Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum comparison

BlackBerry and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.4, while Kaspersky is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.7. BlackBerry holds a 1.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to Kaspersky’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...
Read 44 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reviews
  • 3,417 Views
  • 2,603 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...
Read 21 Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum reviews
  • 1,791 Views
  • 1,254 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum compete in the cybersecurity endpoint protection market. While Cylance excels with machine learning-driven threat protection and a lightweight design, Kaspersky offers robust threat detection and user-friendly features, slightly outperforming Cylance in device management and system hardening capabilities.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers advanced machine learning capabilities to effectively protect against zero-day threats. Its lightweight design minimizes CPU usage, ensuring smooth system operations. The centralized dashboard simplifies management and enhances scanning and reporting through features like CylanceOPTICS. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum provides effective threat hunting and malware detection capabilities. The user-friendly dashboard and remote capabilities through its cloud console enable efficient network isolation. Additionally, its device management and system hardening features provide a comprehensive security package.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance users suggest reducing false positives and improving the responsiveness of technical support. Enhancements to the user interface and more detailed threat analytics would increase its usability. Kaspersky EDR faces challenges with scalability and a cumbersome uninstallation process. It could benefit from integrating comprehensive network management capabilities and improving IoT connection visibility. Both solutions need to enhance their dashboard interfaces, though Kaspersky's installation and maintenance pose slight challenges compared to Cylance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance offers versatile deployment across public and hybrid clouds, appealing to users seeking flexibility. Its customer service receives mixed reviews, with some users reporting slow response times. Kaspersky primarily focuses on on-premises deployment and generally receives positive feedback for its responsive customer service and technical support, although some users desire more comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance is perceived as more expensive, yet its robust protection justifies the cost with significant ROI through reduced security incidents. Kaspersky is seen as more economical, appealing to budget-conscious organizations with its competitive pricing while maintaining strong security features. Both solutions provide valuable ROI by enhancing endpoint protection and minimizing vulnerabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
19th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.6
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
33rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry - PeerSpot reviewer
Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT
I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.
Read full review
SharjeelFarooque - PeerSpot reviewer
Great threat response, provides for proactivity, and has automated threat identification
In terms of the Pakistani market and talking from a salesperson's perspective, I'd suggest that Kaspersky introduce a bundle of Kaspersky EDR-Optimum or Kaspersky EDR-Expert along with its Business Select/Advance suite. When I say this, I understand the Pakistani market and how slow and less eager organizations are to invest in IT and internet security. Most of them don't invest until or unless they face any attack or network failure. However, in addition to the product, Kaspersky should give EDR-Optimum on the cloud for less than 300 users as well, in case any customer has its whole network on the cloud. That way they can easily use it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Two or three years ago when the WannaCry virus struck, the people that were on Cylance were the ones that weren't affected."
"One of the best features of the solution is that it's easy to deploy."
"The solution runs in the background, and I do not need to care about it."
"It secures different entry points into the network."
"I rate the tool a ten out of ten when it comes to the ease of use or management part."
"It is extremely simple to manage and deploy."
"Even if an endpoint loses connection to the Internet, I know that endpoint is protected against 99.99% of the threats in the wild today."
"The solution is easy to deploy."
More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros
"The solution is easy to use."
"The performance is good."
"It fulfills security and protection requirements against newly discovered malware, especially ransomware attacks."
"The solution's most valuable features are the advanced detection and anti-theft features."
"The most advantageous aspect is tracking and taking action automatically."
"Kaspersky EDR is constantly updated and can respond to any threat nearly in real-time. They work hard to produce all the updates on time."
"It protects against malware and secures the network."
"It offers features like system hardening, vulnerability management, patch management, and device control, which are not present in other solutions."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum pros
 

Cons

"Reporting is an area with shortcomings in CylancePROTECT that needs to be improved."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be more competitive."
"The company that sells us the licenses sometimes doesn't know how to do certain things."
"​It needs real analysis of quarantined files. The EDR product isn't showing much right now."
"It could have integration with industrial base HMIS or Human Machine Interfaces Solutions. This is the industrial environment where you have a control center for all the automation that's happening, whether it is oil, gas, or chemical manufacturing. They often have to set up a computer at the back and watch the other stuff to get alerts. In these autonomous or on-premises environments, they often don't have access to email readily. Integration with other industrial solutions, such as HMIS, will allow them to communicate and get an alert that something has been found. This way, they can react to it sooner than having somebody watch the screen and keep checking the screen. Rockwell has its own suite. Similarly, Honeywell has its own suite. There's also an independent HMI/historian solution provider out there called VTSCADA. We actually get asked if we can get it to show up on a screen, which is difficult. Getting those alerts to work within an industrial environment would be a huge plus."
"We would like to see secure integration and multi-factor authentication to be able to access the administration dashboard."
"The OPTICS component could be made more user-friendly with respect to giving people more information."
"The product does not do a lot of reporting on what it is taking care of. Enhanced reporting would be a welcome improvement."
More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons
"We face challenges with the automated effective awareness platform program (ASAP), particularly with its implementation. It is difficult and not effective for us yet."
"I want the tool’s pricing to improve."
"Support is an area for improvement. It should have faster response times."
"They should provide more notifications for incidents and more clarification or information about malicious activity."
"What I want to be added to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is a single pane of glass management, where everything is integrated into a single pane of glass."
"I want Kaspersky to extend its products to internet protection. For example, I would like them to develop a firewall integrated with EDR."
"We would like more data to be available from this solution, in order for it to be usable in strategic decision making."
"EDR Optimum's scalability could be improved."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing part of the product is too expensive compared to other solutions in the market."
"My company is on a yearly CylancePROTECT subscription. Price-wise, the solution is slightly expensive, so I'd rate it as eight out of ten."
"Our licensing cost for the solution is around $4,000 for six months. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"CylancePROTECT's pricing is reasonable, at about €18 per user, per year."
"CylancePROTECT is worth the money, but I'm not sure of its exact price. I can't remember off the top of my head."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."
"The initial end-point cost may seem a little high (~$55/device/year) but when you look at the total peace of mind that the solution provides, with no reboots for updates, and negligible performance impact, it is well worth it."
"I think that the price we are paying is good for what it is."
More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice
"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. You need to pay about 80,000 rupees yearly for the tool. There are no additional costs associated with the product."
"The price of the solution is reasonable. It cost approximately €10,000 annually."
"The pricing is totally reasonable."
"The price is good, not too high."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is more affordable than the endpoint security product of Fortinet. Whether it's worth the money depends on your security strategy."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is affordability, even for companies with limited budgets, such as those in the Pakistani market. It is a subscription-based license."
"Kaspersky gives a consolidated price with a good solution. If we choose something else, we need to add other options on our own."
"The solution could be made a bit cheaper."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?
It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?
The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?
I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immedi...
See all answers
What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?
The product's most valuable feature is the flexibility of installation with the console and a simple administration strategy.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?
The value from Kaspersky is very good, especially since we recently got a special deal.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?
To increase the benefits of the product, Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service from Kaspersky should be included. I use this to monitor devices from a centralized location and report any abn...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 21% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 15% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 6% of the time
Cisco Secure Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 6% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 5% of the time
More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
Compared 19% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
Compared 11% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
Compared 10% of the time
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
Compared 10% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Business vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
Compared 8% of the time
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
April 2025
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reportDownload BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
April 2025
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum reportDownload Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum product report
 

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect
No data available
 

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance provides endpoint security, threat protection, and antivirus capabilities, using AI and machine learning for protection against malware and ransomware on desktops, servers, and virtual machines worldwide. Its AI-driven threat detection operates even with limited internet, facilitating effective threat management.

BlackBerry Cylance's centralized dashboard simplifies threat management and vulnerability protection for organizations globally. The platform combines AI and machine learning to deliver superior zero-day threat protection and minimize CPU usage, offering stable and accurate threat detection without frequent updates. It includes tools like CylanceOPTICS and CylancePERSONA for enhanced user behavior monitoring and adopts a proactive approach that effectively manages threats at various lifecycle stages. Renowned for stability and performance, it efficiently prevents unauthorized applications while maintaining system productivity.

What are the main features of BlackBerry Cylance?
  • Minimal CPU Usage: Efficiently operates without taxing computer resources.
  • AI and Machine Learning: Advanced technology for zero-day threat protection.
  • Lightweight Design: Functions without constant updates for simplified usage.
  • Centralized Management: Offers a user-friendly, intuitive dashboard.
  • CylanceOPTICS and PERSONA: Tools for in-depth user behavior analysis.
What are key benefits to look for in user reviews?
  • Effective Malware Detection: Recognized accuracy in identifying security threats.
  • Proactive Threat Mitigation: Actively detects and manages threats.
  • Stability and Performance: Consistent protection without hampering system performance.
  • Reduced Unauthorized Access: Limits unpermitted application activity.

In the professional sector, BlackBerry Cylance is leveraged to protect crucial infrastructure through a robust approach accommodating environments with limited connectivity. Its widespread deployment in industries, including healthcare and finance, is attributed to its ease of deployment and comprehensive protection capabilities. However, enhancements in reporting, pricing structures, and technical support are avenues for development, reflecting user feedback for improving detection rates and overall dashboard usability.

BlackBerry

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.

Kaspersky
 

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
April 2025
Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.