Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs IBM BPM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Boomi AtomSphere Flow streamlines processes, reduces errors, improves productivity, and enhances integration, automation, data visibility, and decision-making.
Sentiment score
7.5
IBM BPM enhances process efficiency, reduces errors, and often recovers costs within a year despite moderate licensing costs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Boomi AtomSphere Flow's support is fast and knowledgeable, with some communication issues and varying responsiveness; resources aid users effectively.
Sentiment score
6.6
IBM BPM's customer service is praised for expertise but needs improvement in response times and handling complex issues.
It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness.
We had a contract that provided on-site support, which was very satisfactory.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is adaptable and scalable with manual adjustments, appreciated by teams for meeting expansion needs effectively.
Sentiment score
6.9
IBM BPM is scalable but requires tuning and monitoring for performance amid challenges and varied user satisfaction.
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten, as it effectively scales to meet our clients’ needs.
I found IBM BPM to be scalable to a certain level but it struggled with large volumes of concurrent transactions.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is reliable for typical use but struggles with large data volumes and has some bug issues.
Sentiment score
7.2
IBM BPM is generally stable with improved performance, occasional instability issues, and effective support for resolving problems.
The solution maintains high stability, which makes it reliable.
 

Room For Improvement

Boomi AtomSphere Flow needs a user-friendly interface, better stability, enhanced AI, and improved support for government sector suitability.
IBM BPM needs intuitive configuration, better integration, improved scalability, simplified processes, UI refinement, enhanced features, and reduced pricing.
We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT.
IBM BPM also lacks smaller solutions, so I must purchase multiple solutions to start with workflows and applications.
 

Setup Cost

Boomi AtomSphere Flow provides cost-effective, flexible pricing based on user count and features, appealing to enterprise integration leaders.
IBM BPM is a costly solution with complex licensing, best suited for large enterprises seeking powerful capabilities.
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft.
SAP is more expensive, but IBM BPM is very expensive.
 

Valuable Features

Boomi AtomSphere Flow is praised for its ease of integration, low-code development, and cost-effective, scalable deployment.
IBM BPM is praised for process orchestration, integration, user interface, automation, and strong analytics with low-code deployment.
The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients.
The integration capabilities of IBM BPM are excellent.
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
22nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Low-Code Development Platforms (21st)
IBM BPM
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
110
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (7th), Process Automation (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM BPM is 7.6%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

NarendraThota - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that helps save money in the long run with a need to offer users the ability to deal with large datasets
From an improvement perspective, Boomi AtomSphere Flow should come up with the ability to deal with large datasets. The data integration part is a concern when you try to connect to an on-premises environment since the latency is high, making it an aspect where improvements are required to reduce the latency. Whenever Boomi AtomSphere Flow gets integrated with applications like SAP, it is important to ensure that what you develop is user-friendly, which is a process that takes time, especially when compared with webMethods.io or TIBCO. The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement.
Mohammed Almalki - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve
If you're already an IBM shop with the necessary skills and personnel, then I would recommend using it. However, it requires a yearly investment. So, if you're prepared for that, then go for it. New users will need at least six months to get comfortable with IBM BPM, at least initially. So, there's a learning curve. Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. Two main reasons: the skillset required to manage it and its integration complexity.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
5%
Financial Services Firm
31%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft. I would rate the pricing at 6.5 to seven out of ten.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
There is room for improvement in Boomi's AI capabilities. We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT. Additionall...
Which is better, IBM BPM or IBM Business Automation Workflow?
We researched both IBM solutions and in the end, we chose Business Automation Workflow. IBM BPM has a good user interface and the BPM coach is a helpful tool. The API is very useful in providing en...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM BPM?
SAP is more expensive, but IBM BPM is very expensive. If a scale of one to ten is used, I would rate IBM BPM at nine in terms of pricing.
 

Also Known As

Boomi Flow
WebSphere Lombardi Edition, IBM Business Process Manager, IBM WebSphere Process Server
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services
Barclays, EmeriCon, Banca Popolare di Milano, CST Consulting, KeyBank, KPMG, Prolifics, Sandhata Technologies Ltd., State of Alaska, Humana S.A., Saperion, esciris, Banco Espirito Santo
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. IBM BPM and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.