Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Adobe Workfront vs Microsoft Project Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
Adobe Workfront enhances efficiency, collaboration, and productivity, offering ROI through reduced costs, real-time updates, and improved user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.2
Microsoft Project Server offers significant ROI through time savings, effective management, and enhanced visibility, though assessment varies.
Microsoft Project provides significant return on investment through time savings, enhanced visibility, real-time reporting, and risk mitigation for projects.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
Adobe Workfront customer service is praised for responsiveness and expertise, despite occasional delays or costly advanced support.
Sentiment score
6.0
Microsoft Project Server support is satisfactory but issues include slow resolution, complex documentation, and varying service quality by plan.
Their support tends to decline when not supporting cloud solutions.
It's challenging to navigate, often making it necessary to search for solutions externally.
Help forums and online resources like YouTube are helpful.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Adobe Workfront scales well for various organizations, managing users and projects smoothly with high performance and adaptable scalability.
Sentiment score
7.9
Microsoft Project Server is scalable for various organization sizes, but older versions and costs may hinder adoption and navigation.
The desktop version does not have scalability.
Microsoft Project Server is fully scalable and is widely used in many industries.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Adobe Workfront is generally stable, with minimal downtime, quick issue resolutions, and requires modern browsers for optimal performance.
Sentiment score
7.3
Microsoft Project Server is stable, but performance varies with Nintex workflows, configuration, version, and SharePoint integration issues.
I have never had to reach out to their support because the product works as expected.
 

Room For Improvement

Adobe Workfront needs faster updates, user-friendly design, improved integrations, flexible customization, and better documentation for enhanced usability.
Microsoft Project Server needs improvements in integration, UI, flexibility, automation, agile support, deployment, and user training resources.
Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems.
Exporting data from Microsoft Project, especially Gantt charts, is overly complex and not user-friendly.
The lack of collaboration capabilities on the desktop version, unlike the cloud version, is a limitation.
Microsoft has become increasingly expensive, and there seems to be a push towards cloud solutions which can be challenging for some.
 

Setup Cost

Adobe Workfront pricing varies by license type, with significant subscription fees but potential discounts for existing Adobe customers.
Microsoft Project Server offers flexible licensing, with varying costs based on deployment type, user count, and enterprise plans.
Microsoft Project Server is on the expensive side due to high licensing costs.
Microsoft's products are expensive for individuals.
Considering the infrastructure commitments to SharePoint and SQL, the implementation costs are low if already set up.
 

Valuable Features

Adobe Workfront enhances collaboration and decision-making with customizable templates, workflow management, and strong integration supporting agile and waterfall methodologies.
Microsoft Project Server enhances project management with resource management, scheduling, collaboration, dashboards, and integration, simplifying navigation with familiar tools.
The system aids in supporting demand management and producing high-level status reports.
This setup allows for comprehensive reporting and management across multiple projects and portfolios.
The Gantt chart is also a very powerful tool for a visual presentation of sequences, critical paths, and execution processes, which simplifies comprehension for users.
The dashboards are amazing for data crunching and provide a project focus with upcoming predictions, including burn-up and burn-down charts.
 

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Project Management Software (6th), Digital Asset Management (1st)
Microsoft Project Server
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
Project Portfolio Management (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

Graham Sprague - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized task management and simplified creative collaboration but interface is inconsistent
Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API. The current setup was not originally designed API-first, leading to some confusion and differences in available functions. Additionally, the low-code environment in Workfront Fusion is beneficial yet sometimes limiting, and it might be more powerful with enhancements.
Sean Achim - PeerSpot reviewer
Unlock comprehensive reporting and management with robust data extraction
The major advantage for me in using Microsoft Project Server is the SQL Server component. Using Power BI and SQL Server, I can extract a lot more data. The combination of Microsoft Project with Project Server and SharePoint provides a perfect solution for me. This setup allows for comprehensive reporting and management across multiple projects and portfolios.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
63%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Workfront?
I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?
Workfront incurs around a hundred thousand plus dollars per year. Licensing is strict, particularly with free accounts, however, it offers flexibility in project access, which could be enhanced fur...
What needs improvement with Workfront?
Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API. The current setup was not originally designed API-first...
What do you like most about Microsoft Project Server?
The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Project Server?
The pricing model is currently a challenge since it seems aligned to push users cloud-based. Considering the infrastructure commitments to SharePoint and SQL, the implementation costs are low if al...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Project Server?
I am not convinced that the pricing model is the right one. Microsoft has become increasingly expensive, and there seems to be a push towards cloud solutions which can be challenging for some. Addi...
 

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM
MS Project Server
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse
Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Workfront vs. Microsoft Project Server and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.