Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs OutSystems comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Boomi AtomSphere Flow streamlines processes, reduces errors, improves productivity, and enhances integration, automation, data visibility, and decision-making.
Sentiment score
7.0
OutSystems boosts ROI up to 90%, speeds development, and reduces costs, but skilled developers and annual fees can impact returns.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Boomi AtomSphere Flow's support is fast and knowledgeable, with some communication issues and varying responsiveness; resources aid users effectively.
Sentiment score
7.1
OutSystems' customer service is praised for responsiveness and knowledge, though some users note delays and technical support improvement needs.
It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is adaptable and scalable with manual adjustments, appreciated by teams for meeting expansion needs effectively.
Sentiment score
7.7
OutSystems offers impressive scalability, seamlessly handling large back-ends across platforms, though better specifications than recommended may be required.
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten, as it effectively scales to meet our clients’ needs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is reliable for typical use but struggles with large data volumes and has some bug issues.
Sentiment score
8.0
OutSystems is praised for stability and performance, though some note issues under heavy loads or with high user volumes.
The solution maintains high stability, which makes it reliable.
 

Room For Improvement

Boomi AtomSphere Flow needs a user-friendly interface, better stability, enhanced AI, and improved support for government sector suitability.
Users request better containerization, integration, language support, and improvements in performance, documentation, UI development, and automation features.
We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT.
 

Setup Cost

Boomi AtomSphere Flow provides cost-effective, flexible pricing based on user count and features, appealing to enterprise integration leaders.
OutSystems is costly and suited for large enterprises, with prices from $4,000 to €170,000 annually, including user licenses and infrastructure.
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft.
 

Valuable Features

Boomi AtomSphere Flow is praised for its ease of integration, low-code development, and cost-effective, scalable deployment.
OutSystems offers rapid development, integration, scalability, and a user-friendly interface, unifying front and backend services to boost productivity.
The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients.
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
21st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (23rd)
OutSystems
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (1st), Rapid Application Development Software (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OutSystems is 10.3%, up from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Pratibimb Dwivedi - PeerSpot reviewer
A competent solution for integrating enterprise-grade software
The solution is very stable. When it gets pushed to the limit, it starts breaking. For example, it's a bad design when you are using Dell Boomi for millions of records in processing, such as updating a database for millions of records. It doesn't work as efficiently. But if you're using it for a reasonable volume, it is a fantastic tool. Recently, for a client, we were having trouble processing because the volume of the data was high in terms of updating the table. Dell Boomi took about ten hours, but I know tools that could have done this in less time. Dell Boomi is probably not designed for these things; if you push the limits and try to anyway, it breaks.
Vadivelan Rajendiran - PeerSpot reviewer
The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend
The solution is ground up, it follows exactly what the developer does. The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided. Infusing AI that would automate the process would be game-changing. On a logical level, if data on a form is automated, it would be great if when required, the developer can then go and look for it.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
5%
Educational Organization
32%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft. I would rate the pricing at 6.5 to seven out of ten.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
There is room for improvement in Boomi's AI capabilities. We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT. Additionall...
Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?
The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...
What industries do you think OutSystems is most useful for?
I cannot really name an industry in which OutSystems cannot be beneficial. Who does not want to make top-notch applications that work in no time? And OutsyStems does exactly that. The low-code plat...
How did you decide which OutSystems edition was the best one for you?
We started using OutSystems fairly recently, so we are still on the free version of it. My company is still testing how we like the platform, but so far, we have been satisfied with it and will li...
 

Also Known As

Boomi Flow
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services
Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. OutSystems and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.