Alteryx Designer vs Qlik Compose comparison

"The functionality of drag and drop is the most valuable. It is a very user-friendly tool that can be understood easily. My teams also work with other solutions, such as Integration Services, and these solutions are very difficult for people who don't have technical knowledge."

"The product is intuitive and easy to use."

"Workflow automation, in general, is valuable."

"Alteryx is quite easy to use, learn, and understand as a product."

"We use Alteryx Designer for analytics. It's quite helpful because once we set it up, we don't have to manually update or process data repeatedly. It saves time, especially for financial reporting, which is typically done monthly or quarterly. Once we set it up initially, we only need to make occasional updates if necessary."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"For my daily analytics needs, the entire Alteryx Designer platform is beneficial."

"I have been using Alteryx Designer only for data modeling and data structuring."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"It can scale."

"I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years."

"It is a scalable solution."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"It's a stable solution."

"The product could offer more connectors and more databases with support for the in-database function."

"Alteryx's data science and machine learning capabilities are where it loses out to DataIQ."

"Its cost can sometimes be a drawback."

"It would be simpler if they provided a component where you could simply enter some parameters and see the results."

"We discontinued using Alteryx's data science studio because it was not very user-friendly."

"Sometimes, while getting data from a third-party product, the solution works slowly."

"It is challenging to view the data using Alteryx Designer."

"The actual usage part of it needs to be explained more. It's too vague right now."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"I rate the product's pricing a two to three out of ten."

"I rate Alteryx Designer a six out of ten for pricing."

"I rate the price of Alteryx Designer as a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is extremely expensive, and ten is a highly cheap product."

"Alteryx Designer is a very expensive solution."

"The solution is expensive. It has license fees, which are renewable every year."

"Each license is something like $4,000."

"The licenses are expensive, making it difficult to consider acquiring additional licenses to the existing ones."

"Alteryx Designer is an expensive solution."

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."