Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs OutSystems comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Boomi AtomSphere Flow streamlines processes, reduces errors, improves productivity, and enhances integration, automation, data visibility, and decision-making.
Sentiment score
6.6
OutSystems typically offers high ROI through fast development and cost savings, though initial expenses and developer skills impact outcomes.
Developing that same project in OutSystems can be completed in around 40 to 50% less time, requiring only six resources.
Software Developer Advisor at NTT DATA Services
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Boomi AtomSphere Flow support is effective but inconsistent, with strong documentation aiding users in resolving issues independently.
Sentiment score
7.0
OutSystems' service is generally proactive and responsive, but advanced help varies by SLA, location, and contract tier.
It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness.
associate director at Nagarro
I have not personally dealt with Boomi's customer support, but my team mentions that support is not good.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Many helpful videos and documentation are available on the OutSystems site, making it relatively easy to learn the platform.
Software Developer Advisor at NTT DATA Services
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is effective and rated highly for scalability but requires manual adjustments for resource scaling.
Sentiment score
7.5
OutSystems offers scalable, adaptable solutions for enterprises, with seamless cloud expansion and efficient management, despite pricing concerns.
In terms of scalability, the tool is quite scalable, and I would rate it eight or nine.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten, as it effectively scales to meet our clients’ needs.
associate director at Nagarro
They can be deployed vertically and horizontally, supporting as many deployments as needed.
Software Developer Advisor at NTT DATA Services
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is stable and efficient for moderate use but struggles with heavy data loads and API integration bugs.
Sentiment score
7.8
OutSystems is praised for stability and reliability, handling large systems well, with minor issues on high data loads.
The solution maintains high stability, which makes it reliable.
associate director at Nagarro
 

Room For Improvement

Boomi AtomSphere Flow needs user-friendliness, stability, AI enhancements, better support, and flexibility for complex integrations and large datasets.
OutSystems faces performance and integration issues, high licensing costs, and needs improvements in support, automation, UI, and documentation.
It lacks features like the ESQL scripting language found in IBM's, which makes integration transformations easy.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT.
associate director at Nagarro
It is crucial to be aware of which module corresponds to which application in real-time projects, as there are multiple applications.
Software Developer Advisor at NTT DATA Services
What I would like to see is more servicing business analysts in the next release of OutSystems.
Senior ITO Consultant at CBI - Centre for the Promotion of Imports from developing countries
I would like to see more integration between the use of artificial intelligence to speed up the process delivery time.
RPA Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
 

Setup Cost

Boomi AtomSphere Flow's pricing is seen as reasonable, especially for small-scale operations, with ratings averaging 6.5-7/10.
OutSystems is costly, suited for larger enterprises, with yearly fees varying by usage, covering licenses and infrastructure.
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft.
associate director at Nagarro
The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Subsequent users can be added at an additional cost per user; exact pricing details can be found on the OutSystems site.
Software Developer Advisor at NTT DATA Services
 

Valuable Features

Boomi AtomSphere Flow streamlines integration with a low-code interface, boosting scalability, security, and efficiency across diverse systems.
OutSystems streamlines development with low-code tools, offering rapid deployment, easy integration, and enhanced productivity through reusable components.
We use Boomi for various types of integrations, such as SFTP integration, database integration, Snowflake integration, and we also perform transformations using maps and scripts.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients.
associate director at Nagarro
OutSystems offers a lot of reusable components and solutions that I can simply drag and drop and use, which has a significant impact on project delivery time.
RPA Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
I have recommended it in situations where very rigid enterprise structures are blocking them from being agile.
Senior ITO Consultant at CBI - Centre for the Promotion of Imports from developing countries
OutSystems officially supports various integrations and also includes an API discovery tool for consuming and exposing services, providing a lot of information about incoming URLs, similar to how we use Postman.
Software Developer Advisor at NTT DATA Services
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
22nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (31st)
OutSystems
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (1st), Rapid Application Development Software (4th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OutSystems is 5.3%, down from 10.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OutSystems5.3%
Boomi AtomSphere Flow1.4%
Other93.3%
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

KG
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
We manage app integrations effectively and identify areas for more flexibility
Boomi AtomSphere Flow gives us flexibility. Even though our integration requirements are not complex, ranging from simple to medium, Boomi fulfills all our integration needs. We use Boomi for various types of integrations, such as SFTP integration, database integration, Snowflake integration, and we also perform transformations using maps and scripts.
MA
Software Developer Advisor at NTT DATA Services
OutSystems facilitates rapid application development and effective project management
What I find valuable about OutSystems is that it has a very good learning curve for developers. Within two weeks, we can gain knowledge in OutSystems, and it is very easy to learn. With my background being .NET, OutSystems is straightforward to learn, which is beneficial. Developing applications in OutSystems is good, and the flexibility allowed by OutSystems for application development is excellent compared to my experiences with other low-code technologies, where I've faced some challenges. The clean separation of concerns in the architecture provided by OutSystems is a key benefit compared to other platforms. OutSystems integrates with our existing tech infrastructure and provides flexible integration. If we want to integrate with third-party services, OutSystems has SOAP and RESTful services that allow us to consume external services, integrate with external databases such as SQL or Oracle, and includes integration studio for writing custom .NET code. After developing a .NET component, we can reference it in service studio, creating a reference file that makes integration easy. OutSystems officially supports various integrations and also includes an API discovery tool for consuming and exposing services, providing a lot of information about incoming URLs, similar to how we use Postman.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Educational Organization
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise29
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility. Moreover, it lacks features like the ESQL scripti...
What is your primary use case for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
We are working with Cooke Aquaculture, and we use Boomi AtomSphere Flow ( /products/boomi-atomsphere-flow-reviews ) for integration processes. It is specifically used for application-to-application...
Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?
The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...
What industries do you think OutSystems is most useful for?
I cannot really name an industry in which OutSystems cannot be beneficial. Who does not want to make top-notch applications that work in no time? And OutsyStems does exactly that. The low-code plat...
How did you decide which OutSystems edition was the best one for you?
We started using OutSystems fairly recently, so we are still on the free version of it. My company is still testing how we like the platform, but so far, we have been satisfied with it and will li...
 

Also Known As

Boomi Flow
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services
Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. OutSystems and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.