Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Alteryx Designer vs Qlik Compose comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.7
Alteryx Designer enhances efficiency with automation, though recent pricing changes affect its cost-effectiveness despite noted process improvements.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.5
Alteryx Designer customer service is well-rated, with strong community support and generally prompt, helpful technical assistance.
Sentiment score
7.6
Qlik Compose customer service receives mixed reviews, with praise for assistance but concerns about slow response and communication issues.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.8
Qlik Compose is highly scalable, easily managing large data loads, with cloud scaling simpler and mixed user experiences reported.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Alteryx Designer is highly stable, with minimal bugs, rare crashes, and robust performance across varying client sizes.
Sentiment score
6.7
Qlik Compose is generally stable, but high volume and updates can cause errors, with stability scores varying widely.
 

Room For Improvement

Qlik Compose requires improvements in ETL monitoring, scalability, transformation options, integration, support, documentation, and performance with large datasets.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find Alteryx costly, with high annual fees and extra charges, making it harder to justify than alternatives.
Qlik Compose pricing depends on data volume and use case, with potential discounts and recommended direct consultation for details.
 

Valuable Features

Alteryx Designer is valued for its ease of use, automation, versatility, scalability, and integration capabilities, appealing to non-technical users.
Qlik Compose excels in ETL, data integration, automation, and real-time replication, with user-friendly features and efficient warehouse development.
 

Categories and Ranking

Alteryx Designer
Ranking in Data Integration
11th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Qlik Compose
Ranking in Data Integration
22nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Alteryx Designer is 3.2%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Compose is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Ajay Nayak - PeerSpot reviewer
An easy-to-use automation solution with satisfying customer support
Sometimes, while getting data from a third-party product, like data sources that are not present in your system, Alteryx works a bit slowly. Even if you have a good configuration and you are pulling data from an SQL server like SAP, then the solution also has a slow work process. It shouldn't be that much slow if you are pulling ten thousand records, it should not take thirty minutes.
Sahil Taneja - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy matching and reconciliation of data
The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
24%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Alteryx Designer?
When you open a raw Excel file, it can be hard to look at everything in detail. Alteryx makes it much easier to go through the data, summarize it, and use different tools for analysis.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Alteryx Designer?
The solution is expensive. It has license fees, which are renewable every year.
What needs improvement with Alteryx Designer?
Alteryx Designer is not as fast as SSIS and is not good for large datasets. It also needs to improve database procedures. Though it is easy to use, it is limited in terms of technical aspects.
Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?
There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...
What do you like most about Qlik Compose?
The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qlik Compose?
While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Compose, Attunity Compose
 

Learn More

 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Poly-Wood
Find out what your peers are saying about Alteryx Designer vs. Qlik Compose and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.