AWS Batch vs Apache NiFi comparison

Apache and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Compute Service category. Apache is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.7, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0. Apache holds a 7.9% mindshare in CS, compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS)’s 20.3% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.

Apache NiFi

Read 12 Apache NiFi reviews

2,136 Views
991 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

AWS Batch

Read 4 AWS Batch reviews

2,942 Views
2,708 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache NiFi

AWS Batch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache NiFi and AWS Batch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Compute Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Batch vs. Apache NiFi Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Batch vs. Apache NiFi

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache NiFi

Ranking in Compute Service

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AWS Batch

Ranking in Compute Service

6th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Apache NiFi is 7.9%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Batch is 20.3%, up from 19.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Compute Service

Featured Reviews

Bharghava Raghavendra Beesa

Senior Developer at Infosys

The tool enables effective data transformation and integration

There are some areas for improvement, particularly with record-level tasks that take a bit of time. The quality of JSON data processing could be improved, as JSON workloads require manual conversions without a specific process. Enhancing features related to alerting would be helpful, including mobile alerts for pipeline issues. Integration with mobile devices for error alerts would simplify information delivery.

Read full review

Larry Singh

Head of Bioinformatics at Paratus Sciences

User-friendly, good customization and offers exceptional scalability, allowing users to run jobs ranging from 32 cores to over 2,000 cores

The main drawback to using AWS Batch would be the cost. It will be more expensive in some cases than using an HPC. It's more amenable to cases where you have spot requirements. So, for instance, you don't exactly know how much compute resources you'll need and when you'll need them. So it's much better for that flexibility. But if you're going to be running jobs consistently and using the compute cluster consistently for a lot of time, and it's not going to have a lot of downtime, then the HPC system might be a better alternative. So, really, it boils down to cost versus usage trade-offs. It's going to be more expensive for a lot of people. In future releases, I would like to see anything that could help make it easier to set up your initial system. And besides improving the GUI a little bit, the interface to it, making it a little bit more descriptive and having more information at your fingertips, so if you could point to the help of what the different features are, you can get quick access to that. That might help. With most of the AWS services, the difficulty really is getting information and knowledge about the system and seeing examples. So, seeing examples of how it's being used under multiple use cases would be the best way to become familiar with it. And some of that would just come with experience. You have to just use it and play with it. But in terms of the system itself, it's not that difficult to set up or use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is very easy. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one point is difficult, and ten points are easy."

"Apache NiFi is user-friendly. Its most valuable features for handling large volumes of data include its multitude of integrated endpoints and clients and the ability to create cron jobs to run tasks at regular intervals."

"We can integrate the tool with other applications easily."

"Visually, this is a good product."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"The most valuable features of this solution are ease of use and implementation."

"The most valuable feature has been the range of clients and the range of connectors that we could use."

"It is highly effective for handling real-time data by working with APIs for immediate and continuous data extraction."

More Apache NiFi pros

"We can easily integrate AWS container images into the product."

"AWS Batch's deployment was easy."

"There is one other feature in confirmation or call confirmation where you can have templates of what you want to do and just modify those to customize it to your needs. And these templates basically make it a lot easier for you to get started."

"AWS Batch manages the execution of computing workload, including job scheduling, provisioning, and scaling."

Cons

"There should be a better way to integrate a development environment with local tools."

"There is room for improvement in integration with SSO. For example, NiFi does not have any integration with SSO. And if I want to give some kind of rollback access control across the organization. That is not possible."

"The quality of JSON data processing could be improved, as JSON workloads require manual conversions without a specific process."

"More features must be added to the product."

"The tool should incorporate more tutorials for advanced use cases. It has tutorials for simple use cases."

"We run many jobs, and there are already large tables. When we do not control NiFi on time, all reports fail for the day. So it's pretty slow to control, and it has to be improved."

"The use case templates could be more precise to typical business needs."

"The overall stability of this solution could be improved. In a future release, we would like to have access to more features that could be used in a parallel way. This would provide more freedom with processing."

More Apache NiFi cons

"The main drawback to using AWS Batch would be the cost. It will be more expensive in some cases than using an HPC. It's more amenable to cases where you have spot requirements."

"When we run a lot of batch jobs, the UI must show the history."

"AWS Batch needs to improve its documentation."

"The solution should include better and seamless integration with other AWS services, like Amazon S3 data storage and EC2 compute resources."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the free version of Apache NiFi."

"I used the tool's free version."

"The solution is open-source."

"It's an open-source solution."

"AWS Batch is a cheap solution."

"The pricing is very fair."

"AWS Batch's pricing is good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache NiFi?

The initial setup is very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache NiFi?

I used the tool's free version.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache NiFi?

The tool should incorporate more tutorials for advanced use cases. It has tutorials for simple use cases.

See all answers

Which is better, AWS Lambda or Batch?

AWS Lambda is a serverless solution. It doesn’t require any infrastructure, which allows for cost savings. There is no setup process to deal with, as the entire solution is in the cloud. If you use...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Batch?

AWS Batch manages the execution of computing workload, including job scheduling, provisioning, and scaling.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Batch?

AWS Batch is a cheap solution.

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud Dataflow vs Apache NiFi

Compared 33% of the time

AWS Lambda vs Apache NiFi

Compared 28% of the time

Apache Spark vs Apache NiFi

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Fargate vs Apache NiFi

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Stream Analytics vs Apache NiFi

Compared 8% of the time

More Apache NiFi Competitors

AWS Lambda vs AWS Batch

Compared 59% of the time

Apache Spark vs AWS Batch

Compared 22% of the time

Amazon EC2 vs AWS Batch

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Compute Cloud Service vs AWS Batch

Compared 5% of the time

AWS Fargate vs AWS Batch

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS Batch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache NiFi

February 2025

Download Apache NiFi product report

Buyer's Guide

Compute Service

January 2025

Download AWS Batch product report

Also Known As

No data available

Amazon Batch

Overview

Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Apache

AWS Batch enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS. AWS Batch dynamically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources (e.g., CPU or memory optimized instances) based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted. With AWS Batch, there is no need to install and manage batch computing software or server clusters that you use to run your jobs, allowing you to focus on analyzing results and solving problems. AWS Batch plans, schedules, and executes your batch computing workloads across the full range of AWS compute services and features, such as Amazon EC2 and Spot Instances.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

Macquarie Telecom Group, Dovestech, Slovak Telekom, Looker, Hastings Group

Hess, Expedia, Kelloggs, Philips, HyperTrack

Buyer's Guide

AWS Batch vs. Apache NiFi

January 2025

Free Report: AWS Batch vs. Apache NiFi

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Batch vs. Apache NiFi and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Batch vs. Apache NiFi report.

See our list of best Compute Service vendors.

We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.