Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security vs Phosphorus Cybersecurity comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...
Ranking in IoT Security
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Phosphorus Cybersecurity
Ranking in IoT Security
9th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is 7.7%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Phosphorus Cybersecurity is 4.5%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

Alex De Miranda - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 28, 2024
Offers a range of security options, including user ID mapping and VPNs
Palo Alto is valued for its GlobalProtect feature, which offers a range of security options, including user ID mapping and VPNs. Clients also appreciate the firewall's deployment flexibility. IoT provides granular zero trust least privilege policy recommendations. The speed of zero trust policy creation depends on the complexity of the desired outcome. However, assuming a straightforward objective, the process can be quite efficient. Once the desired outcome is clearly documented, creating the policies becomes much easier as the necessary steps are already defined. From there, it's simply a matter of configuring the details and implementing the changes. Overall, creating a zero-trust policy in this scenario is a relatively simple process. Customers appreciate Palo Alto Networks IoT Security's seamless integration with various platforms, including Cisco ISE and other Cisco tools like user identification systems. This flexibility, along with Prisma Access integration, allows for comprehensive security across diverse environments and enhances interoperability with existing infrastructure. The risk assessment information from IoT Security is valuable because it guides necessary changes for compliance with best practices. This is crucial for engineers making adjustments and new deployments, ensuring alignment with industry standards. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security utilizes its next-generation firewall as a sensor, eliminating the need for additional hardware. While this multi-functionality is beneficial, it's important to note that the firewall may not be able to effectively handle every security layer, so relying solely on it for all security needs might not be optimal.
Use Phosphorus Cybersecurity?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The successful migration trend suggests that Palo Alto provides a superior cost-benefit ratio for firewall solutions."
"While Palo Alto Networks IoT Security might cost more than some competitors, its features and effectiveness justify the price tag."
"The pricing for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is a bit high."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Legal Firm
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Wholesaler/Distributor
18%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
10%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
From a security standpoint, it provides a comprehensive range of standard security features that align with our requirements.
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
It is not very comprehensive in terms of visibility. When we tested, multiple application signatures were not available with Palo Alto. Fortinet, Claroty, and Nozomi had more application signatures...
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
Our primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is for the operational technology (OT) network. We have industrial systems, referred to as ICS or Industrial Control Systems, to control man...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis Security and others in IoT Security. Updated: October 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.