Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs OutSystems comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Boomi AtomSphere Flow streamlines processes, reduces errors, improves productivity, and enhances integration, automation, data visibility, and decision-making.
Sentiment score
7.0
OutSystems provides high ROI with faster app creation, cost-saving strategies, and positive user feedback despite some cost concerns.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Boomi AtomSphere Flow support is effective but inconsistent, with strong documentation aiding users in resolving issues independently.
Sentiment score
7.2
OutSystems support is generally responsive but experiences vary, with better service at higher contract levels and valued documentation.
It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness.
I have not personally dealt with Boomi's customer support, but my team mentions that support is not good.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is effective and rated highly for scalability but requires manual adjustments for resource scaling.
Sentiment score
7.7
OutSystems is scalable and robust, ideal for enterprise-level growth, especially in cloud-based and multi-tenant environments.
In terms of scalability, the tool is quite scalable, and I would rate it eight or nine.
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten, as it effectively scales to meet our clients’ needs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is stable and efficient for moderate use but struggles with heavy data loads and API integration bugs.
Sentiment score
8.0
OutSystems is stable and reliable, highly rated for support and scalability but faces issues with massive user bases.
The solution maintains high stability, which makes it reliable.
 

Room For Improvement

Boomi AtomSphere Flow needs user-friendliness, stability, AI enhancements, better support, and flexibility for complex integrations and large datasets.
OutSystems needs performance, integration, and cost improvements, along with better documentation, UI, AI integration, and cloud management.
It lacks features like the ESQL scripting language found in IBM's, which makes integration transformations easy.
We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT.
I would like to see more integration between the use of artificial intelligence to speed up the process delivery time.
 

Setup Cost

Boomi AtomSphere Flow's pricing is seen as reasonable, especially for small-scale operations, with ratings averaging 6.5-7/10.
OutSystems pricing is often considered high, with costs based on user metrics, impacting small businesses but saving development time.
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft.
The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.
 

Valuable Features

Boomi AtomSphere Flow streamlines integration with a low-code interface, boosting scalability, security, and efficiency across diverse systems.
OutSystems excels in low-code development, effortless integration, and user-friendly features, making it a versatile and scalable platform.
We use Boomi for various types of integrations, such as SFTP integration, database integration, Snowflake integration, and we also perform transformations using maps and scripts.
The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients.
OutSystems offers a lot of reusable components and solutions that I can simply drag and drop and use, which has a significant impact on project delivery time.
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
13th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (17th)
OutSystems
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (1st), Rapid Application Development Software (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OutSystems is 10.4%, up from 9.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

NarendraThota - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that helps save money in the long run with a need to offer users the ability to deal with large datasets
From an improvement perspective, Boomi AtomSphere Flow should come up with the ability to deal with large datasets. The data integration part is a concern when you try to connect to an on-premises environment since the latency is high, making it an aspect where improvements are required to reduce the latency. Whenever Boomi AtomSphere Flow gets integrated with applications like SAP, it is important to ensure that what you develop is user-friendly, which is a process that takes time, especially when compared with webMethods.io or TIBCO. The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement.
Bireswar Das - PeerSpot reviewer
A low-code platform for the development of mobile and web enterprise applications
To illustrate a case, the customer initially had a private cloud, essentially a data center hosted within it. They needed a disaster recovery solution, which would involve using a public cloud. This situation led to some deployment challenges due to the hybrid nature of their setup. However, once we implemented the solution for them, they were extremely satisfied. The process was not only effective but also quite speedy. To be more precise, we completed it in around 100 days, even though they initially requested it to be done in four months. They were very pleased with the efficiency of the implementation.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Non Profit
5%
Educational Organization
33%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility. Moreover, it lacks features like the ESQL scripti...
Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?
The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...
What industries do you think OutSystems is most useful for?
I cannot really name an industry in which OutSystems cannot be beneficial. Who does not want to make top-notch applications that work in no time? And OutsyStems does exactly that. The low-code plat...
How did you decide which OutSystems edition was the best one for you?
We started using OutSystems fairly recently, so we are still on the free version of it. My company is still testing how we like the platform, but so far, we have been satisfied with it and will li...
 

Also Known As

Boomi Flow
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services
Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. OutSystems and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.