We performed a comparison between Alluvio Aternity and Datadog based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Alluvio Aternity provides useful functionalities including monitoring machine health and performance data, tracking desktop application usage, offering customization options, measuring UXI score, and ensuring endpoint visibility. Datadog offers dashboards, error reporting, a user-friendly interface, log analysis, and infrastructure monitoring capabilities. Alluvio Aternity has opportunities to enhance its reporting capabilities, customization of asset management, performance counters, and options for monitoring databases. Datadog could improve in terms of usability, integration, intuitiveness of user interfaces, learning curve, monitoring external websites, and SSL security, among other areas.
Service and Support: Alluvio Aternity's customer service provides prompt and skilled technical support, ensuring high levels of satisfaction. Although local support is available, more complex technical inquiries may require assistance from overseas engineers. Datadog's customer service has received varied feedback, with some users praising its helpful and responsive nature. However, others have encountered slow or unresponsive support, especially in the Asia-Pacific region.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Alluvio Aternity was praised for being excellent, simple, and convenient. It involved installing agents on PCs using Microsoft's SCCM solution. The setup for Datadog was generally seen as uncomplicated and direct, although some users found it slightly intricate and necessitated additional adjustments or collaboration with multiple teams.
Pricing: Users generally find the setup cost for Alluvio to be affordable and satisfactory. Opinions regarding Datadog's pricing and licensing are mixed. Some users perceive Datadog as costly and perplexing, while others find it reasonable when compared to alternative options.
ROI: Alluvio emphasizes expense management for ROI, while Datadog's ROI has a range of outcomes, including positive sentiments and the possibility for growth.
Comparison Results: Based on user feedback, Alluvio Aternity is recommended over Datadog due to its straightforward and intuitive setup process. Users appreciate Alluvio Aternity for its effortless deployment of agents and low maintenance requirements. Furthermore, Alluvio Aternity offers valuable insights into machine health and performance, customization options, and an easily navigable interface. Ultimately, the simplicity and user-friendly nature of Alluvio Aternity make it the preferred option.
"As a financial institution, we have a lot of applications that are either written internally or bought from a vendor and customized for us. Having a tool that lets us monitor specific transactions in those applications allows us to focus on the transactions that are important to the business."
"Aternity provides metrics about actual employee experience of all business-critical apps, rather than just a few. It does some out-of-the-box monitoring for the Office suite, but you can create custom monitoring for any of your applications, whether a web client or a desktop application."
"The ability to monitor crash and health event issues at a user level"
"Alluvio Aternity is stable."
"Aternity's Digital Experience Management Quadrant (DEM-Q) has been a game changer for us. While knowing your own metrics is nice, if you don't know how you compare to others or what the numbers should be, then it doesn't tell you much. This solution puts that into context (if we are doing better than others or worse), which helps us prioritize where we want to focus and do improvements versus that's just how slow it's supposed to be. It's also great in communicating what we are doing and why we're doing it to our IT leadership teams, by saying, while we're pretty far behind others in certain categories, the time and changes for our prioritizations are justified."
"While it also provides desktop metrics, the main thing we use it for is monitoring our applications."
"There are many valuable features. If I had to single out one, it would be the UXI score. That's a proprietary Aternity score that tells you how good or bad the experience is for a user on that particular machine, for a particular app. It neatly encapsulates the pain of the user in a single score. It's very easy to find issues and then drill down further into those issues, based on that score."
"All of it, but it depends on who the end user is. The folks that support the applications, like the signatures that we've developed, it gives them feedback on their application performance."
"I have found the logging and tracing features the most valuable."
"The fact that everything is under a single pane of glass is really valuable, as developers don't have to spend their time copying correlation IDs across tools to find what they need."
"The flexibility to create notebooks and dashboards and fully customize them gives us a lot of power to track the exact services and endpoints we are working on."
"The full stack of integrations made it easier to monitor the different technologies and platform providers, including Software as a Service providers, that otherwise would need a lot of work and customization to be able to see what is happening."
"The most useful feature is the APM."
"We rely heavily on the API crawlers that Datadog uses for cloud integrations. These allow us to pick up and leverage the tags teams have already deployed without having also to make them add them at the agent level."
"It is easy to navigate the menu and create tests."
"I find the greatest feature is being able to search across logs from various microservices."
"Their technical support should be improved in terms of response time. Its stability should also be better. We are currently using version 10, and its stability is not so high. The server crashes from time to time and needs to be restarted. Sometimes, you also have problems with applications."
"Some of the dashboarding and reporting on the analytics side could be improved. I think they realize it. Obviously, some of the desktop monitoring metrics always can be improved."
"I would say the reporting capabilities of this product could use room for improvement."
"For me, the biggest problem is the price. It is not so much about how much it costs. It is about Aternity only giving you 12 months upfront. So, you got to purchase it for 12 months. A lot of our customers are on a per-user-per-month type billing. They are all OPEX rather than CAPEX. It would be a lot better for our customers if there was an option available for OPEX so that it is billed on a monthly basis than a yearly basis. They've got only Windows agents. They don't actually have mobile agents. It would be a lot better if they could also integrate Android and iOS because then we can start pulling steps and performance management out of users' mobile devices. That's the biggest addition I would suggest at the moment. A lot of our customers have desktops as well as tablets or mobile devices. We should be able to monitor that stuff as well."
"I would like Alluvio Aternity to be certified by the IRAP for petrol companies in Australia."
"The solution is available at a higher price than other solutions."
"Signature development process requires deep technical expertise in the application and in the use of their studio tools that help you create it."
"They've additionally added some great color coding, but they need to explain better and drive down further on the meanings of this workflow."
"The more tools that they can build that allow you to run AWX playbooks, or other similar fixes, would benefit clients greatly."
"While I like the ease of use, when compared with Tenable Nessus they could still improve their usability."
"For three to four months, we have been experiencing real-time delays. For example, if we're monitoring incoming traffic, the real-time status should be displayed up to a certain point. However, due to delays or issues with Datadog, the real-time data might only be updated at an earlier time. We are experiencing consistent delays in data updates from Datadog, with the most recent data often being delayed by about an hour. This issue has been ongoing for the past four months."
"It would be ideal if the product offered a bit more monitoring from our dashboard."
"The ability to find what you are looking for when starting out could be improved."
"The current way accounts are billed could be vastly improved - especially when involving multiple organizations across multiple accounts in combination with reserved commitments."
"Datadog has a lot of documentation, but a lot of that documentation assumes you know how the service works, which can lead to confusion."
"We want to reduce having to go to different screens to obtain all the information."
Alluvio Aternity is ranked 21st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 37 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. Alluvio Aternity is rated 8.4, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Alluvio Aternity writes "Not only helped us know which devices to refresh, but helped us determine if a refresh was even necessary, with factual data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". Alluvio Aternity is most compared with Dynatrace, Nexthink, SysTrack, AppDynamics and New Relic, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability. See our Alluvio Aternity vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.