleshooting we have to do.

It's a single platform but isn't integrated with anything besides our PSA. I don't think it needs to integrate with anything else other than our ticketing solution. 

Auvik could be more customizable. Also, the network map isn't as clear as it could be. I don't know if it's even possible, but it would be nice if Auvik could pick up on dumb switches. I don't know if that's possible based on SNMP, but if they can figure out a way to do that, it would make our life much easier.

Our organization has been using Auvik for about a year.

We've never had any downtime outside of their regular maintenance windows. They always notify us in advance when there will be maintenance. Even when they're down for maintenance, it's after hours, so we don't notice. 

Scaling Auvik is pretty simple. We just activate SNMP, put the credentials in devices, and we're set once the Auvik collectors are in place.

I'd rate Auvik support seven out of 10. We haven't needed to reach out to them much. I can only recall around three or four times in the past year that we contacted them. They've been pretty good. We have only used web-based support, not phone support. 

Neutral

We were using Nagios, but it was getting too pricey. Nagios also provided more information than we needed. Auvik provides SNMP, which is fine for our purposes. With Nagios, we had to install agents on each node to recognize it. If we could activate SNMP, we'd get more reporting from Nagios when we install the agent, but it wasn't intuitive how to do that. 

Once it was slotted in place, there wasn't much of a learning curve at all, so we saw an ROI right away.

We looked at Zabbix. Zabbix had a free tier, but it had absolutely no support. We went with Auvik because of their support.

I rate Auvik nine out of 10. If you want simplicity, Auvik is probably the way to go.

Zabbix has a free tool, but their paid solution is actually quite expensive.

We use the solution for networking. If a router or a switch is down, we can look that up very quickly in Auvik Network Management, and then diagnose the problem.

Auvik has a lot of conventions or online meetings where we are explained how a new feature works. We don't need to figure it out ourselves, which saves us a lot of time to know what exactly we need to do to find a specific problem or switch.

Auvik Network Management really helps with the overview of every switch or router in a location. We tried other programs, but they just didn't work the same as Auvik.

Auvik provides an intuitive interface that is quite easy to navigate. It helps a lot because I can quickly diagnose the problem, which saves me a lot of time and a lot of money for the client.

It has empowered our entry-level technicians to solve more tickets on their own. Managers only need to explain the solution once, and then everybody understands how it works. Auvik is a time saver and money saver for everybody. The solution is easy to navigate.

Auvik has helped to decrease our mean time to resolution by five to ten minutes per problem.

The time-to-value is a lot better than that of other solutions. It took about a month from the time of deployment of Auvik for us to realize the time-to-value benefits.

Critical devices in our network are monitored by Auvik at no charge. This free monitoring is important to us because it shows that Auvik cares about us. We can know for sure that if we have a month that doesn't go very well, the critical devices will still be okay.

Auvik allows us to spend less time on the solution's setup and maintenance. It saves a lot of time because the solution's setup is easy. It doesn't require a lot of steps, and you can explain it to an apprentice very easily, which saves much time. We used the time saved to ensure that all the smaller problems were also addressed. We could use the time we saved to ask the clients what they think about this new setup.

The solution's loading time could be improved because when you click on a switch, it usually takes some time before it has everything loaded.

I have been using Auvik Network Management for almost one year.

We haven’t faced any issues with the solution’s stability.

Auvik Network Management is a scalable solution. About ten users use the solution in our organization, and it has about 280 endpoints.

The technical support team's response time is great. Problems are solved very fast, with no long waiting time.

Positive

We previously used Domotz but switched to Auvik Network Management because Domotz didn't have many features. Auvik Network Management's strength is its ease of usability. Auvik's disadvantage is that it sometimes takes a lot of time to load. The solution's setup is very easy, making the loading time acceptable most of the time because you can save a lot of time elsewhere.

Auvik's network map and dashboard usually give us a real-time picture of our network. However, it sometimes takes a long time to load. If I want to look up something, it needs some time to process, which can be frustrating at some point. It's not difficult to use the network map and dashboard to gain real-time visibility into our network, but it sometimes has a waiting time.

We use the SaaS version of the solution. The solution requires almost no maintenance, which saves us time. We have the solution deployed across multiple locations. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We're an MSP. We're pretty much monitoring our client's network. 

We offer a full suite of outsourced IT management solutions. We use this as an internal tool, not something we sell to clients; it's mostly something we use internally to make life easier.

It's reduced manual workaround troubleshooting network incidents. It also works around alert management. We get alerts, and those alerts create a ticket in our ticketing system. When the power comes back, the ticket closes automatically. We can have zero-touch intervention. Previous to the solution, the process was much more manual and a person would have to go and see what was happening.

When it comes to network visibility, we can see incidents. We found a lot of issues with our billing system, for example, and that's probably the biggest value-add for us. 

The network monitoring is great.

The solution covers a bunch of things. It's designed to be MSP-focused, which is useful. Your clients are tenants, and you can set it up at a global level so that you can drill down at a client level. It makes it very scalable. That's the biggest pro for me. Once you set up things correctly, it can scale very easily. You can just keep adding clients. You don't have to touch anything beyond deploying a connector on-site.

The alerting and network mapping are the most important aspects of our organization.

The interface is intuitive and easy to use. It helps a lot with troubleshooting network issues. It's comprehensive. It gives us a real-time picture of what's happening. It's fairly easy to gain visibility. Once you have things set up correctly, it provides a lot of visibility.

The automation of alerts and ticketing has saved us about 30% to 40% of our time.

We've been able to decrease our mean time to resolution. It's hard to gauge an average, however. For some tickets, it's significant, and for others, it may not be that much. Likely, we've improved mean time to resolution by 15% to 20%.

Auvik has positively influenced our operational costs and productivity. It's saved us a lot of time in terms of manual human effort. Since we're saving time, we're saving costs. It's also allowed us to position ourselves as network management and network monitoring experts and perhaps target a few clients more on the network side of things that are more network-focused than just the MSP and IT support side of things.

Sometimes we run into a new switch, firewall, or router brand that the system doesn't manage or interpret. If they could expand the products they support, that would be ideal.

I've been using the solution for somewhere around two years.

The solution is absolutely stable. We haven't had any problems in two years. I'd rate the stability nine out of ten. I do get the odd email that warns that the service is down. However, it's usually during the night, and it resolves quickly.

Our clients are mostly small businesses. 

The scalability is excellent. I'd rate it ten out of ten. 

Both support and the onboarding process were excellent. They have the best technical support experience across any vendor we deal with. The first person you talk to actually knows what is going on. You don't have to wade through different levels of service. 

Positive

We did not use a different solution previously. We did have some scripts set up to run manually without RMM that would mostly check online/offline status. However, the system was very precarious. 

The initial setup came with a bit of a learning curve. Unless you've used the product before, it's a bit complex. However, they offer the best onboarding experience I've had with any vendor. I had a team of people at my disposal.

I mainly handled the deployment myself. It took a few months to implement. Then, when we onboarded a new employee, they also assisted. We were a bit understaffed at the outset, however, once I had the extra person, the implementation went much faster. 

Once it is set up, there is no maintenance needed. 

The vendor assisted with the setup. They were very helpful and answered all of our questions. It was very personalized. Their service is very good, which explains the price point. 

I was able to negotiate the price. The list price is pretty unaffordable. 

We did evaluate other options before choosing Auvik. Other products seemed a bit buggy. Auvik was also cheaper and had a lot more room for growth.

I'm a customer.

I'd recommend the solution to others. It's not a cheap tool and may not suit all MSPs; however, it works for us. While it can be hard to get clients and end-users to understand the value of network monitoring, they do provide a lot of resources that can help.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We use it for managing our inventory of assets and for receiving timely alerts from our servers.

Auvik's user interface, interactivity, and ease of use are at an average level.

Its network map and dashboard offer a real-time representation of our network. However, it tends to be quite cluttered.

It enables us to reduce the time spent on setup, maintenance, and issue resolution.

The most valuable features include the inventory management and alerting capabilities.

There is room for improvement in the reporting aspect. Specifically, we would like to receive notifications when individual drives reach full capacity. However, the current system aggregates information for all drives on a server, making it challenging for us. Obtaining comprehensive hardware information from both PCs and servers is also proving to be difficult.

I have been using it for a year and a half.

I would rate its stability capabilities eight out of ten

I would rate its scalability abilities seven out of ten.

Their technical support has been effective, with readily available assistance and help to address issues. Occasionally, the drawback lies in the response that certain features may not be available at the moment, with assurances that they are actively working on it. I would rate it eight out of ten.

Positive

We used Datadog for reporting in the past. We transitioned to Auvik because it provides both functionalities we require at a cost-effective price, combining two essential features into one product. 

Configuring Datadog is more challenging, yet it yields superior reports. On the contrary, Auvik is easier to set up, but its reports are not as comprehensive.

The initial setup was fairly simple.

The deployment time was approximately three or four hours, with assistance from an Auvik representative during the process. Solely, I handled the responsibility from our end. It doesn't necessitate much maintenance.

We recognized its value almost immediately upon deploying it.

The pricing is favorable.

I recommend others have a clearer vision of their goals and assess how well it aligns with their intentions before opting for it. I've spent some time exploring the reporting features, and it falls short of providing all the necessary reports and alerts. Additionally, there are numerous configurations spread across various places, which can be challenging to manage. Overall, I would rate it five out of ten.

We use Auvik to manage our network devices and get alerts about what's happening on our systems. We've deployed it across our showroom office network. We have 140 devices.

We're discovering devices we weren't getting previously. For example, we can monitor printer status and be more aware of what's happening with our printers. It's given us visibility that we didn't have.

It's essential because we don't have a dedicated IT team to manage our network. In addition to our IT infrastructure, we need to monitor smart office devices like the cameras and ensure all our devices are online. The ability to monitor this is massively valuable for our potential clients and us. 

We plan to use Auvik to keep our device inventories updated, but I haven't set that up yet. However, it has already populated a list of devices we will keep up to date. We didn't have that list previously. 

The best feature is the ease of setup. Auvik immediately scans and finds everything. It automatically connects to multiple devices with a single set of credentials.

Managing the platform seems relatively easy. I've only used it for a few days, but it's far easier than the previous product we were using. It gives us a single integrated platform, which is crucial for our business model because we provide solutions for others. The network visualization makes rough sense. There are elements that I find tricky to get my head around, but I think might be because it's all new to me. 

I say it's fairly clear, but obviously, it needs me to spend a little bit more time maybe grouping things together and things like that to make sure we've got the correct devices that things are mapped incorrectly.

I'm still undergoing the trial period. My only complaint is that I still don't understand what the license cost will be. More transparent pricing would be massive. In terms of functionality, it's head and shoulders above our previous solution.

I have only been using Auvik for about a week.

Auvik seems more stable than our previous solution. 

The scalability seems good. I placed a collector on a relatively low-power machine, and it doesn't seem to be struggling on the network. Everything seems fine.

We previously used Domotz, but we switched because it required us to run a device on the network that took another device off the network for some reason. I began looking at other solutions to see if they all had this issue. I stumbled across Auvik and decided to try it out.

One of the issues we face is that some of our customers won't allow anything to leave the site, so it has to be on-prem. That's one reason we chose Domotz. However, that caused problems with our network. We prefer a cloud-based system on our network because I work remotely more often than not. On-prem and cloud solutions have advantages and drawbacks. Some customers need an on-prem solution, but I prefer a cloud-based one.

Deploying Auvik is straightforward, and I did it myself. You install the agent, add credentials, and click okay. After you deploy the collector, the network map populates in under a day. I deployed it in the evening, and everything was there the next day. 

When comparing prices, you should consider how long it will take to set up and configure. A cheaper option might not be completely deployed for months. We don't have tons of time to do these things. The most important aspect is how fast we can get it running. How good the software is, and how quickly we can start using it effectively.

There was no visibility prior to setting it up on pricing. Having set it up, their pricing seems fair. It's definitely more expensive than what we're paying at the moment.

I rate Auvik seven out of 10. It seems fairly simple so far, and we haven't had any issues. However, I haven't used it extensively enough. It's expensive, and it would need to be mind-blowing to justify the cost. 

My advice to future users is to ensure you get your credentials together before starting the setup.

We needed a solution to monitor all of our systems. We were using another system, but it wasn't up to par. Auvik gives us everything we need plus some. Right now, we're using it to monitor all of our virtual machines and switches. We can do configurations on any of our switches directly through Auvik.

Right now, another engineer and I currently use the solution. We're going to allow other IT staff to view it, but nobody else will have access. There will be another five staff members who will see all of the data.

We're able to have a visual dashboard in one central location, so we don't need to have multiple dashboards. If we're going to configure an API, we can have it displayed on a board for our team to see. We didn't have anything like that before, so the ability to see insights on a dashboard is very important to our organization.

Auvik has saved us 50% of the time we used to spend because we get notifications fairly quickly.

We have seen a reduction in our MTTR. We notice that some of our devices are going offline five minutes sooner per incident than when we would first get reports.

The most valuable feature is the ability to see usage alerts on all of our devices. That's not just from our servers, but on all of our machines and user computers.

The ability to see utilization at one central location is easier than having multiple windows. We couldn't configure alerts on everything because it just wasn't available. Auvik provided the solution for us.

The use of the monitoring and management functions is of a medium difficulty level. With some aspects like trying to filter devices, it's a little cumbersome to type in the product. You have to click and apply it like a filter. When you click on the search button, it automatically populates it. It's a different step, so it's a little cumbersome and slow. The interface is quite slow, but that's likely due to it being on the cloud.

Auvik provides a single integrated platform. It's very important for us to have a single integrated platform because the interface shows us everything: all of our interfaces, switches, servers, and virtual machines. We can see it all in one central location instead of needing to pull up multiple windows.

Auvik helps us visualize the network mapping and topology for our organization. The ability to see all of our switches and what's connected to the switches is very helpful for us because not only can we see the device, but sometimes we can even see the device name. When we have an issue, we don't have to try to find it with an IP because we can already see the name of the device.

The solution helps reduce repetitive, low-priority tasks through automation. There are certain tasks that we know are repetitive, and we can't do anything because of the way that the system is built. We can suppress those unless they are over a certain threshold. There are other notifications that we always look at when they pop up.

The user interface could be a little bit faster, and there should be a legend on the map. Trying to filter devices could be easier. Those are probably the top three improvements I would like them to address.

I would rate the overall intuitiveness of the network visualization an eight out of ten. There are some aspects that could be better mapped out or better described. Some connections are confusing to look at. We don't know why one is yellow and why one is blue. It would be nice to have a legend included on the map.

I have worked with Auvik for about two and a half months.

The stability is top-notch.

It's highly scalable and available because it's on the cloud. As long as the correct configuration is done, it's highly available.

Technical support is very good. Our questions were answered right away. It seemed like they already knew what we were going to ask. Maybe they were just judging the situation by the deployments that they've done.

I would rate technical support as ten out of ten. 

Positive

We used Libre, but it wasn't giving us what we needed. Auvik gives us the ability to monitor the network.

The setup was straightforward. We implemented Auvik out-of-the-box. It was immediately available to use. The moment we connected our entire network, it was up. There were some configurations that we had to do on the backend, but it was pretty straightforward. The moment we connected, it was immediately available.

We required two people for deployment, including an engineer and myself. Our responsibilities were to make sure that our credentials were correct, our host was the correct address, and that we could connect to it. We also made sure that certain settings were turned on.

It doesn't require maintenance primarily because it's on the cloud, so Auvik takes care of that. If there was any maintenance, it would just be with our devices on our end.

Auvik is fairly priced. The cost is what we expected considering network management. The benefits outweigh the cost for us.

We evaluated other options, but they didn't offer what we needed.

I would rate this solution an eight and a half out of ten. 

Comparing Auvik's cloud-based solution to an on-premises network monitoring solution, I would rate the usefulness a ten out of ten. I would rate the interface an eight out of ten. I would rate the speed a six out of ten because when it's local and on-premises, it's faster because it doesn't have to go through the cloud or through Amazon.

The benefit outweighs the cost because we're able to see everything in one central location. It gives us one interface to do multiple functions.

The time it took to set up and maintain Auvik was twice as long as our previous network. With our previous solution, we just connected our devices and that was it. Auvik took a lot more time.