Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Allot IoTSecure vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security comparison

Allot and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the IoT Security category. Allot is ranked #14, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Allot holds a 0.1% mindshare in IS, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution.
Allot IoTSecure
Read 1 Allot IoTSecure review
  • 88 Views
  • 30 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...
Read 9 Palo Alto Networks IoT Security reviews
  • 1,498 Views
  • 297 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Allot IoTSecure and Palo Alto Networks IoT Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis Security and others in IoT Security.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IoT Security Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
IoT Security
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,067 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Allot IoTSecure
Ranking in IoT Security
14th
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...
Ranking in IoT Security
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Allot IoTSecure is 0.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is 7.5%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

Kaushlendra Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful bandwidth optimization, reliable, but difficult to implement
The deployment of Allot IoTSecure took approximately one week and it is very difficult. When using a different solution, if you install one device, you can easily install another device. However, in Allot IoTSecure, you have to use the help from Allot. Without the help of Allot, it is not possible to configure it.
Read full review
Muhammad Ahsan Riaz - PeerSpot reviewer
Responsive system enhances network management but integration needs refinement
I find Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to be highly responsive, and its separate management and data planes are a major advantage. As an insurance company in the financial sector, we must meet strict regulatory requirements, and Palo Alto has proven to be an excellent solution. Its management is straightforward, the dashboards and reporting are comprehensive, and most importantly, it functions exactly as described in the documentation. For example, when we needed to block YouTube on our network, Palo Alto successfully blocked access while our Cisco firewall failed to block access on iPhones. This highlights the inconsistency we've experienced with different firewalls, whereas Palo Alto has consistently performed as expected.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Allot IoTSecure is bandwidth optimization."
"Single-pass traffic processing enables very high throughput and low latency."
"The key strength of Palo Alto firewalls lies in their application-based approach, offering a much finer level of control compared to traditional firewalls."
"I like the Cortex Data Lake integration with security automation."
"From a security standpoint, it provides a comprehensive range of standard security features that align with our requirements."
"It is simple to use. We just need to enable features and then configure IoT policies."
"Palo Alto is valued for its GlobalProtect feature, which offers a range of security options, including user ID mapping and VPNs."
"This solution has been most valuable for establishing a VPN and implementing allow/deny rules. It has also enabled us to create security policies. It is an easy solution to customise when it comes to creating templates and pulling reports."
"I find Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to be highly responsive, and its separate management and data planes are a major advantage."
More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security pros
 

Cons

"Allot IoTSecure could improve by providing better documentation, there was not any documentation on their website."
"While not overly complex, its usability could be enhanced, making it a more intuitive experience for everyone."
"More application signatures are required."
"The reporting for this solution could be improved. The logs we receive are only saved for one week. We would like to have the database timeframe increased to a month or two for historical reporting as well as increased storage capabilities to support this data and reporting."
"The cost is still high and licensing is still complex."
"There can be more automation in terms of security and detection. It is already good."
"It would be beneficial to have a more centralized and user-friendly platform that could consolidate all the necessary information, which proved challenging during the initial POC phase."
"Palo Alto Networks IoT Security's reporting capabilities are less comprehensive and robust than those provided by Cisco."
"Essentially, this solution focuses on data analysis and cannot perform any physical actions."
More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is an annual subscription for the use of this solution. Additionally, there are installation costs."
"The pricing for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is a bit high."
"The initial investment is substantial, but the renewal costs make it financially unsustainable."
"While Palo Alto Networks IoT Security might cost more than some competitors, its features and effectiveness justify the price tag."
"The successful migration trend suggests that Palo Alto provides a superior cost-benefit ratio for firewall solutions."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Legal Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
From a security standpoint, it provides a comprehensive range of standard security features that align with our requirements.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
Improvement areas include enhancing integration capabilities and making policy creation less cumbersome. The process involves navigating multiple windows, which could be streamlined. Palo Alto Netw...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
We are an insurance-based company, and we had some regulatory requirements that needed to be fulfilled. We've used Palo Alto primarily for our network security needs. It was part of our infrastruct...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Nozomi Networks vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Nozomi Networks vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 61% of the time
Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 19% of the time
Forescout Platform vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Forescout Platform vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 8% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IoT Security
November 2024
Allot IoTSecure reportDownload Allot IoTSecure product report
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
December 2024
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security reportDownload Palo Alto Networks IoT Security product report
 

Learn More

Allot
Palo Alto Networks
 

Overview

Generate incremental revenue and differentiate your mobile IoT by offering security services. Network-based security addresses important concerns for all verticals, complementary to basic connectivity and other IoT services.

Introducing comprehensive IoT Security solutions tailored for enterprises, healthcare, and industrial operations. Safeguard every device, visible or unseen, with Zero Trust security protocols, ensuring protection against known and unknown threats. With rapid 15X faster deployment times, Enterprise IoT Security, Medical IoT Security, and Industrial OT Security streamline operations, allowing teams to prioritize security over setup. Seamlessly integrate with Palo Alto Networks ML-Powered NGFWs or Prisma Access for swift implementation, making your infrastructure IoT-aware within minutes. Eliminate blind spots across existing IT and security solutions with playbook-driven, built-in integrations, and simplify cloud delivery for deployment across any architecture without the need for multiple sensors or network redesign. Protect your assets and ensure uninterrupted operations with our comprehensive IoT security solutions.

 

Sample Customers

China Unicom
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
IoT Security
November 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis Security and others in IoT Security. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best IoT Security vendors.

We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.