AuraQuantic vs Hyland OnBase comparison

AuraQuantic and Hyland are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. AuraQuantic is ranked #21 with an average rating of 10.0, while Hyland is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.7. AuraQuantic holds a 0.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to Hyland’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AuraQuantic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hyland users who would recommend it.

AuraQuantic

Read 6 AuraQuantic reviews

473 Views
324 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

364 Views
235 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AuraQuantic

Hyland OnBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and AuraQuantic are two prominent solutions in the enterprise content management and low-code automation space. Hyland OnBase excels in support and pricing, while AuraQuantic is preferred for its robust features.

Features: Hyland OnBase offers comprehensive document management, workflow automation, and case management features. Users appreciate its scalability and integration capabilities. AuraQuantic stands out with extensive low-code development tools, advanced reporting options, and a superior rules engine. Users favor AuraQuantic for its customization and extensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase users seek a more intuitive design and faster processing speeds. They also desire improved mobile functionalities. AuraQuantic users report challenges with initial setup complexity and the learning curve associated with its advanced features. Both systems have areas requiring enhancement, but the focus differs significantly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase deployment is praised for being straightforward, with strong customer support backing. Its deployment model is flexible, supporting on-premises and cloud options. AuraQuantic users find its deployment more complex but appreciate detailed support and comprehensive documentation. Despite this, Hyland OnBase is noted for easier deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase is seen as cost-effective with swift ROI due to its efficient implementation process. AuraQuantic, while initially perceived as more expensive, offers substantial ROI attributed to its expansive functionality and customization potential. Users find AuraQuantic worth the investment for its long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AuraQuantic

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

21st

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

17th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (18th), No-Code Development Platforms (6th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (11th)

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

19th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AuraQuantic is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Q&A Highlights

Guillermo Perez

General Manager at XIMPLEX

Nov 01, 2019

Are Laserfiche and OnBase considered eBPMs? How do they compare to AuraPortal?

I am not familiar with LaserFiche or AuraPortal, but we employ OnBase here and I am familiar with IBM's ECM platform. Without splitting too many hairs, tools like these provide a "content-enabled" workflow and are often referred to as Enterprise Content Management (ECM) systems. That is, they don't do anything until a piece of content presents itself for processing. They are very good at automating/mechanizing a wide variety of business processes that have a form (paper or electronic) associated with them. Business Process Management packages are designed to be able to create workflows that do not depend on a piece of content to function properly. So, it depends on what problem you are trying to solve. If the business process that you are trying to automate has content (forms, faxes, etc) then ECM packages like OnBase, LaserFiche, etc. might fit your need. If you need to automate processes that do not require content, then a more traditional BPM system might be required.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Emilio Valle

Programmer at Banco de Guatemala

Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable

It helped a lot when we started using it with more images. Before, it was basic. With images, it's more effective. Users consider it more animated and user-friendly. We can easily track a process and know exactly where a process is. It's a low-code application. The solution is very easy to use. It is stable and reliable. The solution scales well. Technical support is extremely responsive.

Read full review

Phemy Lekalakala

Manager of Information Systems at University of the Witwatersrand

Stable content and workflow management solution with a valuable retention module

We use this solution for record management and digitization of records. We also use it for workflows and to build online forms The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a low-code application."

"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."

"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."

"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."

"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"Its most valuable aspect is its flexibility"

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

More Hyland OnBase pros

Cons

"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."

"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."

"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."

"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial."

"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."

"The migration is a bit difficult in the tool."

More Hyland OnBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be better. It's quite expensive."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"The tool's price is high."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

Guillermo Perez

General Manager at XIMPLEX

Nov 1, 2019

Are Laserfiche and OnBase considered eBPMs? How do they compare to AuraPortal?

See 2 answers

Phillip Downard

Account Executive / Business Partnerships with 51-200 employees

Nov 1, 2019

Laserfiche and OnBase can both be classified as such. They both run very robust Business Process Management applications. I personally know that the Laserfiche application has grown enormously over the past few years and is classified by the Gartner Group as one of the leaders in the industry. If you would like more specifics I would gladly discuss with you but would require a few more details.

Read full answer

it_user1081452

Director Of Information Technology at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Nov 1, 2019

Read full answer

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AuraQuantic?

It's a low-code application.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AuraQuantic?

I do not handle the licensing. I do not have direct knowledge of the pricing. It's not within the scope of my work.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AuraQuantic?

We're just using images. We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example. There could be more adoptions. We'd like the option to connect this product with oth...

See all answers

What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?

The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, ad...

See all answers

Comparisons

Appian vs AuraQuantic

Compared 53% of the time

Camunda vs AuraQuantic

Compared 28% of the time

Bizagi vs AuraQuantic

Compared 19% of the time

More AuraQuantic Competitors

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 20% of the time

OpenText Documentum vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 15% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 13% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Extended ECM vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 9% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic

April 2025

Download AuraQuantic product report

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

April 2025

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Also Known As

No data available

OnBase

Overview

AuraQuantic is a digital platform designed for business users to easily and rapidly build unlimited processes and applications to automate end-to-end operations, reducing costs and optimizing productivity.

AuraQuantic is a no-code platform for building the enterprise solutions that drive Digital Transformation.

Interface

Delight users with attractive interfaces across multiple devices and deliver the best user experience. Respond immediately to their ever-changing needs with the agility provided by the platform and its no-code changes on the fly.

Logic

This is the most powerful part of any application. This is why AuraQuantic offers a long list of built-in, no-code functionalities.

Data

To manage application and process data models, AuraQuantic provides a visual data model designer and supports importing data schemas.

Application Governance

Access rights management (to apps and app development), Application metadata collection, Application performance monitoring, Application works dashboard, Custom ‘guardrails’ for practitioners/developers, Role-based access control to data and services for app dev, Multiple practitioners/developers for a single app and across the platform.

Business Analytics

Digital Decisioning features aim to inform and automate operational decisions. These decisions continue to increase in amount and complexity due to growing customer demands. Business decision automation is a must to keep up with ever-changing customer needs.

Thanks to business activity data collection, using custom applications built with AuraQuantic, the organization is empowered to carry out accurate analysis and act smart by leveraging business insights.

Connectivity

API REST, API SOAP, API DLL
Exposing APIs (process/application logic and decision systems)
Connector builder
REST and SOAP web services connector
External database connectors (Adapters Servers, scripts and stored procedures execution)
.Net Assembly connector Connectors with Artificial Intelligence services (AI)
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) service connectors
More built-in connectors (50+)
Microsoft Office 365, Google Suite, SAP…

AuraQuantic

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Sample Customers

Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase

April 2025

Free Report: AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase

Find out what your peers are saying about AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.